Not to mention that here in Harris County (around Houston), Acorn had registered 4,000 dead people to vote, and surprisingly, those votes were actually CAST in the caucuses.

Hellooooooooo

Obama did not win Iowa. He sent in bus loads of blacks, probably ACORN volunteers, to take over the caucuses. He cheated to get more votes. That is not the same as winning.

On past projection numbers it would indicate more people will vote than there are state citizens.

It would mean you would have to throw out the playbook and campaign in different style.

Low information first time voters, etc.

As it pertains to Hillary, I think we can safely call her behavior “gold digging”, particuarly since even though she made it to Yale, she has core Bible Belt values. As we all know, divorces are easy to come by in the Bible Belt, with Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas having the highest rates in the country.

If Hillary had happened to be raised in the Northeast with Catholic values, we could then attribute her devotion to a philanderer as “respect for the sanctity of marriage”. But since sanctity of marriage is not taught in the Bible Belt, Hillary can only be a gold digger.

And to digress a little. If anyone out there thinks the high divorce rate in the USA is a problem for American society, elect an evangelical minister named Huckabee and watch the divorce rate soar even higher.

Republicans always cross caucus. The GOP has closed door meetings and counts votes later, caucus is all just bluster for them.

Low GOP turnout indicates a lot of ratfucking is going on.

Kerry won Iowa and had higher Dem vs. Rep. turnout and he lost the general by over ten thousand votes.

This is the first time I have checked the pulse of “No Quarter” in several weeks, and I must say that the neoliberal/closet-conservative rhetoric seems to be trying to fashion a few new attempts at disguised progressive discourse. By what definition have Bill or Hillary Clinton ever been anything but bonafide conservatives within the Democrat party establishment? Redefining themselves as DLC style moderates, feeling the pain of the poor and disenfranchised masses, is only good theatre on the political stage of the willingly uninformed; it has little to do with where fact and reason meet reality. Let’s face it boys and girls, conservative thought (which I believe to be the ultimate oxymoron) is antithetical to progressive reasoning. These people are philosophically afraid of unabridged enlightenment and the challenge it presents to the status quo, as viewed through their linear and narrow view of life.
As thinking Progressives how can we not support John Edwards’ desire to end our nations march towards hegemonic fascism through the corruption of our government, and most of its institutions, by corporate interests and their sycophants, or how can we honestly or intellectually allow ourselves to accept politically motivated comparisons between Barack Obama’s intentions and those of the likes of Bill Chrystal and his neoconservative cabal of political charlatans? Does it really matter why such stupid lies and dissembling are employed as “normal political speech?” Is there really any doubt, any doubt at all, who the narrow few are that benefit by such slander and deceit? Is John Edwards wrong on the issues surrounding the corruption of our government and our election process? Is Barack Obama somehow infringing on Bill Clinton’s exclusive right to identify with the dreams and ideals of JFK on the political stage? What a silly and trite idea!
Most of you decry the pitiful and downright shameful condition of our nations press and the corruption of the regulation of our public’s access to reliable professional journalism and information. Well my friends, simply harken back to Billy Bob Clinton’s collusion with the Republican Congress, and the resulting deregulation efforts that have resulted in our present MSM consolidation.
Can anyone appreciate the unmitigated hypocrisy of a leader who advocates for the unfettered education of all children on one hand, while completely abrogating the open access to all information on the other? How can anyone claim an informed public as an ideal, while surreptitiously working to undermine public access to information through political trickery and official censorship?
Remember, this election is about getting rid of the enemies from within our own government, not the foreign variety; once we have our own house in order, the rest will come in due course.
Here is my own take on the Iowa caucus.
230,000 voted – ~153,000 for Democrats & ~76,000 for Republicans
Obama – 58,140
Edwards – 45,900
Clinton – 44,370
Huckabee – 26,600
It would appear that the leading Democrat doubled the votes of the leading Republican, but the conservatives (Clinton and Huckabee ET AL) beat the Progressives 120,370 to 108,630. Obama beat Clinton by 13,770 votes; which is a greater margin than the combined Conservatives beat the Progressives.
We still have work to do, but things are definitely looking better!

That is a real good question. Why would a women disgraced stay? Not so many would…what does that say about her?