<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate, you wuss! (+ Wide Open Thread)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137312</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137312</guid>
		<description>no nimrod, YOU ARE PROJECTING YOUR BULLSHIT.  You are Projecting that I believe someone needs my &quot;manly protection&quot;.  That is your bullshit.  You are making up characterizations of people to play a little game.  You are asserting your inner problems on others and I can see it as clear as can be.

Are you so petty that you are going to play syntax games instead of forming a coherent position on your supposed fascination with &quot;wuss&quot; &quot;pussy swallow your balls&quot;?  or is that your best game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no nimrod, YOU ARE PROJECTING YOUR BULLSHIT.  You are Projecting that I believe someone needs my &#8220;manly protection&#8221;.  That is your bullshit.  You are making up characterizations of people to play a little game.  You are asserting your inner problems on others and I can see it as clear as can be.</p>
<p>Are you so petty that you are going to play syntax games instead of forming a coherent position on your supposed fascination with &#8220;wuss&#8221; &#8220;pussy swallow your balls&#8221;?  or is that your best game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137309</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137309</guid>
		<description>You cant even get a metaphor right! &quot;Firing across the bow&quot; is a warning shot. Jesus, its like arguing with fucking retards in here,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cant even get a metaphor right! &#8220;Firing across the bow&#8221; is a warning shot. Jesus, its like arguing with fucking retards in here,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137306</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137306</guid>
		<description>Eh? No Pithy (and Idiotic) response? wassa matter? your pussy swallow your balls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh? No Pithy (and Idiotic) response? wassa matter? your pussy swallow your balls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137032</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137032</guid>
		<description>How do you type if you are illiterate? Seriously, its amazing! Lets take another look:
” You are arguing for equality for women because they are victims that need your manly &lt;strong&gt;protection&lt;/strong&gt;”

“You really need to go study that “projection” you are fixated on, because you are the one &lt;strong&gt;projecting &lt;/strong&gt; bucko.”
You seriously cant see the difference?
(hint T and J are not the same letter!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you type if you are illiterate? Seriously, its amazing! Lets take another look:<br />
” You are arguing for equality for women because they are victims that need your manly <strong>protection</strong>”</p>
<p>“You really need to go study that “projection” you are fixated on, because you are the one <strong>projecting </strong> bucko.”<br />
You seriously cant see the difference?<br />
(hint T and J are not the same letter!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137026</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137026</guid>
		<description>my point is that both &quot;coward&quot; and &quot;weak&quot; are non gender specific, whereas &quot;wuss&quot; is a specific term for emasculation. Ergo, using &quot;coward&quot; and &quot;weak&quot; is not sexist but using &quot;wuss&quot; is. I personally don&#039;t know why people like you get your panties in a twist (sexist phrase) over sexist terms, but a hypocrite is a hypocrite, you sniveling, co-bag, girlie-man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my point is that both &#8220;coward&#8221; and &#8220;weak&#8221; are non gender specific, whereas &#8220;wuss&#8221; is a specific term for emasculation. Ergo, using &#8220;coward&#8221; and &#8220;weak&#8221; is not sexist but using &#8220;wuss&#8221; is. I personally don&#8217;t know why people like you get your panties in a twist (sexist phrase) over sexist terms, but a hypocrite is a hypocrite, you sniveling, co-bag, girlie-man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137022</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137022</guid>
		<description>JOHN WITHERSPOON:
&quot; You are arguing for equality for women because they are victims that need your manly protection&quot;

RESPONSE:
“You really need to go study that “projection” you are fixated on, because you are the one projecting bucko.”

JOHN WITHERSPOON
(I never said “projection”)

You really need to slow down turbo, you&#039;re blowing your circuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JOHN WITHERSPOON:<br />
&#8221; You are arguing for equality for women because they are victims that need your manly protection&#8221;</p>
<p>RESPONSE:<br />
“You really need to go study that “projection” you are fixated on, because you are the one projecting bucko.”</p>
<p>JOHN WITHERSPOON<br />
(I never said “projection”)</p>
<p>You really need to slow down turbo, you&#8217;re blowing your circuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137016</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137016</guid>
		<description>funny how you fail entirely to address my argument at all. You make a series of nonsense statements:

&quot;Women are “equal” and that can be affected by not treating them as equal.&quot;
(categorically impossible)
&quot;You also assume facts not in play in the comment about what else I support, or what else I could of, and didn’t need to write.&quot;
(just complete nonsense. also run on sentence)
&quot;I start from the premise that women are equal to men and that the society around us isn’t acting in accordance with this.&quot;
(who cares what society does, they are immutably equal or not.)
&quot;You really need to go study that “projection” you are fixated on, because you are the one projecting bucko.&quot;
(I never said &quot;projection&quot;)
&quot;What you haven’t figured into the equation is that I’m pissed off about how my partner, my daughter, and other women in my life are being treated compared to the view of the world we are sharing. I’m sick of those who wish to pretend that sexism and racism are things of the past while I watch it play out every single day in front of me.&quot;
(and you conclude that women in your life need your protection)
&quot;So, Mr. I’m Gonna Show How Much Your Shit Stinks, what additional take do you wish to rabbit hole? Flame bait is what you are doing,&quot;
(really, you should take a remedial english class!)
&quot;not creating a substantive argument about sexism.&quot;
(And after blathering on and making no argument or sense for a few paragraphs, you arbitrarily conclude that i&#039;m somehow not making an argument)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny how you fail entirely to address my argument at all. You make a series of nonsense statements:</p>
<p>&#8220;Women are “equal” and that can be affected by not treating them as equal.&#8221;<br />
(categorically impossible)<br />
&#8220;You also assume facts not in play in the comment about what else I support, or what else I could of, and didn’t need to write.&#8221;<br />
(just complete nonsense. also run on sentence)<br />
&#8220;I start from the premise that women are equal to men and that the society around us isn’t acting in accordance with this.&#8221;<br />
(who cares what society does, they are immutably equal or not.)<br />
&#8220;You really need to go study that “projection” you are fixated on, because you are the one projecting bucko.&#8221;<br />
(I never said &#8220;projection&#8221;)<br />
&#8220;What you haven’t figured into the equation is that I’m pissed off about how my partner, my daughter, and other women in my life are being treated compared to the view of the world we are sharing. I’m sick of those who wish to pretend that sexism and racism are things of the past while I watch it play out every single day in front of me.&#8221;<br />
(and you conclude that women in your life need your protection)<br />
&#8220;So, Mr. I’m Gonna Show How Much Your Shit Stinks, what additional take do you wish to rabbit hole? Flame bait is what you are doing,&#8221;<br />
(really, you should take a remedial english class!)<br />
&#8220;not creating a substantive argument about sexism.&#8221;<br />
(And after blathering on and making no argument or sense for a few paragraphs, you arbitrarily conclude that i&#8217;m somehow not making an argument)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137008</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137008</guid>
		<description>Its probably tired of becoming your paste and run section.

Yes, I&#039;m quite familiar with the use of Wuss, Pussy, Wimp, Coward, Cockold, Whipped, etc.

Now...would you like to actually formulate a position?  You are sounding like a bad take on the Monty Python &quot;Argument Sketch&quot;.  Simply saying No It Isn&#039;t.

Iconoclastic behavior can be rather addictive, so I&#039;d be careful about spending too much time only saying, &quot;No it isn&#039;t.&quot;.  After a while your words will become so vacant nobody reads them.

Since you are such the activist against Sexism, perhaps you can write a post about the sweeping effects of sexism including how it comes back in the form of emasculation.  But, that would be more than simply, &quot;No It Isn&#039;t!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its probably tired of becoming your paste and run section.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m quite familiar with the use of Wuss, Pussy, Wimp, Coward, Cockold, Whipped, etc.</p>
<p>Now&#8230;would you like to actually formulate a position?  You are sounding like a bad take on the Monty Python &#8220;Argument Sketch&#8221;.  Simply saying No It Isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Iconoclastic behavior can be rather addictive, so I&#8217;d be careful about spending too much time only saying, &#8220;No it isn&#8217;t.&#8221;.  After a while your words will become so vacant nobody reads them.</p>
<p>Since you are such the activist against Sexism, perhaps you can write a post about the sweeping effects of sexism including how it comes back in the form of emasculation.  But, that would be more than simply, &#8220;No It Isn&#8217;t!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137002</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-137002</guid>
		<description>You cannot be that dense.
Women are &quot;equal&quot; and that can be affected by not treating them as equal.
Are you going to manufacture some bullshit here?
If the general populous does not treat a class of people as equals, they will not receive the equal opportunities.

You also assume facts not in play in the comment about what else I support, or what else I could of, and didn&#039;t need to write.

I didn&#039;t &quot;pick and chose&quot; areas where women were equal and not, I start from the premise that women are equal to men and that the society around us isn&#039;t acting in accordance with this.

You really need to go study that &quot;projection&quot; you are fixated on, because you are the one projecting bucko.

And your comments about &quot;need your manly protection&quot; is more of your own character imposed where you want to.

You can do better than flame bait can&#039;t ya John Witherspoon?

What you haven&#039;t figured into the equation is that I&#039;m pissed off about how my partner, my daughter, and other women in my life are being treated compared to the view of the world we are sharing.  I&#039;m sick of those who wish to pretend that sexism and racism are things of the past while I watch it play out every single day in front of me.

So, Mr. I&#039;m Gonna Show How Much Your Shit Stinks, what additional take do you wish to rabbit hole?  Flame bait is what you are doing, not creating a substantive argument about sexism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot be that dense.<br />
Women are &#8220;equal&#8221; and that can be affected by not treating them as equal.<br />
Are you going to manufacture some bullshit here?<br />
If the general populous does not treat a class of people as equals, they will not receive the equal opportunities.</p>
<p>You also assume facts not in play in the comment about what else I support, or what else I could of, and didn&#8217;t need to write.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t &#8220;pick and chose&#8221; areas where women were equal and not, I start from the premise that women are equal to men and that the society around us isn&#8217;t acting in accordance with this.</p>
<p>You really need to go study that &#8220;projection&#8221; you are fixated on, because you are the one projecting bucko.</p>
<p>And your comments about &#8220;need your manly protection&#8221; is more of your own character imposed where you want to.</p>
<p>You can do better than flame bait can&#8217;t ya John Witherspoon?</p>
<p>What you haven&#8217;t figured into the equation is that I&#8217;m pissed off about how my partner, my daughter, and other women in my life are being treated compared to the view of the world we are sharing.  I&#8217;m sick of those who wish to pretend that sexism and racism are things of the past while I watch it play out every single day in front of me.</p>
<p>So, Mr. I&#8217;m Gonna Show How Much Your Shit Stinks, what additional take do you wish to rabbit hole?  Flame bait is what you are doing, not creating a substantive argument about sexism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136806</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136806</guid>
		<description>GR3
You might wish to avoid any intake of High Fructose Corn Syrup.  Nasty shit that stuff is.  Screws up the body&#039;s signalling mechanism.  Your body doesn&#039;t know it is sated.  
Probably help with your acid reflux issue and your desire to lose weight.
You might also wish to substitute a good single malt scotch for your beers.  
If you are using a butter substitute, dump it before it kills you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GR3<br />
You might wish to avoid any intake of High Fructose Corn Syrup.  Nasty shit that stuff is.  Screws up the body&#8217;s signalling mechanism.  Your body doesn&#8217;t know it is sated.<br />
Probably help with your acid reflux issue and your desire to lose weight.<br />
You might also wish to substitute a good single malt scotch for your beers.<br />
If you are using a butter substitute, dump it before it kills you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136797</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136797</guid>
		<description>i wish it would stop truncating my comments....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish it would stop truncating my comments&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136794</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136794</guid>
		<description>refutation by dictionary:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
wuss       (wŏŏs)  Pronunciation Key 
n.   Slang
A person regarded as weak or timid and especially as unmanly: &quot;Cats are for wusses, dog men say&quot; (Laura Blumenfeld). 

[Probably blend of wimp and pussy1.] 

ergo, a sexist term relating a man to the lady parts.

weak      /wik/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[week] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective, -er, -est.
1.	not strong; liable to yield, break, or collapse under pressure or strain; fragile; frail: a weak fortress; a weak spot in armor.

[Origin: 1250–1300; ME weik </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>refutation by dictionary:</p>
<p>American Heritage Dictionary &#8211; Cite This Source &#8211; Share This<br />
wuss       (wŏŏs)  Pronunciation Key<br />
n.   Slang<br />
A person regarded as weak or timid and especially as unmanly: &#8220;Cats are for wusses, dog men say&#8221; (Laura Blumenfeld). </p>
<p>[Probably blend of wimp and pussy1.] </p>
<p>ergo, a sexist term relating a man to the lady parts.</p>
<p>weak      /wik/ Pronunciation Key &#8211; Show Spelled Pronunciation[week] Pronunciation Key &#8211; Show IPA Pronunciation<br />
–adjective, -er, -est.<br />
1.	not strong; liable to yield, break, or collapse under pressure or strain; fragile; frail: a weak fortress; a weak spot in armor.</p>
<p>[Origin: 1250–1300; ME weik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136788</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136788</guid>
		<description>refutation by dictionary:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
wuss       (wŏŏs)  Pronunciation Key 
n.   Slang
A person regarded as weak or timid and especially as unmanly: &quot;Cats are for wusses, dog men say&quot; (Laura Blumenfeld). 

[Probably blend of wimp and pussy1.] 

ergo, a sexist term relating a man to the lady parts.

weak      /wik/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[week] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective, -er, -est.
1.	not strong; liable to yield, break, or collapse under pressure or strain; fragile; frail: a weak fortress; a weak spot in armor.
2.	lacking in bodily strength or healthy vigor, as from age or sickness; feeble; infirm: a weak old man; weak eyes.
3.	not having much political strength, governing power, or authority: a weak nation; a weak ruler.
4.	lacking in force, potency, or efficacy; impotent, ineffectual, or inadequate: weak sunlight; a weak wind.
5.	lacking in rhetorical or creative force or effectiveness: a weak reply to the charges; one of the author&#039;s weakest novels.
6.	lacking in logical or legal force or soundness: a weak argument.
7.	deficient in mental power, intelligence, or judgment: a weak mind.
8.	not having much moral strength or firmness, resolution, or force of character: to prove weak under temptation; weak compliance.
9.	deficient in amount, volume, loudness, intensity, etc.; faint; slight: a weak current of electricity; a weak pulse.
10.	deficient, lacking, or poor in something specified: a hand weak in trumps; I&#039;m weak in spelling.
11.	deficient in the essential or usual properties or ingredients: weak tea.
12.	unstressed, as a syllable, vowel, or word.
13.	(of Germanic verbs) inflected with suffixes, without inherited change of the root vowel, as English work, worked, or having a preterit ending in a dental, as English bring, brought.
14.	(of Germanic nouns and adjectives) inflected with endings originally appropriate to stems terminating in -n, as the adjective alte in German der alte Mann (“the old man”).
15.	(of wheat or flour) having a low gluten content or having a poor quality of gluten.
16.	Photography. thin; not dense.
17.	Commerce. characterized by a decline in prices: The market was weak in the morning but rallied in the afternoon.
[Origin: 1250–1300; ME weik </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>refutation by dictionary:</p>
<p>American Heritage Dictionary &#8211; Cite This Source &#8211; Share This<br />
wuss       (wŏŏs)  Pronunciation Key<br />
n.   Slang<br />
A person regarded as weak or timid and especially as unmanly: &#8220;Cats are for wusses, dog men say&#8221; (Laura Blumenfeld). </p>
<p>[Probably blend of wimp and pussy1.] </p>
<p>ergo, a sexist term relating a man to the lady parts.</p>
<p>weak      /wik/ Pronunciation Key &#8211; Show Spelled Pronunciation[week] Pronunciation Key &#8211; Show IPA Pronunciation<br />
–adjective, -er, -est.<br />
1.	not strong; liable to yield, break, or collapse under pressure or strain; fragile; frail: a weak fortress; a weak spot in armor.<br />
2.	lacking in bodily strength or healthy vigor, as from age or sickness; feeble; infirm: a weak old man; weak eyes.<br />
3.	not having much political strength, governing power, or authority: a weak nation; a weak ruler.<br />
4.	lacking in force, potency, or efficacy; impotent, ineffectual, or inadequate: weak sunlight; a weak wind.<br />
5.	lacking in rhetorical or creative force or effectiveness: a weak reply to the charges; one of the author&#8217;s weakest novels.<br />
6.	lacking in logical or legal force or soundness: a weak argument.<br />
7.	deficient in mental power, intelligence, or judgment: a weak mind.<br />
8.	not having much moral strength or firmness, resolution, or force of character: to prove weak under temptation; weak compliance.<br />
9.	deficient in amount, volume, loudness, intensity, etc.; faint; slight: a weak current of electricity; a weak pulse.<br />
10.	deficient, lacking, or poor in something specified: a hand weak in trumps; I&#8217;m weak in spelling.<br />
11.	deficient in the essential or usual properties or ingredients: weak tea.<br />
12.	unstressed, as a syllable, vowel, or word.<br />
13.	(of Germanic verbs) inflected with suffixes, without inherited change of the root vowel, as English work, worked, or having a preterit ending in a dental, as English bring, brought.<br />
14.	(of Germanic nouns and adjectives) inflected with endings originally appropriate to stems terminating in -n, as the adjective alte in German der alte Mann (“the old man”).<br />
15.	(of wheat or flour) having a low gluten content or having a poor quality of gluten.<br />
16.	Photography. thin; not dense.<br />
17.	Commerce. characterized by a decline in prices: The market was weak in the morning but rallied in the afternoon.<br />
[Origin: 1250–1300; ME weik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136780</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136780</guid>
		<description>either women are equal or they aren&#039;t. You can&#039;t pick and choose which parts they are equal in and which they aren&#039;t. Otherwise you are stating that there is an inherent difference between men and women. Your whole post is about why you feel you need to protect women. Why not protect men? Essentially your argument continually refutes itself. You are arguing for equality for women &lt;em&gt; because &lt;/em&gt; they are victims that need your manly protection. How is that not misogyny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>either women are equal or they aren&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t pick and choose which parts they are equal in and which they aren&#8217;t. Otherwise you are stating that there is an inherent difference between men and women. Your whole post is about why you feel you need to protect women. Why not protect men? Essentially your argument continually refutes itself. You are arguing for equality for women <em> because </em> they are victims that need your manly protection. How is that not misogyny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/1520/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136412</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/13/debate-you-wuss-wide-open-thread/#comment-136412</guid>
		<description>Tell me again: &lt;em&gt;when&lt;/em&gt; did actually &lt;em&gt;cry&lt;/em&gt;?  Video please because the two incidents where it seemed &quot;men&quot; like you were so &lt;strong&gt;hyper-sensitive&lt;/strong&gt; that you screamed, &quot;The horror!  The horror!&quot; were NH when she never cried, just got a bit choked up and at Yale where she didn&#039;t drop so much as a tear when her mentor from decades back talked about how proud he was of her and &lt;em&gt;he&lt;/em&gt; cried a bit.

And knock it off with the &quot;victim&quot; card.  Calling for more debates is standard during an election.  That you would go so far to inject your paranoia into it is a reflection of you and the other who you replied to.  If you have a problem with it, argue it on the &lt;em&gt;issues&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me again: <em>when</em> did actually <em>cry</em>?  Video please because the two incidents where it seemed &#8220;men&#8221; like you were so <strong>hyper-sensitive</strong> that you screamed, &#8220;The horror!  The horror!&#8221; were NH when she never cried, just got a bit choked up and at Yale where she didn&#8217;t drop so much as a tear when her mentor from decades back talked about how proud he was of her and <em>he</em> cried a bit.</p>
<p>And knock it off with the &#8220;victim&#8221; card.  Calling for more debates is standard during an election.  That you would go so far to inject your paranoia into it is a reflection of you and the other who you replied to.  If you have a problem with it, argue it on the <em>issues</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

