senate dems are raaaaaaaacist!
By American Girl in Italy on January 7, 2009 at 9:30 AM in Barack Obama, Breaking News, Chicago politics, Current Affairs
Ok, now, I know that the Dems said they would not seat any appointee by Blago before Burris was appointed, so I don’t really think this is about race. But, I don’t think it looks good to reject a 71 year old, experienced African American candidate for the US Senate. I feel bad for the ol’ guy.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
That said, with the news coming out that Harry Reid disproves of three other African American candidates, I do think Harry is looking a wee bit bigoted.
Why does Harry think JJJ would have a hard time getting re-elected in IL? He is supposedly tight with PEBO. Wouldn’t the Obama supporters vote JJJ in? Although, if JJJ and BO are so tight, why didn’t Obama recommend JJJ for his seat? Hmmm.
(I just love that the people who threw the race card willy-nilly this past year are now getting it back in their faces.)
What I don’t understand is why the Dems are refusing to seat Burris. Blago is still the sitting Governor, he is still, under law, required to appoint a senator. Burris will not run in two years. He is a good pick, as far as I know… an elderly gentleman, who will not run again in two years, he is African American (there aren’t any in the Senate), and he is experienced (according to some, all you need is to be over 30 and have a pulse to be qualified for the Senate).
I really think that Obama stepped out of bounds when he said that Blago should step down, and that they would not seat anyone Blago appoints. Blago has not been convicted of a crime yet. Is it the job of the future President to step into the middle of an ongoing investigation, and basically convict someone? Has he heard of innocent until proven guilty?
And, if it is true that everyone has known for years that Blago was corrupt, it certainly didn’t stop Obama from using him to get ahead in Chicago. Heck, he endorsed Blago.
It seems to me that the Dems have all known Blago was dirty. But no one ever did anything about it. Now that Blago has been arrested, they are all running away, as fast as they can, to prove that they had nothing to do with him, and that they didn’t know anything. Me thinks thee doth protest too much, or something like that.
As for Burris being turned away today, it was because he didn’t have his credentials in order – a piece of paper that he needed signed by the IL SoS Jesse White, but he refused.
So what is the problem? Obama and others have all said that Burris is a good man. Don’t they want good men in the Senate? Yes, Blago has been arrested for corruption, but has Burris been charged with anything? Why are they taking this out on Burris if they all like Burris and he is not charged with anything? Blago is still the sitting Governor, and under the law, he is doing his job.
If Burris is not a good choice, because he is dirty, like they are saying Blago is, then why don’t they (Obama) come out and say it? Why all this, *Burris is a good man and a fine public servant* stuff, and then refuse to seat him. If you are going to meddle in the middle of the Blago case, why not drag Burris down too? If it is because he truly is a good man and a fine public servant, then seat him!
Quit keeping the magic man down, raaaaaaaaaaaacists!
Update: Since publishing this post, Diane Feinstein has broken party lines and backed the appointment of Burris.
“Does the governor have the power, under law, to make the appointment? And the answer is yes,” Feinstein said, urging the Senate to settle the matter. “If you don’t seat Mr. Burris, it has ramifications for gubernatorial appointments all over America. … Mr. Burris is a senior, experienced politician.”
The comments flew in the face of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s assertion that Burris should not be seated in part because the move would be tainted by the Blagojevich scandal.
Well, she is not only taking a swipe at old Harry, but at Obama as well. He too said that Burris should not be seated. Me thinks Diane is still a little peeved at Obama for his *political mistake* by not consulting her before appointing Panetta.
“While they might not be termed racist, their action is racist,” Rush told FOX News. “I think that if Roland Burris hadn’t been an African American, then he would have been allowed to accept the appointment and become a senator.”
Whoop there it is. Whoop there it is….

















