RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Deal Announced on Stimulus; Weekend Vote Likely, But Where Is Obama’s Army of Supporters?

First, the latest news on the package:

A.P. video at its YouTube channel

Now, here’s another jaw-dropping observation about how the Obama administration is NOT operating at maximum energy and force:

Tonight, I heard that Barack Obama was stunned that Harry Reid had trouble keeping even his own Democrats in line. Doesn’t Obama realize that many of these Democrats come from rather conservative states, and that they’re under intense pressure from consituents? One “talking head” i heard said that letters and faxes are running 100 to 1 against the package! That is a LOT of pressure on an elected official! Which means one thing: Obama has not only lost control of the message, he has failed to energize his own carefully developed base of e-mail addresses to bombard Congressional offices with messages of support for Obama! Amazing, it is. Just amazing. Perhaps this is why, as Ani told us, Obama’s surrogates had to urge supporters to write kindly letters to the prez. You MUST read Ani’s article, “Maureen Dowd Berates Obama While Senators Durbin and Boxer Want Us To Kiss-y The Prez and Make-y Better.” (Ani’s piece is so good that I’m reprinting it shortly after this goes up.)

David Corn of The Nation raised that vital point: Why hasn’t Obama mobilized his army of millions to pressure their Senators and Representatives? Why hasn’t Obama and his highly successful campaign staffers like David Axelrod, now ensconced in the White House, had people sending out e-mails urging his supporters to write, call and e-mail, just like they did so often for Obama during the election cycle? In “Will Obama Mobilize His Millions of Supporters? The White House Responds,” Corn writes:

On Friday morning, I asked, “Will Obama mobilize his millions?” By that, I meant would he activate the 13 million or so Americans who had signed up with his campaign in order to pass the stimulus bill. Organizing for America, the spin-off of the Obama presidential campaign, is holding house parties on the weekend to discuss the recovery package. But Obama has yet truly to unleash his supporters. His push for the economic bill has not had much of a grassroots component.

On Friday afternoon, I was able to ask White House press secretary Robert Gibbs about this. First, I inquired if President Obama wanted the folks attending the weekend house meetings to pressure members of Congress to support the stimulus bill. (As of this writing, the bill, which had passed the House, was heading toward a vote in the Senate. After that, the two versions will have be reconciled and a final version approved by both chambers.) Gibbs replied with something of a platitudinous reply, noting that the president always encourages citizens to be involved in their government.

I followed up by noting that when Ronald Reagan came to Washington in 1981, determined to pass an economic package of tax cuts and draconian cuts in social programs, he delivered multiple televised addresses and urged his supporters to call their members of Congress and demand passage of this legislation. The phones on Capitol Hill lit up; the legislation was passed–over the objections of the leaders of the Democratic-controlled House. Would President Obama, I asked Gibbs, make a similarly explicit call. “We’ll ask those who support him…to move this economy forward,” Gibbs said.

In other words, maybe.

Why hasn’t the Obama White House already directly engaged its supporters in this fight? After all, Obama has repeatedly said this is the number-one priority of his administration. Perhaps Obama aides initially thought that it would not be necessary to call in its troops. If so, that was a miscalculation on at least two counts. First, it does seem that Obama will have to show some political muscle to get this bill all the way through Congress. Second, whether or not the Obama White House needed its supporters to win this thing, it would have been smart for the White House to have involved its backers in its first–and most important–initiative. That would give these people a sense of ownership. And what could be a better way of keeping those millions (and others) engaged. …

Just as I wrote in my previous article on the census mess, this is White House 101 stuff! Are none of these people thinking imaginatively of ways they can fashion and change public opinion on this bill?

Right now, the Republicans are running away with the positive press and the popular sentiments, while the Democrats are looking like a bunch of disorganized, dunderhead clowns!

  • Winston

    Right now, the Republicans are running away with the positive press, and the Democrats look like a bunch of disorganized clowns!

    Don’t worry. Next week they will get there circus act together and become a bunch of organized clowns.

  • Winston

    Right now, the Republicans are running away with the positive press, and the Democrats look like a bunch of disorganized clowns!

    Don’t worry. Next week they will get their act together and become a bunch of organized clowns.

  • AlexisM

    No, the Republicans are going to take it this time. With all of the bad press surrounding Obama’s cabinet picks, and the Pork Fat Bill, the GOP is looking really good again. Oh well.

  • http://BREAKINGNEWS!! Oisafraud

    Just two weeks and Obama has managed to do what Bush couldn’t do in 8 years, convince the American public that the Republicans are the sane organized members of Congress who are there to protect and save the American tax payers. I’m stunned beyond believe. Obama is truly an arrogant stupid clueless phony fool. 4 more years of complete bullshit.

  • AlexisM

    It’s awesome. I am going to join the GOP soon. Nothing, nothing is as vile, disgusting, disgraceful, criminal, etc., as the Dims these past few years. They can bite me and watch me send my cash to the RNC.

  • Ani

    Can’t say we didn’t warn ‘em what would happen if they chose Obama over Hillary. How many of us wrote letter after letter and made call after call to super delegates during the primary BEGGING them to see reason. Ya think she’d be berating and the American public, or not being willing to work across the aisle. She has a proven record of doing so. So does McCain for that matter.

    Oy! What have they done.

    I remember calling my Congressman in May of last year when he just came out to endorse Obama and I asked him to retract. I spoke with his assistant of 25 years and detailed all the problems with Obama’s flip flops, misstatements, associations and lack of experience. She said they knew all about that but that the Congressman was “looking at the big picture”. What was that big picture exactly — more money in the campaign coffers? The youth vote to grow the party for the 21st century? We’d have had them anyway.

    How’s that big picture now. With the Republican brand so badly damaged, they are looking on message and the Dems are all over the place.

  • Ani

    roflmao.

  • Winston

    Welcome aboard. I hope your expectations aren’t too high. Right now our pride rests soley on the claim that not all of us in the GOP are criminals.

  • Babs

    I have been trying to call my Senator, Arlen Specter, all night, and all his voicemail boxes are full. If he votes for this piece of garbage, I will do everything I can to defeat him in 2010. He barely beat his Republican opponent in the primaries last time, and if he spits in the face of the voters once again by voting for this piece of crap, he is toast.

  • Jim S

    Specter -PA, and the ME contingent of Collins and Snowe have sipped from the Kool-Aid cup and will vote to sell the next three generations down the tube.

  • Winston

    Just two weeks and Obama has managed to do what Bush couldn’t do in 8 years, convince the American public that the Republicans are the sane organized members of Congress who are there to protect and save the American tax payers.

    Great point. I never thought about it in quite these terms. But at any given time it is difficult to decide who is the greater evil and who is for the greater good.

    I can admit quite openly I have used the “Paranoiac-Critical” method made famous by that genius Salvador Dali. Only thru the lenz of surrealism can one get a fix on the ever changing currents washing over political landscape. Reading Kafka also helps, especially “The Castle.” But I have had to call into question my own sanity. Isn’t it true though that the insane never question their own sanity. Their paranoic fears are all external. Mine are both.

  • AlexisM

    Thank you Winston. It feels really good. I get to say that I never voted for Bush or Obama. I’m a hero, huh? I can just say that the GOP is the All-Star team right now. How the hell did that happen.

  • AlexisM

    Ani you are so right. My head is spinning just reading your post. Who thought we would all end up where we are now? I personally thought HRC would win and we would just go on. Funny how life changes so quickly, huh?

    I made a really large bet that Obama would never win. I really thought this country had more brains, integrity and patriotism. I lost a major bet and I’m still paying for it. It’s going to be a long four years, but the good news is that we all found each other. I have friends I never would have met without this horror.

  • Winston

    One veil is lifted and another shroud falls.

    We are not rotten from the inside, we just have some serious bruises, both self-inflicted and many media created. At the present moment I have no party. Still suffering from the pain of compromising our fiscal conservative principles under the telespastic command of Bush.

    He sailed like a drunken spender.

  • ritamary

    Will Obama mobilize his millions of supporters? Not likely since that support was so superficial. Many bots have turned their attention elsewhere now that the feel good American idol candidate is president.

  • Joanie in Brooklyn

    Ritamary: you wrote what I was going to write, so I won’t reiterate it. But here’s another thought: how do we know that he hasn’t tried to mobilize them? but to no avail. it’s not like they would publicize something like that. Would be really, really interesting if that were the case.

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

    Perhaps these supporters don’t exist — they (and their number) was just embellished to make 0bambam look more overwhelming than he really was.

    Could be the all the real 0bambam supporters were paid agitators who went from state to state. A handful of agitators can seem like thousands.

    As someone already said — the majority of 0bambam’s supporters are shallow. Plus if they’re not getting paid — they could care less.

    0bambam is an illusion — someone else seems to be running the Presidenting show.

    Also a pol-sci prof observed that the US has a three pary system — the dems, the GOP and the President’s party. The prez is always an adversary to the Congress — mostly because of the balance of power that the ForeFathers built into our form of Government.

  • UKforDems

    The GOP has not been able to convince anyone of anything. 60/40 Spending to tax cuts. Noow down to 58 to 42%. And typical of Republicans who want to keep America down, what has been removed is money for education.

    The GOP remains shameless.

  • DAB

    The Daily Show did a hilarious segment comparing Robert Gibbs meaningless “platitudinous” Press Conferences with those of his predecessors, Fleisher, McClellan and Perrino. They were identical. Side by side, Gibbs even physically resembles that McClellan drone.

    Wonder if Stewart is also aving some second thoughts about his chosen one. His show recently has improved and is funny again but I’m finding it hard to forgive in pre-election hijinks.

    Guess the actual Obama goods weren’t really as good AS THE ADVERTISED ONES.

  • bert

    I read a news account some where that the White House Bots can’t do the type of organizing they are used to because one, they can’t go through the DNC in the White House, and two, the technology is not as updated in the White House as they were used to on the campaign trail. They were unprepared for what was available to them and haven’t had time to get their act and stuff together.

  • http://www.anova.org/software/ zaine_ridling

    On the flip side, it’s nice to see a Democratic president burning the future as quickly as any Repub prez ever did! Every time a repub takes office in the past 30 years, they exponentially increase the deficit and national debt. I always said that for once I’d like to see a Democrat go hog wild and blow the credit card to smithereens, spending so wildly that it would mock every bill the repubs ever approved.

    Still, Larry’s right. This is all insanity, as if it’s a race to see how fast we can become post-WWI Germany.

  • getfitnow

    I agree with ritamary. I’m not sure all that “support” was really there. If it was, these obots have returned to video games and reality tv.

  • Elizabeth

    The White House is formalizing the campaign through the grassroots mobilization mechanism “Organizing for America,” apparently set up to lobby members of Congress when Obama doesn’t feel up to it himself. He probably didn’t call them to actively promote the stimulus realizing the votes would be there anyway and wanting to be able to make it nominally “post-partisan.”

    http: //www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-obama-network-090130,0,3608152.story

    http: //news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090130/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_campaign

    Although not surprisingly the pre election House Party revivals are a flat-out bust…The economy just isn’t “their kind of issue…” These people are seriously disordered.

    Mack, the house-party proponent from Sacramento, said that comparing the pre-election turnout to the upcoming one was unfair.

    Obama campaign house-party meetings were “truly about something that united everybody,” Mack said. “This weekend, what we’re talking about is the economy, and some people just don’t want to be involved in that. Their issue is health care or climate change or getting out of Iraq.”

    Her theory — and Obama’s hope — is that when subgroup participation is added up, the total will be as impressive as his campaign numbers were.

    http: //news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20090206/pl_mcclatchy/3162543_1

  • Rich

    Well if HUSSEIN gets his STIMULUS,he will be able to spread the wealth like he wants!!!!!

  • Sassy

    Well, bring on your rotten eggs for I’m going to say something to rile everyone!
    No more women will get my vote!
    They don’t have the equipment for the job!
    Snow and Collins undercut the entire Republican Party and their former Presidential candidate!
    Who gave them the authority to cut the legs out from everyone who wanted to negotiate a better deal on this package?

  • oowawa

    Interesting, Elizabeth. Thanks for putting this together.

  • Patrick Walker

    “Why hasn’t Obama mobilized his army of millions to pressure their Senators and Representatives?”

    Well, it’s quite simple. The army doesn’t exist. It’s like Saddam’s WMD. We were promised they were there but people should have opened their eyes to see it was a convenient illusion.

    A good way to prove the lack of Obama’s Army is the realization that he managed only 52% of the vote in a two-horse race. Obama literally won by the skin of his teeth.

  • Ted

    No to “stimulus” bill. Here’s why:
    Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited ‘after-the-fact’ short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addessed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment ‘citizen’ is not sufficient. A ‘President’ MUST BE an Article 2 ‘natural born citizen’ AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

  • sandi78

    They’ve got the “real” American Idol to focus on now. They don’t need the substitute any more.

  • jwrjr

    Once upon a time “the big picture” was the welfare of the entire country. To quote Inspector Clouseau – “Not any more”.

  • Jackie

    Total Votes Cast for Obama in 2008 69,456,897

    Percent of Votes Cast for Obama in 2008 Election 53%
    Percent of Eligible Citizens (> 18 yrs old 223,655,582) Who Voted for Barack Obama 31%
    Percent of Total U.S. Population (305,303,885) Who Voted for Barack Obama 23%
    Percent of Total U.S. Population (305,303,885) Affected by Obama’s Policies 100%

  • jwrjr

    It will be an interesting time for historians 50 years from now. Problem is, we gotta live through it.

  • knotfourhymn

    Now I have a mental picture of a tiny car pulling up to the Capitol building and Pelosi, Reid, et al pouring out of it…

  • Mary

    Well, ok, but if it hadn’t been for Collins, Snowe, et al, it would have been COMPLETELY the Nancy Pelosi show.

    Be grateful for small favors.

  • knotfourhymn

    I agree…I honestly could not picture this man being elected with all of his problems and his lack of experience. I still can’t smoothly say “President Obama” in conversation.

  • JozefAL

    I don’t know where that prof of yours came up with that assessment since the only Presidents that I can recall off hand who’ve had the unexpected adversarial problems with Congress were Democrats.
    Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford and Bush I had to deal with Democratic-led Congresses through their administrations (though Eisenhower had a GOP-led Congress during his first two years in office) and Reagan had a divided Congress through most of his administration–the House was Democratic throughout his 8 years while the Senate was GOP for the first 6 years. With all those GOP Presidents, their party in Congress–almost to a man–stood behind their President (Nixon started feeling a lot of very intense pressure from his GOP Congressfolks after the Watergate investigation and hearings started and most certainly would have faced a unanimous impeachment vote if he hadn’t resigned). Of course, the major difference is that the GOP since Reagan’s era is a far different critter than the GOP before. There were, rather incredibly, Republicans who were downright liberal on social matters and incredibly moderate on fiscal matters–most of these folks hailed from the Northeast states, particularly New England, but many also represented the “Steel Belt/Rust Belt” states around the Great Lakes. At this time, the political scale ran (with most liberal on the far left and most conservative on the far right):
    Lib Dem–Mod Dem–Lib Rep–Cons Dem–Mod Rep–Cons Rep (although the Cons Dem and Mod Rep could switch around depending on the particular issue).
    After the “Reagan Revolution”, the “Liberal” Republicans virtually disappeared from not only Congress but the very social fabric of America and the “Moderate” Republicans absorbed those who were left (the vast majority of the Liberal Republicans either switched to the Democratic Party or went to smaller minority parties, especially the Libertarian; a few stalwarts, mostly from New York and New England, stayed in the GOP hoping to keep the Party from swinging too far to the extreme right, but often finding themselves tossed aside for more conservative Democrats–see Lincoln Chafee for a recent example).
    Democratic Presidents, on the other hand, have faced serious challenges from their own party if not outright rebellions since Truman’s time, at the very least. (I know there were a lot of Democrats in FDR’s time who fought him but I’m not absolutely sure if he ever faced outright opposition to a point–other than his plan to expand the Supreme Court–where the Democrats deserted him that he didn’t win the battle. Truman, on the other hand, faced opposition from Congressional Democrats almost from the start, and, following the 1946 mid-term election where the Congressional Dems went from absolute dominance to minority party overnight, top Dems in Congress were among the leaders looking for a new face to put on the top of the 1948 Presidential ticket.) Kennedy didn’t face the same level of opposition since he’d literally risen through Congressional ranks (6 years in the House and 8 years in the Senate) and he’d gained some ability in how to judge when and where to fight his battles; of course, he was assassinated before he could really begin fighting his toughest battles. LBJ, on the other hand, wound up having to fight those tough battles, especially on civil rights. LBJ literally had to resort to blackmail in some cases to win over Southern Democrats on the matter. There was one Southern Senator who’d been having an affair with a black maid/housekeeper, of whom he was especially fond, and LBJ had hard evidence which he showed the man in a private meeting; the Senator, amazingly, made a turnaround and supported the Civil Rights package. Of course, LBJ knew he’d used up all his cards to ensure the passage of the Civil Rights bills and faced a very hostile contingent of Southern Democrats for the rest of his Presidency.
    Then came Carter, and, while Southern Democrats were mostly happy to work with him, most of Carter’s opposition came from the “cultured and urbane” Northern and West Coast Democrats who never really liked the “hick from Plains”. Of course, the Southern Dems in Congress were generally more conservative than Carter (as were the voters who put them there, as witnessed by the large switchover in those states from Dem to GOP in the 1980 Presidential election–most of Carter’s Southern state wins had come from states that had gone to either Nixon or Wallace in 1968 and to Nixon in 1972) while the overall Democratic Party in Congress was more liberal than Carter so Carter was rarely, if ever, able to please either faction.
    Then came Clinton in 1992. While Congressional Dems were glad to have the White House again, they were very reluctant to let Clinton get what he wanted, instead pushing THEIR goals at Clinton’s expense. Indeed, Congressional Dems seemed hellbent on standing in Clinton’s way at every step, whether on energy policy, gays in the military or health-care reform. Looking back, it’s almost “Through the Looking-Glass”-style bizarre how Clinton was able to work better with his GOP “opposition” than he was with his “own” party.
    Then came Dubya. When Dubya took office in 2001, the GOP was in control of the House and had effective control of the Senate (the Senate was split 50-50 which left tie-breakers up to the VP). Then a few months later, Dubya made a serious political blunder and left GOP Sen Jeffords of Vermont out of a very high-profile publicity event (when a Vermont teacher was honored as “Teacher of the Year”), it seems that may have been the trigger for Jeffords to leave the GOP and become an Independent, caucusing with the Dems and giving the Dems control of the Senate. Then came 9/11 and a complete collapse of any serious party “opposition” on the part of the Democrats, something which lasted pretty much until 2005 when the Dems were the minority party; as to the GOP, its members in Congress largely gave Dubya a rubber-stamp for virtually everything he wanted. Then, when the Dems retook Congress in 2006, very little changed. Oh, sure, there were some high-profile fights here and there, but on the whole, what Dubya wanted, Dubya largely got.

  • r2d2

    Obama army of supporters only work with the media, not with Congress. Not enough people have not been sold by a stimulus package that’s hodgepodge of spending without a clear path to get the economy spinning out of control and back to work.

  • LindaP

    Well. Dubya won.

  • LindaP

    And you wonder why the “Obama Media” is losing business. Obama did not win by an overwhelming majority. And many of those that did vote for him are sorry that they did. I guarantee you that those that didn’t vote for him, aren’t sorry that they didn’t.

    If the Media and Hollywood want to save their businesses, they need to remember who they are selling to, not who they are selling out to.

    Total Votes Cast for Obama in 2008 69,456,897

    Percent of Votes Cast for Obama in 2008 Election 53%

    Percent of Eligible Citizens (> 18 yrs old 223,655,582) Who Voted for Barack Obama 31%

    Percent of Total U.S. Population (305,303,885) Who Voted for Barack Obama 23%

    Percent of Total U.S. Population (305,303,885) Affected by Obama’s Policies 100%

blog comments powered by Disqus