RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

[PatRacimora Cartoon Update!] Finally! Lily Ledbetter sees her fight signed into law!

lilyledbetter-signing

[Note: Lilly Ledbetter is the blonde woman standing to your right of Steny Hoyer.] Big tip to PatRacimora for sending me this wonderful column by Gail Collins in the NYTimes. UPDATE: PatRacimora has created a special cartoon that is going up tonight around 6 p.m. ET! It is poignant that this new law won’t benefit Lilly personally, but she has brought about a huge change for millions of other women. Bless her!

Lilly’s Big Day

Obama told her story over and over when he campaigned for president: How Ledbetter, now 70, spent years working as a plant supervisor at a tire factory in Alabama. How, when she neared retirement, someone slipped her a pay schedule that showed her male colleagues were making much more money than she was. A jury found her employer, the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, to be really, really guilty of pay discrimination. But the Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 decision led by the Bush appointees, threw out Ledbetter’s case, ruling that she should have filed her suit within 180 days of the first time Goodyear paid her less than her peers. [So many of us women remember that black day when the Supreme Court ruled against ALL of us. - Susan]

(Let us pause briefly to contemplate the chances of figuring out your co-workers’ salaries within the first six months on the job.)

Until the Supreme Court stepped in, courts generally presumed that the 180-day time limit began the last time an employee got a discriminatory pay check, not the first. More below:

In an attempt at bipartisan comity, the Senate decided to simply restore the status quo, rejecting House efforts to make the law tougher. Even then, only five Republican senators voted for it — four women and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who is currently the most threatened of the deeply endangered species known as moderate Republicans.

Ledbetter, who was widowed in December, won’t get any restitution of her lost wages; her case can’t be retried. She’s now part of a long line of working women who went to court and changed a little bit of the world in fights that often brought them minimal personal benefit.

Another was Eulalie Cooper, a flight attendant who sued Delta Air Lines in the mid-’60s when she was fired for being married. Not only did a Louisiana judge uphold the airline industry’s bizarre rules requiring stewardesses to be young and single, Cooper was denied unemployment benefits on the grounds that by getting married she left her job “voluntarily.”

But she began a pattern of litigation that eventually ended the industry’s insistence that women needed to look like sex objects in order to properly care for passengers on airplanes. Next time you talk about US Airways Flight 1549’s spectacular landing on the Hudson River, remember that the three flight attendants who kept calm in the ditched plane were all women in their 50s and give a nod to people like Eulalie Cooper.

Patricia Lorance, an Illinois factory worker, went to court after her union and employer secretly agreed to new seniority rules that discriminated against the women who had been promoted in the post-Civil Rights Act era of the 1970s. Like Ledbetter, she lost her court fight because of a ridiculous ruling about timing, which had to be fixed by Congress.

Working at a series of lower-paying jobs after the factory closed, and then disabled by physical ailments, Lorance lost track of her case long before it finally wound its way through the Supreme Court. “But to this day, I am rather proud of myself because I was not a dumb person. I believe in just standing up and fighting for your own rights,” she said in a phone interview.

Ledbetter’s real soul sister is Lorena Weeks of Wadley, Ga. Weeks, now 80, had worked two jobs to support her orphaned siblings, then struggled with her husband to set enough money aside to assure their children would be able to go to college. A longtime telephone employee, she applied for a higher-paying job overseeing equipment at the central office. Both her union and the management said the job was unsuitable for a woman because it involved pushing 30-pound equipment on a dolly, even though Weeks regularly toted around a 34-pound typewriter at her clerical job.

Weeks v. Southern Bell helped smash employers’ old dodge of keeping women out of higher-paying positions by claiming that they required qualifications only men could fulfill. But it was a long, painful fight during which Weeks was terrified that she might lose her job entirely. “I felt like I was so alone, and yet I knew I was doing what God wanted me to do. Going back to the fact my momma had died working so hard. And I knew women worked and needed a place in the world,” she said.

It’s a good day for the feisty working women who went to court to demand their rights and the frequently underpaid lawyers who championed them. … Read all.

Also, from the White House blog:

Thursday, January 29th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

A Wonderful Day

It’s about justice. It’s about who we are. And on this “wonderful day,” we’re getting a step closer to both of those things.

That was President Obama’s message as he signed his first piece of legislation, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which will make it easier for people to get the pay they deserve — regardless of their gender, race, or age.

“Ultimately, equal pay isn’t just an economic issue for millions of Americans and their families, it’s a question of who we are — and whether we’re truly living up to our fundamental ideals,” President Obama said. “Whether we’ll do our part, as generations before us, to ensure those words put on paper some 200 years ago really mean something — to breathe new life into them with a more enlightened understanding that is appropriate for our time.

Surrounded by leaders like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and with the new law’s namesake, Lilly Ledbetter, at his side, President Obama signed into law a powerful tool to fight discrimination.

The law is now up on our website, where you can review its full text and and submit your thoughts, comments, and ideas. …

ALSO via the White House blog are Lilly Ledbetter’s remarks at today’s signing:

I fell in love with those people campaigning with them. I have to tell you that. And that’s not on my prepared speech — (laughter) — but I have to tell you I love she and the President. And I just believe in them and their work so very much.

But thank you very much. Words cannot begin to describe how honored and humbled I feel today. When I filed my claim against Goodyear with the EEOC 10 years ago, never — never — did I imagine the path that it would lead me down. I have spent the past two years since the Supreme Court’s decision in my case fighting for equal pay for this day. But to watch you sign a bill that bears my name, the bill that will help women and others fight pay discrimination in the workplace, is truly overwhelming.

Goodyear will never have to pay me what it cheated me out of. In fact, I will never see a cent from my case. But with the passage and President’s signature today, I have an even richer reward. (Applause.) I know that my daughter and granddaughters, and your daughters and your granddaughters, will have a better deal. That’s what makes this fight worth fighting. That’s what made this fight one we had to win. And now with this win we will make a big difference in the real world.

On behalf of all the women in this country who will once again be able to fight pay discrimination, thank you. Thank you to all the senators and House members who fought for and supported this bill. Thank you to the many organizations and broad coalition that worked tirelessly for its passage. And thank you to the countless women around the country who rallied behind this legislation. It would never have happened without you.

With this bill in place, we now can move forward to where we all hope to be — improving the law, not just restoring it. President Obama, I want him to know that we’re very grateful for his support. And you can count on my continued commitment to fighting to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act — (applause) — and to make sure that women have equal pay for equal work, because that’s what this country is all about.

And thank you very much. (Applause.)

  • Mel’s Bar

    Not only did a Louisiana judge uphold the airline industry’s bizarre rules requiring stewardesses to be young and single, Cooper was denied unemployment benefits on the grounds that by getting married she left her job “voluntarily.”

    ——–

    And then we wonder about GITMO, and this latest verdict…

    Aye…

  • bert

    What a fantastic story and what a wonderful advance for women. Thanks to all the women who have fought the good fight and have helped all women in the process. Lily Et al. make me so proud.

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

    And yet WOMEN continue to be women’s worst enemies.

    The Gov. of Washington State back when she was in the Attorney General’s office went to court and argued AGAINST equal pay for equal work — and thanks to her efforts women lost the right to equal pay.

    As Governor she has NEVER attempted to undo her backstabbing work AGAINST women.

    She lost my vote forever.

  • Sandi78

    Isn’t this another bandwagon Obama jumped on a bit late in the game?

    When he’s giving his speeches, I never get the feeling that he really cares a bit about whatever the subject is, including this one. Obvious exception would be if it’s about himself.

  • UKforDems

    True. Isn’t it great that true Hillary supporters stayed loyal and rejected a Candidate who said he would have vetoed this.

  • Zut alors

    agreed! Yet I can’t understand how McCain was constantly against abolishing this injustice.

  • Cindy

    Why shouldn’t Obama be happy with himself? He has gleefully made sure that a woman will NOT be President for at least 4 years, and probably (he hopes) EIGHT years. He can use his signature to help women all day long, but when the big prize is up for grabs, he trounces on us!
    I hate him for using us for his political gain, and I’m not ashamed to say it.

  • Ani

    Great point. This is not something he ever campaigned on and was a piece of legislation that was being worked on for quite a while — any Democrat would have signed it into law once getting into office. Not to take away from the fact that he signed it, but there is no way he could NOT have.

  • UKforDems

    Comment by Zut alors | 2009-01-29 15:10:19

    agreed! Yet I can’t understand how McCain was constantly against abolishing this injustice.

    That is why true Hillary supporters voted Obama

  • ChooChooMagoo

    Kudo’s to Obama. Great post and a great day for all americans. Not just women. Women head an awful lot of households. Thanks Susan. Looking forward to Pat’s cartoon.

  • UKforDems

    McBush would have vetoed it though.

  • Allie

    You’re delusional if you think this means BHO cares about women. Your comment is childish and petulant. People have a right to vote their conscience without ridicule. No candidate is a perfect choice on every issue. Grow up Obot.

  • Cindy

    UK—Sorry, you’re wrong. I know you’re baiting us but it’s fun to watch..You’re so transparent.. Alot of us true Hillary supporters did not vote for the koolaid ticket.. We are not robots. Deal with it.

  • TorchWood

    Speaking as a progressive male who dearly loves his mom and still thanks her for not leaving me for the wolves when I was a kid:

    YOU GO GIRL!!

    (PS: Hil rocks in Fuscia!!)

  • UKforDems

    In an attempt at bipartisan comity, the Senate decided to simply restore the status quo, rejecting House efforts to make the law tougher. Even then, only five Republican senators voted for it — four women and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who is currently the most threatened of the deeply endangered species known as moderate Republicans.

  • Allie

    Election’s over UK – time to get over it.

  • Cindy

    UK——OBama did not appoint any more women to his cabinet than Bush did. And at least, Bush supported a WOMAN on his party’s national ticket. that’s more than you can say for Obama, who is a disgrace.

  • http://bullmoosegal.blogspot.com bullmoosegal
  • http://bullmoosegal.blogspot.com bullmoosegal

    Compare the number of women in his campaign (and Senate office for that matter) who have real power and equal salary to that of Pres. Obama then and now. McCain may not like expanding Federal powers (which is in lock-step with his political philosophy), but he walks the talk unlike the Pres.

  • barry bums a ciggie

    Say what sweetie? His silence was deafening during the primary when his minions made sexist jokes and comments about Hillary. Isn’t this one of the songs your messiah Barry Soetoro liked? And while you’re at it, do a search for that clip where he gave Hillary the bird and brushed his shoulder. Yeah, he respects women for sure.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg8dYL3an9k

    I give him credit for being man enough to sign this. But just because a man brings home flowers after he beats his woman does not make him alright.

  • Julia

    Stupid UK, first I beating you after I give you a wonderful present, you are so lucky, don’t forget it. Obama is the best example of attacker man, you fool. He’s a misogynist, a woman hater.

  • Julia

    He’s touting himself as feminist, of this way he can do NOTHING for the half of the country, women, once he gets the brand of feminist. No politics that help to develop women’s issues and No women rights of course.

  • kat in your hat

    “The new legislation isn’t limited to gender-based discrimination. It amends the 1964 Civil Rights Act and also applies to discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, disability or age.”

    http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/President44/Story?id=6757817&page=1

    :)

  • LNAB

    not…an Obama fan here but I do love that he DID what has needed to be done for decades.

    but it’s only a start at taking the corporate shoe off the american worker’s neck

  • NoBamaNoWay

    correct, bull. while this law should have been passed a long time ago (and this is an example of bone-headed partisanship, which we here at NQ know exists on both sides), there is a difference between walking the walk and talking the talk.

    the reality is that most women who are discriminated against in this way will *never* file a lawsuit against the employer, for a number of reasons. most people will never hear about this law. what we need is for people in positions of power to make equal treatment for women a reality through their actions, and it appears that mccain has done a better job at this than obama.

  • NoBamaNoWay

    yep, and women (at least dem women) already gave him a blank check, so he knows that there will be no accountability for him.

  • NoBamaNoWay

    word, cindy.

  • Patrick Henry

    This is GREAT..Its about time…!!!!

  • beebop

    Did 0hypocrit ever raise the salaries of his own female staffers — who were paid less than their male counterparts? Unlike BOTH Hill and JMc? Talk is cheap … well, unless it’s Porkulous talk!

  • kat in your hat

    This bill has been touted as purely a women’s bill. And it’s not.

    It’s good for all people to be equal (of course) but it’s not just for women, this Ledbetter bill. I’m tired of women getting lumped in with everyone else.

    Obama just gave his John Hancock. It’s the women who fought tooth and nail for this.

  • beebop

    But mention how much LBJ did for the civil rights movement and you’re a racist … twisted brother logic …. lol

  • Debs

    You are calling someone else a fool? I can hardly even understand what you are saying Julia. Go and learn how to construct a proper sentence and maybe the bitterness will not show on your face as you age. (looked in the mirror lately?)

  • UKforDems

    Comment by Allie | 2009-01-29 15:30:17

    You’re delusional if you think this means BHO cares about women. Your comment is childish and petulant. People have a right to vote their conscience without ridicule. No candidate is a perfect choice on every issue. Grow up Obot.

    Of course bigotbot. Womens issues are such a small issue to Republiscum. No wonder you lost.

    69 million say na na na na gooodbye na na na na.

  • Debs

    Hilarious. Are you seriously suggesting that Obama wanted to become Pres specifically to keep a woman out of the Whitehouse? I seriously need to leave this site. I am concerned I am going to do myself an injury, never laughed so spontaneously and repeatedly for ages. What do you women really do here, hangout to see who can become the bitterest and ugliest the quickest lol? Ciou everyone…you’re a funny bunch I’ll give you that.

  • oowawa

    Julia, I think your words are full of life. Poetry even. Don’t change.

  • UKforDems

    Comment by Cindy | 2009-01-29 15:32:26

    UK—Sorry, you’re wrong. I know you’re baiting us but it’s fun to watch..You’re so transparent.. Alot of us true Hillary supporters did not vote for the koolaid ticket.. We are not robots. Deal with it

    Then that meant you did not support Hillary. 69 million dealt with it ans as a result you do not have a President who would have vetoed this, real Democrats are cheering from the rafters. Fake ones may need a push over.

  • UKforDems

    Comment by kat in your hat | 2009-01-29 18:29:56

    This bill has been touted as purely a women’s bill. And it’s not.

    It’s good for all people to be equal (of course) but it’s not just for women, this Ledbetter bill. I’m tired of women getting lumped in with everyone else.

    Obama just gave his John Hancock. It’s the women who fought tooth and nail for this.

    It was always an equality bill – are you objecting to that?

  • mary

    UKforDem

    You’re such an impecunious dunderhead you little obotic residual discarding fluid made in Chicago’s rat sewers…

  • BB

    Way to go Obama. You are making change happen!

  • Texas Playwright

    bho the fraud is taking credit for Hillary co-sponsoring this bill. He’s pandering, that’s all.
    He just took family planning out of the stimulus package to appease the conservatives. Hillary would have left it in. bho is a misogynist. He doesn’t care about women. Keep watching.

  • LonnieH

    BB..STFU troll. Come ON, how stupid do you think we are?

  • Cindy

    Texas—–So right you are! And as a fella Texan, I must say you’re extry special!
    Seriously, great insight.

  • Seattle Moss

    I told you all here at this blog that hillary taking the SOS position would propel her to new heights.
    Watching her just brings a big smile to old mossy.

  • VMorris

    You nailed itm, Cindy. Thanks.

  • Strawberrybitch

    Okay, that was good…I’m writing that one down…

  • http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/01/30/our-hillary-watch-secretary-clinton-talks-about-foreign-policy-and-diplomacy-january-27-2009/ Our Hillary Watch: Secretary Clinton Talks About Foreign Policy and Diplomacy January 27, 2009 : NO QUARTER

    [...] joining Lilly Ledbetter and members of Congress along with President Obama on Thursday to sign the ” [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus