RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Mary Schapiro And What To Do When They Don’t Seem To Care About Us

I’m with Larry, no matter what we think about Obama he will be the president tomorrow and we have to figure out how we move on from here. In my first post, I discussed some of Obama’s early signals and how they provide a lens that shapes the way I will be viewing the Obama presidency.

While I believe it is important to document all the bad things that happened to this point (and may happen during Obama’s presidency), my main personal concern is the question: how we can force positive changes when the people on top are not “on our side”.

By scrutinizing Obama I hope to learn where he is and isn’t vulnerable to persuasion and where my efforts will be best spent.

I included a video of Michael Jackson’s song “They Don’t Care About Us” above because that is how I now approach my political activism*.

I used to be a very active Democrat because I believed that they had my best interests at heart. The primary machinations disabused me of that view. I already had a deep distrust of the Republican Party in general, the last eight years revealing the grounded ness of that distrust.

Furthermore, it is clear that the media is not on our side. They have gotten us into so much trouble by enabling the worst abuses of the Bush Administration. I’ll go further and even say that they were active participants in bringing our country to the precipice on many different fronts. This mindset may seem hopeless and, in fact, the odds of getting our voices heard may be stacked against us. That means we have to navigate the current climate deliberately and we all would do ourselves a favor by getting more familiar with the terrain. (* I want to be explicit here: though I view the major political parties and the news media as generally corrupt and not on the side of “the little guy/gal”, I know many people in both parties and in the media who decent and caring people carrying on the fight for us. Its important to keep these folks in mind and give them support.)

I had other topics I wanted to discuss, but reading Larry Doyle’s plea for answers from Mary Shapiro, I felt it was worth brainstorming ways in which we could generate a more vigorous and wide reaching debate on the important issues that Larry raises. I can’t say I have the answers, but I have a few questions I’ve been asking since I first read Larry’s article.

What are the steps that take place in the confirmation process, and who are the folks who can help get us answers or at least ask the questions? The first step in the process is the Senate Banking Committee hearings (online here). Committee hearings can kill a nomination or set the frame in which the nomination is debated when the nomination goes to a full floor vote. Who are the members of the committee we can consider potential allies? I personally see a number of old fashion deregulators and Wall Street types who probably couldn’t care less what we had to say. On the other hand, Jon Tester was elected largely on a platform of cleaning up the mess we are in. Additionally, Sherrod Brown has a long track record for being more of a populist and though I’m not entirely comfortable with protectionist policies on moral grounds, he has generally pushed for policies to hold corporate malfeasance in check. Can we pressure those two to start shaping the debate for us? Are there any other members on this committee who may be sympathetic? Can we take advantage of any overly partisan Republicans who just want to stick it to Obama in order to get them to ask some of these questions?

Assuming that we can get some Senators to ask questions, we will still need at least some in the media to cover the concerns we have. In Larry’s article, he notes work done by the Wall Street Journal. Clearly others are worried about Ms. Shapiro’s “light touch”, but I don’t know many folks who subscribe to the WSJ. At Google News there are currently only about 115 articles getting a hit with the search “Mary Shapiro Confirmation”. Do we recognize any of those sources? Which news sources are missing? Are there any articles appearing in Tester’s or Brown’s home state (MT and OH respectively)? How can we get more local coverage in MT and OH papers?

Those are some of my questions and thoughts. What are your recommendations?

  • Tony

    Were a bunch of sheep.We need to know what to do.It’s flurstarting to here so many lost sheep. Many clinging to the birth cirt. thing. I send E-mails to my senators and congressmen and get the gerneric response. We need a Leader!!! Mcain is a dem.so is Graham. Palin ( bless her heart ) looked like a deer in the headlights on the curric interview,but we were so desperate we went out. SOMBODY SAVE ME!!!

  • Solara 7

    Great post. Today it was made real. So tomorrow I will start trying to see what I can do. Thanks Chris.

  • I’m a Linda too

    There are many that have integrity and considering their upset with Obama’s proposals of “more of the same” and just furthering “trickle down economics” and the reality that Nancy wants to be Queen and has created the stimulus, not allowing the Committees and Chairs in their areas of expertise to do it. It looks like maybe they have toted the last line with blind and blank checks for the sake of “party unity” for their finally incoming One. They gave him his blank check on the bailout when they really didn’t want to (AND SHOULD NOT HAVE)

    We have to hold them all accountable.

    Yes, we must find ones to work with. I think like Feingold, Harkin, Whitehouse, etc.

    Don’t know about Sherrod Brown. I always heard he was more progressive, but my exposure ended with different reality. He was spreading rumors about a Major who volunteered to serve in Iraq, because he felt it was his duty(even being opposed to the war), leaving his family of 4 and his private practice and was running for the Senate when Brown backed out of his earlier promise not to run. AND….AND….this was pricless, then he VOTED against Habeas Corpus on his run up to the election. HIS vote from me was the absolute last “for the sake of party unity” crap from the Dem’s.

  • Janet in Texas

    Excellent post. It’s the big money boyz who OWN the media who are the trouble — they chose George to set the stage so they could steal all the wealth, and they have selected Obama to get the young men of the country (who should be protesting, joining unions, and generally mad as hell) to settle for a life of “less.” Listen to the language — “sacrifice,” “service,” “social security reform,” “everybody doing their part,” etc. They are supposed to believe that a $30,000 income is big-time wages!

    The misogynistic frat-boy crap is part of the package designed to make them feel like they’re part of the special boyz club and distract them from noticing they are missing out on the whole high-paying job, big house, wife and kids thing — all that is just icky girly stuff!

    The young women of the country have yet to notice they are totally screwed — they will have no equal pay (such as it will be), no prospects for the house and husband and kids, and no safety net after the new boyz get through “reforming” social security — something carefully hidden until after the election, as readers here have no doubt observed.

    The Big Boyz are going for the complete submission of a zombie population that will docilely accept working for less than what it actually takes to live here! Some day the system will collapse — they can’t forever pay people a dollar an hour with one hand while demanding a $1000 a month in rent with the other, but they will take every cent they can in the meantime. Some things have NOT changed!

  • AMERICA R.I.P.

    It’s so corrupt…GE owns NBC and MSNBC…GE is broke and asked for bailout money…The Obama thugs promised GE Billions of Dollars…Magically integrity and honesty in reporting left the building…Chris Matthews and all the LOSERS from NBC, MSNBC reported inaccurately and falsely, attacked Palin with lies and BS, and shoved Mr. Tingle down our throats.

    The day AFTER we waved Buh Bye to America, November 5th, MSNBC started selling the Fraud Dinner Plate Collection. Hmmmmm….what part of this are the ignoramus BOTS not getting? The “Presidency” was bought and paid for. The ones making money now are the ones selling the velvet paintings, cheap shitty plates, brass coins, falsified “Obama Story” videotapes, and other nasty CRAP that some pathetic people think is a “collectors item.”

  • LD

    Chris,

    Thanks for a great piece. I am glad that my piece inspired you.

  • Chris Martin

    The silence and participation by the Dems during the primary left me skeptical of all but a handful. Also, I don’t think we can count on “good guys” on all the issues, but I think we can choose our allies differently on different issues. And they don’t necessarily have to be “with” us if we can shame them into the appropriate actions.

    Truth be told, at this point I’m not really interested in some massive, broad range political movement. I think we have enough huge issues where broad popular support already exists (economy, environment, torture, war, for example). These are dire enough such that a high priority should be placed on them, particularly the economy, but also the public wants the right thing while the pols are helping their buddies get away with some serious crimes.

    Oh, one last thing: we need to stop blaming the “coprorate media”. Even some tiny little blogs were contributing to the misogyny and atrocious coverage. Some of the nastiest stuff also seemed to have a blog origin (like the “darkened photo”). Something else was/is going out and the media are just one part.

  • Chris Martin

    I don’t care about the dinner plates or the silver coins–they have them for everyone and everything. I’m more concerned with Warren Buffet investing $3 billion in GE, which owns MSNBC and the possible correlation with their Obama boosting. Since every network seemed to be Obama boosting, there is probably nothing to that. It could simply be that Obama was against public financing and pro-Obama forces paid close to a billion dollars to advertise. One hand washes the other.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Well,…..I agree.

    You hit some very important points. Yes, we have REALITY on our side, we don’t need a manufactured groundswell for support. The folks of our country already said, “we’re not really happy with your majority, but we really are tired of what Bush gave, so were’ giving you more space…AND THIS TIME YOU BETTER DELIVER”. I think that’s why Dem’s are worried about the midterm. I believe they are weary of the “action” coming as well. That’s ALSO why we have been plagued with the political game of “expectations” and that “it will take YEARS”…espcially when your spending is on corporate (donor) interests and not solving the PROBLEM” (sorry, emotion got the better of me)

    Yes, you are ABSOLUTELY correct that we would be foolish to look to O-s [registered]party as the only the aid on this endeavor. And, (i’m choking here) are you saying, we must make nice to the “media” because they showed they are still persuasive? So as to not “blame” them as the big problem? I mean, seriously, we know about SMALL blogs, I can name a few now, not to mention “the picture” and the orange MONSTER, but we learned, all are “sources” if the favor, blog, messaging,… FITS-USE IT.

  • Chris Martin

    No making nice. They definitely are not on our side. But the crap we saw went way beyond the “corporate media”. We need to stop differentiating the so-called MSM/”corporate media” from everything else. That misses the true scope of what happened. All I’m saying.

  • AMERICA R.I.P.

    I believe there was more to it with GE and MSNBC. That doesn’t mean they weren’t doing the SAME thing with the other corporations and networks.

  • truthtelling007

    “Truth be told, at this point I’m not really interested in some massive, broad range political movement. I think we have enough huge issues where broad popular support already exists (economy, environment, torture, war, for example)”

    Well said.
    The euphoria of this “movement” is not likely to produce any change. Euphoria wanes as reality sets in, then the apathetic go back to apathy and the active ones don’t really grow in numbers. I would love to be wrong and see lots of people get active in their communities, but it isn’t the first time ‘inspiration’ came and produced little in its wake.

  • truthtelling007

    MSNBC has become the FOX of the left. And though I appreciated and often relied on their cynical coverage of Bush, they’ll be useless in keeping an eye on Obama (if the current paradigm persists).

    CNN is mostly lame, never asks tough questions. So Fox, jeez.., is going to be the source of critical bits for Obama. I don’t end with them, but they’ll be a start. After that I’ll have to scour as usual to get the real story.

    Buffet and others who throw so much money at media ownership are a major concern that we should focus on. He who controls the channel, controls the message.

  • dobarah

    Tester is a local Montana farmer turned Senator. He has common sense, which has tended to be lacking in Washington. As for coverage in the local papers, the Great Falls Tribune (http://www.greatfallstribune.com) is a local daily paper.

    As a fellow Montanan, I would help in any way I could.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/tristkiss trist

    Skepticism is the key!

    People keep saying, no matter how you feel about “the one” or how he got in there, you SHOULD hope that he succeeds.
    Ummmmm, no, I hope the country succeeds. My hope for Obama’s success is contingent upon what that success entails. That is something NONE of us out here knows.
    For instance, his utter lack of loyalty to anyone or belief leads me to believe that he won’t champion causes that would otherwise help those of us without health care for instance. But rather he may intend on just further lining the pockets of big corporations and those who bankrolled him into the WH with taxpayers money. So should I hope to see him achieve his goals in that case?

    This is the fundamental problem. We have no idea who he is, what he wants to do to us and now we have virtually no way to stop him. This scares the shit outta me! ’cause we JUST barely made it through 8 years of people in power who’s goals led us to the crisis we’re in now. And every sign that those who’ve just seized power, will do more of the same….if not worse.

    Until I know what Obama intends to do to the Nation, I cannot and will not root for him. Nor will I ever forgive or forget the damage he and his supporters have already done.

  • cathnealon

    Janet
    Great comment. Remember that BO’s campaign in December 08 began with the Obama Girl, a very smart marketing move on their part. They understood the young people and the culture they have been a part of in the last 25 years and played straight to it. But it also revealed exactly the extent of their attitudes toward women–objectification and sexualization. And then of course the real misogynistic images and t-shirts appeared against Clinton and Palin and with the media leading the charge they proved that women will be close to meaning NOTHING in an Obama administration, I don’t care how much his daughters hug him.

  • democrat

    Politicians get better coverage when they have high approval ratings. Right now Obama has 80% approval ratings.

    And given his extraordinary political skills, that should last for awhile, especially because it will, let us say, impress, members of Congress and will help him get legislation passed. And that will keep his approval numbers pretty high. After awhile, they’ll get in a more normal range. Right now, when 8 of 10 Americans think well of Obama, he’s going to get great press.

    By the way, it’s a pleasure to see a president dance with his wife when they both have such evident chemistry between them.

  • democrat

    The campaign didn’t create Obama Girl nor did it market any campaign related materials except for their own candidate.

    Try doing some research.

  • WildChild

    I guess you could say BOBO inherited the BOBO girl.

  • WildChild

    We need a comparison test. Someone has to switch off the teleprompter during a BOBO address to the congress. Bill Clinton didn’t miss a beat when they did it to him.

  • democrat

    When you have incumbent Republican Senators up for re-election in 2010 deciding to quit, that shows that it’s the Republicans who are quite concerned about the midterms – not the Democrats.

  • democrat

    I guess that that’s what you think is the most important test.

    Personally, I’d go with getting health care reform, you know, passed — something on that order.

  • democrat

    And Murdoch? No problem as far as you’re concerned? As a Fox fan, evidently not.

  • WildChild

    BOBO signing a bill that the congress passed isn’t a test. However being able to speak at length without the lines being feed to you…

  • democrat

    This site lost all its credibility with its claims about the Michelle whitey tape, not to mention the birth certificate claims.

    That means that no one is going to take its “evidence” seriously.

  • WildChild

    I know, especially since BOBO’s fight the smears campaign cleared that whole whitey thing up . MOMO said why’d he. Maybe John Roberts was feeding her the lines.

  • democrat

    Strange. Every historian judges presidents by their legislative accomplishments. That’s why FDR gets credit for the New Deal, LBJ for the Voting Rights Act, and Bush for No Child Left Behind. That’s because it takes an enormous amount of political work to move presidential priorities through Congress.

    See Civics 101.

    By the way, I have no doubt Obama can speak off the cuff. He does it all the time and did it all the time through college and law school and in IL.

  • Strawberrybitch

    Prove it.

  • WildChild

    FDR proposed the new deal. Health care reform has been on the democratic list of things to do since 1992. But hey, wake me up when BOBO has an original thought OK…

    or in 16 months when all the troops are out of Iraq.

  • steel magnolia

    How do you know? There are no records of that – at least none that can be RELEASED!

  • noproblama

    The Hopium is strong in this one.

  • WildChild

    two words: Kool… aid…

  • Seattle Moss

    Yo Democrat,
    Who needs a whitey tape when you have a fool like Lowery saying in the invocation

    When Whites embrace what is right..

    That’s racist and Obama smiled

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86675

  • UKforDems

    Comment by WildChild | 2009-01-20 23:27:43

    I know, especially since BOBO’s fight the smears campaign cleared that whole whitey thing up . MOMO said why’d he. Maybe John Roberts was feeding her the lines.

    Dirty sprog, you need to read around a bit more often. Why’d he came from a friend of Johnson, not Michelle Obama.

    http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/6/1/235757/2325

  • CG

    Great suggestions CM. I guess I need to figure out what committees my state’s senators and representative serve on in terms of issues we need to monitor to look for help. I am fairly pleased with mine, Senators Murray and Cantwell, and Representative Inslee on most issues. But honestly, though I am still a registered Democrat, I wonder how I can support the party after the Rules and Bylaws Committee fix. I was making calls for Hillary’s campaign that day, and was so devastated about that process and decision. I don’t feel like there is any desire on the part of the Democratic Party to reform and so I don’t believe I can continue supporting it. The Washington State Democratic Party chairman seems to be pushing Clinton supporters out the door in not so subtle ways, I guess because he believes the youth that turned out for Obama is the most valuable asset. I guess I am at a crossroad since I feel disenfranchised by my party. Do you think the DNC will always be the Obama National Party from now on?

  • jjsmoof

    excellent point SM. I haven’t seen this mentioned in the ‘news’. all aboard the free pass express.

  • dogismyth

    Good god people. Stop drinking the fluoridated water!

    Stop eating processed sugar, and ingesting artificial sweetner…its a central nervous system poison!!

    Stop eating junk/fast food.

    Stop watching TV.

    Stop believing in a government that is not duly elected by the citizens of this country, nor are the elected officials committed to the constitution WE believe in.

    You people need to get a clue. THEY WILL NOT HELP YOU. THEY CANNOT HELP YOU. THEY ARE THE ENEMY.

    How many more years, decades of suffering, deception, fraud, corruption do you want?

    Do not write them. do not fax them. Do not call them. THEY DO NOT CARE UNLESS THEY CAN BENEFIT FINANCIALLY FROM YOUR SUPPORT.

    Americans have been dumbed down. it is obvious from this post. What the hell are you talking about. If you want your country back, then you must TAKE IT BACK…and be willing sacrifice everything.

    So let me say it one more time for you people…

    THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT HELP YOU. THEY WILL ONLY HELP THEMSELVES. THEY ARE CONTROLLED FROM BEYOND BY UBER RICH ELITIST FROM ENGLAND. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU. YOU CAN CRY TO THEM, BEG THEM AND EVEN GIVE YOUR LIFE FOR THEM…AND THEY WILL DO NOTHING FOR YOU.

    GET A CLUE. STOP WASTING TIME TALKING ABOUT HOW TO INFLUENCE THEM. ORGANIZE.

    TAKE YOUR MONEY FROM THE BANKS.
    REMOVE YOUR PENSION/RETIREMENT MONEYS.
    STOP SHOPPING AT THE BIG NAME STORES.
    STOP WATCHING TV.
    STOP DRINKING FLUORIDATED TAP WATER.
    STOP EATING JUNK FOOD.
    STOP SHOPPING FOR CRAP.
    STOP WASTING NATURAL RESOURCES.

    WE HAVE THE POWER, BUT OUR POWER IS NOT THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT, THE BANKSTERS OR THE GANGSTERS.

    WE HOLD ALL CONTROL. STOP WASTING YOUR TIME DISCUSSING, PLANNING, ORGANIZING MOVEMENTS TO PERSUADE SUCH PEOPLE.

    IT WILL NOT WORK!!!

  • Ferd Berfle

    Good god people. Stop drinking the fluoridated water!

    Wow. You lost me there, ace. When I start seeing that mind-bending, communist-plot stuff, I get to the nearest exit–pronto.

blog comments powered by Disqus