<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I post.  You &#8230; uh &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collen</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144909</link>
		<dc:creator>Collen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144909</guid>
		<description>What should I get over?  And why are my comments rude - just because I don&#039;t agree with your opinion?  
It is unfortunate that Rachel Maddow has become more snarky since she got her own show - but surely you know that being snarky is part of her contract?  No snark, no viewers.
However, we obviously differ in our opinion of her, especially during the primaries and gen election - I do not find that because she pointed out Hillary&#039;s flaws and often critisized her that that translates into &#039;attacks successful women.&#039; Quite the contrary, she is VERY complimentary of the many successful women who come on her show.  And she is also very critical of Obama when she feels he warrants such criticism.  All fair, no?
I could go back to the primary wars and give you examples of when Hillary and her supporters made snarky and rude comments towards obama - and many of those supporters were on TV talking for all to hear.  That&#039;s what politics is - 
you have your candidate and I have mine, bound to disagree. Where I see some truth, you see rude.  
And while I supported the candidate who won, i don&#039;t see that it justifies the hatred that comes from you all on this blog, in the form of dissecting every word the man says, every opinion he gives (and often its your interpretation of what he is saying, not his real intention)  It&#039;s ALL bad and ALL at Hillary&#039;s expense.
Come on, American girl, can you just give me ONE positive on the President&#039;s actions or policies (other than appointing Hillary as SOS)?  Could you try?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should I get over?  And why are my comments rude &#8211; just because I don&#8217;t agree with your opinion?<br />
It is unfortunate that Rachel Maddow has become more snarky since she got her own show &#8211; but surely you know that being snarky is part of her contract?  No snark, no viewers.<br />
However, we obviously differ in our opinion of her, especially during the primaries and gen election &#8211; I do not find that because she pointed out Hillary&#8217;s flaws and often critisized her that that translates into &#8216;attacks successful women.&#8217; Quite the contrary, she is VERY complimentary of the many successful women who come on her show.  And she is also very critical of Obama when she feels he warrants such criticism.  All fair, no?<br />
I could go back to the primary wars and give you examples of when Hillary and her supporters made snarky and rude comments towards obama &#8211; and many of those supporters were on TV talking for all to hear.  That&#8217;s what politics is &#8211;<br />
you have your candidate and I have mine, bound to disagree. Where I see some truth, you see rude.<br />
And while I supported the candidate who won, i don&#8217;t see that it justifies the hatred that comes from you all on this blog, in the form of dissecting every word the man says, every opinion he gives (and often its your interpretation of what he is saying, not his real intention)  It&#8217;s ALL bad and ALL at Hillary&#8217;s expense.<br />
Come on, American girl, can you just give me ONE positive on the President&#8217;s actions or policies (other than appointing Hillary as SOS)?  Could you try?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FLDemFem</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144821</link>
		<dc:creator>FLDemFem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144821</guid>
		<description>What Ms. Maddow failed to understand, probably through her own ignorance, is that the lining of that coat has dragons on it, and they are a very important symbol to most of the people in Japan, China and the rest of Asia. And in all of Asia, but especially China and Japan, the dragon is a HUGE cultural icon, and a symbol of good luck and prosperity. I would bet money that Hillary knows that, and chose that particular coat for that very reason. Either way, it&#039;s a big plus in her karma column in the cultures she is currently visiting. And the fact that the dragons are so close to her person, inside the coat, is also a good thing. The closer they are, the better. Hence the large number of dragon tattoos you find in Asia. Can&#039;t get closer than skin, right? But having them display on the lining of her coat, even if it&#039;s an accidental display, is huge joss in Asia. I bet Hillary knew that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Ms. Maddow failed to understand, probably through her own ignorance, is that the lining of that coat has dragons on it, and they are a very important symbol to most of the people in Japan, China and the rest of Asia. And in all of Asia, but especially China and Japan, the dragon is a HUGE cultural icon, and a symbol of good luck and prosperity. I would bet money that Hillary knows that, and chose that particular coat for that very reason. Either way, it&#8217;s a big plus in her karma column in the cultures she is currently visiting. And the fact that the dragons are so close to her person, inside the coat, is also a good thing. The closer they are, the better. Hence the large number of dragon tattoos you find in Asia. Can&#8217;t get closer than skin, right? But having them display on the lining of her coat, even if it&#8217;s an accidental display, is huge joss in Asia. I bet Hillary knew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tango</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144339</link>
		<dc:creator>tango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144339</guid>
		<description>&quot;Preen&quot; is the right word to describe Maddow. In a business full of egos, Maddow still manages to be their equivalent of a peacock spreading her wings, admiring herself and preening with an attitude that says &quot;look at me, aren&#039;t I cute and oh so smart with my snarky flippant personality and sing song voice&quot;. Ewww. By choosing to comment on Hillarys coat as the opening remark, Maddow managed to minimize the SOS and her trip because anything after that obviously had to be trivial since she choose to open talking about Mrs. Clintons wardrobe.  You think anyone channel switching would stop to listen when a newscaster is snarking about a coat? 

I did watch her last night to see the supposed big story about the former soldier and the true story behind the guards at Gitmo. What a let down. I was expecting some serious scandal by the lead up (Former guard tells us what REALLY happened at Gitmo!!!!) but that wasn&#039;t the case. There was some inappropriate behavior and unless he chose not to tell the more horrifying stories on TV which wouldn&#039;t make sense if he&#039;s trying to garner sympathy from an audience who already feels Gitmo terrorists are abused, I thought what he did say wasn&#039;t terribly horrible. But good old Rachel managed to put out enought sincerity and seriousness like she was breaking Watergate! But that ended thank goodness and it was back to her snarky smarminess for the next bit of her show. 
Her self-depreciating act grows old really quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Preen&#8221; is the right word to describe Maddow. In a business full of egos, Maddow still manages to be their equivalent of a peacock spreading her wings, admiring herself and preening with an attitude that says &#8220;look at me, aren&#8217;t I cute and oh so smart with my snarky flippant personality and sing song voice&#8221;. Ewww. By choosing to comment on Hillarys coat as the opening remark, Maddow managed to minimize the SOS and her trip because anything after that obviously had to be trivial since she choose to open talking about Mrs. Clintons wardrobe.  You think anyone channel switching would stop to listen when a newscaster is snarking about a coat? </p>
<p>I did watch her last night to see the supposed big story about the former soldier and the true story behind the guards at Gitmo. What a let down. I was expecting some serious scandal by the lead up (Former guard tells us what REALLY happened at Gitmo!!!!) but that wasn&#8217;t the case. There was some inappropriate behavior and unless he chose not to tell the more horrifying stories on TV which wouldn&#8217;t make sense if he&#8217;s trying to garner sympathy from an audience who already feels Gitmo terrorists are abused, I thought what he did say wasn&#8217;t terribly horrible. But good old Rachel managed to put out enought sincerity and seriousness like she was breaking Watergate! But that ended thank goodness and it was back to her snarky smarminess for the next bit of her show.<br />
Her self-depreciating act grows old really quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarainitaly</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144310</link>
		<dc:creator>sarainitaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144310</guid>
		<description>and what the heck is your problem with me? i don&#039;t see your rude comments directed at anyone else on here.... perhaps YOU need to get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what the heck is your problem with me? i don&#8217;t see your rude comments directed at anyone else on here&#8230;. perhaps YOU need to get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarainitaly</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144307</link>
		<dc:creator>sarainitaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144307</guid>
		<description>oh please colleen - why don&#039;t you read it again, adn why don&#039;t you lighten up! My comments above were light.

yes she said something nice about hillary, but i said it was killing her to have to do so. 

i think maddow did a pretty good job of solidifying her feelings for hillary during the primary. now that Hillary is SOS, Maddow is trying her best to be nice to hillary. so she compliments her wardrobe...? please. would it kill her to compliment hillary on her accomplishments? my opinion, yes, it would.

support maddow? hardly! it was torture to just watch that clip. maddow didn&#039;t just say nice things about obama, she kissed his ass, threw her career out the window, and ripped apart Hillary.

Maddow accused Hillary of using race to divide, and drive a wedge in races, she caled hillary a liar about her vote on Iraq resolution, she piled on her about the Bobby Kennedy comment, she pushed for Hillary to drop out of the race, she mocked Lady Lynn Rothchild, she brushed off claims that Hillary received sexist treatment, and on and on. 

Maddow also said that Sarah Palin was flat out lying about the trooper story, which she wasn&#039;t, and repeatedly attacked and mocked her. 

Maddow gets no love or respect from me.  Please don&#039;t tell me to get over anything. 

Maddow is an intelligent woman, it is most unfortunate that she lowers herself to KO standards, attacks succesfsul women, and has become a ridiculous snarky biased commentator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh please colleen &#8211; why don&#8217;t you read it again, adn why don&#8217;t you lighten up! My comments above were light.</p>
<p>yes she said something nice about hillary, but i said it was killing her to have to do so. </p>
<p>i think maddow did a pretty good job of solidifying her feelings for hillary during the primary. now that Hillary is SOS, Maddow is trying her best to be nice to hillary. so she compliments her wardrobe&#8230;? please. would it kill her to compliment hillary on her accomplishments? my opinion, yes, it would.</p>
<p>support maddow? hardly! it was torture to just watch that clip. maddow didn&#8217;t just say nice things about obama, she kissed his ass, threw her career out the window, and ripped apart Hillary.</p>
<p>Maddow accused Hillary of using race to divide, and drive a wedge in races, she caled hillary a liar about her vote on Iraq resolution, she piled on her about the Bobby Kennedy comment, she pushed for Hillary to drop out of the race, she mocked Lady Lynn Rothchild, she brushed off claims that Hillary received sexist treatment, and on and on. </p>
<p>Maddow also said that Sarah Palin was flat out lying about the trooper story, which she wasn&#8217;t, and repeatedly attacked and mocked her. </p>
<p>Maddow gets no love or respect from me.  Please don&#8217;t tell me to get over anything. </p>
<p>Maddow is an intelligent woman, it is most unfortunate that she lowers herself to KO standards, attacks succesfsul women, and has become a ridiculous snarky biased commentator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve1</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144290</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144290</guid>
		<description>What can you expect from a charlatan????? MSNBC Madcow!  The blind, non journalist and a fool who has sold her soul for her BF, Kieth Olbermann-the crazies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can you expect from a charlatan????? MSNBC Madcow!  The blind, non journalist and a fool who has sold her soul for her BF, Kieth Olbermann-the crazies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy L. NC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144263</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy L. NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144263</guid>
		<description>Mel, LOL!  You&#039;ve boldly gone where no man has gone before!   

Rachel just lost any authority on womens&#039; issues she may have had.  Get her a bowl of milk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel, LOL!  You&#8217;ve boldly gone where no man has gone before!   </p>
<p>Rachel just lost any authority on womens&#8217; issues she may have had.  Get her a bowl of milk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collen</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144244</link>
		<dc:creator>Collen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144244</guid>
		<description>Oh please....she was not knocking Hillary at all - she said the coat was badass and she would have commented had Powell or another SOS wore such a great garment.
Get over it Sara - Hillary is happy as SOS.  Instead of your continual knocks on Obama or anyone who ever said anything positive about him (which of course means those same people must hate Hillary, right?) why don&#039;t you just support her?  
lighten up-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please&#8230;.she was not knocking Hillary at all &#8211; she said the coat was badass and she would have commented had Powell or another SOS wore such a great garment.<br />
Get over it Sara &#8211; Hillary is happy as SOS.  Instead of your continual knocks on Obama or anyone who ever said anything positive about him (which of course means those same people must hate Hillary, right?) why don&#8217;t you just support her?<br />
lighten up-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noproblama</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144232</link>
		<dc:creator>noproblama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144232</guid>
		<description>Maddow can&#039;t criticize Hillary now because she&#039;s prezbo&#039;s sos, so she has to settle for heaping (rather uncomfortably) faint praise on Hillary&#039;s attire.

She&#039;s also conforming to the hack journalism style of Obamamann and tweetie that went over so well with Obama supporters - probably with the hope that some of them are still watching.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And now, CLASS: Please compare, and contrast, these two examples of television journalism:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I saw only one example of journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maddow can&#8217;t criticize Hillary now because she&#8217;s prezbo&#8217;s sos, so she has to settle for heaping (rather uncomfortably) faint praise on Hillary&#8217;s attire.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s also conforming to the hack journalism style of Obamamann and tweetie that went over so well with Obama supporters &#8211; probably with the hope that some of them are still watching.</p>
<blockquote><p>And now, CLASS: Please compare, and contrast, these two examples of television journalism:</p></blockquote>
<p>I saw only one example of journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144229</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144229</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take Sheila Smith and real news over Madcow and corporate propaganda media (CPM) trash any day of the week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take Sheila Smith and real news over Madcow and corporate propaganda media (CPM) trash any day of the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulieDarlingNotJulieOBOT</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144223</link>
		<dc:creator>JulieDarlingNotJulieOBOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144223</guid>
		<description>What would Rachel Madcow know about women&#039;s fashions?!

What a freak show MSNBC has going on.  

They should stick to something they have a chance of mastering like guessing weight or funnel cakes.

PS:  Thanks for filtering the news, so I don&#039;t have to Susan!  I&#039;m way busy studying up on the Tilt-A-Whirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would Rachel Madcow know about women&#8217;s fashions?!</p>
<p>What a freak show MSNBC has going on.  </p>
<p>They should stick to something they have a chance of mastering like guessing weight or funnel cakes.</p>
<p>PS:  Thanks for filtering the news, so I don&#8217;t have to Susan!  I&#8217;m way busy studying up on the Tilt-A-Whirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144222</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144222</guid>
		<description>I used to listen to Dr. Rachel Maddow on the radio before she became an Obamamaniac. 

It was good to see how many people here had comments I agree with with respect to Rachel&#039;s piece.  As I watched the first minute, I thought: This is demeaning and sexist towards Clinton, Maddow is boring, and she is trying to hard to be like Olbermann. Sensationalism for the masses.  It&#039;s acceptable to like Clinton for her clothes, cause then, you know, she is &quot;like..cool...&quot; Not as cool as Obama of course, or as smart as Obama.  That is why she is wearing the coat with the magic lining. To deflect attention away from the fact that she doesn&#039;t have a brain. Fortunately, for true Hillary supporters, we see what is underneath the coat, not just the lining.

I really hope Hillary runs in 2016.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to listen to Dr. Rachel Maddow on the radio before she became an Obamamaniac. </p>
<p>It was good to see how many people here had comments I agree with with respect to Rachel&#8217;s piece.  As I watched the first minute, I thought: This is demeaning and sexist towards Clinton, Maddow is boring, and she is trying to hard to be like Olbermann. Sensationalism for the masses.  It&#8217;s acceptable to like Clinton for her clothes, cause then, you know, she is &#8220;like..cool&#8230;&#8221; Not as cool as Obama of course, or as smart as Obama.  That is why she is wearing the coat with the magic lining. To deflect attention away from the fact that she doesn&#8217;t have a brain. Fortunately, for true Hillary supporters, we see what is underneath the coat, not just the lining.</p>
<p>I really hope Hillary runs in 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakwoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144218</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakwoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144218</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__vrWsx8Gao&amp;feature=related&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; The Horns of the Berlin &amp; Vienna Philharmonics &lt;/a&gt;


Horn Players Unite! 

In spirt of Grumpy Old Guy, what was your favorite work?

Thanks posting the Martin Savage piece. He is consistantly a even handed insightful human being. I did not know Maddow was a Rhodes Scholar and obtained a PHd. Who&#039;da Thunk? (thanks candymarl) 

When you dismiss the class will Maddow stay beind and do penance?

 I can see you having her write on the blackboard,like Bart Simpson, 500 times &quot;I will stop drinking BO Kool-aid.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__vrWsx8Gao&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow"> The Horns of the Berlin &amp; Vienna Philharmonics </a></p>
<p>Horn Players Unite! </p>
<p>In spirt of Grumpy Old Guy, what was your favorite work?</p>
<p>Thanks posting the Martin Savage piece. He is consistantly a even handed insightful human being. I did not know Maddow was a Rhodes Scholar and obtained a PHd. Who&#8217;da Thunk? (thanks candymarl) </p>
<p>When you dismiss the class will Maddow stay beind and do penance?</p>
<p> I can see you having her write on the blackboard,like Bart Simpson, 500 times &#8220;I will stop drinking BO Kool-aid.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oisafraud</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144193</link>
		<dc:creator>Oisafraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144193</guid>
		<description>What are they paying Rachel Maddow for???? Seriously???????????????&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are they paying Rachel Maddow for???? Seriously???????????????<strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socalannie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/14680/i-post-you-uh/#comment-1144161</link>
		<dc:creator>socalannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=14680#comment-1144161</guid>
		<description>LMAO!  You nailed it Sara!  Especially loved the oberfuerhrer comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO!  You nailed it Sara!  Especially loved the oberfuerhrer comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

