Res Ipsa Loquitur
By SusanUnPC on December 28, 2007 at 1:33 AM in Clinton, Obama, Pakistan
Then, the next segment:
Video from “Bhutto Assassination Could be a Change Event,” by Taylor Marsh, who adds:
No one was caught looking as clueless as Mike Huckabee, but I’m not sure what to make of Mr. Obama’s statement today. Even Chris Matthews called it “cold.” I’m stunned he was reading it so mechanically, but even more taken aback that he seemed to have no connection whatsoever to the event itself. Add to this the Axelrod gaffe, and what a horrible day for the Obama team at a time he cannot afford it.
Adds radio host Marsh, “Axelrod is now freaked at the developing story, which has gone wide. Marc Ambinder got an unsolicited phone call from Mr. Axelrod, which says it all”:
“It was an answer to the question — in no way was I implying that she was personally responsible for what happened.” … ..
… .. “Everyone who was there understands the context. There were 20 reporters there and only one who wrote that. I know that [Clinton spokesman] Phil [Singer] and [communications director] Howard Wolfson are …trying to stoke the meager, flickering embers, but there’s just no fire there.”
Taylor then points out:
This has absolutely nothing to do with Phil Singer and the Clinton camp. This is about Mr. Axelrod’s desperate attempt to cover for what is now unfolding, which is every single pundit on cable is blathering about Senator Obama’s lack of experience at a moment of crisis. When you look at the video above it only drives the disconnect to Axelrod’s candidate home. Obama couldn’t look any more robotic at a time of crisis and completely disconnected to the event.
Regardless of how you feel about Clinton, the video above shows the exact opposite. …
Read all: “Bhutto Assassination Could be a Change Event,” by Taylor Marsh
SEE ALSO:
- “Obama’s Bizarre Reactions To Bhutto’s Assassination,” a front-page story at MyDD.com
- “Did Hillary Clinton kill Benazir Bhutto?,” by Reza Aslan, AC360 Contributor, Anderson Cooper 360 blog, CNN. Writes Ms. Asian:
… Axelrod’s comments are not just distasteful. They’re nonsensical. Exactly how were we diverted from Pakistan because of the war in Iraq? If it weren’t for the Iraq war, and the larger war on terror, we would not give Pakistan a second’s thought. The country would still be under US sanctions for its illegal nuclear program.
Perhaps Axelrod means to say that our presence in Iraq has elevated the terrorist threat in Pakistan, thereby forcing the US into an uncomfortably cozy relationship with — and $10 billion in aid to — the country’s military dictator, Pervez Musharraf, which he seems to have squandered on military equipment to maintain a police state rather than fight al-Qaeda elements in the country, thereby compelling the US to send in Bhutto under a power sharing agreement with Musharraf to salvage what’s left of Pakistan’s democracy, thus tainting her as an American stooge and leading to her assassination by the very same al-Qaeda elements that Musharraf has yet to do anything about.
Perhaps.
One thing is certain though. If things continue to spiral out of control in the wake of Bhutto’s death, Obama might get his chance to fulfill a campaign promise to invade Pakistan were Pervez Musharraf to lose power in a coup.

















