RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

How to Buy a Mansion You Can’t Afford

The Obamas’ new home has received a lot of attention in the corporate media and on the blogs. This post will discuss other perspectives.

Hyde Park, where the Obamas have lived since 1994, is home to the University of Chicago (UC) Law School and at least one of UC’s hospitals. Leo Struass taught in the university’s Committee on Social Thought. The Federalist Society was born at UC, and it is the alma mater of many Neo Cons, including Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

Kenwood, where the Obamas’ new home sits, is a small neighborhood, only 1.09 miles in area. It is bound on the south by Hyde Park, on the north by North Kenwood, and on the west by the neighborhood of Highland. Kenwood was once one of the most elite neighborhoods in all of Chicago.

This map shows the juxtaposition of the Hyde Park and Kenwood neighborhoods:

kenwood.jpg

According to 2000 census figures, both neighborhoods boast racial diversity.

Group Identification Hyde Park Kenwood
White 15.9% 43.5%
Black 75.7% 37.7%
Hispanic 1.64% 4.11%
Asian 4.27% 11.3
Other 2.52% 3.39%

A census commissioned by Century 21 Real Estate in 2005 reveals how Hyde Park and Kenwood are comparable in almost every category, with Kenwood having the smaller population.

Neighborhoods Hyde Park Kenwood
Population Estimate 22,600 9,514
Avg. Family Income 81,800 88,839
Median Age 39 45
% of Population with Bachelors Degrees 21.03% 21.75%
% of Population with Postgraduate Degrees 42.49% 32.14%

The Obamas had decided that politics was Barack’s ultimate future while still dating. In 1991, then Michelle Robinson, who was then Obama’s fiancée, left her job at the law firm of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood. She went to work for the city of Chicago, first as an assistant to Mayor Daley, then as the Executive Director of Public Allies Chicago, a nonprofit that provides leadership training to young adults interested in public service careers.

In 1996, she left the Public Allies to help create a student volunteer program at The University of Chicago. By the time of this interview, she was the Executive Director of Community Affairs for The University of Chicago Hospitals. This is how Michelle portrays her change of career:

She was devastated when her father died from MS complications. “That’s when I started analyzing my life, sitting in a firm,” she recalls, adding that in that same year she also lost one of her best friends from college to cancer. She soon left the firm to pursue a much lower-paying path in the public sector.

The fact is Michelle was actively recruited for City Hall by a close friend, Valerie Jarrett, who was Mayor Daley’s Deputy Chief of Staff at that time. Valerie later became the Finance Chair of Obama’s 2004 US Senate campaign and then First Treasurer of Barack’s political action committee, Hopefund.

It helps to have friends at City Hall. Among other positions, Michelle was appointed twice to sit on the board of the Commission of Chicago Landmarks for two consecutive terms. Michelle maintained this board seat from 1998 to March 2005, although normally a member only serves one 4 year term.

Flush from the success of Barack’s speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, the Obamas decided it was time to find a residence more fitting for their anticipated new status. Barack’s 1995 autobiography Dreams of My Father soared, and they knew Alan Keyes was no threat to their future success in the US Senate elections.

Sitting on the Commission of Chicago Landmarks board, Michelle knew of a permit, waiting for review and approval to sell, for a designated Historical Georgian revival home built in 1910 with four fireplaces, glass-door bookcases fashioned from Honduran mahogany, and a 1,000-bottle wine cellar owned by a doctor in Kenwood. The Commission is supported not only by donations and taxes but also by charges for permits. It’s a pretty extensive process, and they want a complete history of the house and property when a permit is requested. Once the Board approves a permit, the application goes to the city planning or zoning commission if more than a simple sale is involved.

The doctor who owned the Kenwood home wanted more than the Obamas could afford. As Barack has stated in numerous press interviews, buying the home would be a stretch. Barack contacted his patron Tony Rezko, despite knowing he was under investigation at the time, in order to see what could be done so the Obamas could afford their dream house. Sub-division was likely the agreed-on solution. In order to divide the lot, which the doctor purchased as one entity, he would have to:

– Hire an approved architect and general contractor, who had been involved in renovations and sub-divisions in Kenwood previously

– Have the lots surveyed and new plot plans drawn

– Re-start the Landmark Commission permit approval process

– Hold a public hearing (required).

On page 51 of the Commission on Landmarks Ordinances, one finds a justification for the doctor agreeing to subdividing the land.

The applicant bears the burden of proof that the existing use of the property is economically infeasible and that the sale, rental or rehabilitation of the property is not possible, resulting the property not being capable of earning any reasonable economic return.

Pages 51 and 52 of the Landmark ordinances show how many proofs and other forms of extensive documentation are required in order to subdivide the land. Can any rational person believe the doctor would have been willing to go along with having his property sub-divided, and all the work and time involved, without compensation and assistance? Who paid for this?

With Michelle sitting on the Landmarks board, Commission approval wasn’t expected to be an issue, even though I have not located notice of the Public Hearing from any of the involved boards. From there it would go to the City Planning Board and the Zoning Boards, which also require public hearings. Each of these steps average between 6 weeks and 3 months to complete.

The doctor’s property was located in what Chicago Zoning Terms refer to as Residential Single zone 1, or RS1. This means the house the Obamas bought required 6,250 sq. ft of area. Even if it had the designation lowered to RS2, it still would have required 5,000 square feet, as seen on page 5 of Chicago’s zoning ordinances. Starting on page 8, the ordinances specify setbacks and how much space must be available on each side of a building. The open space on the building’s sides normally conform to Fire Regulations, so that equipment can access all portions of a building during crises.

Public Records at the Chicago Commission on Landmarks, the Chicago Planning Department and Chicago Zoning Boards would show the exact dates of permits, hearings and approvals. Michelle was so confident she listed the Obamas’ condo, which was located on the first floor of a Hyde Park Brownstone. In October 2004, Michelle expressed surprise to a Chicago interviewer that the Condo had sold so quickly, which meant they either had to put off a closing date or write in a lease agreement for a specified amount of time in their Condo purchase contract.

2004 was a year flush with success for the Obamas: the autobiographical book sales increased; the DNC speech had been well received; Obama won his US Senate seat; and Michelle received a recent promotion to a $316,962-a-year position as Vice President at The University of Chicago Hospitals. Their income was over 1.67 million dollars, with anticipation of even greater gains ahead.

All that needed to be done, in the name of the doctor, on the Kenwood property was completed by March 2005, and the house was finally listed. Michelle Obama resigned her seat on the Chicago Commission on Landmarks at the same time. Barack and Michelle closed on their new home in June of 2005, for $1.65 million dollars, $300,000 less than the asking price, and most likely using the proceeds of their Condo for a down payment, while taking out a mortgage for $1.32 million from Northern Trust. Tony Rezko’s wife purchased the newly divided sub-plot for the full price of $625,000 and closed on the same day.

The City of Chicago requires parking permits, or people must rent space at parking garages for around $30 per diem. There is no overnight on-street parking. The Obamas had no yard to park on, and most likely parked on Rezko’s property.

Within in a month of purchasing their new home, the Obamas began the same process the doctor previously went through. Because Tony Rezko was being indicted, they needed to be distanced from him. So the Obamas hired a lawyer and an architect. Additionally, the Obama’s wanted to put up a fence separating the two properties. On page 21 of the Landmark Ordinances above, it states fences for Historic homes can be no more than 5’ high and must not be visible from the street. If the Obamas had purchased a prefab chain, picket or wooden fence, they would have lost the Historic designation and also the eight-year property tax freeze benefit accrued by agreeing to keep the house in conformance with Landmark regulations.

A picture of the front view of Obamas’ house reveals landmark and zoning requirements.

obamashome.jpg

The concrete wall and evergreens were most likely done after the city appropriated land for sidewalks, and the paving of what has been noted as a wide and busy thoroughfare. If you notice, the trees were planted one to two feet behind the concrete wall, most probably a result of zoning constraints.

The new fence was specially fabricated to conform to historic standards, and the $14,000 cost was billed to Rezko per agreement by Obama and Rezko. Obama states he paid for the architect and Lawyer. Strangely enough the fence actually sits ON the property line between the two lots. Obama agreed to yard maintenance for both properties. And given Obama’s history with the Harvard Law Review and his limited known court experience from public records, Obama most likely either edited or personally wrote the legal documents for his sub-division and the fence. On January 12, 2006, the Obamas closed on the 1/6th of Rita Rezko’s property they purchased for $104,500.

Facts not specifically cited above, and much more, can be found in this Chicago Tribune article.

This MyDD diary features a special video from NBC news that provides broader views of Obama’s property. The diarist makes note of an SUV sitting on the 1/6 new parcel of Obama’s land.

In all likelihood the driveway was previously on Rezko land. Behind the house is most likely an old carriage house converted into a garage. Parking on the street in that type of neighborhood is prohibited by zoning and fire safety laws, unless someone in authority had been previously notified of a large gathering.

One other event of note occurred in 2005. Daniel Mahru, Rezko’s partner in Rezmar for 16 years until the two men had, according to Mahru, “a difference of opinion,” resigned from Rezmar, Rezko’s slum landlord operation. Did Mahru leave because he knew any shady deals while Rezko was being investigated would lead to disaster?

There were lots of people involved in the purchase of the Obamas’ house, and they would all be owed some kind of consideration for their help and support. Obama’s favors from Rezko amount to $925,000, plus an additional $14,000 for the fence, bringing the total cash value to just one person to $939,000.

Will Rezko sit quietly in jail or will he bring Mayor Daley, Governor Blagojevich and Senator Obama down with him?

How will Obama repay the “favors” he owes all these people?

I am sure Patrick Fitzgerald will reveal all these connections and much more in Rezko’s upcoming trial at the end of this month.

  • Em

    TM says to send some love.

  • Em

    Aren’t three of Obama’s economic advisors from U of Chicago? Possibly Friedmanite school? It brings to mind Naomi Klein’s shock doctrine.

    • http://OUTRAGEDBUTNOTSURPRISED bama_barrron

      interesting point Em … oborgs will tell you that barack was influenced by another chicago professor … saul alinsky. yet, his advisors are neoconic friedmanites.
      ms. klein got it spot on in her book … no doubt!

  • MarkL

    Thanks for the diary.. that’s impressive detail!
    My question is about measuring the size of Rezko’s “favor”.
    Is Rezko’s lot buildable? If it can be built upon, then sold, then you can’t consider the full $625,000 to be a gift, can you? Are you saying it’s not buildable?

    • norrismorris

      It’s called a kickback given by a crook under investigation for fraud,blackmail,money laundering and kickbacks. Rezko to Obama.

      Rezko was clearly under federal investigation and as Obama’s main patron and donor Obama felt no constraint about concluding this stinky land deal.

      Judgement? Is this a judgement a future President should make?

      Rezko, now indicted, and in jail for lying to the court about his finances and money laundering [covered by Larry last week], is in jail. His trial is February 25th. I wonder if this comes up at trial. Meanwhile, Mr. Pure and Inspirational
      may be mentioned should this land deal arise.

      So far the hysteria of adoration is so intense from Obamaites, even murder would elude consideration.

      Blind faith has made him The Messiah. Maybe the trial will change perceptions.

      • John

        Check out the posts on HuffPo. One of them says that Hillary supporters are “trying to shout down the rising Sun.”

        That’s right. Obama is the sun to these guys.

        Another poster replies to an Obama critic with “I think you’re late for your KKK meeting.”

        Also- I’ve lost count of how many callers to Air America and Washington Journal who’ve said that they are for Obama, and if Hillary wins the nomination, they won’t vote for her. I have YET to hear a SINGLE Hillary Clinton supporter say that they won’t vote for Obama if he’s the nominee. Obama’s supporters are not Progressives. They are petulant, starry-eyed children living in a dream world of their own making, who are perfectly willing to take their ball and go home if they can’t lead the team.

        Get ready for President McCain. My only question is, how does Obama’s defeat this fall get blamed on Hillary?

        • simon

          I won’t vote for him, I cannot in good conscience vote for a man I feel is as unqualified, and as corrupt, as Bush.

          I will write in Edwards.

        • shirin

          I won’t vote for him. Of course, I also won’t vote for Hillary.

      • asdf

        who cares about the political news irs gay and boring

      • asdf

        who cares about the political news its gay and boring

    • TeakwoodKite

      I think very unlikely that anything will get built on that lot and the plan was for enough time to pass and Barak Obama would ‘buy’ back the lot. After all if Obama doesn’t purchase it, the property has a good chance of a lean being placed on it by the Govt’ if Resko is convicted after a fair trial. It was in Rezko’s wife’s name and that says enough right there.

    • BernieO

      What I would like to know is whether getting the house for $300,000 under the asking price was consistent with what the market was doing at that time. It is odd that the lot went for full price but the house was not. Why would that be?

      • TeakWoodKite

        I think you would have to find the 300,000k some where else on (or off)the balance sheet. The person selling the property for an unrelated compensation or Rezko would have to absorb the difference. Mob financing.

        Obamas closed on the 1/6th of Rita Rezko’s property they purchased for $104,500.

        Doing this would lock the out any chances of the lot being developed, especially if the lot was the minimum size allowed under the zoning laws.

        What a sweet deal to get inside info on a property that has an 8 year property tax freeze on it. What are the property taxes like in that part of Chicago? Hell of a savings I’d think. Did the seller take a note?

  • Mr.Murder

    Please, that fourteen thousand for a fence is such an inconsequential amount of money…
    the average family of two college professors getting 200g a year, in danger of having the Bush tax cuts repealed, could easily cover that much cash.

    Then again, two instructors don’t make 200k combined, the tax cut doesn’t help middle of the road Americans, and fourteen thousand is a lot to sneeze at for the average American.

    Barack made fence construction a priority on the border…

    …of his mansion.

    Maybe he’s going after the Paul votes?

    • norrismorris

      Obama is dishonest. Plain and simple. But there is no traction yet as the outrageous lack of ethics and bullshit around Obama is under the radar.

      He can get the nomination and GOP takes this plus other stuff and another failed Democratic election.

      • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

        My aunt, a devout Republican but a dear person nonetheless :) , told me today that she thinks the Republicans will find it difficult to attack Obama during the general election simply because of his race — they’ll be afraid to attack him and get accused of racism. Just a thought from a smart lady.

        • simon

          They wont be speaking to your aunt, they’ll be speaking to Rush’s listeners.

          And they will be subliminal, not overt, attacks.

          All of this supposing Hillary loses, of course.

          A big if.

        • BernieO

          Rush has already sung “Barack the Magic Negro” on his show, so I doubt that if he is already willing to be this disgusting he will be afraid to attack Obama. Heck Republicans thought nothing of attacking a genuine war hero, John Kerry, accusing him of lying about his record. These guys have no shame and will be perfectly willing to do the dirty work for the party.

          • simon

            So Rush uses Obama’s technique against Obama –divide and conquer.

            I’ll have to give it to Rush.

        • Antigone

          When Republicans turn away from using race to win elections hell will have truly frozen.

  • cbear

    Am I the only one here that finds it inappropriate, and possibly dangerous, for you to publish a picture of the Obama’s home???

    And no, I am not an Obama supporter.

    Use your head(s) please.

    • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

      Oh dear. That picture has been in hundreds of publications purchased by millions of people, and shown on every television network!

      • TeakwoodKite

        Obama has security second to Cheney. Come to think of it, does an Illinois state senator have to live in the district they represent?

    • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

      To add to my comment just above: ABC alone has shown that picture dozens of times. Every Chicago TV station has shown it innumerable times. So has CNN, MSNBC (see the video above), and on and on. Every Chicago newspaper and numerous newspapers around the nation, as well as around the world, have also shown the picture.

      Besides, your tax dollars are hard at work protecting the home. With full Secret Service protection. Yes, just for the home. Not just for the Obama family. Probably costing millions.

      • TeakwoodKite

        It is a historical building as well. Michelle Obama using inside info, which jives with the statement about Obama saying he approached Resko about it.
        They don’t build them like that anymore.

        • simon

          Using inside info?

          How so?

          • TeakWoodKite

            In the artical above it says:
            (sorry for the length of the post.)

            Among other positions, Michelle was appointed twice to sit on the board of the Commission of Chicago Landmarks for two consecutive terms. Michelle maintained this board seat from 1998 to March 2005, although normally a member only serves one 4 year term.

            Ok I think if you “plugged in” and this happens:

            Sitting on the Commission of Chicago Landmarks board, Michelle knew of a permit, waiting for review and approval to sell, for a designated Historical Georgian revival home built in 1910 with four fireplaces, glass-door bookcases fashioned from Honduran mahogany, and a 1,000-bottle wine cellar owned by a doctor in Kenwood.

            she was the Executive Director of Community Affairs for The University of Chicago Hospitals. and had known the doctor but only found out about through the permit phase.

            Michelle Obama picks up the phone and says:
            “Hey Barak guess what I saw today?”
            Barak: Really! Where? How much??? I don’t think we can swing that much, let me make a call or two.
            Michelle: Later
            Obama: Hey Tony…
            Rezko: Hey whats up?
            Obama: I got this sweet deal but I have to act fast and I need some money to close the deal ASAP.
            Rezko: What’s in it for me? You know I got the Feds lookin at me, don’t you? I heard it from ____(fill in VIP)…
            Obama: Yea I heard that, but I will be in the dog house forever man, if I don’t get this done. Maybe we could subdivide the lot…(crunching the deal and the appearances)
            Rezko: well if you want to do the heavy lifting I’ll split it with you.
            Obama: I’ll get the ball rolling…
            During the next week:
            Obama: Hey Tony, Michelle got the property locked down and and if we subdivide the lot, Michelle doesn’t want to have anyone building on your lot.
            Rezko: How the hell do you suppose that makes it right with me? I can’t sell the lot.
            Obama…well Michelle says if we by back 1/6 of your lot it can’t be built on. We can get you your 20% down back out and I will ______(name your quid pro quo)owe you one bigtime.
            Rezko: I would have to put it in my wifes name so the feds can’t peg me.
            The rest is public record (or lack of) if you can find it.

            This whole chain of events was put in motion by Michelle Obama knowing in the permit process, a house was coming on the market. A house can’t be approved for sale unless it has gone thru the legal hurdles required. If one has foreknowledge of this and seeks to profit from the information that is subject to legal scrutiney.
            That’s is why Obama says it was a “boneheaded move”, because he did something that his wife wanted and would run counter to common sense. He knew Rezko was under investigation and it did not matter because as any leashed husband can tell you, “If I make the wife happy I can play with my friends.”

            • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

              You are SO good! I hope the author sees this. It’d be great to add or use in another article.

              • TeakWoodKite

                If I could only type…Thanks, but I am riding on the shoulders of many fine people at NQ. I clicked add and saw the Comment by Steve Judd who put the icing on the lemon cake. Thanks Steve Judd.
                If Rita sold it to a former lawyer of Rezko’s, is there attorney client privilege that would “insulate” Tony in this deal from the Feds?
                And the sweetest part is that the property taxes are ZIP nada for 8 years. The last time I heard of deal like that a relative and his wife had a “grandfathered” rent control apt in Sunnyside Queens 2 bd for only 120 dollars @ month when rents for the same were 1800.00.

                HEY TONY

            • Nellie

              Tea,

              I laughed so hard – These would have been my exact words – but like Halloween you have to be careful of the wierdness, the form the cultists take on Super Tuesday is unknown in my lifetime.

              Thanks for your directness and the great laugh!

              • TeakwoodKite

                be careful of the wierdness.
                Welcome to the “Magic Theater”.

                :)

    • TeakwoodKite

      Not these days. Have you used google earth? I can see the doughboy pool in my backyard from space.

    • BernieO

      The video was on MSNBC. I doubt that this website will pose a greater threat.

  • simon

    I grew up in Chicago.

    It makes me so sad to think those idiots originated at UC, in my hometown.

    When I was a kid, some earnest young man tried to recruit me to the Communist party of all things, when I was hanging, with a friend, near the UC. Sure not the Scalia crowd.

    I was a Democrat, though, even at that age, I said no thanks, I thought he was unrealistic, off his gourd, really. The things he spoke of didn’t jive with the reality I saw, the people I knew, but, you listen, you learn. I told my parents, learned communism was worse than being a moonie, but he was just this little thing, with glasses, thereby referred to as “the communist,” in my family, as in “I don’t want you hanging ’round with that communist anymore.”

    Ok, Dad.

    I thought it was funny. He was puny, tiny as could be…

  • MarkL

    Was the Rezko lot listed as undeveloped in the first sale? Wouldn’t the driveway contradict that designation?

    • Nellie

      According to records – the entire property was one plot – the sub division came when the Doctor who owned the property tried to sell. The Rezko’s lot after all the hearings was refrred to as the “Garden Plot” by Obama in the Tribune article. That is probably the most apt description of the piece Rezko has.

  • Nellie

    Well Done City! I am truly impressed.

  • Alibe

    Did you know that Obama’s community organizing job in Chicago was a “faith-based” community orginizing effort. I did not know this. Obama never mentions this. It is always making us believe he worked as an organizer. Almost as if he were a labor organizer. Or a non governmental worker. I never once heard he worked for a church affiliated “faith based” group for three years. Is obfuscation considered a non-truth.

    • Cee

      I never once heard he worked for a church affiliated “faith based” group for three years.

      LOL!

    • Mr.Murder

      Previously I said we should skeptical of the amount he coordinated campaigns with faith based initiatives.

      South Carolina was my example.

      It’s more broad than that, a pattern indicator.

    • Nellie

      Alibe,

      The rubic ‘community organizing’ contains ‘faith based’ stuff in Hyde Park and Kenwood. Here are 2 links to newsletters from the Hyde Park-Kenwood Community Conference (HPKCC). THE main area organization that /] controls Development, Preservation, Zoning, Community Meetings, Cultural Calendar, Community Events, Civic/Social/Personal Development, Spiritual Affairs, Events, and More:

      http://www.hydepark.org/

      http://www.hydepark.org/historicpres/urearlyhpkcc.htm

  • Pete

    This is a very important post. Are you applying for a job in the future Hillary administration?

  • Mr.Murder

    Mr. Gruber finds that a plan without mandates, broadly resembling the Obama plan, would cover 23 million of those currently uninsured, at a taxpayer cost of $102 billion per year. An otherwise identical plan with mandates would cover 45 million of the uninsured — essentially everyone — at a taxpayer cost of $124 billion. Over all, the Obama-type plan would cost $4,400 per newly insured person, the Clinton-type plan only $2,700.

  • Steve Judd

    Great and thorough post about the Obama-Rezko deal and I always wondered how the Obamas learned the property was available.

    A few follow up points, if I may. The property was “sold” by Rita to Rezko’s former general counsel, a lawyer (and decent sized Obama contributor) named Sreenan who now has the property on the market for 1.4 mil, probably due to all the publicity. There are no concerns about security, then, as you can call the broker and go see it if you like.

    Saul Alinsky never taught at Chicago, lord knows, nor is it likely Obama ever met him as he died in 1972. He was a legendary, tough, no holds barred community orgaanizer who likely would have laughed at a guy like Barack who spent a couple of years with The People to launch his political career. Alinsky despised politicians in general and liberals in particular. Read his Rules For Radicals for a bracing call to action at the grassroots and only through the grassroots.

    Obama’s main economic people are the U of C’s Austan Goolsbee and from the law school Cass Sunstein. Their guiding doctrine is called “Libertarian Paternalism” and no, I’m not making that up. Its foundations are described in Volume 70 of The University of Chicago Law Review. Not being an economist, I can’t explain it well, but it’s part of the very au courant theory of “behavioral economics” which deviates somewhat from pure free market theory (Milton Friedman). Barack’s health care plan is lousy with the theory and I think it’s fair to say Krugman and other true liberals think it’s largely hooey.

    • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

      Great comment, Steve. Search our site for the name Goolsbee, and you’ll find an article about his economic advisers.

      Stephen Schlesinger began revealing who they really are.

      But, wow — “Libertarian Paternalism” takes the cake. I wish I knew more about economics so I could dig into that more.

      And if you search for Paul Krugman, you’ll find cites from both his columns and his blog on Obama’s terrible health plan as well as his “disreputable” economic stimulus plan (at least the first one) and that his second plan is far less helpful than either Edwards’ or Clinton’s.

    • prostrateragon

      Saul Alinsky was a UC alumnus, as were/are Paul Samuelson, Richard Sennett, Katharine Dunham, Susan Sontag, Andrew Greeley, John Paul Stevenson, Greg Palast, and Seymour Hersh.

      It’s a travesty that an institution of as much depth and breadth as UC has become so identified with a coven of fools.

      That is all.
      –Relative of a Divinity School alumnus.

    • Nellie

      Steve,

      A few comments about your follow-up points on Obama’s property – this

      A few follow up points, if I may. The property was “sold” by Rita to Rezko’s former general counsel, a lawyer (and decent sized Obama contributor) named Sreenan who now has the property on the market for 1.4 mil, probably due to all the publicity. There are no concerns about security, then, as you can call the broker and go see it if you like

      I taught Mid Easterners for 18 years at the college level. No it wasn’t one of the top 75 colleges. Bush Sr. in the early 80′ hired recruiters for the Mid East, Korea, China, Taiwan, South East Asia and the Pacific Rim for lesser known colleges, and forced us to accept these people. Our population ended up being 39%, mostly from Arabic speaking nations and Iran.

      Long story short – it was very helpful in teaching us Americans about different cultures – and we got to know them in depth because the state I’m in has very strongly enforced in Locus Parentis laws.

      There is much more to this laywer of Rezko’s than you can imagine. However, I do not have the street creds of Larry, Mr. Murder, Pat Lang etc.

      The summary of it is that Mid Easterners, because of the crappy governments they have always had, enjoy savoring what they call justice and Americans call revenge.

      I will send Larry the info I have, and perhaps he can get one of his colleagues to verify and post about what I believe I know.

  • justsomeone

    Mr M, isn’t it obvious why the Clinton plan costs taxpays less? It’s because she wishes to mandate millions of people purchase their own insurance or pay fines or face garnishment? Maybe the fines she’ll extract from the people who can’t afford a policy are factored into the so called savings. People between the ages of 50 –65 are just about impossible to insure. Forcing them to buy extremely expensive coverage with a 10K deductable, policies that have dozens of disclaimers, is as Obama says, “House insurance not health insurance”. Personally if there are going to be mandates (which I oppose) I’d prefur mandating that everyone have to carry 20K with low deductable & just have the taxpayers indemnify all catastrophic, it’ll get us to a single payer system quicker, which is where I want to be, with the insurance giants out of the picture. A not for profit concept.

    • Nellie

      Not at all. Massachusettes, where my Aunt lives, has a version similar to what Hillary is proposing. The state being a LARGE customer, chose insurance comapnies based on peoples’ need for treatment and medication.

      This allows the state to be the direct client to the Insurance company. Payment of plans is predicated on income. For example, my aunt pays $25.36 monthly directly to the State. The state in turn pays $27.36 monthly to my aunts insurance company.

      This allows my aunt to get meds that cost over $400/month that she needs to stay alive. In turn because it is such a large pool of people, the Insurance Companies (I believe my aunts pharmacist said there are 7 in her area) still make a profit. While the state of Massachusettes actually REDUCED their medicaid costs.

      Not as perfect as pure single payer, but a hell of a lot better than what was before. In the past people were forced to make cruel choices as whether to get meds and eat dog food, or eat better and become ill becuase they couldn’t afford the meds.

      This way the state is covering everyone, and actually saving money.

  • justsomeone

    The idea of share holders in an insurance company profiting by a sick/injured party being denied care is abhorrant to me, as is (what Clinton did during the end of his first term) paying med schools like John Hopkins a subsidy to train less physicans, therefore insurring greedy doctors would continue to to be non-competative & keeping costs high, also in times of need (like now) draining the 2nd & 3rd world countries of their needed doctors. The care we have in this country is, for the most part, assembly line & grossly over priced.

  • justsomeone

    Steve & Susan, libertarian paternalism is more palatable to me than pure paternalism. Google it Susan, it’s not difficult to understand. It beats the hell out of sledge hammer big brother pateralism, where the individual has no choice in deciding their own destiny & becomes chattle of the state for the good of the state.

    • Nellie

      Guess what justsomeone, As long as the BIG moeny guys have purchased in full a potential president that is exactly what you WILL get. In December 2006, Obama made a deal with the BIG money people and is TOTALLY owned by them, Here is your link:

      http://nymag.com/news/politics/30634/

      Whether you call it libertarian paternalism or plain paternalism , the actual dictionary and historical meaning of FACISM applies – and it does not matter how you label or parse it.

      What everyone is upset about is that Obama supporters clearly haven’t done their vetting or homework. Either that or they are behaving as much like ‘BOTS’ as the right wing. Either scenario is horrifying.

  • Jacek

    Oh dear, where do I start on debunking some of the insinuations in this post. I will try my best. First, I am a real estate attorney that used to practice at a real estate boutique in Chicago. After reading this article, I did not find even a whiff of illegality in these transactions, and worse, people seemed to have missed some obvious points.

    First, I am completely befuddled by the ominous description of M. Obama’s role in this. She volunteered for the Landmark Commission. That job is, quite honestly, a pain in the rear. No owner is happy to get the designation, and the poor schleps who volunteer for those boards are often beset by angry landowners. (Why? Just imagine having to wait for over a year to get permission to replace windows. Sound fun?) The fact that M. Obama learned of a mansion through her role on the commission is not even remotely an ethical impropriety. (There is nothing inappropriate about this, unless you are averse to networking for information and contacts. Think about it – you volunteer to serve on boards to make contacts and potential business contacts, as well as knowledge of the business. Learning about a house for sale through one’s work is wrong, umm, how?)

    Next, the Obamas can’t afford the house + the vacant parcel next to it. (Although that seems difficult to believe as they seem pretty flush. Rule of thumb – multiply your salary by 3 and that is the house you can afford.) So, they strike a deal with the owner to sell the house and parcel separately. Again, nothing even remotely inappropriate about this transaction. I have no idea what point the author is driving at about subdivisions. They are completely commonplace in Chicago and in every other city and town of this country.

    Here is the point that everyone, and I mean, EVERYONE is missing. The doctor seems to have earned MORE than his original asking price. The doctor sold the house parcel for $300,000 less than his asking price, but earned over $600,000 for the vacant lot. In other words, the doctor earned an additional $300,000. (That answers the author’s “innocent” query about why the doctor would undergo a subdivision process. He made more money by selling the lots separately!) Why is the house less $300k and the parcel $600K. Aha! See the above discussion concerning the house being landmark. Once a landmark always a landmark. The vacant parcel, on the other ohad, is one of the most valuable parcels in the city.

    As for the insinuation that Obamas purchased the house for $300,000 under market…that is just …plain…wrong. Let me say it slowly…if the seller sells you less land, then you pay the seller less money. Ergo, the Obamas did not pay $300K less than the asking price. In actuality, the seller made MORE than he should have. Use your heads, folks.

    Next, we turn to the vacant lot. Why would the Rezkos buy a vacant lot in one of the hottest, most prestigious neighborhoods in the City of Chicago? Said neighborhood is filled with 100 year mansions and brownstones, and there are very few vacant lots. And, oh yeah, a state and now federal senator lives next door. What kind of idiot wouldn’t see the marketability of that lot? Why would the Rezkos pay for the fence? Umm, I believe one of the above poster say the lot was being marketed for over a million dollars at the moment. Any more questions?

    The only issue that stinks – the Obamas obviously asked the Rezkos to buy the vacant lot. Rezko is a dirtbag. If I recall, Mr. Obama said it was “boneheaded” mistake.

    However, the rest of the insinuations are pretty laughable. Are you people a bunch of noobs when it comes to real estate transactions? If this is the worst thing you can pin on a Chicago politician, then it is obvious that most of you are unfamiliar with that town. Unless something more comes of this, there isn’t much here to fret about.

    • Steve Judd

      Next, we turn to the vacant lot. Why would the Rezkos buy a vacant lot in one of the hottest, most prestigious neighborhoods in the City of Chicago? Said neighborhood is filled with 100 year mansions and brownstones, and there are very few vacant lots

      But wait, wait…this runs contrary to the governing Obama narrative that they got the property below asking (which they concede, never having made your interesting point) because of the down market for housing at the time of the sale in 2005. So if the market is trending down, why pay 625 for a vacant lot where you’ll need a new home to price at, what, 2 mil to make any money on the deal? In Kenwood, hot or not?

      Also, and I don’t know the answer to this, is it just the Obama home that’s landmarked or is it in a landmark district where new construction would be governed by the Landmarks Commission as well? In either case, I read that the buyer from Rezko floated a six townhouse project for the vacant lot and landmark district or not, local preservationists went sufficiently thermonuclear that the property is now back on the market at the inflated 1.4 mil, complete with Secret Service protection.

      But I agree with your main point; there seems to be no illegality here. Nonetheless, and damn, making Tony R your partner when everyone knows he’s not far from that orange jumpsuit? Can we at least agree that the deal is troubling from a judgment standpoint?

    • Madison

      From your description it would appear that the members of the Landmark commission deal directly with the owners of historic properties. In the case of an applicaiton to subdivide would the members of the commission vote on the application, would they have significant influence on the outcome of the application or would this be almost entirely a staff decision?

      I think you have some of the facts wrong in your description of the situation — from what I have read the house and the neigborhing lot were initially part of an application to sell them as a unit and the rules for subdividing stressed economic necessity. I have not seen anything saying that that application was ever completed nor have I seen anything saying that the house and the lot were ever offered as a unit. At the point that the Obamas bought the property, the house was being offered at 1.6 and the Obama’s bid 300,000 less and this was accepted. Separately the other lot was offered for 635,000 and Rita Rezko paid full price.
      So given the state of the realestate market in Kenwood at that time for that type of property was the discount plausible?

      If you are correct that the house and lot sold together but bound by the Landmark regulations were worth less than the house and lot sold separately which you state frees the land from from the Landmark controls were worth more.

  • Nellie

    Oh Jacek,

    First of all, either starting on page 21 or page 22 of the Ordinances linked to above, it clearly states the MAYOR appoints these people. I honestly do not know if they are paid.

    However I come from a state where State Senators are Paid $200/annum and State House Reps are paid $100/annum plus 45 cents per travel mile. They can meet as often as needed and have a beautiful new building in which to do so. Thus, we have a REAL Citizen Legislature. Our Bond rating is also much HIGHER than Illinois’. Whether people volunteer or are asked its called public service, as written in most state consitutions.

    I believe that corrpution whether it’s called that, or change is one of the main issues for Americans.

    Where I come from, Michelle, if she had REAL ethics, would have recused herself, instead of taking advantage of her position. Secondly, if you actually practiced there, then you are aware of the HPKCC, which has tremendous influence, due to their affluent members. Their participation is also part of this whole package as is that of the Alderwoman for ward 4.

    I am fully aware that Chicago is as much a cesspool as DC. However, that does not respond to the need for impartial PUBLIC SERVANTS for ALL constituents in a given area.

    Excuse me for being so brash, but your entire comment is a justification for SITUATIONAL ETHICS, rather than GOOD GOVERNANCE.

    I strongly suggest you visit Beirut, Amman Jordan or any other Mid-East country where there is relative safety, and where the same thinking has always been standard operating procedure. Then take take a hard look at the living conditions for the average citizen, and ask if this is the type of place you would like for future American citizens.

    My state threw a guy named Thayer (IIRC) off the State Supreme Court for much less than this. The current Bush made him a FEDERAL JUDGE. According to the logic in your comment, the citizens of my state were WRONG and Bush was RIGHT??

  • TeakwoodKite

    Jacek; as I said the 300,000 is some where else on the balance sheet. Thanks for the points you made… I really hate being noob. What then is the 1/6 thing about?

  • Nellie

    If you have a copy of the Doctor’s first permit on intent to sell, and the original asking price, you would be doing everyone a service and posting it. My hunch, and knowledge from googling, is that $2.1 – $2.8 Million+ is the typical asking price for homes of this type in that area.

    • TeakwoodKite

      Doctor’s first permit on intent to sell…

      City Clerks office?

      • Nellie

        No,

        Chicago Commssion on Landmarks – Heres the location:

        33 N. LaSalle St.
        Suite 1600
        Chicago, IL 60602
        TEL: (312) 744-3200

        When wandering through the files, you will find all kinds of great information. Pages 51 and 52 in the Landmark Ordinance link above will give you what you are looking for.

        The Cook County Registry of deeds, should be the next stop and will provide even more detail. Don’t forget to note mortgages, amounts and when they were discharged.

        Once you have the addresses and names of the realtors, a quick look with a Realtor you know for May 2005 MLS listings, will show if there is/was a carriage house or garage on the Kenwood property.

        The magic of addresses will also allow you to wander over to the city property tax office and find the rate and full assessment for both the Kenwood and Obama’s Hyde park address.

        If I lived anywhere within 60 miles, I would have slethed out the info. Alas, I live half a continent away.

        I look forward to seeing what you dig up – maybe Susan or someone she knows, can give the entire package to the lazy, lazy National Media – as well as Hillary’s campaign. The very wealthy usually delegate these kinds of details, and aren’t aware of them unless a ‘situation’ arises.

        • TeakWoodKite

          I live near the big pond. Not the lakes. It is on my “walk about” short list.

  • justsomeone

    Nellie, read your link & must say I don’t get the point. Is it the Clinton campaign practices “total retribution”? I’m not interested in this type of inner party vengence. I’d sure like to see total campaign finance reform minus the McCain/Fiengold type of curtailment on free speech. Ever since the Supremes ruled money is speech & free for the pickin’, the high dollar stuff is outta my control.

  • justsomeone

    Teakwoodkite, “first notice on intent to sell”, what’s with Chicago’s mother-may-I approach to selling a property? Or does this only pertain to historic districts?

    • TeakWoodKite

      justsomeone, first notice on intent to sell
      I have think it is historic. From the artical it is implied that “historic” properties have to go through a process, analogous to to getting a car smogged before you can sell it. I am curious as well and the answer is public so it can be found with enough digging.

  • Jacek

    Nellie,

    I am STILL completely at a loss about what you are implying. M. Obama is guilty of what corruption? I have not made ANY conclusion of situational ethics because there is NOTHING unethical in M. Obama’s actions. Let me recast the situation in less “sinister” terms. The permit comes before M. Obama’s commission, and she learns about the house. She says to herself, “Hey, this sounds nice. Let’s go check it out.” The Obamas see the house and love it, and decide to buy it after the usual wrangling that every couple goes through before they make a very large purchase.. Anything wrong in that? I don’t see it.

    Teakwoodkite – Obama bought the house parcel for $1.6M, which was $300K less than the asking price for the house parcel+vacant lot. So, the original asking price was $1.9M. The doctor received $1.6M from the Obamas and $600K from the Rezkos for the vacant lot, meaning the doctor earned $2.2M for a real estate parcel he was originally marketing for $1.9M. In other words, there is not a MISSING $300K, but rather, the doctor earned an ADDITIONAL $300K by dividing the lot into two transactions.

    The 1/6 thing is explained a follows: The Obamas asked the Rezkos to sell a 1/6 portion of the vacant lot to the Obamas. I went to the actual Chicago Trib article, and it stated that the Rezkos offered to sell the 1/6 parcel to the Obamas for the pro rata share of the ASSESSED value of the parcel, which would have been approx. $40K. The Obamas refused, and instead paid the Rezkos’ 1/6 of the Rezko’s purchase price, i.e. full market value, of the lot, totalling $100K or so. In other words, the Obamas could have done something unethical at this juncture, and received a $60K gift from the Rezkos, but they turned it down.

    Quite honestly – if the Obamas were engaged in an unethical transaction here, why would they have suddenly turned ethical at the tail-end of this transaction. Why pay $60K more than strictly necessary. (Note – assessed value is not the true value of a property. It is probably enough to withstand IRS scrutiny, but not ethical sanction. Sen. Murkowski in Alaska made this mistake a little while ago.)

    Nellie – I know you want a “there” there in this story, but it just doesn’t have any “legs” other than the one Obama has already admitted was boneheaded. And say what you will about Chicago corruption, the City is not nicknamed the “City that Works” for nothing. Machine party politics it may have, but it a fantastic city in which a lot of people have pride. Mock it, but you won’t win many fans that way.

    • Nellie

      Jacek,

      At a bare minimum – M Obama is guilty of Duplicity, Hypocricy and shady dealings. Obama and his surrogates broke at least 3 Laws of our state laws while campaigning in NH.

      Public Servants, are to be examples of good behavior and above approach. Furthermore, M Obama, whom you obviously like, started whisper campaigns in NH and elsewhere. She even was trying to recruit Edwards volunteers, while his campaign was still active. Even National League sports teams have strong regulations against that last. How do you teach young people about solid ethical behavior, if you sanction lack of it in someone because they have titles or are politicians?

      Frankly, I am NOT trying for office in the Windy City. In the early 80′s I attended the IBM school there quite a few times. I loved the market area, got to see the play “Evita’ and adored the open sidewalk cafe’s/restaurants along Lake Michigan.

      You and I obviously have very different ideas of acceptable levels of right and wrong. Having coffee together would probably not work too well.

      However, if I was looking for a lawyer, not too concerned with going to the edges of the law, while ignoring the spirit of the law, and standard ideas of right and wrong, I wouldn’t hesitate to call.

      I come from academia, where the feeling of responsibility to teach solid ethics, is primary and strongly enforced. A primary tool of teaching is to practice what you preach. Or by example if you will.

      This statement of yours says all I have surmised about the Obama’s I have not made ANY conclusion of situational ethics because there is NOTHING unethical in M. Obama’s actions. What they have done, as mentioned in the first paragraph above falls into much more than unethical – it falls into criminal in my neck of the world.

      Again you plainly believe its okay to use a PUBLIC position for personal gain. That is competely opposite of what we believe here. Even your justifications for the constant moving boundaries of the lots; it is expensive, and the number of PUBLIC tax dollars to support hearings and approvals is a waste, and thereby frauduent use of taxpayer money. Those same dollars could be going into projects that benefit an entire community, rather than just a few people.

    • TeakWoodKite

      Ok I get your point; it is Chicago. The original point I was making is that Michelle Obama gets on national TV and says “we don’t play those games”.
      I say Bullshit! (Like the card game) Infact I would not be surprised if she gets “jammed” by the Federal Prosecuter as a way of getting Obama to be verbally compliant about his relationship with Rezko. He tossed a reporter in jail for less and it appears Obama is the kind of person who would toss you overboard as a matter of self preservation. Obama is in WAY over his head.

      1) She knew, knew of, or was aquainted with the Doctor prior to the house legally going on the Market Due to her position as
      2) This house was not legally for sale at the time Michelle informed her husband who called Tony Rezko for monetary assistance in getting the deal going.
      This supposition is supported by the Obamas putting the condo up for sale when they did.

      3) The doctor may have started the process of sub-dividing the lot but the artical states that Barak Obama paid for this cost. So in terms of making it worth while for Tony Rezko, between the concerned parties Tony and Barak needed to subdivide the lot for a stake.

      4) Regarding the 1/6 thing.
      a )I still want to know what effect it had on the viability, to build on the lot. In that situation I would have looked at that very possibility to make it “unusable”. b) In either case paying the 100k back to Tony Rezko just means he got his equity back out sooner than later. yes as you point out that the 40k would have looked “bad”. SO now there is the 60k on the balance sheet along with 300k difference in the price of the subdivided lot.
      5) The good doctor could propably not give rats ass, as long as he got his asking price or better. It would be a Plus, if the party interested in purchasing it for more than he was looking for had connections in the Chicago Commssion on Landmarks and could help take care of any bumps in the road for the good doctor. I know I would if, as justsomeone ponders, the “Chicago’s mother-may-I” laws may require such a obstical course to sell a property.
      6) Tony Rezko was interested in money, maybe not a fat profit but enough to get in and out of the transaction with a quick return and a favor owed, Michelle wanted THAT house and Obama? He just wanted a happy wife. Not a small number of men break out in hives when making your wife happy adds up to 1.65 million dollars. Been there done that for a whole lot less.
      7) Michelle Obama resigns from Chicago Commssion on Landmarks the same day it goes into a 90 day escrow.
      8) Tony Rezko’s wife purchased the newly divided sub-plot for the full price of $625,000 and closed on the same day and subsequently sold to a freakin lawyer that had Tony Rezko a former client.
      God it is a small town in someways and the Grapvine in Chicago is well established.
      So while really DO get what your saying, the whole thing was a real creative package and still it remains by 2 degrees “all in the family”.

      • Jacek

        Teak, Some quick responses…

        Preface – Umm, you see to see hypocrisy in M. Obama. Maybe there is, but I am not up for that discussion. I am just refuting misconceptions of the real estate transaction, which is quite above-board.

        1. To my knowledge, there is no concept of a house going on the market “illegally.” If you own a house, you can sell it whenever you want. There is no restriction or mandate on how or when to sell it. If a house is designated “historic,” it means only that the use of the domicile is subject to restrictions. However, you can sell or buy the historic house whenever you wish. The fact that M. Obama learned about the home being for sale before it was listed with a private broker on the MLS is done all of the time. It’s called a “For Sale by Owner” type of sale. Again, no illegality or impropriety.

        2. See above about the house not being “legally for sale.” See previous posts where Obamas have admitted it was “boneheaded” to involve Rezko in the transaction.

        3. I think you are mixing up the subdivisions. There were TWO subdivisions. The first was done by the doctor at his cost to separate the house into two lots, which the doctor sold in two transactions, one to the Obamas and the other to Rezko. The second subdivision was done and paid for by the Obamas to purchase the 1/6 lot from the Rezkos.

        4. Viability of the remaining lot – thats an easy one. The City of Chicago would not approve the subdivision unless the remaining lot complied with zoning laws.

        5. Umm, this is pure speculation, but the doctor was trying to sell his house, not rehab or change it. So, there is no “quid” to go along with the “quo.”

        6. You are probably right about Rezko wanting to ingratiate himself. It was a mistake.

        7. That appointment sucks. I would get off the board as soon as I could as well. It is truly a thankless job.

        Conclusion – Chicago is definitely “machine politics,” which is one reason why I chuckle when people claim Obama will be weak. Chicago eats weak politicians alive. Anyway, good questions.

        • TeakwoodKite

          Thanks for the exchange. I will put my shovel away for time being. :)

          • TeakwoodKite

            I am using a laptop that really likes playing larghissimo. Must be from all the wine in the cellar. What I neglected to include in the conversation was sound of the sound of the phone tap. I would be betting against the house if there are not tapes of Rezko Obama conversations related to this and other transactions.
            As Cheney recently pointed not so long ago, “Everything leaks eventually”,.or some one gets a marker.

      • Nellie

        Teak,

        Superlative points and all well said.

        • randy austin

          only a real loser would talk about this shit

  • justsomeone

    I’m all for historic & landmark preservation but having to ask the gov for permission to sell property is just crazy. Now requirin’ temp visas for Yanks to sojourn in the South is some regulation that may be worth entertaining. Carpetbaggers have done mucho damage to so much southern architecture; they’ve never seen a historic district that didn’t need razed & surplanted with a friggin’ high rise, even if it fronts on a one lane road.

  • justsomeone

    Jacek, I tried explaing to these folks about a month ago that politics are “different” in the Windy City but they feel a need to grasp at any straw, vaccum for dust if not dirt.

  • justsomeone

    jacek, my last real estate comment. I promise. I previously have tried in vain to explain how Clinton’s Community Reinvestment Act was so mismanaged that it became the Yellow Brick Road leading down to the sub-prime/predatory lending cris we’re in. However these Clinton true believers won’t even try to understand anything that doesn’t immeniate from HRC Central Command & Control.

    • Nellie

      Just someone,

      It is again plain you DID NOT read my earlier link As to today’s sub-prime crises – look into Bush family history and their collusion with oil companies, financiers and BIG money.

      Are you really that dense – that you don’t GET how the little guy, struggling to get by is suffering from high gas prices, and how that has affected all other markets? When Bush took office oil was #35 dollars per barrel. Do you ever take all facts and connect them to get an accurate picture, or is your world full of isolated one off events?

      Niel Bush’s saving and loan fiasco has cost American taxpayers 1.4 TRILLION dollars to date.

      All this and more is okay HOW???

  • Jacek

    Calm down, Nellie. I understand you like Hillary, but you are really over-reaching. Casting aspersions on my morality is quite silly. If you don’t like the facts, too bad. There is nothing in this deal that even remotely approaches criminality. As I quite involved in ethics portion of the bar, I think your insult is quite, well, silly. Quite honestly, I am sure you honestly believe what you are saying, but you just don’t understand real estate transactions. For example, subdivisions are just a run-of-the-mill lot change. Just because you do not do them in your life does not mean that they are illegitimate. I did dozens of them in Chicago, and even more in Seattle. Furtermore, they are not a cost to the public. There are fees associated with every subdivions request which are assessed to recoup the cost of the subdivision.

    If M. Obama did something wrong in NH, well, that is a separate issue, and we can discuss it as civilized adults. I would be interested to know what it is.

    You are losing sight of an important fact. The Obamas did ask the Rezkos to help. That was a mistake. However, you are building a bigger mountain around that mountain. Most of that is because of your loyalty to Hillary, and the rest of it to your ignorance of real estate transactions.

    • myiq2xu

      I’m sure everything was perfectly legal in the sense it will be virtually impossible to prove anything different.

      On paper it was legal because they wouldn’t write down anything illegal. But we’ll never know what Rezko and the Obamas discussed in private. It’s only bribery if there is a “quid pro quo.” Otherwise it’s just “help from a friend.”

      But I doubt Mr. Rezko would have been so helpful to me if I wanted to buy a house I couldn’t afford.

  • Jason

    Hello, excellent summary concerning Obama’s land purchase and relationship with Tony Rezko. While I understand your point, which is echoed by John Kaas and Lynn Sweet, basically saying that Obama should not project himself as someone of the highest standard of ethics, when he has a piece of his past directly illustrating the opposite. (eg: fishy land deal) The fact of the matter is that he did not break any law. Yes, I realize that it looks fishy, especially considering the other buyer being Rezko, but don’t forget Rezko wasn’t indicted until 14 months AFTER this land purchase. So, to say that Obama is going to owe Rezko a favor is quite a reach. It’s not like he’s going to give a Presidential Pardon (Like Clinton did for Susan McDougal) if he were to become President. It appears that if Rezko were to “bring anyone down” then it will most likely be Governor Radjoivic. (Sorry for the mispelling on that one) Just look into the connection to the killing of Chris Kelly in Chicago (gang banger, contractor, etc.) and you’ll find plenty if you dig enough.
    Side note, it’s just my opinion, but you appear to have too many assumptions scattered throughout this piece. I understand your attempt to provide some facts with some editorial, but your blending of the two often comes across as a feable attempt to create fact from your assumptions. For instance, your description of the use of the land that Rezko purchased. Plus, what’s with the jab at U of Chicago Law school producing Neocons. Seriously, you can say the same about Yale (Clarence Thomas comes to mind). Anyway, I appreciate your site and impressive article. Thanks for accepting my message. Jason from CT.

  • City Nell

    Thanks for the thoughtful comment.

    Why point out neo cons – because if you review some of Obama’s votes – without some of the inordinate pressure applied by the activist base – there seems to be strong similarities to the beginnings.

    Let me explain. I am a researcher by nature, not a writer. A couple of years ago I really dug deep into the whole ‘unitary executive’ B/S. Lots of twists and turns – bottom line ‘unitary executive’ is the new Orwellian label for Nazi Furherprinzep (Leadership Principle)

    Time moved on and I started to see a lot of similarities to Germany – 1930′s. Remember, Facism is the political ideology. Nazism was simply a political party like the Greens, Repubs, or Dems.

    Obama’s issue page is either filled with empty rhetoric or very, very light on ‘change’ or facts.

    When the house thing came up – I understood there was much more to it. In teaching Mid Easterners, I had learned a bit about the convoluted manner in which things connect in their universe.

    So for me, the logical thing to do was to start with zoning, where I ran into the Historic Regulations. Admittedly I wish I had more data – hopefully someone near Chicago will go to the various city departments to dig up more specifics.

    I am a little surprised that you think there are ‘assumptions’. I stated facts as documented in links above – paraphrased rather than use dry legal language- and asked questions about the unknowns. So please kindly tell me where the ‘assumptions’ exist.

    The manner in which it occurred, the timing, the fact that several public hearings are mandated by ordinance and that I could not find any notices in 3 papers, and that Barack himself made an issue of the fence as noted in the Trib article included above – plus the interconnectedness of the other people involved – are leading down a road I fear ends in a rather unpleasant swamp.

    Its the old – start pulling on one piece of yarn and the whole ball will eventually unravel.

    Much better that our own side does it, rather than Karl Rove – who gave ample warning in his WSJ article right after the NH Primary. And speaking of the porcine shaped devil, part of me is tempted to flick by Fox News tonight and part of me is terrifed he will drop a bomb shell, and I need my sleep tonight. I truly hate the whole idea of Rove having a Media Platform.

  • Jacek

    As an aside, I am impressed by your fervor in researching this matter. True, the Landmark designation is byzantine process, but it is not that hard to understand. Basically, your property is designated as having “historical value,” and as such, there is a limit to what you can do to develop the parcel, change the house, etc. In other words, you own the house, but you can’t change it without permission from the Commission. If you want to make any changes, then a permit needs to be filed. Simple as that, really. Other than that, the subdivision process is a pretty cut-and-dry process described in the Chicago ordinances.

    I appreciate your zealousness, Nellie, but you are a bit out of your field here. It’s not rocket science by any stretch of the imagination, but there really was nothing inappropriate in this transaction other than the fact that one of the players was Rezko. The doctor was paid MORE than his asking price. The Obamas paid full market value for the house parcel. The Rezkos purchased an extremely rare vacant lot in one of the oldest, nicest and most expensive neighborhoods in Chicago, which is on sale now for approximately twice the value paid to the doctor. The fact that M. Obama learned about the house through her work on the commission is no more of a concern than if she learned of it through a broker. After all, the Landmark Commission is a public body, and any permits will be publicly disclosed.

    The only issue is that an unsavory character was part of the deal. Obama admitted it was a mistake. Nuff said, move on.

    • Mike Howell

      Jacek,

      Nellie’s right. Nobody can safely say yet whether this deal was legal. I would imagine that Rezko’s trial might shed some light on a lot of deals.

      Obama paid $300K less than the asking price and he would not have been able to purchase the mansion at all, but for Rezko buying the other lot at full asking price. Obama paid for the upkeep on the other lot and only put up a fence when it looked like Rezko would be indicted.

      And Obama approached Rezko while he was being investigated for kickback schemes.

      Let’s imagine that I’m a judge or prosecutor.

      Would it be O.K. for me to hit Rezko up for a mansion if he had a case in my jurisdiction? No, I’d lose my law license and likely go to prison. Sure Obama clearly couldn’t care less about ethics, but to say nothing was wrong with it except for Rezko being unsavory is simply not factual.

      Obama certainly benefitted from this crooked deal and if he did any favors for Rezko in anticipation of said benefit or because of it, it’s not legal. There are entire divisions at the U.S. Attorney’s Office who deal with public corruption. Most notably – Patrick Fitzgerald.

      I’m still very interested in whether Obama helped Rezko try to get Auchi into the U.S.

      So I hope that you are able to see that Nellie is correct.

  • lilr

    I know that some of what you wrote is factually incorrect. For example, you state that there is no overnight street parking (so the Obamas probably parked on Rezko’s property). I don’t know where you are from, but overnight street parking is definitely permitted on the block in question. When a reporter makes statements I know from personal knowlege to be wrong, I find myself unable to credit the rest of what is presented as fact.

  • Pingback: Experience, and Experiences (of the Rezko sort) : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: Make Them Accountable / Media

  • Obama’sAThug

    Probably the safest place for Rezko is JAIL (don’t want his fate resembling the Trinity’s gay choir director’s). At least, not until ALL the DIRT is out on his dealing with Obama. (father’s dreams or not).

  • Pingback: Never Yet Melted » Democrat Race a Tie, Press Says Hillary Will Withdraw

  • jbjd

    Am I missing something? Here’s what I thought happened. MO learned this multi-million dollar house of her dreams was for sale. She and her husband couldn’t afford it. They could borrow money directly from their good friend, Tony Rezko; but that would look bad, given his already growing legal problems. So, they – the Obamas and the Rezko’s – came up with this scheme. Get the seller to agree to sub-divide the land, aided by MO in her role on the Historical Commission; in exchange for their promise to him to buy the house and obtain a purchaser for the newly zoned adjacent lot, and to close on both properties on the same day.

  • Pingback: Eric

  • DanielP

    Another dirty chapter of Chicago politics. But why won’t the mainstream media report this? Oh I forgot, they are campaigning for BHO, not reporting news.

  • Joy

    Obama got his mansion from cozying up to a slum lord and McCain got his mansion from cozying up to a slut. Let’s see, slum lord or slut. Take your pick.

  • Pingback: “CHICAGO MACHINE” : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: Open Thread * Obama Can Try to Run But He Can’t Hide : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: CORROBORATED: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: About the Financial Institution Mentioned in the Sun-Times: Obama, Tony Rezko, Amrish Mahajan, the Kenwood Mansion & Rita Rezko : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: BREAKING: Obama Land Deal with Rezko and Mutual Bank Subject of New Court Complaint : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: Valerie Jarrett : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: [Classic NQ] Obama Fundraiser and Political Patron Antoin “Tony” Rezko Convicted : NO QUARTER

  • south sider

    I haven’t done the research, so I have no way of knowing about all the details on this situation (I came here via Google, looking for something else completely).

    BUT, your info on parking is completely wrong. The city of Chicago absolutely allows overnight street parking. There is no restriction on street parking at all on that block (unless it’s been put in since the election – we avoid that street now because of all the security).

    Like I said, I can’t speak to the rest of it, but the legality of parking overnight on a Chicago street is such a simple fact that is so easy to check.

  • Phil Krone

    This article takes many facts and weaves them into an unfortunate and inaccurate conclusion.  Michelle never took advangtage of her position as a member of the Commission on Landmarks, and it would not have been necessary.  Further, the house was not worth the asking price, but the empty lot was worth more becausee it actually had better zoning.

    It would not be inaccurate to say that I am the leading expert on landmark preservation in Chicago, especially from the stanpoint of cevelopers.  Mr. Rezko has never been a clinet of mine and there is no fiduciary relationship with him.  I did appear before the Commission on many occasions, and particularly before the Program Committee of which Michelle Obama was a member.  She never voted against any of my requests and I  never lobbied her or any other member of the commission.  Anything I had to say was stated at public meetings ao I have no conflict of interest whatsoever.

    A great disservice has been done to the Obamas to suggest that anything untoward was done in this process.  When Barack Obama said it was ‘boneheaded’ he was only correct to the extent that it might appear to be wrong.  Frankly, knowing all of the facts, I do not even see the ‘appearance of impropriety.

    Another issue which I find reprehensible is the accusation that Michelle Obama received an undeserved salary increase when her husband became a U.S. Senator.  The truth is that she received the same salary as all others with the same title and responsibilites, and while it was a significant increased, it was more than deserved.

    One hundred years from now all these critics will have the combined effect of a swarm of gnats.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VCSLHO6MSAK6ZNEQ5UKU3PLLF4 Neel

    messed up

  • Pingback: Obama sinks along with the American people : NO QUARTER

  • Alinanancy

    I found some
    great information in your blog. This blog is very useful and helpful to me.
    Thank you for sharing this information with us informative .. I love your
    blog……
    Sell Property