RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Lyndon Johnson placed “the full weight of his office on the side of justice”

I implore you to watch this very brief and riveting video of the Bill Moyers Essay on January 18, 2008, with special thanks to Josh Marshall for posting the full video of Moyers’ marvelous, historically rich essay. One brief comment: I wish every American too young to have experienced this tumultuous, violent, frightening and ultimately uplifting era would watch this video, and realize the courage, the countless hours of effort, the cajoling and the strong-arming it took for President Johnson to enact such historic legislation. CLICK here to watch:

Susan’s Note: Below, I’ve provided the transcript, interspersed with images I grabbed from the video as it was playing. For easier reading, I am not placing the text in blockquote format.

BILL MOYERS: If William Shakespeare were around I suspect he might describe the recent flap between the Obama and Clinton camps as much ado about nothing or a tempest in a teapot. Senator Clinton was heard to say that it took a president – Lyndon Johnson – to consummate the work of Martin Luther King by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Almost no one in the media bothered to run the whole quote. Here it is:

HILLARY CLINTON: Dr. King’s dream began to be realized when President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when he was able to get through Congress something that President Kennedy was hopeful to do, the president before had not even tried, but it took a president to get it done.”

moyers-2.jpg
BILL MOYERS: There was nothing in that quote about race. It was an historical fact, an affirmation of the obvious. But critics pounced. THE NEW YORK TIMES published a lead editorial accusing Senator Clinton of “the distasteful implication that a black man needed the help of a white man to effect change.” Suddenly we had a rhetorical inferno on our hands, with charges flying left and right, and pundits throwing gasoline on the tiniest of embers. Fortunately the furor has quieted down, and everyone’s said they’re sorry, except THE NEW YORK TIMES. But I can’t resist this footnote to the story.

Many many years ago, I was a young White House Assistant, when President Johnson at first wanted Martin Luther King to call off the marching, demonstrations, and protests. The civil rights movement had met massive resistance in the south, and the south, because of the seniority system, controlled congress, making it virtually impossible for congress to enact laws giving full citizenship to black Americans, no matter how desperate their lives. LBJ worried that the mounting demonstrations were hardening white resistance.

johnson-convincingothers.jpgHe had been the master of the Senate, the great persuader, who could twist your arm with such flair and flattery you thought he was actually doing you a favor by wrenching it from its socket. He reckoned that with a little time he could twist enough arms in Congress to end, or neutralize, the power of die-hard racists – all of them, including some of his old mentors, white supremacists who threatened to bring the government, if not the country, to its knees before they would see blacks eat at the same restaurants, go to the same schools, drink from the same fountains, and live in the same neighborhoods as whites.

johnson-king-listened2.jpgAs the pressure intensified on each side, Johnson wanted King to wait a little longer and give him a chance to bring Congress around by hook or crook. But Martin Luther King said his people had already waited too long. He talked about the murders and lynchings, the churches set on fire, children brutalized, the law defied, men and women humiliated, their lives exhausted, their hearts broken. LBJ listened, as intently as I ever saw him listen. He listened, and then he put his hand on Martin Luther King’s shoulder, and said, in effect: johnson-king-confer1.jpg “OK. You go out there Dr. King and keep doing what you’re doing, and make it possible for me to do the right thing.” Lyndon Johnson was no racist but he had not been a civil rights hero, either. Now, as president, he came down on the side of civil disobedience, believing it might quicken America’s conscience until the cry for justice became irresistible, enabling him to turn Congress. So King marched and Johnson maneuvered and Congress folded.

NEWS COVERAGE: President Johnson calls for all Americans to back what he calls a turning point in history.

johnson-king-signinglaw.jpgBILL MOYERS: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended segregation in public places.

MARCHERS: “We shall overcome…

BILL MOYERS: But they weren’t done. King kept on marching, this time for the right to vote, and once again Johnson kept his word, and did the right thing. As one of his young assistants, I stood on the floor of the House that ides of March when morality and politics converged, and watched the faces of congress transfixed…mesmerized… knowing they were riding the surf of history as the president of the United States enlisted all of us in the cause.

LYNDON JOHNSON: It’s all of us, who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice. And we shall overcome.

BILL MOYERS: As he finished, Congress stood and thunderous applause shook the chamber. Johnson would soon sign into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and black people were no longer second class citizens. Martin Luther King had marched and preached and witnessed for this day.crossburning.jpg Countless ordinary people had put their bodies on the line for it, been berated, bullied and beaten, only to rise, organize and struggle on, against the dogs and guns, the bias and burning crosses. Take nothing from them; their courage is their legacy. But take nothing from the president who once had seen the light but dimly, as through a dark glass — and now did the right thing. Lyndon Johnson threw the full weight of his office on the side of justice. Of course the movement had come first, watered by the blood of so many, championed bravely now by the preacher turned prophet who would himself soon be martyred. But there is no inevitability to history, someone has to seize and turn it. With these words at the right moment — “we shall overcome” — Lyndon Johnson transcended race and color, and history, too — reminding us that a president matters, and so do we.

:::::::::::::::

Bill Moyers’ Journal airs weekly on PBS. Check here for local listings. I “DVR” it every Friday night at 9 p.m. on KCTS, Seattle’s PBS affiliate, seen throughout the Northwest and Western Canada. Moyers’ Web site promptly provides videos and transcripts, and makes for some truly fun digging and reading.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    Slightly OT: Maya Angelou has written a poem expressing her support for Hillary Clinton. My pal MassLib has diaried it at MyDD.

  • lowdowndog

    Bill Moyers, a voice of reason, certainly sets the record straight. Thank you so much for posting this. I saw it at Crooks and Liars as well. The way I see it, the media played the race card and Hillary got blamed for it. On Jan. 14 the day before the MSNBC debate Jan.15, Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama made a truce on the issue of playing the race card in their campaigns. During the debate, right on cue, Tim Russert attempted to get Clinton and Obama to mix it up, and he was deservedly heckled for it. Everyone played nice and didn’t give him any traction to fan the embers of racial divide. Prior to the debate Hillary had been accused of being racially insensitive in her remarks about Dr. King. In my opinion she said nothing offensive. She simply stated a historical fact and the media made a big deal out of it. The New York Times and the rest of the media, especially the Huffington Post, owes this country an apology for creating a racially divisive tempest in a teapot. The New York Times editorial Jan 9 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/opinion/09wed1.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Unite+Not+Divide&oref=slogin “Unite, not Divide, Really This Time” made the distasteful implication that a black man needed the help of a white man to effect change. Sen. Clinton implied no such thing, but the media pundits gleefully jumped on the story and kindle racial division. By Jan. 13 Sen. Clinton after attempting to defended herself for a few days, Sen. Obama finally weighed in on the media created controversy for the first time, and described Clinton’s comments about the legacy of Dr. King as “unfortunate” and “ill-advised.” I believe he could have done more to quell the anger of African Americans. However, his poll numbers in South Carolina had been rising in the aftermath of Hillary’s “gaffe” and in my opinion, he did not seem too eager to put a stop to the media frenzy.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    Very well said. Yes, it was the media that stirred this up. And one of the outcomes of this kind of tempest-in-a-teapot is that it makes the candidates more inhibited about saying what they really think about each other.

    It’s also personally frustrating to me that sexism doesn’t get its due alongside racism. That was one thing that especially irritated me about Tweety’s countless comments — so brilliantly attacked by Media Matters’ David Brock. Besides his constantly sexist remarks, Chris Matthews thinks that the problems of sexism are behind us. I beg to differ.

  • kenoshaMarge

    Only one thing I disagree with you about in your post; you said “Chris Matthews thinks…”. I don’t think he does. I don’t think he’s capable of a rational thought.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    That’s funny. I laughed out loud. (And I wonder how long he stays chastened after MSNBC executives, as well as Media Matters and numerous women’s groups, came down on him. He is what he is. Which is an old-fashioned sexist man.)

  • http://noquarterusa.net/blog/ Leslie

    Great video Susan. I found nothing wrong with Clinton’s statement either, and Bill Moyers is eloquent in stating why there was nothing wrong with it. Moyers was there!

  • lowdowndog

    I was a precinct captain for Hillary in Iowa. Getting people to support your candidate at the caucus is like herding cats…wily and unpredictable. After Iowa, Clinton turned her NH campaign around in 5 days and she worked non-stop to win. The media gave her little credit for her win. Instead of congratulating her for winning, I saw a ration of bologna served up to explain away her victory with silly theories…the “Bradley Effect” (says that people are bigots), the “Spiral of Silence” (says that women are afraid of their husbands in the presence of pollsters). This is unbelievable tripe. Media pundits should have been eating crow and instead they were blaming women for their stupid predictions. http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/12/media-pundits-insulting-voters-now-because-being-wrong-wasnt-enough/ Good old fashioned door to door campaigning, tirelessly taking questions, passionately caring about peoples lives and giving them confidence in her ability to fight for them, this is what worked for Hillary. She also had a canvassing army from Bill’s NH primary of get out the vote people knocking on doors and changing people’s hearts and minds. The facts are that the women and the working class, the democratic base, chose her over Obama and gave her a win. Zogby, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-zogby/polling-the-new-hampshire_b_80657.html lists several reasons why the polls were off, but the most intriguing was that some of the independents who would have voted for Obama voted for McCain to stop Romney because the polls said Obama would win. Pollsters don’t want to admit that they influenced the vote, but they did. Plus, there were 18% undecided voters that were difficult to factor in. One more point: idiots like Chris Matthews were dancing on Hillary’s grave all day and mocking her “tears.” He pissed off the women and they voted for Hillary because he is a sexist a-hole.
    Her win in Nevada just shows what a formidable campaigning organization she commands. Obama’s pandering for the Los Vegas Review Journal’s endorsement hurt him. He thought he had the Culinary Workers vote in his pocket and tried to pick up a few more votes by positioning himself with independents and Republicans. He was mistaken. Didn’t anyone warn him that invoking Reagan’s name is anathema to any self-respecting union member? Anyway, most of the independent vote he hoped for went to the Republicans. Union members want to vote for a Democrat and for that, Hillary won their hearts.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    He sure WAS there! As a young man. So bright and able that he was already working in the White House.

    It’s sad that Sen. Clinton’s historical reference was distorted by the media.

    It’s also sad that Lyndon Johnson’s great achievements as president are overshadowed by his failures about Vietnam. Gosh, I’m trying to remember the name of that marvelous HBO movie about Johnson’s presidency, focusing on Vietnam. It is a must-watch. And I’ve watched it at least five or six times because it’s so riveting. Alec Baldwin played Robert McNamara. One thing that that film shows is how tortured Lyndon Johnson was by Vietnam.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    It’s also worthwhile, after watching this video, to review Ronald Reagan’s dismal record on civil rights. including trying to undo what Lyndon Johnson worked so hard to accomplish.

  • Ron Cowin

    Excellent. This is what the media should be doing if they still cared about Journalism. Tim Russert could be one of the worse interviewers on Television. He has ignored the legacy of Lawrence E. Spivak. Chris Matthews would be a perfect replacement for Fox’s short-lived half hour comedy hour. The rest of the media just fell in line. Noone seemed to be concerned with what was really said, or historical accuracy. Barak could use a good book on the history of the Civil Rights Movement. When he quoted Ron Reagan should be nominated for a “What was he Thinking?” Award. Like Mitt Romney remembering his Father marching with Dr. King. Mitt must have had a dream!!!

  • TeakWoodKite

    Thanks for the concise reminder. Isn’t it odd how the NYT would not print a few extra words of Hillary’s (or anyone else) statement for clarity? It completely changes a statement of historical fact and shows the NYT is not the paper of record, just an agenda.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/blog/ Leslie

    What strikes me about that era is how wrong we were about the situation in Vietnam: It was a civil war. But we thought we were saving the world from communism. Sad. And how often have we misread situations since then or worsened them through myopic, short-term policies? [I'm not just referring to Bush here.]

  • norris morris

    Thank you Susan,

    I was offended that the press distorted and engaged in innuendo regarding Hillary Clinton’s accurate remarks about LBJ and the CVivil Rights Act.

    Hillary’s remark was an example of stating historical fact to make a point. But then I watched the press turn her remarks and intentions around negatively.
    Russert is always on the prowl for taking a clear statement and taking it out of context to fit his bias and need for “news”. The press started this, and Obama followed.

    And I’ve decided that Arianna’s mean spirited blog’s main purpose is to trash Hillary at all costs.

    But I’m not completely surprised at Huffington who came here fresh from Oxford University a full blown uber conservative, and then managed her husband’s failed run for US Congress. On to her subsequent divorce from super wealthy Huffington, and voila! Arianna emerged a Progressive.

    Ever intense Arianna then systematically proceeded to trash and burn Al Gore on a moment to moment time line and assure everyone that Gore and Bush were alike. Sure. They stood for the same things
    and there was no difference between them No one but Ralph Nader could do the job as a true progressive. It was her way or the highway, and America has been skidding ever since.

    Huffington ran for governor in California against Schwarznegger, but we all know that was a photo op moment. Her Hillary hate is dysfunctional, but there’s a lot of bile on HuffPo we could do without.

    I hope this election doesn’t provoke racist or sexist themes that evolve into anger and confusion. We don’t need it.

  • Bill Keyes

    From Leslie..

    But we thought we were saving the world from communism.”

    This is what they wanted us to believe, the same way the current admin wants us to believe they are saving us from an another ….ism, terrorism.

    Communism was never a threat to the US. It was all a ploy that President Eisenhower warned us about.

    Thousands of lives lost, millions of dollars wasted.

    In Iraq history is repeating itself.

    I am waiting for that day when live TV is showing the last people being airlifted out of the Green Zone as Iraqi’s storm the gates much the same way the Vietnamese stormed the American Embassy in April 1972.

    Yes Leslie it is sad that in spite of all the good this country has done (we are of course not perfect and have made mistakes) the evil that is always present has finally brought this country to its knees. But as the old saying goes evil always succeeds when good men(generic) do nothing. The “good men” in Congress could end this nightmare in a second but they won’t…Hillary wont Obama wont and certainly if the Repugs win which they will wont either.

    It is a dark day for the Republic….

    Lets get back to the playoff games.

  • Bill Keyes

    Here is a good article about Dr King

    It Was The Hope Of The World

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19109.htm

    In his day we had real leaders not perfect leaders but real leaders who stood up for what they believed in at all cost and many of them paid with their lives.

    Today we have no leaders just power grabbing opportunists who talk big but don’t deliver unless their own agenda is honored first and then they give us a few crumbs. The American people are just like the Germans in the 30′s too stupid or blind to realize what is going on.

    Yogi Berra said “it aint over till its over” and its not over but the end is close. The “bloodless coup” which took place in January 2001 will end this way.

    A false flag incident will happen some time in Sept/Oct this year probably with Iran, or maybe even another 9/11 on American soil only bigger. Panic will erupt and in order to maintain order, martial law will be declared and the elections postponed indefinitely and this nation which was oncew the hope of millions of people will fall into just another failed experiment in the annals of history.

    Only one thing can stop them…

    IMPEACHMENT

  • norris morris

    Yes, it was Hillary the workers in Nevada saw as a hard working representative of their interests, and without doubt the cynical Reagan remarks backfired. And backfired more so as they were made at one of the most reactionary newspapers in Nevada.

    Obama accepted endorsements from the two very conservative Newspapers that have supported the Iraq war. Both papers are anti union, and pro Bush/Cheney. It struck me as an intentional use of anything to defeat Hillary, even telling us Reagan was transformational, etc.

    As Obama’s camp parsed this today, it felt hollow as I remember how we are still paying for Reagan’s hard right positions. Deregulation of the airlines and everything else, anti union policies, tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy,etc., along with the secretive plotting in Iran contra, and surpressive actions in Guatemala. Ignoring the energy crisis was Reagan’s nod to the oil biggies and escalation of drug prices. The “market finding it’s level” turned out to be huge increases in medical and drug prices.And as Reagan said there wasn’t a tax cut he didn’t like, or a government department that could be too small.

    In fact, Bush’s policies were easier for him to implement as Reagan’s policies gave him his landing strip. And the biggest government beaurocracy ever that hasn’t done a thing for the people.

    I found the description of your volunteer work very inspiring, and thank you for it. We need to take our country back!

  • Fred C. Dobbs

    >>> But we thought we were saving the world from communism.

    I was pretty sure that all I was doing was staying out of Federal confinement and, coincidentally, shooting at strangers.

  • http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/01/20/mlk-lbj/ MLK & LBJ | The Ruth Group

    [...] comments at NoQuarter. TPM also hosts the whole [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus