Happy Campaign Trails + OPEN THREAD
By SusanUnPC on November 27, 2007 at 7:50 PM in Current Affairs, Presidential Candidates
From First Read: “Kerik keeps following Rudy (sort of). NBC/NJ’s Matthew Berger reports that Giuliani has been followed around New Hampshire by a man in a Rudy mask, carrying a sign that said ‘Free Bernie’. But today the masked man was joined by a man in a mask closely resembling Bernard Kerik. The duo waved at passersby, and were quick to hug when the cameras started rolling.”
From TPM: “[Y]esterday a Muslim businessman named Mansoor Ijaz wrote a column in the Christian Science Monitor in which he claimed that Romney had told him that he wouldn’t appoint a Muslim to his cabinet because there aren’t enough Muslims in the US to merit a cabinet post — sort of a cartoonish caricature of interest group liberalism.” (Election Central digs deeper.)
From MSNBC: “On Oprah campaigning for him, Obama said she may draw people to an event, but ‘Ultimately, though, I’m going to have to make the sale to the people to support me’.” (Uh, what about those who DON’T YET support him?)
From TPM: “Sen. Hillary Clinton has sent a letter to the White House outlining her opposition to permanent U.S. bases in Iraq and saying they would ‘damage U.S. interests’. As we reported yesterday, Sen. Chris Dodd is also opposed. We’ll have a statement from former Sen. John Edwards’ campaign shortly.” (Remember John McLaughlin’s lead that “the U.S. will have enduring military super-bases in Iraq” ["super-bases" is the new term used by Bush and Gates] because — if the deal goes through the Iraqi parliament [Bush has already circumvented democratic process in the U.S.] — “American companies would get access to 63 of Iraq’s 80 known oil fields for 30 years.”)
The assault on your civil liberties continues … see below …
From the Seattle P.I.:
U.S. withdraws subpoena seeking identity of 24,000 Amazon customers sought as witnesses
By RYAN J. FOLEY
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITERMADISON, Wis. — Federal prosecutors have withdrawn a subpoena seeking the identities of thousands of people who bought used books through online retailer Amazon.com Inc., newly unsealed court records show.
The withdrawal came after a judge ruled the customers have a First Amendment right to keep their reading habits from the government.
“The (subpoena’s) chilling effect on expressive e-commerce would frost keyboards across America,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker wrote in a June ruling.
“Well-founded or not, rumors of an Orwellian federal criminal investigation into the reading habits of Amazon’s customers could frighten countless potential customers into canceling planned online book purchases,” the judge wrote in a ruling he unsealed last week.
Seattle-based Amazon said in court documents it hopes Crocker’s decision will make it more difficult for prosecutors to obtain records involving book purchases. Assistant U.S. Attorney John Vaudreuil said Tuesday he doubted the ruling would hamper legitimate investigations. …
[...]
The initial subpoena sought records of 24,000 transactions dating back to 1999. The company turned over many records but refused to identify the book buyers, citing their First Amendment right to keep their reading choices private. … READ ALL.






















