RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Let Them Eat Junk!

(bumped up from yesterday morning, by our great NoQuarter cartoonist PatRacimora)

weblunchtoonlarge_edited-2

A Riddle: What is often poorly prepared, overloaded with unhealthful ingredients (and sometimes contaminants), costs the American taxpayer 9 billion dollars a year, and as much as half is thrown into the garbage before ever being touched?

Answer: The federally subsidized meals our kids get in schools.

The free (and low cost) meals operate in over 100,000 public and non-profit schools and serve up to 31 million children each day. But, of course, there really is no such thing as a free lunch, and that old saying applies in some shocking ways in this instance.

Although we acknowledge that there are exceptions, ask school teachers about what they actually see. Minimum nutritional standards are supposed to apply, but much of what kids get served is junk: cheese pizza, chicken nuggets (pre-fried), calzones (a lump of dough with some tomato sauce and cheese inside), hot dogs (on a bleached flour bun) and other low-grade meats, canned fruit, macaroni and cheese, and the like. Sometimes there are carrots (swathed in Ranch dressing) or little pieces of lettuce (which is essentially green water).

My friend who teaches at an elementary school in Los Angles is outraged by what she witnesses every day: trash barrels full of untouched prepackaged highly processed foods that kids don’t like. She estimates that more food is thrown out than is consumed. The kids complain about still being hungry after lunch, which makes them more challenging to teach.

My friend also reports that some items served to the kids make no sense whatsoever. For example, one day the “healthy item” was a kiwi. No, not a peeled or cut up kiwi, but a whole kiwi—thick brown fuzzy skin and all. What are little kids supposed to do with that? Another day their “fruit” was a small package of cut-up jicama and a wedge of lime. How many of her students consumed this off-beat offering? Not a single one.

Environmental implications are also huge. My teacher friend notes that it‘s not just tossed food, but tons of packaging. In the Los Angeles system, everything comes in little packets, foil for what will be warmed up and plastic for cold. Then that is all set into individual cardboard trays. This adds substantially to the mounds of daily trash that goes into our landfills.

Incidents of improper food handling and dirty facilities in many school feeding areas compound the problem by contributing to making the kids sick. According to a study by the Center for Science in the Public Interest , not one school in the 20 jurisdictions surveyed scored above 80 out of 100, and only 5 above 75, when it came to meeting inspection requirements. The worst district earned a score of 37. Problems included improper food storage, poor temperature maintenance, contamination by food handlers, broken equipment, mouse droppings, and inadequate hand-washing facilities.

The report spells out the consequences:

Just one food-borne illness outbreak can have devastating consequences for the health of students, productivity in the classroom, and even financially on the school system. In fact, school districts have been held liable for the damage caused by outbreaks. For example, a school district in the state of Washington was ordered to pay a $4.6 million verdict when 11 children were sickened with E. coli 0157:H7 linked to ground beef in tacos. A 2003 report on federal school meal programs by the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that two-thirds of food-borne illness outbreaks in schools involved federally subsidized meals.

To make matters worse, major incidents involving unfit-to-eat and contaminated food being brought into schools have surfaced recently. A shocking Associated Press story headline reads “An undercover video showing crippled and sick animals being shoved with forklifts has led to the largest beef recall in the United States and a scramble to find out if any of the meat is still destined for school children’s lunches.” Yes, an estimated 37 million pounds of that beef did end up being sent to schools.

Even the recent peanut scandal involves our school children. As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle , 32 truckloads of toasted peanuts and peanut butter destined to our nation’s schools were sold to the federal government by the Peanut Corporation of America, even as the company’s own tests revealed salmonella bacteria contamination.

Perhaps the worst feature of this serious situation is that the little consumers are the very people whose health and well-being comprise the future of our nation. Sometimes we tend to think of our brain as something apart from the rest of our body, but it is an organ just like all of the others. It requires sufficient protein and other healthful fuel to develop properly. We have known the negative affects of poor nutrition on brain development and attention span of still-maturing humans for decades, and yet remain unmoved when it comes to feeding our kids.

Even Sam Kass , our President’s chef in the White House, is also outraged. He notes that the National School Lunch Program designed to provide low and free lunches to school kids (but any child can purchase these meals for very little) is influenced by what the government subsidizes. This means that the meals are low in veggies and overloaded with fat and additives high-fructose corn syrup.

One hopes that Chef Kass will corner the President after a dinner and get him to spearhead some changes. After all, these children will have to pay back the money being spent on the stimulus package. They will need healthy bodies and alert brains to carry that heavy load.

In an article titled “No Lunch Left Behind,” the authors offer some ideas. Implementing them won’t come cheap, but can we afford not to ensure that our kids are getting a decent and healthy school lunch?

  • Strawberry

    THANK YOU PAT!!! This is a rather important issue for me. The health and nutrition of our children. At the same time we’re feeding our kids overpriced crap, we’re cutting back on recess and PE programs. And neighborhoods are built for maximum houses on the least amount of land so kids have no where to play and be kids. No more big backyards for games of catch or kickball. By the way, have you seen ‘Supersized’ the documentary about a guy who lives off of Mickey Ds for a month? He actually does touch on the horrid scam that is our National school lunch swindle. If eating nasty, tastless crap doesn’t make you ill, this film will.

    • Pat Racimora

      My teacher friend mentioned this also. She notes that the kids almost have a choice of eating or playing–no way to do both.

      The breakfast program at her school occurs up to 2 hours AFTER school starts (those who have already had breakfast will get fatter–we didn’t cover obesity yet–and those who had no breakfast probably learned nothing in those first 2 hours) AND the breakfast is during a 20 minute recess! Whoever thought this plan up has zero understanding of young minds and bodies.

      • http://ksclematis ksclematis

        “Whoever thought this plan up has zero understanding of young minds and bodies.”
        Maybe George Bush????

        • dawnelle

          Pat! GREAT Again! ~~W00T~~

          Thanks also for reminding me it’s time to eat!
          ;-)

          heehee!

  • Juliezzz

    Chef Jamie Oliver attacked this problem in England several years back. He totally shook their whole lunch program on its head although it wasn’t easy. There is a documentary on what obstacles he faced and how he turned the tide.

    http://www.channel4.com/life/microsites/J/jamies_school_dinners/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFkAszCA9dI&eurl=http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Jamies%20school%20dinners%20episodes&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-USiurl=http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/kFkAszCA9dI/hqdefault.jpg

    We need a Jamie Oliver in America….problem is. Many schools aren’t built with kitchens and all food is prefabed and shipped to school each day. It’s disgusting.

    • Pat Racimora

      Thank you for this lead Juliezzz. I had not seen this particular program. I am going to study this project.

      • Juliezzz

        I saw this documentary on the Learning Channel a couple of years ago. I think it was a good 6 hrs total. It was fascinating! Jamie Oliver went into it wide eyed and innocent but he was very resourceful. He made changes happen in that country. He started with one school and branched out to a district. He trained lunch ladies who were used to just warming up and slapping it on the plate to really cook. He crafted menu’s to be cost effective and yet nutritious but also kid friendly. His pasta sauce and pizza sauce had like 7 vegetables in it. He had to sell the kids on the idea as well. They were very resistant. But, he had good ways to reach them. Getting them to cook some of their own food really helped. I don’t think his battle is totally over but he did get awarded MBE (Member of the Order of British Empire) from the Queen for his efforts.

        He’s right though. We have to treat nutrition like we do to the DARE say no to drugs program and such. I send lunch boxes with my kids because the meals at school are beyond reasonable. They charge you an arm and a leg for cud I wouldn’t feed a pig. It’s no wonder ADD and overweight children are rampant. We’ve given up feeding our children so they can think, so they can behave, so they can have a general feeling of well being throughout the day. And the reason why? To save money and laziness.

        • Pat Racimora

          Hear! Hear! JulieZZZ. There are so many great comments here. I am going to download them and try to get someone to listen.

        • Linda Anselmi

          Juliezzz -

          I watched the Jamie Oliver series also. It was great.

        • Linda Anselmi

          Excellent article Pat

          And great cartoon. The little boy on the right has the perfect ‘I can’t believe i’ve got to eat this’ look. And that brown – ahem – whatever on the girls plate.

          you really lay it out there – putting facts behind what every parent should have known or suspected if they are involved in their child’s school and education.

          We concede too much in the name of efficiency and economy. And govt oversight – shameful, criminal, words fail. As you say – this is for growing minds and bodies.

  • The Real HC

    Great, I cant wait until government gets to manage all my healthcare choices too.

    • Seattle Moss

      Some have said that I need to give up going to nice restaurants and focus on eating at McDonald’s for the good of all.
      I’m not sure I can survive on happy meals…

      Does anyone remember the Carter days when they tried to label Ketchup as a vegetable at the schools.

      I’m loving this new socialism!!

      • Pat Racimora

        I do remember hearing that Seattle Moss! And sweet pickle relish also. (But was it Carter? Why am I thinking Reagan?)

        • Seattle Moss

          Pat,
          I remember watching it on TV and being only 18 at the time.. was getting cramps just thinking about the chepness of making ketchup a vegetable. That was at the height of the recession.

          According to the Web site http://www.moynihaninstitute.org, the “ketchup is a vegetable idea” was proposed by a Carter appointee, I’m guessing from either the Education or Agriculture department. The proposed rule (which also allowed school lunches to substitute doughnuts for bread) was withdrawn by budget director David Stockman in September 1981, before it was ever enacted. This appears to have been part of a large series of dietary guidelines prepared for school lunches, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the ketchup provision was added as a “gotcha” to make Reagan look stupid. Since it takes a long time to get anything written in Washington, I suspect the ketchup stuff may have had its genesis in the Carter years. And since Reagan made a big deal about cutting costs when entering the White House, the proposed guidelines were interpreted as Reagan trying to take vegetables away from children.

          • Pat Racimora

            Ah, very interesting. Thanks!

          • JozefAL

            Someone needs a better source link. When I clicked the link to read the sourced article, all I got was a “This website may be for sale” with links to a bunch of different sites.

            • Tricia Spiegel

              The Jamie Oliver links are good (and interesting) but seattle Moss’ link is bad.

        • The Real HC

          There will be no substitute for parents actually feeding and caring for their own kids.

          Why would we expect schools to be nutrition experts? Schools will meet whatever guidelines the USDA sees fit to implement including, yes, ketchup, french fries and salsa as vegetables (Carter, Reagan, Clinton). And technically I guess they all are – except tomatoes are fruits.

          Take care of your own kids people. Dont just expect the government to do it for you.

          • Pat Racimora

            Hear Hear The Real HC!!!! Parents need to be put into this mix. I suspect it is much easier to hand the kid a buck in the morning (this is what kids who are not eligible for a free lunch pay in Los Angeles) than take the time to make a healthy lunch.

          • heather

            We need more people to think that way.

            I fear that we have a nation of children who are being raised to believe that the government is the place from which everything emanates. There was a time when you went home for lunch, and I understand that time is gone, with two working parents in many homes, but people should take responsibility for what they feed their children.

            I’m amazed by the kids who show up at my house who don’t seem to know that food can be prepared at home. They seem amazed by homemade cookies and muffins, or homemade soup. My son’s best friend has never said no to anything I put out at dinner time (which causes me to love him!) and eats everything on his plate. His mom works and doesn’t cook.

            I can’t tell you how many women I know (and even stay at home moms) who proudly pronounce that they don’t cook. I’m always confused by that — but, don’t you eat? How do you get around the cooking part of things? Are you a raw believer or what?

            The other thing that I can’t figure is the people who think you need a mix or something to start your recipe. You know, you CAN make chili from scratch, or muffins without a package (and you can use a better quality ingredient when you do). Good quality food is not that hard to do.

            I agree also with the sadness on the advent of the small yard. I’d have to say that cable tv and video games have also made it so that even kids with yards are often sitting in the dark inside on beautiful days. The day my boys got access to video games was, in retrospect, a sad day for my family.

            • Solara 7

              I was thinking about kids playing outdoors also. You don’t see it so much anymore. It isn’t just small yards, but parents are concerned about letting kids run loose in the neighborhoods–even ones deemed relatively safe. Vrazy things happen (or at least the media focus on such stoires make it seem that way). Instead kids are playing video games or watching TV–on TOP of having had a bad lunch.

              I loved the movie Wall-E for the underlying message it was trying to get across.

        • JozefAL

          Because it WAS Reagan.
          From The Straight Dope website (http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2517/did-the-reagan-era-usda-really-classify-ketchup-as-a-vegetable )

          In mid-1981, only a few months after Reagan took office, Congress cut $1 billion from child-nutrition funding and gave the USDA 90 days–the blink of an eye, for the federal bureaucracy–to come up with new standards that would enable school districts to economize, in theory without compromising nutrition.
          ……..
          Mid-level Reaganauts at the USDA saw all this as a matter of giving the states more latitude; wiser heads might have realized that the rest of the world would see it as taking food away from children. Unfortunately for Reagan, the 90-day deadline allowed no time for higher review. When the proposed new rules were released for comment in September 1981, food activists went ballistic. Democratic politicians staged photo ops where they feasted on skimpy-looking meals that conformed to the new standards. The mortified administration withdrew the proposal and the USDA official in charge of the program was transferred, a move widely interpreted as a firing. One person who didn’t come out of the mess with ketchup on his face was Jimmy Carter, who’d had nothing to do with it.
          So, a garden-variety goof, right? It looked worse than that, thanks to agriculture secretary John Block, an antiregulatory zealot who attempted to defend the new rules after the fact, claiming they’d been misunderstood.

        • http://noquarter foxyladi14

          it was reagan

      • Diana L. C.

        IT WAS REAGAN’S PLAN.

        (I am sorry, but I am not sure I like all the dissing of Carter here. He IS and WAS a good man. Reagan was far more arrogant.)

        • Ferd Berfle

          You’re right, of course. I distinctly remember the ruckus over it.

      • Snickers

        Seattle, that was Ronald Reagan who labeled ketchup as a vegetable, not Carter.

        • Seattle Moss

          Ferd,
          I heard it being discussed during Carter’s time. Later I think Reagan signed the bill.

          • The Real HC

            Ketchup as as a vegetable never became USDA policy. It was discussed during the Carter/Reagan transition but never happened. But it made a lot of nice photo ops for people to be outraged. And I guess its still a good excuse to scream “Reagan!”

  • barry bums a ciggie

    My son’s elementary school in Denver gives out these subsidized/free lunches (30% if the students) and the image of the overflowing garbage bins (and they are the big ones) is accurate. Although his school is a little more “progressive” in their lunches (yogurt, granola bars, cheese and crackers), the kids just aren’t interested. They are kids and want to play and not eat. That said, I don’t know why the schools don’t divide the large amount periodically during the day so that it gets consumed and not go to waste. I honestly get upset when I see all that “food” go in the dumpster.

    • lark

      That is true. But moreover, and the idea of breaking down meals into a series of snacks is terrific. But why not allow parents to participate in the food delivery process. And I don’t mean paying them but allowing them actually to contract with the school in which their children attend to bring suitable food and deliver it to the children. That means that in a space close to the school, another group of parents could be preparing such a meal. And yes, one quality control manager/owner of the system.

      But no, it has to a big name purveyor. Yak. Who likes prepackaged food that was prepared last month or two.

      • Strawberry

        Pre-packaged food that was prepared last month or two? Lark, you’ve obviously never eaten an MRE. Which makes you one lucky person. I’m sure your bowels thank you.

        • Ferd Berfle

          The MREs are a damn sight better than the C-Rations we had when I was in the service. The eggs and ham in a can were right out of a Dr. Suess book, i.e., green. We didn’t like them much, but, alas we ate them. And don’t even get me started on the applesauce.

      • barry bums a ciggie

        That’s the thing Lark. Because of allergies and the risk of being sued by parents, the schools are only allowed to serve the pre-packaged foods…it’s hideous what they call food just as long as it satisfy the protein, vitamin, etc. requirement. You can’t tell me that uncrustables pj sandwich is healthy…it sits in a box for over a month!

        • Ferd Berfle

          Yeah but some of that prepackaged, over-refined cardboard product has processed peanut remnants in it, which is the item which causes the most problems.The ubiquitous corn sweetener is also a problem since many people are allergic to it as well.

  • Diana L. C.

    Last year when Salazar was still our Senator, I joined a group of people who belong to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine to lobby for significant changes to the Farm Bill. Agribusiness is the problem, and unfortunately for all you meat eaters out there, so is the huge shift our country has made to a meat-based and dairy-based diet.

    I could go on and on: Meat production is at the root of the problem for most school lunch programs. No matter how much th lunch ladies might want to try to provide healthy lunches, their hands are tied by the regulations that make it mandatory for them to buy from the massive surplus of meat and dairy products provided by the government–or whatever product is currently overstocked by the government’s funding of agribusiness.

    If they wanted to follow the actual food pyramid and serve enough vegetables and fruit products, they could not buy enough because we no longer produce enough of those products to feed our population those products.

    I used to drive Highway 85 from my small town of LaSalle to Denver. Along the way we USED to be able to see Japanese truck farms producing cabbage, carrots, tomatoes, etc. Now it’s all corn to fuel the production of beef and also, now biofuel.

    If you look to Japan, you’ll see that that country’s medical profession is now battling Western diseases like heart disease and cancer and obesity because they’ve adoped much of our unhealthy meat-based eating habits.

    Years ago, and it still plays out today even more than it did then, the debate question for high school debate teams in our state was this: Should we boycot fast food because of its contribution to the depletion of the Amazon rain forest? Agribusiness has cut down lots of the forest to provide a place to grow enought to feed cattle to supply the fast food industry. We should also mention the increased production of methane gas from cattle flatulation (at least 30% of the gas that may be causing global warming).

    Another thing I would personally mention is the terrible suffering we inflict on these gentle animals by making many of them live in filthy feed lots and then suffer brutal deaths in the slaughter houses. If you feel you need to eat beef or pork or chicken, thank that animal’s spirit for its sacrifice as the Native Americans did before you bite. Read Fast Food Nation, too. It will make you think twice.

    There’s my rant. You want to make school lunch room programs healthier, part of the problem is all of the meat eaters here and abroad.

    I need to finish by saying they did make very small changes to the Farm Bill, but not nearly enough.

    • lark

      Is 11:51. I would like more than anything to run to Wendy’s for a dollar double stack and a 1.29 small chili bowl. OMG. I love that stuff.

      • Pat Racimora

        Fortunately, Lark, you are already an adult. This stuff is counterindicated for an immature brain if that is all they get. (Well, maybe the chili isn’t so bad if it isn’t too greasy.)

      • Docelder

        I know, I will “think” about giving up beef when Al Gore and Pelosi sell “their” private jets. But, I will never buy into the notion that cow methane is warming the globe… not while the stuff is produced from the earths mantle out of inorganic constituents, pressure and heat and it just boils up constantly. To go along with the poster, too much beef is not good either… point taken. But, also think that animals raised solely for food is neither good nor bad… it’s just a reminder that its’ good to be the “top tier” predator. Let none of us be like those cows that are merely raised for consumption. ;)

        • Diana L. C.

          Docelder,

          Pat’s post today is on a topic I’ve done much thinking and reading about.

          I’ve responded to many posts, but I’ve saved yours for last before I have to head out and off the computer.

          Animals never evolved to be raised for food production. And they did not evolve to have survival “skills” for living in stinking, stressful, dung-up-to-their knees feedlots. And if you study anthropology, our ancesters were not huge meat eaters either. Like the Native Americans, they ate only what they could hunt.

          Our herbivores that provide your meat are often fed ground up MEAT. Did you know that? If you study the prion diseases that are so frightening, such as mad cow disease is, the evidence points to somewhere along the line of having a cow that ingested contaminated meat. They are often pumped with chemicals,too. An early farmer’s cow or chicken was never raised first to supply meat. It provided milk and eggs, etc. In fact, in my ethnic group’s early years in Russia on land without trees, they depended on the dung for burning to provide heat in the winter. Only when it was too old was it butchered.

          So you need to read and study and make sure you can really stand by your notion that these animals were just meant to be raised only for meat production.

          All religions have some form of belief that humans were put over animals to “administer” to them or worry about their place on the earth. I truly believe our greatest sin as humans is the arrogant belief that animals’ lives are just not as important as our own.

          As for methane production, all you had to do was grow up in Greeley as I did (again, it’s featured a lot in Fast Food Nation) and have to take the kidding about the smell because of the feedlots. Or live in nearby Kersey where there used to be a huge, horrible turkey production facilty and have to answer questions about the smell and the contamination. Even today when things are a little better in Greeley and Kersey, the university does not get the applications it probably should get from in-state students because of its excellent programs, simply because of the reputation about the smell in town.

          Rationalization and minimizing problems are common traps for us humans–all of us do them to avoid having to change our ways over bad habits we’ve come to love.

          I learned this year to quit rationalizing my reasons for membership in the Democratic Party. It was a painful habit I just finally had to break. :-)

          • Snickers

            Diana LC, I read this as well. I hate to mention the name, but Al Franken’s book had information about all the waste being produced by these poor animals. I rarely eat beef, and tend much more to chicken or seafood. The meat I do eat, like bacon or chicken comes from free range animals. That is the only meat I will eat. Ditto eggs from free range chickens. At the heart of it all is overpopulation. When we have to provide so much food for too many people then everyone loses.

      • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

        They use the unsold precooked burgers in the chili.

  • lark

    So there are dozens and dozens of opportunities for entrepreneurs of all kinds to enter into the school food delivery system and change it in a way as to minimize food waste and maximize food intake.

    Of course I am not going to tell you HOW to do that.

    The problem in our society is the same problem that the Obama administration has. Everyone wants to get rich quick and no one wants to spend any times observing and learning from the environment. So without a lot of meditation new ideas are scarce.

    Then the government requires one ton of regulations and measures that stifle people from entering the system and providing solutions.

    The answer always is simply more money for those entrenched in the establishment. Which translates into waste.

    That is why I am charitable when it comes to illegal immigration. Not that I am not for enforcing the border. But until we curb the tons of waste we produce in this country, illegals should be able to dig into it.

    • http://americanpumainitaly.blogspot.com/ sarainitaly

      i don’t know why schools can’t hire parent’s of the kids to be the *lunch ladies* and cook, or be in charge of the school lunch program at their school.

      these massive govt. handled programs are colossal failures, it seems.

    • tek

      lark: your logic is fuzzy. Do you not realize the harm illegals do in this country? Maybe not all of them, but here’s a group of people who have no stake in the U. S. they love their countries of origin. They send the money they make to their countries of origin. Ever notice how many hispanics who can’t speak English are driving Tahoes and Escalades? They have no consciousness about the environment and they are shopping at the grocery store in Wal Mart, not Whole Foods. The more these illegal dilute wages and benefits, the more the quality of life in this country will fall. I’m not sure what part of that Americans don’t understand.

      Sometime read up on what illegals are doing to our national forests. They plant marijuana in all the national forests and sneak deadly pesticides in from Mexico to protect it. They set up camp around the crop and shoot endangered species for food and leave tons of garbage in these forests for the rangers to deal with. The toxic pesticides wash into nearby rivers and pollute drinking water downstream. Americans aren’t even aware that they are consuming the stuff in their water. But by all means, let’s have as many million of these illegals as we can stuff into the U. S. It’s good for business.

      • lark

        I am against illegal immigration. I support strict and expansive border enforcement. I also support deporting unemployed illegal immigrants. But I am charitable enough to oppose deporting any illegal immigrant that has found a way to establish herself/himself in the country. Once they own property, like Escalades and Tahoes, in my book, they have earned the consideration of continuing their stay, to raise their families and to contribute to our society by entrepreneurial activities. Of course, any criminal acts should earn them their deportation papers.

        We are such a wasteful society. The day I go to WalMart and don’t find what I’m looking for because illegal immigrants have purchased all of what was left, then I will begin to have second thoughts. I feel we can fit a lot more people here. There is a lot of country left. Our land is God’s property and good people are entitled to dwell in it. I agree with enforcing the border and no allowing illegal immigrants from entering. But once they are here, and they are contributing, the deserve to be loved and appreciated. They are God’s people too.

        • wodiej

          God’s people don’t break the law by illegally squatting in another country.

          • lark

            God’s people carry with them characteristics that merge with other people and end up improving the lot. Characteristics like humility, and determination. Illegal aliens from Mexico and Central America have improved the American psychic quite a lot, making it much less violent. Otherwise we would have a much more violent society than the one we own at this time. The problem with the Anglo Saxon psychic which requires perfect organization and placement of every item in sight is that it disallows the free expression of entrepreneurialism that exists in the entrepreneurial people of the South. In top of that you have a common bias that says that anything that comes from below latitude 19 carries the stigma of stupid. If blacks would have come from northern latitudes they would have been accepted much more readily by Anglo Saxons, but because Africa is below latitude 19, then blacks like all Hispanic Americans and WOMEN in general have to prove themselves over and over and over in order for Anglo Saxons to believe they are worthy.

            It is my theory that WOMEN and Hispanic men suffer from the same type of distorted perception from Anglo Saxon men. A perception that requires them to prove themselves 20 time per year, at least.

      • heather

        I just have to ask — why is it so much better to shop at Whole Foods?

        I read a great book last summer called “Animal Vegetable Miracle” by Barbara Kingsolver. Her premise is that Whole Foods is the Walmart of organics, basically. Whole Foods is the corporate version of food — the food is grown within the letter of the law, but not within the spirit of it. It’s a feel good thing rather than an actual good thing in many ways.

        I have noticed that while Whole Foods does carry organics, they also carry non-organic food at inflated prices. A family of my family’s size can’t afford to pay inflated prices just to feel crunchy-granola-y.

        I also don’t shop at Whole Foods because their carts are sized for a family of two. If they want me to shop there, they’re going to have to work with me — and I think the size of the cart is small so that you don’t really notice that your $200 bought so little. My grocery bill as it is is somewhere above $800 a month — if you translate into Whole Foods dollars, it would probably be $1200 or more.

        Kingsolver’s premise in her book is that while organic is great, local organic is actually more likely to have a positive impact on the environment. When you buy organic bananas from Belize, you’re spending an awful lot of energy to get that happy organic feeling.

        • Snickers

          Heather, I used to go up the road a piece to Whole Foods and buy a whole lot of food to freeze and get me through for a couple of months. Since the economic crisis hit us I buy at my local co-op from local farmers which saves so much fuel. The organic fruits and veggies I get there are truly organic and may cost more but are supporting my neighbors. Thank you for the title of Kingsolver’s book. I’ll order it and read it.

  • Pat Racimora

    Excellent comment Diana L C! I hope everyone who comes here reads it because it offers more detail about the cause of the problem. Thank you!

    • Diana L. C.

      Pat,

      I am sorry I didn’t thank you first for bringing up an important topic. This is just one that gets my blood boiling–as an animal activist and as an ex-teacher and as a mother and soon-to-be grandmother.

      The choices for a vegetarian lunch are so minimal in any school lunch program. But the requirement for buying federally subsidized surplus food (meat and dairy) IS a major problem. The government doesn’t subsidize mush vegetable or fruit production.

      Agribusiness is a major, major problem.

      The PCRM (Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine) presents an award for the best school lunch programs in the nation. Often the contenders are schools that are private or more privately funded so they don’t have to deal with the government.

  • NCgirl

    Pat, I am sooo glad you did this post. When I was in public school, 1965-1977, we had meals with meat, vegetables and a homemade dessert. It wasn’t full of salt, fat and high fructose corn syrup. You had milk with your lunch, not soda. In high school, we even had a small salad bar. The food was prepared from scratch, not this pre-processed garbage they feed kids now.

    • Docelder

      Yes, they cafeteria had a cooking staff that actually cooked. I remember the meals being pretty good. My kids hate the school food now. It has turned into more of a business than a service. But to be honest here, I dislike eating out at the national chain restaurants for the same reason… you can get pretty much the same stuff frozen at Sams Club if you want. Very little of that food is actually cooked on premises… if you subtract heating it up as cooking it. Yes, it is full of preservatives and was probably made with the lowest bidder ingredients to begin with. I wonder if anybody could make the connection to the rampant diagnosis of childhood ADD and ADHD to these foods, along with the total absence of really nutritious foods for many children.

      • Diana L. C.

        Well, I went through public schools in the fifties and sixties, and our lunch programs were horrible even with the ladies doing the cooking. They, even then, were bound to certain food buying practices by the government. It was “homemade,” but it WAS greasy, starchy, cheesy, and most of the vegetables were overcooked and sometimes smothered in sauce. I stopped eating school lunch very, very early in life because I couldn’t digest it in the short time required. I made my own lunch and took it with me.

        Think of the kids, like my son, who have a a more pronounced lactose intolerance. A doctor whose practice dealt with many people of my ethnic group researched and discovered that this type of intolerance came from having lived poor and in times of famine over their history. Their bodies just did not digest fat and milk, etc., well.

        (Heck, I even remember a time when our government decided to help the poor kids of Africa by sending much of our excess of powdered milk to them. It caused the African kids much pain because of their dependence on eating a more grain and plant-based diet. They ended up sometimes using the powdered milk to make a substance like a plaster to patch their roofs.)

        The people in our family who are not overweight are the ones who have learned to “listen” to our bodies and modify our eating habits. We are the ones who do not develop heart disease, diabetes, etc.

        You can look the other way if you must, but eating too much meat and dairy is not a good thing.

  • http://americanpumainitaly.blogspot.com/ sarainitaly

    geez, does ANY give a crap about anything? how can companies just shovel that crap to kids. Don’t these people have souls? seriously…

    I loved my school lunces in high school. we had a salad bar, and all kinds of options.

    the schools here (preschool anyway, not sure about higher up) prepay annually for lunches. This way, they know who will be partaking every day, and can plan accordingly.

    before high school, the best lunches I ever ate at school are the ones my mom used to pack for me.

    • http://americanpumainitaly.blogspot.com/ sarainitaly

      does ANYONE give a crap…

      (i obviously don’t give a crap about my typing… haha)

      • The Real HC

        Well, the obvious people who should give a crap – parents – seem to sometimes not. I am amazed at this and I just dont think there is a fix.

        I will give you a (longwinded) example. I take kids from Baltimore out on the Chesapeake Bay on a historic skipjack now and again. Most teachers and school administrators take this event seriously and seem to actually care about the kids. But you would be surprised at how many parents do not seem to be able to focus on the details of what is required. They sign a waiver and dump the kid at school without any thought – they dont even send the kids with jackets or food. I just dont see how schools can compensate for kids being raised this way.

        Its sad to me because I see enough of these kids that I went out and bought a ton of extra jackets just to be prepared, and we now bring lots of extra food for these little outings as well.

        Children require work and attention to raise, it makes me mad when people don’t want to do this work and expect schools to compensate. If parents dont care, why expect anyone else will?

        Not to excuse ketchup as a vegetable, failure to follow guidelines, and poor kitchen hygiene at all. Schools can certainly be better but they can never be as good as parents who care.

        • http://americanpumainitaly.blogspot.com/ sarainitaly

          i agree. and schools/programs get away with this crap because parents don’t pay attention.

          you think if they did, they would revolt and change policy.

          where is the Al Sharpton for kids? Why does Al Sharpton get all postal over a cartoon, but doesn’t fight for kids eating ketchup for school?

          And, I wonder how rich Teresa and John Kerry got off that program? haha

    • tek

      Sarainitaly: same here. We had a cafeteria, snack bar and grill in my high school The food was really good. This problem is another indication of how everything in the U. S. is just about greed. No attention is ever focused on creating quality of life, just billions of tax dollars spent to make unconscionable business people rich at the expense of average people trying to live a quality life.

    • wodiej

      before high school, the best lunches I ever ate at school are the ones my mom used to pack for me

      Amen sister!!

  • Rich

    Wonderful Cartoon! This is a very important subject that few parents seem to interact with. I can understand if in very poor areas the children need to be fed at school and the parents do not feel empowered to do something about what the kids eat. However this problem goes on in communities where the parents can afford to make their children a good breakfast and lunch. Communities where the PTA is supposed to be looking out for our children and they do nothing about the poor nutrition the children are eating, the food that is wasted, and our tax dollars are being used to fill up our landfills. My parents both worked and the four of us lived in a one bedroom apartment with my parents sleeping on the living room sofa bed, and yet they found time to give me and my brother a breakfast and made sure I had a good lunch to eat. If we are now so child oriented, and we know now so much more about nutrition, then why are parents, the government, the school administrators and the PTA turning a blind eye to this issue? This problem affects our children’s health as well as their ability to learn and it makes teaching of the children with poor eating habits a very difficult job for all teachers.

    Rich

    • Diana L. C.

      Again, some of the people who went with me to lobby Salazar were PTA parents. They had worked hard at their schools but came up against the wall of government regulations that required the food buying practices. Unfortunately the poorer schools, where the kids often need even better nutrition at school, are the ones worst hit by horrible fat-laden, flour “enriched” lunchroom food. Agribusiness is a big lobby, and O and his Illinois corn growing lobby fall into that category.

  • Sassy

    Our grand-daughters have taken their lunch from home for years now. Thankfully they LIKE healthy, fresh food!
    The schools were supposed to have taken out the cola dispensers(who paid nice sums) and cut back on empty calorie lunches, but it would seem they have not done enough.
    Preprocessed is NOT food…we won’t eat the stuff from the frozen section of the super market!

  • tek

    Pat: this is a great article highlighting a very serious problem.

  • CB

    Pat, You are probably familiar with Alice Water’s Edible Schoolyard program through her Chez Panisse Foundation. (There’s a Web site.) She is trying to spread this elementary-school program in which children grow some of their food in a garden, learn to cook, and learn to sit down and share a meal throughout California and to other states. When her daughter Fannie went to Yale, she visited with the president and offered to help start a garden and a whole foods cafeteria for Yalies.

    A remarkable chef, Ann Cooper, has transformed the Berkeley School District’s lunch program (she was sponsored by the Chez Panisse Foundation and is moving on the Boulder Valley School District next school year).

    http://www.chefann.com/blog/?p=397

    • Pat Racimora

      Yes, yes! It is in the last “hot” link of my story. I wish there was space to write a really long piece. I wuold have covered that project for sure.

      Things CAN change–there just needs to be a willingness on the part of everyone involved.

      My teacher friend tells me that she tries to bring up the problems, but everything falls on deaf ears because the system is so big and entrenched.

      There are so many good comments here–I wish every parent of school-aged children could see them.

  • Sammie

    The school board where we used to live determined that it would be more cost effective to use Styrofoam trays instead of running plastic trays through a dish washer, so everyday hundreds of trays were thrown out at lunch time (and some school systems serve breakfast too, so up to two trays may be used per child per day). As far as nutrition, the school nurse even admitted to me that my kids would probably be better off if I just packed them a peanut butter and jelly sandwich on whole wheat with fresh fruit, and yogurt from home.

    Aside from the quality of the food, kids often don’t eat because they aren’t given enough time and they get distracted by their friends. Even though many kids get on a bus around 7:15 and don’t get off the bus until between 3:30 and 4:00, the schools can’t seem to find more than 15 to 20 minutes to schedule for their lunch. For cost savings reasons (to limit the number of buses and drivers), many children who only live a few miles from school end up riding the bus for about 45 minutes both before and after school (not a very efficient use of their time).

    When you look at how a child’s time is spent at school, you often find that they aren’t given much time at recess to run around (and often have in-door recess). Even though recess has been cut down as much as possible, to keep up with the pressure of federally mandated test scores, kids often come home with about an hours worth of homework (so, when are they supposed to have time to play). They also come home with backpacks full of papers that need to be reviewed by the parents, including papers from the school system lecturing parents about the importance of good nutrition, exercise and living a “green” lifestyle (now, if only the school system would listen to their own lectures).

  • ginger411

    My son came home from school so excited about the fact that they were going to get served a turkey dinner for Thanksgiving. The school needed parent volunteers for the “special” day. I went in to help out. Turns out it was turkey nuggets and fries.
    Talk about ticked off! He very loudly said, “what a rip.” All eyes went to him and then to me. I couldn’t help myself. I started to laugh. I was thinking the very same thing!

    • Pat Racimora

      Good Lord–I didn’t even know they had turkey nuggets!

  • wodiej

    First thing they need to do is remove all vending machines. They are filled with JUNK. No pop, candy, chips. All empty carbs and calories. Sugar is hard for the body to process and then you “crash” after eating it. It also doesn’t curb hunger long-you need protein for that. Perhaps in place of vending machines, schools can have a small “store” with fresh fruit, veggies, crackers, granola bars, milk, juice etc.

    For meals, who the hell mandates nutrition in this country at schools? Parental responsibility should be first and foremost but since kids on free lunch primarily have irresponsible parents or they wouldn’t need free lunches, forget that.

    Next time you go in public anywhere, look at people and tell me how many are not just a few pounds overweight, but downright obese? 75%+….people eat junk, eat out and they don’t exercise. 12 yr olds should not have a weight problem! Adults should provide nutritious meals because they are the adults! If the kids have nothing else to eat, they get hungry enough, they’ll eat what’s there. Most of the time my parents packed lunches for me. My Dad fixed us breakfast every single morning. And we never took free anything.

    Again….NO ACCOUNTABILITY.

    • Solara 7

      Harsh but true, Wodiej.

  • Don X

    Pat, your cartoon and presentation highlight a critical issue that has been widely ignored. Unless parents and teachers recognize the implications of this problem for the physical/emotional/mental health of their children and organize to bring about change, this outrageous disregard for the safety and well-being of children will persist indefinitely. Fortunately, as some have indicated, there are some schools and some parents and some teachers who do take positive action with respect to their own school children. Some parents prepare lunches for their own children because they are aware of and care about the kinds of crap being served by school lunch programs. Unfortunately, some parents are too uninvolved or “too busy” to monitor what is going on in their schools, whether it is the lunch program or the curriculum or activities on the school ground. It is easier to pass on this responsibility to the school district and the government and to just assume that all is well. The bury your head in the sand or ostrich approach to raising their children. Thanks, Pat, for stimulating some discussion of this very important, and unresolved problem that needs our attention….and action. Without some action, it’s just words, and just another problem in our tough times that will be relegated to the low priority pile of unresolved issues or left for someone else to deal with.

    • Solara 7

      Good comment, Don X. As someone else remarked, if this is what he government has been doing to school kids, what would national health care be like?

      I loved the cartoon from a while back about a hospital trying to cut costs. So CAT scans were being done by a nurse holding a live cat to look at the patient. Now that somehow doesn’t seem so funny.)

    • go4one

      As a single parent, I can assure you that it is not out of some kind of school lunch loyalty that my kid has as to why he gets lunch at school every day.
      We make lunches when we can. Buy lunches on the days we can’t.
      As for me, yes, I can afford school lunches. But, I know plenty of families who can’t. They either get free or reduced lunches.
      Furthermore, did you know that your school’s Title I funding is directly tied to how many of students receive free or reduced lunches?

      • http://deleted Buzz Latte LaRue

        That still doesn’t excuse the move to prepackaged food. By the way, I worked in a 100% free lunch school. They were the truly poor.

        Lunches were rarely thrown away. Kids actually stole food off of others’ trays to stuff in their pockets to take home. But, much of the food was made from scratch, then. Kids actually learned to read by studying the lunch menus.

        The last school I worked in was funded for free and reduced lunch at about 80%.

        Many of the lunches were thrown away on a daily basis complete in their plastic packaging. Many of the kids coveted the lunches that kids brought from home. Why? Because they were a symbol of parents actually caring about their kid and the lunches didn’t resemble something from McDonalds.

        • http://americanpumainitaly.blogspot.com/ sarainitaly

          there’s nothing that can replace your lunch box, with a thermos of soup, a PB&J, a piece of fruit, a dessert and a milk, and a note from mom on your napkin. :O)

          I used to buy milk at school, for a nickel. And it came in a plastic pouch that you poked with a straw.

      • go4one

        “Some parents prepare lunches for their own children because they are aware of and care about the kinds of crap being served by school lunch programs.”

        My comment was in direct response to this. Perhaps some parents don’t care. But, more than likely, it is because they can’t afford another option.

        • The Real HC

          Americans cannot afford an apple and a sandwich? I disagree. Our biggest problem as a nation is that we are fat.

          I grew up with next to nothing in an immigrant family and my parents always found a way to take care of us. We certainly had some wardrobe issues and didnt always live in the best areas. But lack of food? Never. Not one time.

          • Ferd Berfle

            Our biggest problem as a nation is that we are fat.

            And it is getting worse. Sometimes I will skip lunch at work and my colleagues look at me in amazement, as if I’m some sort of nut. I’ve even had people makes remarks about how “thin” I am, as if that is some sort of disgrace. I don’t live to eat but eat to live. Skipping a lunch now and again would hurt no one, unless there is a medical condition which makes that impossible.

  • mamakay

    I worked for a my daughters school many years ago. The food was cooked from scratch and the government gave them real butter and cheese. The baked goods were also from scratch – no boxed cakes or cookies. The very sad part was the waste. The children threw out whole apples, fresh salads etc. It made me very sad to see the waste. By law the school was required to throw everything away. I always felt there was a better way but no one would listen. This school alone could have fed the homeless a decent lunch with what was left over.

    • Docelder

      Some years ago, I knew a guy who worked for one of the major breakfast cereals makers. He was one of the guys who negotiated wholesale prices and shelf placement to the chain groceries. I knew him very well, and asked one day out of just curiosity… how much did it cost really to make a box of “corn ****” he kind of laughed and said… I think we spend more on the box than we do the cereal. I asked him where does the out of date cereals go? To food shelters? He replied to the dump. We tried giving it away before and were sued for the people eating it. Now, we just throw it all out.

    • wodiej

      You know what, when I was growing up, I ate it or went hungry. 99% of the time I ate it. Kids today just don’t have good eating habits nor are they taught to be thankful for what they have.

  • PO’dVet

    This is not a tough problem to fix!

    Employees of the Department of Education must eat the same meals provided to the children in their schools.

    Within a few weeks I would guarantee you, that the school lunches would be improved across the board!

    • Solara 7

      LMAO!

    • Diana L. C.

      At first glance, your suggestion seems to be a good idea. HOWEVER, you can’t believe how the younger teachers and school employes will go for the greese-laden french fries and the gooey, greesy cheese pizza of very doughy bread when they are being served in the lunch room. The younger generation–and I am talking late 20s and 30s–have terrible eating habits too.

      • PO’dVet

        I have no doubt you are correct Diana L.C.! But while some of the young teachers might not have a problem with it being used college days of eating whatever is laying around. I do believe the members of the local school board would not be so flippant about eating the crap on most school menu’s. Think of the last time you went to a school board meeting and about the members on that board. Those self indulgent pricks looking for ways to enjoy more kickbacks from lowest bidder contracts are not willing to suffer themselves. Personally, I think one of the requirements for even running for the school board, should be having a child in the local public school system.

  • Dylan

    I work for St. Paul schools and the food that is thrown away is actually cooked up and made up into slop for pigs. This is a great idea.

    • Ferd Berfle

      I work for St. Paul schools and the food that is thrown away is actually cooked up and made up into slop for pigs. This is a great idea.

      Only so long as there is no meat in it, that would be OK. If there is, you’re asking for trouble.

      • Docelder

        Where I went to high school, the cooks carried some of the excess food home. They weren’t supposed to, but everybody knew one family that commonly hunted for their meat. Their kids actually ate raccoon and oppossum some of the time. Nobody said anything about them taking some of the extra stuff home that would have been thrown out for them. That family would rather have died than to take anything like welfare from the government. When their father died, the sons actually buried the dad on the farm because they could not afford to bury him the right way. Of course that was a time back. Just a side note… most people don’t know this, but pigs really like meat. When I was a kid, I grew up on a cattle ranch… there was a local farmer who acquired a lot of sickly skinny hogs and some sickly skinny horses. He then slaughtered the horses, one at a time, feeding them to the hogs which grew fat and he made out on selling them. Gruesome, yes. But pigs do like meat.

        • Ferd Berfle

          A animal that eats meat is considered carrion and is unfit for human consumption. There’s also that pesky problem with trichinosis. All the pork producers I knew in Nebraska in the 1980s fed their pigs corn, in part get rid of trichinosos but also as a “selling point” for pork. I guess that went by the wayside, too, in the name of profit. I had thought better of the American farmer.

          Thanks for letting me know. I’m off pork again, which is especially god-damn irritating considering that I like pork.

          • Docelder

            I doubt any of the big hog farms do this this these days, but they do feed the hogs antibiotics in their daily feed as well as give them growth hormones. Just look up “ralgro” for example. Profit trumps everything.

            • Ferd Berfle

              I do hope that you are correct. I will have to do some further research on the subject. I knew about the antibiotics and growth hormone, which is an awful practice, but I can “live” with that. The very idea, though, of feeding pigs “slop” is where I draw the line.

        • Diana L. C.

          It’s true; I lived on a farm. Aso, for you film buff, think of the horrible scene in Snatch. But animals eating the meat of their own kind, especially, is like a sort of cannibalism. Cannibalism in humans and other animals has spawned some deadly prion diseases. And herbivores eating meat is also dangerous.

  • FembotsForObama

    Great post Pat. The link between adequate protein (from primarily meat sources) and kid’s brain functioning is something that is not discussed enough. Aside from the protein, beef sources also supply much needed B vitamins and amino acids. Too many kids are going without this and it shows — they are slow learners and lethargic.

    Just something I heard/read a few years back… there is a school in New York that is battling this, and even used its gym on weekends to allow organic and local farmers to sell its wares, so the parents would get educated about and could buy good food. Sorry, don’t remember the name. And if I recall, there is another school in Green Bay, WI that was trying to go to locally produced food as well. A lot of WI schools have at least rid the vending machines from the halls.

    • Diana L. C.

      You can get those things from other very good protein sources that are NOT meat based.

  • mamakay

    Pat do you remember the high school in Arcadia? They had vending machines that sold fruit. Why cant they do that now? We couldnt get candy and soda drinks. Somewhere we lost the reason for nutrition, we just wanted to apease the kids and keep them “happy”. We really need to get back to the basics in many areas.

    • Pat Racimora

      You are right Mamakay. Vending machines did used to have good stuff in them. But I bet the profit motive got in there somewhere along the way.

      Apples and other good stuff that would go bad if it wasn’t bought up quickly may have become a financial liability. On the other hand, much of that prepackaged stuff with sugar or tons of preservatives will last for a year.

      • Ferd Berfle

        Twinkies have a half-life longer than that of Plutonium and are probably just as bad for you.

        • jangles

          We call this “bar code food.”

      • Diana L. C.

        Many suggested regulations for providing better food items in vending machines or for eliminating certain things from vending machines in schools have been voted down. Vending machines are the source of some of the major revenue for PTA groups, school sports and club revenues, etc. It IS always a money issue.

  • jangles

    Here is another interesting side salad. Schools get an allocation for each student who is qualified for a free lunch. In inner city schools where most kids qualify for a free lunch, the district can actually meet federal guidelines and make money on the program. I worked for a district that not only made money, they made BIG money—legitimately.

  • Linda Mac

    This is such an important issue. If I remember correctly this tone of being willing to serve junk to our children and tell them it is food began in a public way with the Republican God, Reagan, who declared that catsup is a vegatable so that when children are fed french fries ad catsup they aregetting the two vegetables they need at a meal. That was only one of the times that he demonstrated how h really felt about the children of this country. He set the attitude toward nutrition in the insttutions of our country and we now have those children who have no clue about real nutrtion.

  • Linda C.

    I wonder how many “food suppliers” to the fed food program are as unscrupulous as Halliburton. I can’t beleive the rampant fraud perpetrated upon us for the past 8 years is only limited to one company.

  • MrMike

    Like the government cheese program, the school lunch is a set up to dump unwanted surplus foods on to the public. Brought to you courtesy of a corrupt legislator taking money from a lobby.
    This is why even though I favor a single payer health care system I shudder to think how it will be implemented. There will be massive fraud involved thanks to your local crooked pol.
    There is a reason Nancy Pelosi didn’t want to impeach George Bush ad it has noting to do with maintaining stability during a war.

  • pm317

    Compared to the rest of the world this country is smarter and richer in all respects. Somehow the perceived advantage from that does not trickle down to these levels where they need it the most. It is sad.

  • tminu

    The rutin, ascorbate, kaempferol, narigenin, quercetin, lycopene, other carotenoids, tocopherol, and trace minerals, are all highly concentrated in the equivalent of “tomato jam”. To be fair, ketchup does concisely sneak phytochemicals into a child’s diet they would never otherwise eat.

  • Sassy

    While it could become tiresome after a time, there are menus that could be healthy and fairly durable in shelf life.
    Breakfast could be “scramblers” , apple sauce, toast or small bagels.
    A good lunch would be low-sodium soups, apples, pears, or bananas.
    We love carrot sticks, brocccoli cuts, and sliced cucumbers. Fresh, fiber, and low cal.
    Too many parents are choosing corn dogs over nutrition!

    • Strawberry

      Sassy, even the parents like myself who do provide healthy meals, must contend with our kids choosing junk food over the good stuff. I’m a nutrition junkie, competitive bodybuilder etc. My kids were raised on healthy food, but once they started going to school, forget about it. They became entranced with Fruit by the Foot, candy bars made by candy companies labeled ‘granola bars’ or ‘nutrition bars’. Yogurts made with more sugar and artificial colours and flavorings than pudding. (My kids were caught trading their rather expensive, healthy lunches for their friends’ cheap, junk food). Not to mention it’s a bloody nightmare wading through all the crap on our grocery shelves. You’ve got to have a bloody PhD just to be able to read the labels. Now add into the mix all the commercials and PR aimed at selling this crap to our kids…even parents with knowledge about nutrition can’t fight these forces. AND once kids’ tastebuds are programmed for a high salt, high sugar, high fat diet, it’s like taking them through rehab to get them back to understanding what REAL FOOD tastes like. Ugh. I’m stunned sometimes when I see children being fed garbage then expected to learn and behave in school. Just plain gobsmacked. But most parents have no clue what healthy eating is anymore thanks to big agri companies.

    • Solara 7

      Too many people are chossing DOGs (period) over their kids. When I go to the pet store owners are fawning over the ingredients and rejecting anything with too much this or that. (I do hope they are actually caring as much for the kids.)

      Meanwhile, there are really BAD dog foods as well. If it’s really cheap its the same as the kid’s lunches.

      • Strawberry

        OMG Solara 7, you are so right. We have a store up here in WA called Mudbay Pet food. All they sell is dog and cat food. One night I needed some dog food and they just happened to be open until 9PM…I COULD NOT BELIEVE WHAT THEY CARRIED! OR HOW MUCH IT COSTS! I walked out with a five pound $15 dollar bag of wild trout and sweet potato dog food. Organic. USDA quality. My dogs loved it…and being mastiffs it fed them for one or two meals until I could get to costco for their regular lamb and brown rice. 40 pounds for 20 bucks. (Oh and yes, we couldn’t resist, our curiosity had us by the short ones…the trout and sweetpotato kibble wouldn’t be half bad if you added almonds, butter and some brown sugar)

      • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

        Cheap food is all corn. And it generally contains menadione, which is a chemical used in the cocktail they use to euthanize animals. Therefore, it’s not hard to figure out what they are putting in that “animal digest” and “byproduct” part of the pet food. Pet food mfgrs can use roadkill if they want to. There are no laws. Diamond hauled off those dead cows from farms in texas. Wonder what they died of.

        If you can’t read your pet’s food bag, you don’t really love your pet.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          Incidentally, cats are Obligate carnivores. This means that anything other than meat in a cat’s diet serves no nutritional purpose whatsoever.

  • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

    My mother made my lunch till I was tall enough to reach the counter myself. Then I made my lunch the night before school. I guess that’s too much to ask now.