RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Inaugural “Dear Lord, Give Me a Break” Thread

THEY ARE HEROES, ALL!

dudley-1Oh the waxing over the heroics of the plucky, stouthearted Dudley-Do-Right-ingness of Arlen Specter, lauded by the spoony Obama-obsessive lyrical liberal blogger Steve Benen — who makes Susan bang her forehead on her desk and reach for her barf bag:

PROFILES IN COURAGE…. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) was, of course, one of only three Republican lawmakers in Congress to support the economic stimulus bill. To hear him tell it, however, some of Specter’s GOP colleagues wanted to vote for the package, but didn’t think they could get away with it politically. …

On the moving account by Mr. Specter of Mr. Specter’s own TRUE GRIT:

“When I came back to the cloak room after coming to the agreement a week ago today,” said Specter, “one of my colleagues said, ‘Arlen, I’m proud of you.’ My Republican colleague said, ‘Arlen, I’m proud of you.’ I said, ‘Are you going to vote with me?’ And he said, ‘No, I might have a primary.’ And I said, ‘Well, you know very well I’m going to have a primary.’” [...]

On the more self-sacrificing, truer heroism of Joe Lieberman who UNSELFISHLY came to the aid of His President, despite the nasty, mean things The President had said about the valiant and altruistic Connecticut senator during the campaigns — although now that is all forgiven and forgotten:

Lieberman played a crucial role in talking several Republicans off the ledge [OFF THE LEDGE! WOAH!], thereby vindicating President Obama’s refusal to be vindictive toward the Connecticut Senator, who had some nasty things to say about Obama and Democrats in general during the presidential campaign.

So sayeth the so-insightful Joe Klein for Time’s Swampland blog, who addeth:

“Those who wonder about the President’s efforts to be nice to Republicans–a singularly ungracious lot, cult-like in their devotion to failed economic policies past–should bear this particular example in mind as we go forward.”

Which brings us to the REAL hero …. The One, The Only, The REAL HERO (never mind that his bipartisanship worked on three Republicans out of 234 Republicans total in the Congress!):

thepage-headline-s

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen, the HEROES of the 2009 bah…bah….bah….billions of dollars of stimulus that nobody knows where or what it’s doing except the lobbyists, ahem, who wrote the damn 1,000+-page tome. (God, I wish I had it. I could use it as a foot stool!)

*************************************************

*************************************************

A BONUS ADDITION TO THE

“Dear Lord, Give Me A Break” Post

On the subject header in the e-mail from Conde Nast publications — which made Susan’s mouth gape wide open:

Get Michelle Obama Guaranteed – only from Vogue

(Uh, no thanks.)

  • The Real HC

    Let Obama marry himself to this porkulus package. I would say he has another 6 mos of bleating about how George Bush done him wrong before even the stupidest of humans sees what is afoot.

  • sowsear

    And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen, the HEROES of the 2009 bah…bah….bah….billions of dollars of stimulus that nobody knows where or what it’s doing except the lobbyists, ahem, who wrote the damn 1,000+-page tome. (God, I wish I had it. I could use it as a foot stool!)

    ==============================
    I have the links if you want to run it off. You probably could get a grant to cover the cost. I know it’s in the Stimuloss Obamlosi Pork Package somewhere.

  • jbjd

    Our government was founded on the principle of balance of powers. That is, if the executive branch – the President – determines the legislative branch – Congress – has passed an unwarranted law, he is authorized to veto the legislation. And Congress can only override his veto with a super majority seldom achieved. If both President and Congress overstep their bounds, Plaintiffs may petition the courts – the judicial branch – to declare the law as passed and signed, is unConstitutional.

    But when the ‘President’ successfully solicited for legislative passage of this ’stimulus’ bill, which Congress admittedly had not read; together these two branches of government literally violated the principle of governmental separation of powers.

    Now, they need to be stopped, by the Court.

    • sowsear

      The court has left the building, too.

      • http://noquarter foxyladi14

        been gone awhile now..i noticed right away..

      • Winston

        Too bad the court jesters are running the show.

    • Winston

      You are right, and Obama, the freakin lawyer should know better.

      I even think it is a violation of free speech for Obama, as president, or any member of his cabinet, to single out a private citizen, by name, so as to intimidate that person and tarnish their image. He does this all the time by mentioning certain individuals in talk radio.

      We are the chattering class that has the right to criticize the government. When the gov does it back, that is the beginnings of tyranny. It is a one-way-street as far as this goes and they are driving down the wrong way.

      You have made a great point. Thanks for waking us up.

  • C.S.

    If the Judicial Branch had intended to carry out their Constitutional duties; we would know when and where Mr. Soertoro/Obama was born and if he met the Constitutional job requirements.

    But this I find absolutely mind boggling! The same men who helped to give the office of president to a man who didn’t win the People’s vote are now so afraid of the voters that

    some of Specter’s GOP colleagues wanted to vote for the package, but didn’t think they could get away with it politically.

    Just who would be able stop them from “getting away with it politically”? Certainly not the voters because Congress has just proved to us that they were more afraid of not selecting Obama than anything we voters might do.

  • Lizzy

    Now how much was Memememechelle paid by Vogue? Enquiring minds want to know. Not bad for a Disbarred FLOTUS. It’s only 1100 pages of pork; we should be able to get through it in a couple of hours.

  • Texas Playwright

    Voting on something no one read???? Voting on anything unread, whatever the size, party affiliation, intended beneficiaries??? It’s up to us, citizens, to kick these goons out of office ASAP, and elect American leaders who will repeal this Democratic welfare/patronage system masquerading as a bill. We must also elect moral beings who will read the bills and let We the People read the bills before they are voted on.

    I’m 58 and I still want to live in America until I die. If I wanted Russia, China, North Korea, Kenya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, or the wonderful new extremist Islam country of UK, I’d go live there. Nope, I want to live in America until I die. Does anyone else?

    • trixta

      Get with the program, Texas. Reading any Bill before voting on it is soooo yesterday!

    • http://firefox AnnieCollier

      Yep. We were here with George Washington and we’ll be here after the faux Lincoln is laughed out of town.

  • http://psychobabbleandpotpourri.blogspot.com/ Mary

    Needed the laugh, Susan – great piece. Did have to skip the video I confess – my mental status is still too fragile to gaze upon The One.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Get Michelle Obama Guaranteed – only from Vogue

    I think my subscription ended with the last issue. On the off chance the March issue comes, I’ll send the cover and all pages with MEchille back to them with some choice comments. I did that with the re-order form from Vanity Fair and I guess just to spite me, they’ve sent me another one.

  • susaninbosque

    Okay, I know that somewhere, someplace this question is stupid and that I probably missed something. But this question is not about “how things are done” but it is about the “law.”

    My simply lowly question is: isn’t it simply in some way ILLEGAL for those who represent us to vote on something without reading it first. I know it is done all of the time but my question stands. In my feeble brain, it would seem to be illegal, really illegal and unconstitutional. Isn’t it awfully close to taxation without representation which seems to be sooo basic to our constitution. It does not seem to me to be possible for someone to represent me – in any way – if they have not read what it is they are voting for and these votes have rearrange my taxation status and/or my financial status or they in any way constrain me???

    And they are certainly spending my money (not a lot from me personally but nevertheless mine) without really representing me??

    This does not seem to be a handy dandy gimmick to make us happy – this reading of the bill first kinda thing – but actually a constitutional requirement? And maybe I have not read the previous thread sufficiently closely but it seems time to sue on the basis of constitutionality. Class actions are not simple things to put together but they do get some attention because it is a legal binding together.

    Larry or Susan or any other brave group of souls out there: are we capable of putting a class action lawsuit together to protest the nationwide unconstitutionality of this mess? I have little money and my body is limited in the time it can be abused by being in front of a computer but I have a serious temper and it is matched by LOTS of people. Anyone have an idea of how we can make this happen because I am willing to put myself behind it.

    I rarely call upon this wonderful and brave group of people to help clear my mind on something but I need help now:

    Is this an insane question on my part: is it unconstitutional and can we bring an action? Please looking for help here.

    • Winston

      It is not a dumb question. You sound a little distressed. We all are. But if this becomes too much to handle, go for a walk, pray, chill and take care of yourself first. Look at a tree and marvel at it.

      I remind you that major portions of this bill are time-released. Most of it will not take effect for 2 years. Maybe by then there will be new leadership and the damage can be reversed somehow. I am not aware of any law that can’t be undone if we set our minds to it.

      No one alone can shoulder the weight of the world, so don’t try it yourself. And feel free to express yourself here cause believe me it helps.

  • Babs

    I live in eastern PA, Specter is my Senator, and believe me, I will do everything in my power to help get him unelected in 2010. My favorite line was “I gave my word”. How do you give your word to vote for something you haven’t read? No, Senator Specter, you gave your word to the citizens who voted for you that you would represent us as a Republican, not a tool of the Democratic partisans who crafted this abomination of a bill. I will not forget.

    • Magic Puzzle Box

      So do I, and he’s not always this bad. You also have to keep in mind he has had some very serious illness over the past decade, and that takes a toll as well. I’d still take him any day over Chris Matthews who wanted to challenge him in 2010.

  • OG

    It begs the question – What was Specter promised? Had to be suthin reallly big…

    • Andy

      A conservative judge for SCOTUS?

  • Andy

    You are a funny woman SusanUnPC. Great post; exposing all these guys in the media for what they are…punks.

  • Peggy Sue

    Whoops. My post disappeared before I got a chance to post it.

    What I was going to say is:

    I think these media types are worse than simply punks. They’re part of the propaganda machine that Obama and his supporters have counted on for cover and senseless explanations.

    But I can’t help but feel that the economic conditions on the ground are going to get to a point where even the “in-tank” media types will have problems lugging the water for this crew. Without being laughed out of town.

    As for Arlen Specter? As I said on another thread, I hope he’s toast [professionally] in the mid-terms. It’s time for him to step down because this vote on a monstrosity of a “stimulus package” is no different than his “magic bullet” theory. Both are hooey.

    Time to go, Senator Specter. Do the American public a service.