RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

January 2009 Financial Markets Review

Was it only a mere 4 weeks ago when we had a 3% upward move on the first trading day of the year? Do you recall that most equity analysts and money managers were calling for a turn in the economy by midyear and that people should increase their equity exposure?

In fact, for the first four days of the year the atmosphere was somewhat ebullient with markets holding those 3% gains. I wondered what the analysts and money managers were seeing. Not seeing it myself, I wrote the following on January 8th:

I believe a best case scenario for the equity market is that it merely marks time and does not further retract. I have a very difficult time making a case for a rallying equity market. I am more in the camp that we will likely retest the equity lows seen on November 20th. We may penetrate those lows by another 8-10% which would bring the S&P into the 700-725 area from its current level of 915. I do believe the prices in the corporate bond market, including the high yield space, largely reflect the concerns highlighted above. I also believe that despite the Fed and Treasury purchasing government and mortgage debt, these rates will end up higher at the end of this year than they are now simply due to the growing deficit. A move higher in these rates will potentially cause further anguish within the equity markets.

Every coach knows that the films don’t lie and the stat sheet speaks volumes. In that vein, let’s look at the stats for January and see “which players are making the grade.” The tickers under the high yield, mortgage, and municipal bond headings are electronic trading funds (ETFs) that I use as surrogates for those sectors.

INDEX 12/31/08 1/30/09 % CHANGE
DJIA 8776 8001 -8.8
NASDAQ 1577 1477 -6.3
S&P 500 903 826 -8.5
High Yield (COY) 4.08 4.50 10.3
Mortgage (FMY) 16.42 16.25 -1.0
Government (ITE) 59.0 58.41 -1.0
Municipal (NXR) 13.77 13.90 1.0
10-year Treasury 2.22 rate 2.86 rate 64 basis pts
2-year Treasury .77 rate .96 rate 19 basis pts.
Dollar/Yen 90.70 89.81 -1.0
Dollar/Euro 1.399 1.28 8.5
Oil 42.66 41.60 -2.5
Gold 882/ounce 929/ounce 5.3

What does it all mean??

The economy is worse than what was thought coming into the year. Earnings estimates were wildly overestimated. The 8.5% drop in the S&P 500 is the LARGEST single drop in any January since this index was formed 81 years ago.

For those who track the markets, there is a 75-80% correlation in the annual moves in equity markets with the performance in January. Without parsing words, this performance in January portends a very challenging year for our equity markets. All eyes and ears remain focused on Washington for a comprehensive financial rescue package (Bank Transition, insurance for other assets, aid to stem foreclosures, et al). Trade the range for now with a very wide band. Buy the S&P as it approaches 750 and sell it as it moves above 900. Otherwise….be patient!!

In the bond space, I did believe and continue to believe that despite the Fed and Treasury promoting the concept of quantitative easing (using the Fed’s balance sheet to buy Treasury, agency, and mortgage related assets), these rates will work their way higher simply due to the MASSIVE financing needs of our government and global governments.

The corporate bond space, led by high yield bonds, had very solid returns this month. As we mentioned, we thought these sectors had already priced in the economic turmoil to a much greater extent than the stock markets. High yield bonds were up almost 10% on the month. I would not add to that sector after that performance.

The dollar inched lower versus the Japanese yen. I believe the dollar will continue to weaken versus the yen, as well as the Canadian dollar. The U.S. dollar dramatically outperformed the Euro and the British pound. The economic situation in Europe is just as bad, if not worse, than in U.S. In fact, a number of European countries are being seriosuly challenged to raise funds. Sovereign credit risks (the risk that a government defaults) have risen considerably.

In the world of commodities, gold outperformed due to the global government credit risk, the threat of longer term inflation, and weakness in currencies. Oil remains very volatile but ended the month down 2.5%. Metals remain weak with anemic demand.

Add it all up and what is one to do? In my estimation, an investor is being paid to WAIT before making any major capital commitments. For those who are significantly underweighted stocks, a dollar cost averaging (add a fixed dollar amount on a regular basis versus one lump sum at one point in time) approach is always recommended. I am not going out on a limb to say that we will retest the lows (down another 7-9%) seen on November 20th.

We are starting to see and hear some hints of liquidity inching back into certain sectors of the real estate markets. While I do think government and mortgage rates may continue to move higher, the other rates in the bond space may not come down much, but I do not think they will move up much either. We saw some healthy issuance of bonds this month. The money being borrowed is expensive, but the fact that the deals are getting placed is a positive.

In regard to today’s GDP report, the -3.8% reading was better than the expectation of -5.5%, but in a behind the scenes review the report is actually much worse than expected because it reflects a buildup in inventories and even slower demand from consumers and businesses. That inventory buildup means businesses will need to work even more aggressively to move those products. Expect ever more aggressive sales and marketing programs from retailers.

Wish I had better news but I hope you have come to expect that you will get NO pandering here on issues of economic interest!!

For our new readers, we had fabulous interviews on No Quarter Radio this month. On January 4th, we spoke with Kevin Doyle of 12th Street Capital about the sub-prime mortgage industry. On January 11th, we spoke with Sean D’Arcy about the challenges facing the insurance industry. On January 25th, we spoke with “the man to see” Michael Maloney about the past, the present, and the future on Wall Street. You can listen to all archived No Quarter Radio episodes at any time. And don’t forget that No Quarter Radio episodes are also available as free podcasts on iTunes. Just open up iTunes, go to the iTunes store and type “No Quarter Radio podcast” in the search window. Complete No Quarter Radio iTunes instructions are always listed in the right column of No Quarter.

I thank all the readers here at No Quarter for your support!!

LD

  • ChooChooMagoo

    Thanks LD. Great post. Just watched on Cspan the senate budget hearing from yesterday I believe – with Johnson, Setser and Adams. Best part was at the end when B Sanders of vt. asked if the new rule should be too big to fail to big to exist. And Johnson told him to stick with that. He suggested a requirement of future (inevitable) infusion should be breaking these big institutions up into smaller entities. what do you think?

  • ChooChooMagoo

    Sorry should explain they were discussing the bailout (past), stimulus (present) and consensus that future monetary infusion and actions would be required.

  • Arabella Trefoil

    Thanks for the update, LD. I’ve had over 20 years sales experience (research/medical equipment and expendables) and we got paid on orders shipped. No matter what I tried to do, I couldn’t stop my managers from “double shipping” orders at the end of a quarter. Which ticked my customers off, and meant that they cancelled orders for the following quarter. How many boxes of DNA synthesizer reagent can you store in one lab?

    My point is that I think the numbers are worse than reported because a lot of companies were desperate to make their numbers look less bad. Not “better” – less bad.

    That plus my 10 years experience working in the finance industry tells me that the talking heads on radio and TV are acting all rah-rah when they say “it’s not as bad as we expected!” (No, it’s worse.)

    Thanks for your straight shooting.

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Hi Larry–Thank you for providing this timely information. Appreciated as always.

    I have a question. My aunt has money in TIAA-CREF. Apparently even though she will be 70 and a half this year, she will not be forced to take it out as there has been a one year extention (if I have it right).

    BUT, my question is, should she start taking some out? The amount has been going down in value rather steadily starting last September. If it doesn’t go back up within a year and she is forced to take it out then, she may lose more than if she takes her money and runs now.

    Thank you for any ideas to share with her.

  • felizarte

    No matter what “solutions” they all come up with will do no good if it does not put money into the hands of the majority of the consumers. Businesses will still continue to fail; even if bad real estate loans are bought by the govt/or whatever org. is created, as long as millions of families are homeless from the foreclosures, the situation will continue to get worse.

    Japan had a very slow economic recovery because they couldn’t get the Japanese people to spend (even if they had savings). The American people are not spending because a) they have little or no money b)what money they have, they are afraid to spend because of very uncertain economic times and perhaps having lost their jobs, they don’t know where their next money will come from.

    I am afraid, those in positions of power don’t really know what they are doing and they are just trying a lot of things hoping something will stick. Once the seeds of doubt and discontent are planted in people’s minds, the ensuing conflagration will surely be disastrous. This global economy is not so good after all.

  • getfitnow

    Thanks LD

  • Cubs in 09

    The 8.5% drop in the S&P 500 is the LARGEST single drop in any January since this index was formed 81 years ago.

    Ouch!

    LD…

    What are your thoughts on the Keynesians vs the Austrians? I lean toward the Austrians.

    What are your thoughts on the following statement by Mike “Mish” Shedlock?

    In deflation government bonds, cash, CDs and most likely gold will be about the only things that do not get hammered senseless. Look at it this way. Cash in deflation increases in value by definition. Treasuries and CDs pay interest but cash does not.

    Thanks for your insights and great posts! :mrgreen:

  • Larry Doyle

    Choo, Choo….good to hear from you. I wish that there was one size fits all sort of answer but there never is. certainly there are plenty of organizations that are too big, too unwieldy, and very poorly managed.

    I think the issues revolve around:

    1. how robust and timely is the risk management process
    2. how dependent is the instituation on borrowed funds for financing purposes…
    3. how strong and capable is the management team..
    4. can regulators properly monitor them?
    5. is the compensation program consistent with long term health of the company..

    Those questions are just the beginning of the program. To the extent that there are very large organizations that can pass muster on these questions then there is no reason that they should not be allowed to thrive. There are certainly other large rganizations that have displayed that they don’t have the wherewithal on all these fronts.

    NO organization should be so large or so filled with risk as to pose real systemic risk to our economy and in turn our country.

  • Larry Doyle

    Thanks for that insightful color. Nothing like padding the numbers. Thanks also for the plug!!

  • Larry Doyle

    Tricia…

    It would be irresponsible of me to offer an answer of substance on this topic. Let me expound.

    I do not know your aunt’s current assets vs liabilities. I do not know the mix of those assets and liabilities. I have no idea whether she has done other estate planning.

    There are so many other variables that play into this equation. Not knowing what the current investment choices are either.

    I think your aunt like any person should review a number of items.

    I am a big one for literally writing down a detailed listing of assets and liabilities. Within those headings then a person can further highlight and detail the types of assets (stocks, bonds, cash, real estate) and the smae with liabilities.

    Having done that, then detail a budget and see how the budget is being met.

    Having taken those steps, any person will hopefully more fully appreciate the level of risk they are taking on all fronts (assets, liabilities, budget) determine if they are comfortable with the degree of risk and the nature of the risk, and then decide.

    I think the real answer lies in what type and how much risk a person is taking and is comfortable with versus whether the market is going up or down over the next month.

    I hope this helps.

  • Larry Doyle

    Cubs….

    I will admit that I am more a student of the markets than I am of different economic schools of thought. There are certain compelling arguments within both schools. Seeing how people react within the markets along with the impact of economics on society truly fascinates me.

    Sorry to be so vague but against that backdrop I do more favor the Austrian school.

    Mish is correct that in a deflationary environment, “cash is king”. Cash-like instruments are also superb. While he is correct in his assessment, I do think that we will work our way through this mess over the next few years and that we will end up battling inflation. This topic is widely debated.

    Thanks for the plug!!

  • CG

    THANKS, LD! Your posts and radio interviews are invaluable, and of course appreciated… I hope you’ll will one day in the not-too-distant future be reporting that the economy is moving in a positive direction.

  • Cubs in 09

    Thanks, LD!

    After baseball (only ~1 month ’til Spring Training!) economics and finance is my “hobby.” I wasn’t engaged to two (!) economists for nothing. :wink: Neither “worked out,” but I had to read about economic principles to keep up with the conversations at parties. :twisted:

  • Cubs in 09

    :twisted: :mrgreen:

  • Seattle Moss

    Hey Cubs!

    Did you go hibernate for awhile. Good to see you on the blog!

  • Seattle Moss

    Hey LD,
    If January is any indication we have a long way to go in finding a bottom.

  • Cubs in 09

    Howdy! I’ve been working 12- 18-hour days. Yah, go figure… in this economy. I’ve always been outta step! :wink:

    Only ~1 month ’til Spring Training!

    I was just reading your chat with UK for Dems on the Open Thread (I sometimes keep two NQ windows open and jump to and fro).

    May I recommend for your reading pleaure…

    http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

    P.S. Did Galt return to the home planet?

  • Cubs in 09

    pleasure

  • Seattle Moss

    Cubs…I think Galt got bummed out that nobody except me responded to his parlor kitchen thread. The reality is that everyone was on holiday..I think he was hurt!

    Good to see you and your army of smileys!

  • Cubs in 09

    P.S. I suggest that the time on the comments be changed to the 12-hour AM/PM clock. Having to subtract 12 in my head and then figure the local time-zone difference (the blog is on ET, no?) is too much math late at night! :wink:

  • Cubs in 09

    …we have a long way to go in finding a bottom.

    I’m with you, SM.

    …but I’m no economist. I only dated two economics professors! :roll:

  • Karma

    That sucks about Galt….I miss his posts.

    Hope he finds his way back here.

  • Cubs in 09

    Good to see you and your army of smileys!

    I learned those from Galt!

    If what you say is true, it’s unfortunate.

    GALT! If you’re out there, come back! We miss you.

    SM… It’s good to read that your biz is a bit better. I read your posts saying that things were way down for awhile.

    I was gone working, but also just “absorbing” the news and comments at NQ—taking a wait ‘n see approach. I’m more pessimistic than optimistic looking two or three years ahead. Oh, well… This too shall pass.

  • Seattle Moss

    Cubs…Business is still way down!
    However, I hustle and think outside the box and have been able secure an additional vertical markets in Canada this past week.

  • Cubs in 09

    Whoop! I accidentally closed the window.

    Yeah… Maybe LJ or Susan will email Galt.

    HINT! :mrgreen:

  • Cubs in 09

    One day at a time.

  • WildChild

    There is nothing to grow on. There is no new technology. There is no new industry. Everything that can be merged or acquired has been. Everything that can be chopped up and shipped over to the commies is there. All the scams have been played out.

    There is nothing left to grow on.

  • Cubs in 09

    I’m a 1930′s movie fan (addicted to TCM). Those movies have taken on a new meaning today. Anyway… When you look at the clothing, furniture, autos, household items, and so on in those movies (and later ones) and think that virtually everything was made here, you have to wonder if we will ever have that again—quality products putting Americans to work. I understand the argument against protectionism, but hasn’t it moved too far in the other direction?

  • WildChild

    It’s funny how those who speak out most loudly against protectionism are the first in line to go invade somebody to protect “our interests”. Protectionism only seems to be a problem with them when we are protecting my job. The second the fat cats face a little peril, they are screaming for protection.

  • elise

    Is there a particular reason the Yen is gaining and is it the only currency to do so? How is the economy in Japan right now? I can generally follow the info you present, but I had some problems with Transition Bonds in your last post. Will these be different than regular Treasury bonds and do you have an idea on the interest? Thank you so much for your posts. I understand more about the economy than I did before although I’m still pretty lost.

  • LD

    Elise,

    A nation’s currency traded in a free and open market is evaluated by

    1. a nation’s interest rate policy
    2. trade deficit
    3. perceived credit risk of the sovereign government

    The Japanese are by nature prodigious savers ( a national savings rate north of 30%) and thus as a naiton they do not have the level of debt that other countries are currently trying to service.

    The economy in Japan is much more based on exports.
    Given the enormous dropoff in consumption worldwide and especially here in the U.S. both Japan and China are also hurting.

    Those “Transiiton Bonds” are merely a concept at this point presented by me. The prospect of a “Bank Transition” is being discussed and I would imagine that “Transition Bonds” would be needed to finance the operation. The bonds would most assuredly be government guaranteed. The interest rate would likely be marginally higher than the interest rates on U.S. Treasury bonds. All my conjecture at this point.

    I am glad you understand more about the economy. Don’t be afraid to ask anything that you do not understand.

  • LD

    I hope so as well. Glad you like the stuff!!

  • LD

    Seattle….The oevrall situaton remains interesting to say the least.

  • LD

    Seattle….The overall situation remains challenging and interesting to say the least.

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Thanks.
    Her situation is more simple–I should have said that. She owns a home that she will stay in and has her TIAA CREF plus a pension and SS. That’s about it. No other investments.

  • ChooChooMagoo

    Thanks for the insight LD.

    Can’t help thinking the american people would feel a lot more optimistic about any future bailout, if the powers that being laid out a framework based on your last sentence.

    NO organization should be so large or so filled with risk as to pose real systemic risk to our economy and in turn our country.

    Then before they gave them any money, evaluate them on your criteria and downsize them accordingly. It would not only help with the David vs Galiath psychology that average americans are feeling right now. (Which is no small matter in our recovery). But it would seem to be the only way that regulators could possibly monitor and effectively have any control over these mega monsters. As long as the threat of the collapse of these mega monster is a gun at our head, we can not and will not make the right decisions. I guess, I’m saying I see your #4 (monitor, with some real teeth for enforcement of compliance) as the pivotal factor.

    BTW, would not maintaining a healthy level of competition be a factor to consider? Real competition would be a regulating factor in an of itself. What we have now in just about every industry are govt supported oligopolies.

  • Annie Oakley

    Won’t it be interesting if China nationalizes some of “our” assets, especially if we default or devalue the dollars they hold? Will we invade? Lol? Those cheap factories might look a lot more expensive soon.

  • elise

    LD, Thanks for the information.

  • vivi

    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-rolando-120-pumps-p-3435.html”>Christian Louboutin Rolando 120 pumps</a>
    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-rolando-hiddenplatform-black-pumps-p-3539.html”>Christian Louboutin Rolando Hidden-Platform Black Pumps</a>
    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-rolando-hiddenplatform-dark-red-pumps-p-3540.html”>Christian Louboutin Rolando Hidden-Platform Dark Red Pumps</a>
    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-rolando-platform-pumps-p-3436.html”>Christian Louboutin Rolando platform pumps</a>
    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-ronda-dina-140-platform-pumps-p-3541.html”>Christian Louboutin Ronda Dina 140 platform pumps</a>
    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-ronron-100-patent-pumps-bleu-p-3437.html”>CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Ronron 100 Patent Pumps (Bleu)</a>
    <a href=”http://www.loveshoppingshoes.com/christian-louboutin-ronron-100-patent-pumps-noir-p-3438.html”>CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Ronron 100 Patent Pumps (Noir)</a>

blog comments powered by Disqus