RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Honeymoon Continues

I came across this article on Tuesday by Jonah Goldberg, “Day 15 of Obama’s honeymoon“: One doesn’t have to break a sweat searching for examples of the news media’s ongoing love affair with our president. In this, he is like FDR. I have to say, on some levels it was reassuring. Apparently, the country has been through all of this fawning by a press corps or sychophants, and survived. Mr. Goldberg has this to say:

Barack Obama and his supporters have been relentlessly comparing the new president to Franklin Roosevelt. At least one similarity is shockingly accurate: They were both beneficiaries of an obsequious press corps.

In part because the feeling was mutual, the reporters hated FDR’s Republican predecessor, Herbert Hoover. The new Democratic president, however, left White House correspondents “jubilant,” in one historian’s words. Indeed, they were so charmed by his first news conference, reporters literally burst into applause when he was done. One grizzled newspaperman observed that “the press barely restrained its ‘whoopees.’ ”

There’ve been no standing ovations — yet — with Obama, but there’s no denying that many in the news media are clapping on the inside. Obviously, not everyone is swooning, as the news media aren’t a monolith. And, yes, President Obama deserves his honeymoon. But honeymoons suggest a respectful partnership of equals. What we’re seeing here is more like a gaggle of aging love-struck groupies following Jon Bon Jovi around.


That’s quite the image, isn’t it? Accurate, too. Come to think of it, considering Obama listens to misogynistic rappers like JayZ, maybe HE should have been the example Goldberg used. Ahem. He continues:

Though no one’s idea of an objective reporter, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews does express the euphoria nicely. On The Tonight Show, he told Jay Leno that the Obamas “are really cool. They are Jack and Jackie Kennedy when you see them together. They are cool. And they’re great looking, and they’re cool and they’re young, and they’re — everything seems to be great. I know I’m selling them now. I’m not supposed to sell, OK? … But the fact is, I wouldn’t be an honest reporter if I didn’t tell you what the spiritual experience is like of being in a Barack Obama rally.” …

On Inauguration Day, Matthews came a hair’s breadth from shrieking like a teenage girl at the Beatles’ debut on The Ed Sullivan Show. As is often the case with crushes, what Matthews seems to like best about Obama is how he makes Matthews feel about himself — and his network. “This is the network that has opened its heart to change, to change and its possibilities,” Matthews gushed.

I am providing a break here in case you need to run to the bathroom to throw up.

Okay. I’m just shaking my head at what passes for “journalism” these days, but MSNBC/NBC has demonstrated long ago that they are nothing more than a propaganda arm. No surprise. As to the bias, Goldberg writes:

One of the great tests of news media bias is when the storyline has become unfalsifiable. With George W. Bush, no matter what he did, the facts always seemed to prove he was to blame. With Obama, no matter what he does, he’s always the hero. For instance, during a trip to China in 2005, then-President Bush tried to open a locked door while leaving a news conference, and the press tittered at his buffoonery. Yet last week, when President Obama walked into an Oval Office window that he thought was a door, much of the news media looked the other way — perhaps recognizing his genius at spotting where a door should have been.

Bush’s love of exercise was analyzed as a troubling obsession of an out-of-touch president. Obama’s fixation with physical fitness gives numerous reporters hope that he will alleviate America’s obesity epidemic. In a front-page exclusive, The Washington Post revealed that on Obama’s recent vacation, the Hawaiian “sun glinted off (his) chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weightlifting sessions each week, and a body toned by regular treadmill runs and basketball games.”

Remember that? How people made fun of Bush for riding his bike all of the time, and for exchanging his drinking addiction to an addiction for exercise? Everyone made fun of him. Now, of course, it’s cool because Obama is hip, cool, and “chiseled” (cough, choke). But it isn’t only the superficial in which these differences are highlighted:

A more serious example can be found in some of the news coverage of the stimulus bill. Obama made it his top priority to get bipartisan support for his unprecedented spending bill. The president exerted enormous personal effort to sway House Republicans to his cause but failed to win a single GOP vote, and he even lost 11 Democrats. And yet the Post reported in another front-page article that the Democratic House’s passage of the bill — which was always assured — “marked a big victory for his presidency a little more than a week into his term.” Indeed, it’s hard to see how anything short of a crushing defeat would be described as anything other than a “big victory.”

He meant to do that

Oh, yeah, that’s the ticket. It was all part of his master plan!! Just like this:

Then there’s Obama’s inaugural address, which was panned as pedestrian by pretty much everyone who hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid and was received as the greatest oration since Henry V rallied the British at Agincourt by everyone else. Leave it to New York magazine’s political reporter, John Heilemann, to square the circle. He conceded that Obama’s speech failed to deliver the goods, inspirationwise. But, don’t ya see, he meant to do that. In a piece titled, “Obama’s Spare Inaugural Rhetoric Signals Strategic Mastery,” Heilemann explained that the speech was “less than thrilling in itself, perhaps by design.”

Apparently, the press corps has decided that antonyms are the way to go in reporting these days. Well, golly gee, I guess this is their idea of “change.”

Goldberg concludes his article with the daily barrage of what Saint Obama means to do today, or what pithy little detail they can find about his personal regimen, or what he and the family eat for breakfast, which will no doubt bring about World Peace:

Since the inauguration, it seems every day brings another article about “Day 3″ or “Day 7″ or “Day 12.5″ of the Obama presidency. And each one reads like a People magazine blog about American Idol. Everything he does signals hope for peace in the Middle East or race relations or the economy or whatever.

CNN’s John King recently said “nobody disputes” that journalists are too enraptured by Obama’s historic presidency; he seems to think it will wear off when the serious work of the nation kicks in.

History is not so reassuring. “You are still the most interesting person,” newspaper editor William Allen White told FDR at the end of his second term. “For box office attraction you leave Clark Gable gasping for breath.” (Jonah Goldberg, editor at large of National Review Online, is a member of USA TODAY’s board of contributors.)

See, I think it is reassuring, because it demonstrates that the country has survived this kind of sophomoric fawning by the media before. FDR, Bush II, and now Obama. It gives me hope that at SOME point, they will realize what a grave disservice they have done this country by their lack of unbiased coverage. One can on;y hope that John King is right – maybe he’ll be one of the first journalists to get off the bandwagon. One can but hope.

  • Sassy

    Well done Amy!
    At this point, I no longer care about their coverage.
    Let’s face it…the media has so much invested in BO, they will need two terms to hit terra firma!
    I’m hoping for a one-termer, and until then, I can pass on the teeny-boppers!

  • wodiej

    I didn’t know boobs could be chiseled.

    Chris Matthews must have a serious head injury or maybe he is just mentally unstable.

    The media can keep drooling, they are just making themselves look utterly stupid. Perhaps they are all having a mid life crisis including O and trying to relive it. Normal middle aged people don’t act like fawning teenagers. It’s absolutely pitiful. At any rate, the media has become a mindless conglomerate of idiocy and it’s relevance will slowly but surely wane while substance will prevail in the end.

  • Foxtrot

    Larry,

    I am sad to say that I don’t think this “infactuation” with Obama from the press will wane anytime soon. I know there are hints of it here and there, but overall, they still give him the benefit of the doubt, when there is no doubt! Obama has already gone back on many of his promises from the campaign. Hiring Lobbyists when he said he wouldn’t is one of many of his pledges that have gone by the wayside. His choice of cabinet members . . . well don’t even get me started on that one. So much for “no more politics as usual”! The only one who is completely qualified is Hillary, and I am hopeful as to what I know she will be able to accomplish in her role. You will also notice that having a “transparent government” only occurs as it applies to others, and not him. Simply amazing!

    As for MSNBC/NBC, I have written them several times teling them I can no longer watch their programming. It is so blatantly bias, and what they did to Hillary in the primaries was inexcusable. Matthews clearly has a “bromance” with Obama. It is over the top. I cannot believe the executives at MSNBC haven’t removed Matthews as I know they have had to have lost some market share due to people who feel the same way I do (and wrote to tell them so). Doesn’t Matthews know he is the laughing stock of the journalistic world? Matthews and many others will have their “due” when they finally expose Obama to not be “natural born”, maybe not even a U.S. citizen. I hope then that it will be a huge wake up call for journalism to make a return as the non-bias, objective, unemotional, days of old reporting that we grew up with and counted on. Thanks for allowing me the rant!

  • Strawberrybitch

    Chiseled boobs, hahahaha. Obviously you’ve never been to the Playboy mansion, wodiej. You could lose an eye. But having said that, I did notice a few rumblings over at MSNBC yesterday morning. The only time I get to watch TV is on the treadmill at the gym so it was interesting to see all the headlines about Obama now with the Fox News patented question mark attached to the end. No more out and out THE MESSIAH HAS COME!!! statements. A little doubt has begun to seep in. Watch for yourself, if your stomach can handle it.

  • Winston

    I have an idea for the next NQ cartoon.

    Its Tweety Matthews in a bird cage with an MSNBC logo on it. Tweety looks down and says:

    “I tawt I taw a puddy tat. Dat’s no poody tat, dat’s a…”

    And a PUMA jumps up and eats him. All you see is a bunch of yellow feathers. Maybe Matthew’s head could be sticking out of the mouth of a smiling PUMA.

  • Winston

    Chiseled boobs, hahahaha. Obviously you’ve never been to the Playboy mansion,

    This is without doubt your finest work. It can’t topped, not in this lifetime.

  • http://baddemocrat08.wordpress.com/ obamastolemyboyfriend

    I love that one!

    Pat?

  • wodiej

    dats a good one!

  • http://! stodgie

    ok, here’s my take! the american people are falling out of love quickly. the media is fickle to say the least. when they see the hand writing on the wall, presuming their reading comprehension is working, they’ll turn on obama like a pack of hungry wolves. i think barrack is going to find this little trip to wh he and michelle had in the fantasies will hit the freight train of reality.

  • Portia Elizabeth

    BHO’s only similarity to FDR is neither had a leg to stand on.

  • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

    LOL – I’ll pass that along to Pat Racimora!

  • Winston

    Its all in good fun.

    There is of course the obvious reference to “Looney Tunes” and perhaps HRC could be stamped on the PUMAs collar. It might be difficult to pull off in one frame but PUMA could be stamped on the posterior of the animal as it walks away with its catch; after all it is Party Unity My A$$.

    By the way, I hold you, RRRA, in great regard for the trail you are blazing. We will follow.

  • C.S.

    JFK? Lincoln? FDR? Is the guy known as Obama just trying on presidents for style or trying to build a scarecrow? I know his political career has been based on being a shape shifter but not only are these presidents all dead; they aren’t going to be making new policies to help him out of situations our country must deal with today. The Democratic party appointed Barack Obama, formerly known as Barry Soertoro, and now reincarnated as Barack Hussein Obama, knowing he was lousy at making decisions and his strongest government decision was “Present”. You can’t buy a pig in a poke and expect it to turn out to be a magical unicorn.

  • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

    Oh, Winston, thank you. I am truly touched by your remark. WOW!

    I’ll pass along the addition to the toon. I think it would be hilarious!

    And thanks again, Winston!

    Stodgie, I sure hope you are right!

  • tango

    So C.S. following your comment, it then begs the question: who is in charge (or will be in charge) of the White House and making decisions and directing policy if Obama is not qualified nor interested?

  • memi

    Great post Rev. Amy!

    Did Obambi really walk through a window thinking it’s a door–the man is OBAMYOPIC, ain’t He!? And no one reported on it!! figures! The Moron PrezII saga continues. The other side of the Bush-moron-neconon coin is Obamyopia a la Bipartisanship!

  • Thinker

    On The Tonight Show, he told Jay Leno that the Obamas “are really cool. They are Jack and Jackie Kennedy when you see them together. They are cool.

    - Can someone please explain this to me:

    It’s a well known fact that JFK cheated on Jackie with NUMEROUS women, including one mistress, Marilyn Monroe, his jumpoff who sang happy birthday to him in front of the whole world!! His OTHER WOMAN serenaded him in front of everyone, and if you believe some political insiders, he later passed her on to his brother Robert. They were on some “it ain’t no fun if the homies can’t have none” before Snoop wrote the song.

    The Kennedy wealth was built on illegal activity, Ted Kennedy accidentally killed a woman, and this is the family that the media chooses to honor and revere while bashing the Clintons every chance they get.

    JFK cheated, MLK cheated, John Edwards cheated & had a kid outside of his marriage, Newt cheated, Jesse Jackson cheated & had a kid outside of his marriage.

    None of these men get such bad press as Bill Clinton and I’m just not understanding why. None of their wives get criticized for staying with him, but people get mad at Hillary for staying in her marriage.

    Is it simply a matter of hating on the Clintons?

    What gives???

    Am I missing something????

  • Thinker

    I agree.

    Love it!

  • JozefAL

    Boy, that Jonah Goldbert is really with it, isn’t he? Does he really think there are a “gaggle of aging love-struck groupies following Jon Bon Jovi around”? (Maybe we’re supposed to applaud his choosing a rocker who got started in the 1980s instead of the 1960s.)
    THEN, Goldberg decides that Obama’s Inaugural Address was praised as the greatest oration since Henry V at Agincourt? Hmm. That’s funny. While there’s no doubt that Henry V’s speech was stirring (especially as it was written by Shakespeare; there doesn’t seem to be any evidence of any reliable accounts from the period verifying the contents of Henry’s speech–some French accounts state that Henry did speak if only to remind his troops that the nobles could be ransomed if captured while the majority of foot-soldiers would likely be killed after being captured, and you’ve got to admit that would be pretty inspiring on its own), there have been many, MANY more memorable pieces of oration, both fictional (Hamlet’s soliloquy, anyone?) and historic (Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address; MLK’s “I Have a Dream”; various of Churchill’s speeches to the House of Commons in 1940, including the “This was their finest hour” and the “blood, toil, tears and sweat” speeches; FDR’s First Inaugural speech–with the “only thing we have to fear is fear itself” line–and his Four Freedoms speech, to say nothing of his response to Pearl Harbor; even Elizabeth I’s speech at Tilbury, a real speech given before Shakespeare penned the Agincourt speech, and could have been “borrowed” as the inspiration for Henry V’s words) that rate equal to, if not better, than Henry’s words.
    Goldberg’s overall message is pretty spot on, but he’s a REALLY lazy writer with his analogies.

  • Thinker

    And no one reported on it!! figures!

    - The MSM has been covering for his sorry ass from jump.

    They have cameras all up in his ass, but no pics of Barry smoking a cig??

    REALLY??

    Can you imagine? News organizations refusing to report/publish certain images because it might embarrass Barack?

    I’m telling you, if Hillary or Palin, or Bill or McCain were chain smokers for 20 YEARS, we would see non-stop pictures of it. We would hear about how Palin is such a bad influence on her kids,etc.

    The hypocrisy continues.

    20 years Barack?

    Where are those medical records???

  • JozefAL

    When JFK cheated, the press didn’t believe it was their place to report it (they certainly kept quiet about other Presidents who’d strayed either before or during their Presidency–including Ike, FDR and Wilson). The FBI planned to use Dr King’s cheating against him, but the White House and Attorney General’s office put a stop to it. As to Edwards and Jackson, both were caught and the “court of public opinion” punished both of them (Jackson’s role as a Civil Rights leader has been incredibly minimized; Edwards’ reputation was so destroyed following the reports that his chances of running for elected office are virtually nil). As to Newt’s cheating, once it was disclosed (coming at the same time as Clinton’s “infidelity” and the calls for a Federal Marriage Amendment), Newt was rightly seen as a hypocrite (until then, Newt was among the leaders calling for Clinton to step down due to his trysts; after his own infidelities were exposed, Newt quickly did a 180 and began advocating that Clinton’s “other” crimes be the sole source of prosecutions).
    As to the Kennedy wealth being built on “illegal activity”, the same could be said about any number of wealthy families from the late 19th and early 20th centuries (the Hearst fortune, for instance, was built on yellow journalism; the Dole pineapple fortune wouldn’t exist without older cousin Sanford’s participation in overthrowing the Hawai’ian monarchy). If the activities weren’t out and out illegal, then they were highly questionable if not highly unethical (even for the era in question–many actions that are now absolutely illegal were in grayer areas, if not actually condoned and routinely practiced).

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Let’s not forget Papa Joe Kennedy’s long affair with Gloria Swanson. WR Hearst with mistress Marian Davies. I don’t believe these were all that hidden…way back when…but certainly allowed for acceptance.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    He is magic…morphing from one to the other as necessity dictates. Inspiration? Lincoln or Kennedy, take your pick. Economy, tough times? FDR. It’s bound to make for some confusion, especially when he didn’t know who the heck he was to begin with.

  • Thinker

    Interesting points about the leaders I mentioned, but imo, it just seems like the press treats WJC like he’s the scum of the earth for what he did.

    Even to this day, the press talks about JFK and Jackie in glowing terms, in a time when they don’t have to censor themselves. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Their silence on all of his blatant cheating implies that he was a great President, despite of his mistakes as a husband, but they refuse to treat Bill the same way.

    And if for example, WJC’s father built Clinton wealth the same way that JFK’s father built their family’s wealth, it’s a given that the MSM would not be as forgiving.

    Heck, I bet you we would hear calls that Bill and Hillary’s assets should be seized, somehow tying their money into the illegal activity of the patriarch or something.

blog comments powered by Disqus