RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Barack’s Geniality Is Not Enough

Let’s give Barack Obama some credit–he’s a good looking man, speaks well and projects a happy personality. Swell. If you’re looking for your ideal college roomie then he’s your guy. But let’s get real. We don’t need a buddy we need a leader and on that front Barack’s inexperience is painfully evident.

He has failed to strike the right chord in rallying the public to confront the imploding economy without scaring the shit out of the financial markets. An old friend of mine who still works in the financial sector on Wall Street, in a comment dripping with sarcasm, praised the “Obama rally” on Wall street–the market has dropped almost 20% since Barack’s impressive November victory.

Why blame Barack for that, at least for part of it?

Very simple. The financial transactions–people and institutions buying and selling–that constitute the market react to a variety of events, decisions and non-decisions. In this regard Barack is an unrelenting economic gaffe machine. He says the economy is the most important priority and then names Turbo Tax Timmy Geithner as the Secretary of Treasury. Geithner in turn ends up projecting an image on television that makes Dan Quayle look strong and resolute and then proved his ineptness by fumbling his first major policy pronouncements. The markets pummeled him.

We could excuse this as just nervous jitters but then the Barack team launched the much ballyhooed stimulus package. (I am reading that beast in detail and will be posting the details in a form you can use to inform yourself. ) Let’s be candid. Barack Obama and his team did not write this turd. Instead of bringing together a bipartisan group of legislators to craft a bill to deal with the immediate crisis, he surrender the initiative to Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats. And did the markets celebrate the passage of the “stimulus?” Hell yes. Further market declines.

Then there was last Saturday. Obama’s team sent clear signals that they will raise taxes in 2011. Economists rarely agree on anything (the old joke, what happens if you line up all economists end to end? They all point in different directions) but there is broad consensus on this point–you do not raise taxes in a recession/depression. Add in the news filtering out that Citibank will be effectively taken over by the Federal Government and you have the recipe for yesterday’s drop in the stock market, which almost crashed thru the 7000 floor.

Fear not. Mr. Hope and Change will work miracles tonight during his State of the Union address. How do I know? Well the media says so. Yes sir boys and girls, Barack’s magic economic elixir will give you erections on demand, cure baldness, allow you to drink beer without building a bulging gut and pay off your mortgage.

How else to describe the bullshit this man is going to spin. We are already committed to spending close to $1.5 trillion this year alone on all of the various economic rescue/stimulus packages. And those numbers are not reflected in the budget. Yet Barack promised us realistic accounting and is getting credit for putting the costs of the Iraq war into the budget. Well isn’t that special. He is still doing the politician trick–saying one thing and doing the other.

So let me speak frankly and candidly:

The economy in the United States in contracting. This means that fewer taxes will be collected at all levels of government. Unless Federal, State, and local governments cut expenses they will be compelled to borrow more money in order to pay for the goods and services they provide.

The world economy is in worse shape. Europe in particular is getting hammered. India and China also are struggling. They too must cut expenses or, if they continue spending a the current level, must borrow money.

But how can folks and governments borrow money when the credit markets and banks are in shambles? The answer to that is still being sorted out but this much is clear–credit for the average consumer is very limited. In the DC area, for example, it is impossible to get a mortgage for anything in excess of $600,000. There are neigborhoods where the average house costs $1.5 million (lots of lobbyists and lawyers don’t cha know). Those housing sales are grinding to a halt. People can afford to pay for a $1 million mortgage but the banks/mortgage companies ain’t lending.

There is not an infinite pot of money. When governments increase their borrowing the result is to reduce the amount of money available to the private sector. And people who have money and are looking for a place to “safely” store their case are quite happy to lend the money to the government. Why? Ever hear of a Treasury Bill? It is guaranteed. If you can’t trust the government to come thru then you should buy gold, get a gun and hunker down in your basement.

Barack’s winning smile does not change these economic realities. And while he will talk about “cutting” programs tonight the reality is the opposite–the Federal Government is going to increase dramatically its spending level. Cuts in defense programs, for example, will be countered by increases in other areas of government spending.

What are the implications for the long term? Massive inflation. At some point, in order to borrow more money the borrowers (i.e. the government) will have to pay more for the money. That is another way of saying you are raising the interest rate.

Did I mention the “strong” dollar? Man, it is good to be an American. The dollar is stronger. That will teach those foreign fuckers. Only one problem–when the dollar is stronger that simply means that anyone outside the United States must pay more of their money to buy anything made in the United States. What happens when the price of something goes up? Do you normally buy more of it or less? Most people buy less.

Guess what? In the midst of the recession the dollar is getting stronger. This means we will be able to sell fewer products overseas because the price of U.S. produced goods and services have gone up. But why is the dollar more costly? Because nervous folks overseas who are worried about their own shaky economic circumstances are still buying U.S. Treasury bills. The demand for U.S. dollars is going up.

Would it not be better if Barack Obama could just flash his grin and get us all moist? It would be so much easier. We would not have to worry about budget deficits, higher taxes and growing government. But no matter how genial President Obama strives to be, the realities of finance, taxes, economics and trade remain. His failure to understand the complexities of these factors are sowing the seeds for the destruction of his Presidency. Unfortunately he will take the country with him.

  • The Real HC

    The part that makes me lose any remaining respect for Obama is that he constantly blames others for our problems.

    If it werent for Bush blah blah, if Clinton hadn’t blah blah. As if he just popped in from planet Mars (as opposed to the US Senate) and found us in shocking disarray.

    Mr Obama, you are the president. Stop the blame game and start being responsible for your actions. Even those that voted for you aren’t going to buy your crap forever.

  • http://deleted Aaron

    LJ,
    I disagree with the assessment that Pelosi wrote the stimulus bill. Rahm worked hand in hand wit her on the bill and Obama got everything he has talked about during his short political career in the bill. From over turning Clinton’s welfare reform and expand entitlement programs to the usurpation of State’s rights by inserting mandatory federal dictates or blatant intimidation through the use of the bully pulpit. The stimulus program is his baby and his alone.

  • beebop

    Larry, I don’t actually see a happy personality. I see a miserable human being who, rather than undergo painful self examination, dispenses meaningless bon mots. He’s a farce. And the market knows he’s a phoney.

  • FLDemFem

    If he had not come up with the gloom and doom tour, the markets would be in much better shape. If he had actually found and appointed qualified people, the markets would be in better shape. If he had a work ethic and even a small clue about economics, the markets would be in better shape. The markets are responding to what everyone but the fools who voted for this fraud know, that he doesn’t know what the hell he is doing. If he wants to save the economy, the first thing he should do is appoint Bill Clinton as his chief economic adviser. That would send the markets soaring since the whole world knows what kind of economy we had during the Clinton administration. People trust Bill Clinton on the economy, they don’t trust Obummer. Obummer won’t do that because it might take the shine off his own “accomplishments”, but he should.

  • termo

    You are precisely right in your assessment of Obama. Experience does matter and his lack of it is evident in the first month.

    Obama was never in charge of anything in his 48 years: not a company, a squadron, a village – not even a boy scout troop. Therefore Obama had no experience with direct reports (and please do not count those campaigns).

    So either we were going to see some magical management talent he has never had to use or we were going to see somethng bordering on anarchy. It is evident we are seeing the latter.

    His economic policy is incoherent and has been taken over by vote buying members of Congress. Geithner was a disaster on the Hill. And now he struts out yet another team of economic supermen.

    It took Bill Clinton to give him a lesson in Presidency 101 by advising him that it was now HIS economy – the campaign is over – and don’t keep talking down the economy.

    The kumbaya session of fiscal responsibility was another bad idea as the stock market conintued its nose dive since he became President.

  • cathnealon

    I agree Real. As if two wrongs make a right, as if making matters worse makes everything better. He somehow managed to get to the White House and now he is responsible for everything that happens since January 20. He’s got two cards to play and he’s playing them like there’s no tomorrow(literally); the race card and the blame card. It’s starting to be very apparent that he is out for absolute power from the corrupt people he’s appointing to every area of his administration to the propaganda coming from his mouth. I am telling my young adult children, get involved now against the taking of the democratic, capitalist society where millions and millions of our parents and grandparents have found freedom, economic and individual freedom.

  • sjc-tx

    Yes but, but… He has got that ‘brutha’ strut and hops up on stage like a actor going to receive an award…

    What a juvenile, incompetent fool. He is drowning is his own self glorification and sense of magnificance. He truly believes all he has to do is make (yet another!), speech and the seas will part and angels will sing!!!

    I can’t listen at all. He makes me want to puke.

  • Hermagoras

    I think the stimulus bill is a good thing, though it has too many tax cuts and not enough stimulus. The bank bailouts have not gone as well, mainly because nobody seems to have to guts to do what needs to be done — nationalize the big banks (basically put them in receivership temporarily). That’s going to happen sooner or later, but they’re dithering on that. But hey, I’m an Obama fan.

  • HARP

    Lipstick on a pig.

  • beebop

    A waste of the lipstick ….

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Vey scary stuff. I am going to start growing my own food–seriously! Who needs flowers and grass right now?

  • Seattle Moss

    Hello Beebop,
    Obama thought it was all fun and games with perhaps roads and schools named in his honor. I’m sure he also thought of a bust to the One.
    Now Obama looks cranky because he has to actually work and the job doesn’t allow for fooling around.
    Obama has realized that being president actually sucks especially for one that hasn’t the experience or the wherewithal to actually do the job.

  • tek

    Aaron: You bet your life Rahm Emanuel is going to have a hand in everything in this administration, Mr. Trillion Dollar Chicago Banker, has to figure out how to stick it to the little people.

  • beebop

    Moss … think about his personna … is there a genuine joy smile? One that doesn’t hold just that tinge of malice? I don’t think he has ever shown anything but “staged” presence.

    I feel very sorry for him. The life his parents created was horrible. But we don’t owe him the presidency and he is doing a miserable job of it. I think it was totally predictable. Where is there any promise of achievement on his resume? Any?

  • EWard

    Larry

    Excellent analysis of Obama’s doom and gloom economic program.

    Obama is doing this for a multitude of reasons:

    - payback to all the groups that selected him as the nominee and President (unions, financial lobbyists, teacher’s groups, SEIU, Acorn, Democratic governors, mayors, and Congress, etc.)

    -he’s saying this is the worst economic crisis to add more stimulus or debt because BO wants Americans dependent on government handouts

    -BO is setting the stage for his reelection in 2012 (most of these programs don’t even take effect until 2010 or 2011-where is the stimulus?)

    -have you noticed that the WH press corp is stacked with Obama hackers – Chuck Todd, Major Garrett, Jake Tapper, Ed Schultz, Huffington Post, etc. – Obama’s first press conference – he answered 17 questions in 60 minutes to only a few select journalists – this man is a con and fraud……

    -finally – Obama stated to Joe the Plumber that he intended to redistribute our wealth…Obama and the Dems are going to bankrupt this country until they are impeached…..

  • tek

    FLDemFem: I can’t even let myself think anymore about if we had one of the Clintons in the WH. Abraham Lincoln was born to be president during the Civil War, Hillary Clinton was born to be president during this economic meltdown, but the stupid DNC stole it from her. I knew it was a huge mistake to put this rookie in the WH.

  • tek

    sjc-tx: I almost barfed when Sean Penn said he loves living in a country that elected “an elegant man” to the WH. Elegant might be good in movies, but we need a leader with a brain and experience in Washington, D. C. Funny how the journalists keep saying, “Well, we know he’s intelligent.” What they want to say is: so why is he acting so stupid.

  • PaddyJ

    “he’s a good looking man, speaks well and projects a happy personality.”
    Oh, really Larry.
    Well I, my wife, and many associates and friends beg to differ. Big time.
    We don’t even find him particularly good looking. He is an abominable speaker when taken away from his teleprompter. Frankly, he’s pretty abrasive and boring even with it.
    As for happy personality – you’ve got to be kidding. Sarcastic, nasty, negative, petty, self-important, jealous and insecure would be a better descriptions.
    Don’t start your criticism from a false premise.

  • Diana L. C.

    Well, I wouldn’t want to share a dorm room with him even if I were a guy.

  • Seattle Moss

    Where is there any promise of achievement on his resume? Any?

    I guess that’s why I’m just shaking my head.

    What an error!

    Electing a president that’s only qualification is running for office…

  • Anon

    Still a pig.

  • Mercedes

    Although I have tried somewhat to understand what is going on, I find this economic business so confusing. Obama clearly did not write the stimulus bill. So who did? Then there is the part about cutting the deficit in the midst of a trillion dollar spending spree. I missed the explanation of how that will be accomplished. Then there are the political forces at work here. Lyndon LaRouche did accurately predict the housing/financial crisis and during the campaign, his PAC website accused Obama of being an instrument of the British/Dutch oligarchists, but now the LaRouche articles are urging support of Obama (I wonder why; does it have any thing to do with nuclear fusion?) LaRouche did also accuse Pelosi of being an instrument of Soros and Felix Rohatyn (which seems to be true) and he hasn’t relented in his criticism of her. Frontline says that the world financial system crashed because Lehman Brothers went down and there was no way to predict that…although various articles claim that the French financial minister specifically warned Mr Paulson about this danger. And where are all those professors from Harvard and Princeton and the University of Chicago who endorsed Obama’s candidacy? Did they have any input into his economic plan and/or do they have any confidence in it? I don’t give much weight to anything any Republican thinks or says these days. Maybe if Obama and Timothy Geithner could get their hands on Bernie Madoff’s billions and cycle them back into the US economy, Obama and crew could get things jump started. In any case, I hope they have a plan for controlling inflation…the free market won’t work.

  • lkt

    You people are nucking futs!

  • John D

    Bitterly clinging to my paycheck before President Xerxes comes for it all. We are FUBAR!

  • sowsear

    Exactly my sentiments.
    Larry, I don’t know where you get some of your nicey, nice about this obamination. There is no clean end to a turd?

  • sowsear

    Someone explained that when BO talks about cutting the deficit in half, he ‘s not talking about the accumulated deficit, he’s talking about one year’s budget deficit.
    I’ll look and see if I can find the link.

  • andrew191

    The market and economy would be heating up right now if Obama had simply mentioned the possibility that he might consider REAL tax cuts, (specifically capital gains and business taxes), a reduction rather than a huge increase in government, a moratorium on crippling and pointless legislation meant to address the fraud of man made global warming, and firmly pronounce that the solution to the problem lies with us, not the government. But that would be giving back many of the rights that the socialists in control right now have carefully stolen from us over many years. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and others don’t want a market/free enterprise/capitalist solution, they want to mangle the invisible hand with a hammer and sickle. They want a semi-controlled collapse so that the masses will throw themselves at their feet begging for a solution. Say goodbye to any remaining powers of self determination. P.J. O’Rourke accurately described it as a government that breaks your legs, then to show it’s profound love for you, gives you some crutches. Nice, huh.

  • Ellen D

    I could never figure out how anyone thinks this guy is intelligent. He’s just another hustler – a con man.

    Thanks, Larry for “Turbo Tax Timmy”. It made me laugh, although I suspect Intuit isn’t laughing.

  • pm317

    0bama was a marketing phenomenon. Now we’re reaping the benefits “evil” marketing. By an odd coincidence I was reading the post (linked) and it makes sense here with Larry’s post.

    http://www.blogcatalog.com/search.frame.php?term=sugata%20mitra&id=3e6a600e46552cea0d99372e80fcc57d

  • lark

    Obama is a beggar. The only thing he has done in life is talk. Talk in order to get something for him. That included lying, undercutting his position and distorting reality. It also includes talking a remake of history. He is a master at remaking history into a series of failures that produce discontent. Michelle too.

    Now Obama needs to talk to get things done for others. That is something he doesn’t know how to do. He does not have experience as a lawyer or an advocate for others. So the formula of pathological lying does not work to well when reconstructing history as a miserable experience. You can’t ask for the benefit of others if others are the cause of the misery to begin with.

    For Obama America was bad and is bad and in order to be good and do good it has to remake itself. That would be fine except Americans do not readily accept that theory. So Obama must concentrate his energy in talking us down in order for us to somehow shed out the bad in us and adopt a new act of charity – the name he doesn’t want to use = SOCIALISM.

  • Linda Anselmi

    Planning my container garden. I come from farming stock, hopefully it will pay off with a bountiful harvest. Even if it is only tomatoes and the like.

  • NCgirl

    “he’s a good looking man, speaks well and projects a happy personality.”

    Maybe he could do TV commercials then. I want a president that knows what they are doing.

  • http://libland audacity of hype

    go away

  • lark

    Good point. Start wrong and is impossible to end right. Impossible.

  • to77

    you like the STIMULUS bill? can you tell me how increasing pell grants is going to stimulate the economy, how increasing food stamps by 13% is going to simulate the economy, how fully funding head start is going to stimulate the economy, how giving people $500 in rebates/tax cuts will stimulate the economy (when Bush gave $600 last year and it did nothing).

  • Docelder

    In the end, we may have all overestimated this man. In the end. he may prove to be little more than a “useful idiot”. Question being… Whose useful idiot then?

  • r2d2

    I compared the response to Bill Clinton’s presidency. The market responded very positively to his actions, and we got out of the recession he inherited from Bush I, and never looked back. I’ve been very negative towards Obama because of his lack of experience, but I’ve come to the conclusion that the problem is deeper. Obama is in many ways more like G.W. Both lacked experience, and were not curious to figure out the direction the country should take. In the case of G.W., Cheney took over. Obama is diffused. It’s not bad in the foreign affairs area because he has Hillary, but with the economy, nobody is in charge. Geithner shares the job with other people, like Summers, hence there is no clear direction. Obama’s response for the homeowners that are underwater and the zombie banks won’t work.

  • to77

    well righ,t he’s not talking about the 10 trillion we owe but the annual budget deficit, but is still makes no sense. how do you increase spending (nearly 2 trillion over the next 2 years for “stimulus” and rescue) and the dems are talking about adding another $400 billion dollars this month in new spending and you are talking about expanding medical funding (100′s of billions) and the only cuts your talking about is the money spent in Iraq and Afghanistan (even though you are increasing troops there). Even if you spend $0 a year in those 2 places it only offsets a fraction of the trillions of NEW spending and we are already running a $700 billion annual deficit.

    700 billion a year + 800 billion a year – 200 billion a year doesnt cut the deficit in half. It leaves you with a $1.7 trillion annual inflation.

  • to77

    sorry, $1.7 trillion annual deficit.

  • DAB

    You picked out all the correct adjectives — describes exactly how I see him too.

    Was particularly struck by how he lectured both the gathering of mayors and governors recently on how he was watching them and would hold their feet to the fire. He had this real scowly look on his face but he projected no gravitas at all and came off looking like an arrogant fool.

  • Sally

    And now for the chantilly on top: 1) Pelosi and Obama are trying to abolish TERM LIMITS and 2) can the 2nd amendment.

    Fascism anyone? I told you so–and you thought Bush was bad…

    A pedophile and porn advocate as 2nd in command as Attorney General floor me….especially when I hear nothing about this OBOMANATION and no one seems to care!

    Good bye America! Your goals were noble and you had a good run…but good bye.

  • basil

    “he’s a good looking man, speaks well and projects a happy personality.”

    LARRY!!!!!!!
    What have you been smoking??????
    He’s a homely flat-faced big-eared long-legged “macDaddy” (sorry – couldn’t resist Manning’s nickname for him).
    He’s boring as all get-out, his timbral (speaking ) range is irritating and he has a habit of speaking in ascending then descending tones and clipping off his last word.
    And he exudes the nastiest, arrogant, entitled, most-narcissistic, ghetto attitude of any prez evah!

  • Sally

    I’m sorry for the typo…I mean 1st amendment (but an attack on the 2nd is on the horizon I’m sure)

  • DAB

    On Bloggingheads tv Ana Marie Cox who has personally met Obama on a couple of occasions said that in person he is pretty unremarkable and bland and that he projects better on stage than one on one.

    By contrast she said that although Bill Clinton had a group charisma persona, he was even more impressive in person.

  • lark

    Larry I think you have a problem of perception.

    What was Barack’s geniality?

    It was his ability to get back to home base and discuss the issues with Michelle.

    Barack’s geniality was Michelle.

    But now he doesn’t have that ability.

    His dining room is filled with people and service personnel from the kitchen and the secret service. He cannot sit down to confide with Michelle anymore. The only time he has for that is late a night in the bedroom and by then a lot of other things like headaches, and frigidity has Michelle snoring like a hog.

    Barack is all alone now. His geniality is gone. She sleeps it through out the night.

  • (trying to get over it)

    check out

    cinie.wordpress.com

    she’s got a lot of those great names for obama’s buddies, too! and great analysis besides…

  • to77

    bad math, 1.3 trillion.

  • DAB

    P.S. I always appreciated how Bill and Hillary would both make every effort to explain policy in as much detail as possible. It showed respect for the listener.

    By contrast, Obama deals in vague generalities and one gets the impression that he can’t be bothered to let us in on the particulars because we probably wouldn’t understand and/or he has no idea what he is doing and is covering that up.

  • FLDemFem

    I never thought I would find myself saying this, but GWBush had more governing experience than Obummer does. He, at least, had been Governor of Texas for two terms. That is a ton more executive experience than Obummer has. All Obummer wants is perks, praise and adulation, he doesn’t want to do the work that comes with the job he spent 3/4 of a billion dollars to get.

  • lark

    came off looking like an arrogant fool.

    To the entire world.

  • FLDemFem

    If they abolish term limits we can have Bill Clinton back..hehehe. If we point that out and make it clear that is who will be back in the White House rather than Obummer, that bill will die a quick death. And I don’t worry about Constitutional Amendments that much, even if they get through Congress they still have to pass 2/3 of the states, and that will never happen, at least not with the term limits.

  • lark

    You mean do a Chavez on Americans. I can’t believe it. So soon. Envy rises so quickly.

  • Docelder

    We just plowed up about half of a quarter acre Florida subdivision backyard, planted corn, beans and tomatoes etc. and dug in a well to water it with. Now… to get one of those old fashioned pitcher hand pumps in case the power goes off. The neighbors might think I am nuts when they see corn over the fence. Let us hope they have no reason not to keep on thinking that.

  • DAB

    Word has it that Obama is planning to cut defense spending perhaps not realizing that this will effect a large number of jobs. One facility in our community is on the potential chopping block. Since the Feds can directly affect employment in these areas, why are they not at least maintaining current employment levels within this segment?

    Just doesn’t make sense and makes me feel that this whole stimulus thing is more ideological than pragmatic.

  • Judy L. NC

    Jumpin’ on the PaddyJ wagon (heh). I agree with this assessment. Larry, step away from the Kool-Aid fumes. Who the hell is PBO to be lecturing us just yesterday about spending cutbacks in order to reduce the deficit. Surreal!

    Also, I believe that stimulus bill is merely a compilation of the Democratic wish lists for the past 8 years…written in true Republican fashion by lobbyists. Read who’s getting the money. Banks, corporations. Computerized medical records. A huge bamboozle, IMO.

    And if he doesn’t inspire us with some of his soaring rhetoric tonight, I can’t imagine where the markets will go tomorrow.

  • pm317

    TV commercial for toothpaste! (Biden could join him)

  • Rob G in Chicago

    Adding to this pain at the national level are the states and local governments who, in many cases, are legally obligated to present balanced budgets, and cannot legally engage in defecit spending. Their knee jerk (emphasis on the jerk part) reaction is to find something else to tax. While they may pare down payrolls to some extent, they don’t really terminate existing spending programs excdept as a last resort. They will install more red light cameras, raise gas and other sales taxes, increase licensing fees, tax transactions, raise the taxes on utilities and cell phones, raise parking ticket fines and the quotas for writing tickets. The local governments wouldn’t dream of curtailing spending on no-bid contracts, consultant studies, hiring of friends and family, building magnificent structures with their names prominently plastered all over the facade. Any give-aways at the federal levels are more than matched by take-aways at the state and local levels.

  • Sally

    I guess whether it works or not, the point is that these are the kind of viscious sneaky Fascists we have put in place under guise of making things LESS FASCISTIC. This is their intent…and that should say enough to scare the shyte out of Americans…if they knew about out it of course.

  • FLDemFem

    Get rain barrels to put under the downspouts of the gutters on the house, that will give you lots of good water that would be wasted otherwise. Don’t forget to put a screen on top to keep the mosquitoes out.

  • ginger411

    Is he ever going to stop campaigning?

  • K

    He may have won the election but as a leader he’s acting like a loser.

    The $4-8 trillion that business owners, investors and the wealthy of America have sitting on the sidelines looks like it will continue to sit until there is some sign of real leadership (motivational leadership). In the meantime the working class will continue to pay the price. Maybe that IS the plan.

  • kc_in_tx

    President Obama knows exactly what he is doing. He is showing the world the true colors of the GOP: obstructionists and the cut taxes to solve all problems party. In the future when they filibuster he will not depend on any of the senate republicans who are complete obstructionists and he can annoy and manipulate them as a group. He will always pick up 2 or 3 moderates to get his agenda through congress. Why you say? Because he has the people on his team.

    No obstructionist group in congress can come close to defeating the will of the people and President Obama has a huge majority behind him. He has it all under control. Just watch and marvel at his successes and the complete destruction of the GOP.

  • mountainaires

    Well, last I checked the market’s were having a little rally today–financials are up. Don’t know the reason, except that Bernanke spoke today and sort of, kind of, perceptually, implied that he supports what Obama is doing.

    On the other hand:

    WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Open Market Committee, seems to be at odds with his colleagues about how strong the economic recovery may be next year.

    The official FOMC forecast calls for healthy growth next year and robust growth in 2011, but the chairman of the Federal Reserve has his doubts that a depression can be averted.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Fed-expects-growth-Bernanke-worried/story.aspx?guid=%7b52BDE42F-5273-448A-9807-BF0103B26CE7%7d&print=true&dist=printMidSection

    In his semiannual testimony on Wednesday to the Senate Banking Committee, Bernanke stressed the depth of the economic crisis and the fragile nature of consumer and business confidence, despite the desperate measures that the president, the Congress, the Fed and the Treasury have taken. See full story.

    After noting incremental progress in credit markets since September’s narrowly averted meltdown, Bernanke warned that “significant stresses persist in many markets.”

    And he repeated what the FOMC said after its last meeting: “Economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for some time.”

    The fed funds target has been set as close to zero as possible.

    Bernanke expressed hope the Troubled Asset Relief Program and Troubled Asset-backed Security Lending Facility, and all other programs over time, “should further stabilize our financial institutions and markets, improving confidence and helping to restore the flow of credit needed to promote economic recovery.”

    If everything goes right, if the government’s actions are successful in restoring stability — “and only if that is the case, in my view” Bernanke said, “there is a reasonable prospect that the current recession will end in 2009 and that 2010 will be a year of recovery.”

    But the chairman warned that a lot could still go wrong. “The downside risks probably outweigh those on the upside,” he said, pointing to the global nature of the downturn and to the possibility of “the destructive power of the so-called adverse feedback loop, in which worsening economic and financial conditions become mutually reinforcing.”

  • Carol HAKA

    Larry – why do you continue with the media hype that Obama speaks well? He is a stuttering, stammering, telepromter reader!

    There is no magic. AND, pretty is as pretty does and that is a slick willy look he displays not a happy face!

    CAROL HAKA :evil:

  • Rob G in Chicago

    Bill & Hillary tend to look at the people the people with whom they are conversing, rather than over and beyond them (or at the camera), as is Obama’s preferred method.

  • http://www.lesstalkmoreactivism.blogspot.com whoframedrudy

    “There’s going to be an economic catastrophe worse than the Great Depression unless we adopt the same policies that sent the Soviet Union down the toilet.”

    “P.S. Our only hope is Nancy Pelosi.”

    “P.P.S. You are a Nation of Cowards.”

    That’s the message I’m getting from ‘my President.’

  • TeakWoodKite

    If you are a BO fan, what is that based on?

    Did what Mr. Johnson post not dampen your enthusiasim? Had you read Lary Doyles recent articles regarding the issues of “Nationalizing”?

    Seriously, Hermagoras I would like to know how one can have a reasoned and constuctive exchange with a self described “Obama fan”. Does not the sound of the approaching Obama Langoliers cause you to question the veracity of your position?

    It is required that leadership be done in earnest, but BO is not aware of his surroundings, after being a “blank slate” for all who would project themselves his way. That blank slate may work to allow self deception, but it in no way makes one a leader.

  • Docelder

    I think that “happy face” is really a “mask”. It is there to hide behind probably since he was a young kid. Being abandoned by your father, expatriated by your mother, then dumped on your grandparents, then add the identity confusion because he doesn’t color match who he thinks he is or thinks he should be… I could see him developing a “happy face” mask. But underneath that… look at who he chose to marry for a clue.

  • cynic

    Someone actually believes Obama could say something tonight that would magically turn back the tides?

    The problem with such expectations is that Obama isn’t a magician, and no such magical words exist. The tide will continue to roll in and the water will get deeper before it turns. Meantime, the name of the game is damage containment. You do whatever you can do to keep essential things from washing away.

    Attributing the tide to Obama makes no sense. The moon was already in the sky long before the election, predictably pulling the sea along behind it. Alert people saw the tide coming. Anyone arriving in the White House at that moment would have been confronting the same irresistable forces.

    The stock market averages have been nearly halved from their highest point. Much of those losses represent the evaporation of imaginary value that would have happened however the election had come out. Bubbles simply don’t endure. Current gyrations are nothing more than mood swings reflecting uncertainty about the depth of a panic-driven bottom after some bubbles have popped. (Somewhere in the mid-6000s?) Actual values are considerably higher than what we’re currently seeing. That’ll seem totally obvious once objectivity returns. At that point people will look forlornly back on the lows as the missed opportunity of a lifetime, when obviously solid stuff was selling dirt cheap.

  • Rob G in Chicago

    Obama says that he will cut the deficit by ending the Bush Tax cuts, cancelling some defense projects, drawing down troops and support staff in Iraq, and clicking his ruby slippered heels together three times.

  • TeakWoodKite

    BO had his thump and index finger working while at the podium giving the internationally recognized sign for decribing a small …. well you’ve seen it.

    What now? Stay tuned?

    Mr. Johnson, I don’t have a basement and indifference cancels out anything else that maybe remotely considered attractive.

  • TorchWood

    Oh, good. Guess I can add Sean Penn to my list of people/celebrities that I will NEVER spend a dime on again including Madonna, Cher, Oprah, Matt Damon, Wanda Sykes, etc..

    Celebs should learn when to keep their mouths shut-ESPECIALLY about politics. The only way to do that is to hit them in the wallet.

  • Docelder

    Actual values are considerably higher than what we’re currently seeing.

    Provided you have faith that these companies will be able to turn a profit from their business in the near future. In the end, these are all businesses. I am not sure anybody in Washington understands that anymore.

  • cynic

    That’s the message that’s being constantly transmitted from countless right-leaning sources. From my point of view, those hammering hardest on it are motivated far more by their own narrow political agendas than by any real desire to see confidence in the economy of the nation restored. We we can’t regain that without having some measure of confidence in intentions of our leaders.

  • cynic

    …in the intentions…

  • NoTrollZone

    I’m thinking that house in Kansas is going to be hitting ground before those ruby slippers get clicked. So, Dorothy- wherever you are– here’s your cue….get those slippers before Obama’s feet curl up and get on with the job
    of showing the farce behind the Wizard of Oz and getting us all back home.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Excellent post Larry.

    Yes, do you really think BOberry is suprised that his arrogance and condescention is losing him support on his agenda? I’m praying our President, Obama, is not that dumb or we’re really screwed.

    It may have boiled down to him selling his soul to the Devil and making deals with all his sponsors ad donors to feed his ego and rise to the top early (before you see he really can’t do anything) and really is only good at campaigning, lying and making a ton of promises.

  • Anee

    Yeah I noticed that gesture during his campaigning, its really gross and annoying, as is his new ugly gesture, bouncing down the airplane’s stairs with his hands bobbing in front of him, he looks like an idiot puppet.

  • FLDemFem

    No, because it’s the only thing he knows how to do. Actually working at a job isn’t something he has ever done.

  • moonette

    President Obama knows exactly what he is doing. He is showing the true colors of the GOP: obstructionists and the cut taxes to solve all problems party. In the future when they filibuster he will not depend on any of the senate republicans who are complete obstructionists and he can annoy and manipulate them as a group. He will always pick up 2 or 3 moderates to get his agenda through congress. Why you say? Because he has the people on his team.

    No obstructionist group in congress can come close to defeating the will of the people and President Obama has a huge majority behind him. He has it all under control. Just watch and marvel at his successes and the complete destruction of the GOP.

  • John

    Economists rarely agree on anything (the old joke, what happens if you line up all economists end to end? They all point in different directions) but there is broad consensus on this point–you do not raise taxes in a recession/depression.

    Bill Clinton raised taxes to get us out of the recession of the early 90′s.

  • and

    He is an arrogant fool.

  • beebop

    He doesn’t have the grasp. Cause and effect are so simple. I don’t understand the unraveling so quickly.

  • beebop

    He gives the overall impression that he is too good to roll his sleeves up and do the work. So. If he isn’t doing it, someone is. Nancy Pelosi? God save us all.

  • Texas Playwright

    bho the fraud is a fraud. A fraud, a fraud a fraud. Fake smile, fake speech patterns, fake plans, fake concern for America.

    A socialist, fascist, lying, stealing, cheating, pandering fraud who is bankrupting our country, our military and our values. IMPEACH the fraud!

  • C.S.

    Was particularly struck by how he lectured both the gathering of mayors and governors recently on how he was watching them and would hold their feet to the fire.

    No wonder so many states are passing Amendment 10 legislation!

    Has this guy ever read the Constitution? Does he even have a copy? I remember when GWB said the job would be easier if it was a dictatorship but Soertoro/Obama, Cousin Odinga’s biggest supporter, obviously thinks he is a dictator. Someone force feed this guy Article II, please. He is badly in need of a copy of the United States Constitution for Dummies – with the relevant parts underlined!!

    Now for the I told you so… I said we’d live to regret not impeaching Bush because the next nitwit in office would use it as a precedent. I just didn’t realize that the time lag would be less than a minute.

  • Park Slope Pubby

    I can’t decide if he is incompetent or actually malevolent. Does he want the US to fall apart?

  • susan h

    I do not think Obama cares about anything except his image. He reminds me of George W, who couldn’t wait to get out of WA back to Crawford, TX as often as possible. Gosh, and he even has to work on Saturdays. Then he couldn’t wait to finish the presidency so he could travel around the country on the circuit giving speeches to replenish his coffers (those were his words, not mine). Obama is no different. Unlike congress, the presidency is 24/7 (not that he ever worked as a senator in Illinois, he was too busy running for president and traveling around the country and world (to Kenya) on Illinois taxpayer money). Once in a while Obama was forced to show up in the Senate and actually vote on something. My my, what hard work. The man has been handed everything on a silver platter. Now he has our country handed to him on a silver platter by the lying media and corrupt DNC (someone needs to remind him that along with all the perks comes responsibility) – maybe he should read Harry Truman’s autobiography where he said: THE BUCK STOPS HERE.

  • NYSmike

    “speaks well” should be changed to “reads well.”

  • cynic

    Perhaps you should stick to the malevolent angle. The fact that Obama has gotten more of his initiatives on the roll in three weeks than any other president in U.S. history doesn’t argue well for incompetence.

  • Mercedes

    This is precisely what I think too!

    It is very reassuring to see that someone exactly shares my perception of the Great Obama.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    without lipstick!!!!

  • termo

    The bill is NOT a stomulus – it is a spending bill that is the one chance every Congress person had to get money to buy votes in their district.

    Tax cuts are stimulus when used properly.

    The banks don’t need nationalization (except maybe Citibank).

    What this economy needs is either for Obama to leave the stage – stop talking – or start doing what Clinton told him to do – provide hope and not fear.

    So far Obama’s first month is a disaster.

    By the way, the only reason the stock market is up is because ben Bernanke testified that the recession is almost over and will be this year – something apparently that has escaped the genius that is Obama.

  • The Real HC

    incompetent:
    1. not competent; lacking qualification or ability; incapable: an incompetent candidate.
    2. characterized by or showing incompetence: His incompetent acting ruined the play.
    3. Law. a. being unable or legally unqualified to perform specified acts or to be held legally responsible for such acts.
    b. inadmissible, as evidence.

    I dont know, incompetent is sorta working for me.

  • Sassy

    I have no problem with geniality…in a neighbor, co-worker, minister, or friend.
    But here’s the thing!
    We are in a serious fight here, and for that, I want to line up with a leader!
    Let me know if one shows up before 2012!

  • Anee

    Yes, I noticed that annoying gesture during the campaigning, glad to know I wasn’t the only one. Now he has added another annoying mannerism, the fists bouncing as a bonds down the stairs of his airplane, he looks like an idiot puppet.

  • Ferd Berfle

    I really take issue with the “speaks well” phrase. Speaking well is not constituted by empty platitudes designed to placate the obamabot herd nor is it constituted of repetitive phrases which make up nothing more than a chant for someone to accompany with a djimbe or two. I will beg to differ. A great speech encompasses in the fewest words the breadth of both intellectual and emotional understanding, with the proviso that the intellectual must come first to recognize the emotional in its full measure. If it is the other way around, it can become hystrionics or even an appeal to baser instincts. Hitler’s speeches were great form an emotional standpoint but were bereft of any logic. On the other hand, Linconln’s speeches were first and foremost an appeal to the intellect. That they were emotionally charged, particularly Gettysburg, is self-evident. He was the master.

    I have read the words of great orators and heard quite a few. That One has no rank in such a list as the content and presentation are pedestrian, at best. Perhaps that is the fault of the frat-boy he chose to write them. But perhaps it is because That One cannot connect on any sort of personal level at all. He leaves me cold and uninterested.

  • masslib

    Oh Larry, your Republican stripes are showing. If only Obama would “raise taxes”. No, he doesn’t have to do a damn thing. Those tax breaks for the uberwealthy are set to expire, and even Republicans have used the expiration of these giveaways in their budget predictions for several years. These particular giveaways have done nothing to stimulate the economy, nor will they do anything to drive money out of the markets. Indeed, I think markets will respond much as they did when we were still in recession in the ’90′s when Bill Clinton raised taxes on the uberwealthy. They will react positively because they will conclude the administration is at least somewhat serious about decreasing the deficit.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Perhaps you should stick to the malevolent angle. The fact that Obama has gotten more of his initiatives on the roll in three weeks than any other president in U.S. history doesn’t argue well for incompetence.

    Actually your second statement is false As for the first, it is false cause fallacy, cynic. You of all people should be better-trained in the fine art of logic. It could be that Congress is too chickensh*t to stand in his way, a situation which may have far less to do with his ability than their own cowardice in the face of adversity or a desire to placate the goose-stepping herd. And we know how dumb they are, now don’t we? (Sarah Palin would make a good running mate for Oblahblah; HRC was for the war; Oblahblah will pay my mortgage; HRC is a divisive figure). Unlike you, I know the adversary for what it is.

    There is a lot more here than meets the eye.

  • cynic

    If actually getting results means anything, that might all be more applicable to the opposition.

  • Chris

    I hardly think Obama is driving the financial market down. What is driving the financial markets down is the declining economy and deteriorating corporate earnings. I think the financial markets are taking a wait and see approach to how much the government can actually help to get the economy going again. This would have been the same no matter what was proposed by the government. I don’t think any President could have done anything at only one month into his presidency to prevent the slide in the economy and in financial markets. It would have been the same under a Clinton or McCain presidency. The financial markets are actually saying that the problems may be too big for the government to fix any time soon. Larry, I know you have a long history of smearing Obama, but to say that he is the cause of the financial market decline and that he could have done anything about it in the last month is a joke. Ask anyone with some creditability in the financial markets and they are likely to tell you that the problems are much bigger than the President.

  • Docelder

    somewhat serious about decreasing the deficit

    After spending nearly a trillion dollars? and talking about going back for 400 billion more? somewhat serious? These aren’t uber-wealthy people we are talking about either. Who is uber-wealthy after having just lost half their assets? Seriously. “Republican” and “Democrat” are just marketing placement brands. These parties play us against the fear of each other. We don’t need any tea parties… we need a second revolution. We have been betrayed, and because we let it happen, we betrayed ourselves, we betrayed our children, we betrayed our country.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    You said it! I can’t stand to see him bopping up or down the steps to airplanes, helicopters, or stages. He looks like he thinks he’s on a GQ runway. From my POV, he’s definitely not handsome or cute…just revolting. He’s actually not even an interesting person. Pre-packaged fast food.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    uh, by to 77, you’re only getting $400. Shifting sands, ya know.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    I remember a saying: “A man will tell you who he is and what he’s about in the first five minutes of meeting him.” “Listen carefully to what he says and believe him.”

    Joe the Plumber innocently revealed the true Obama. All of us, when viewing their exchange, knew we what we were seeing. That’s why all of his apologists went ballistic.

  • cynic

    Basically it was the greed-driven, short-sighted, totally irresponsible behavior of some big players within the nation’s financial system that nearly caused it to sink itself. Now criticism is being heaped on the Obama administration for their ungoing rescue efforts because they’re doing the wrong things, too much or too little, too slowly or too quickly. The common, contradictory themes seem to be Why hasn’t this been fixed yet? and You’re interfering too much with the working of the free market economy.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    I completely agree with your observations. Even if he were outwardly attractive (he’s not), he would be repugnant from the inside out.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    I am acquainted with someone who was a top oil executive in a 3rd world country when Big Bill visited. He detested both Clintons (a major disagreement with me…and he stood corrected more than once). When he met Bill, he had to admit he was impressed with his knowledge and said he was the most charismatic person he’d ever met. He still hates him though…jealousy?

  • Linda C.

    I thought the stock markets originally rallied back when when Geitner was first mentioned?

    Yes CITI will be nationalized and why not. If tax payers are going to put billions into it, why not own it. Wall Street want to have its cake and eat it too. The markets will react badly because it is not business as usual.

    However, if they are going to nationalize it, or partially nationalize it, then do it and get it over with.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    he has a habit of speaking in ascending then descending tones and clipping off his last word.

    His speaking style drives me crazy…I can barely stand to listen and usually don’t.
    He also whistles his “S”s and habitually places emphasis on the last word in a sentence. Grates on my ears.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    They have separate bedrooms because he’s “stinky and snorey.”

  • beebop

    The fact that Obama has gotten more of his initiatives on the roll in three weeks than any other president in U.S. history doesn’t argue well for incompetence.

    hmmmmmm …..

    The witch got Snow White to bite an apple. Competent? I guess it depends on what your standards are … outcome should be part of the equation imho but hey, admittedly my standards aren’t everyone’s …..

  • imustprotest

    I don’t even think he has a “happy face”. He always seems angry to me. Reminds me of the class bully.

  • Linda

    I don’t think it’s jealousy. I think a lot of
    people honestly see him as a sleazebag, white
    trash etc. Sad but true.

  • Prem

    Exactly! I can’t stand to listen to him—he either sounds like he is reading a script, and reading it poorly (teleprompter) and sounds very condescending, boring, monotonous. I can tell by the roteness of how he speaks, that he has put no heart or soul into the words/thoughts he says. He is a one-dimensional man, and that one-dimension is his own ego and self-aggrandizement. Every speech I have tried listening to sounds exactly the same in timbre and tone—boring.

    I saw him last night for a brief second on one of the local news broadcasts here (had to turn it off quickly) and he seemed “at ease” in front of the audience but it still seemed like an act.

    Somewhere I read during the primaries (sorry I don’t have the link), that someone had an opportunity to shake his hand and ask him a question. The person said that BHO could not look him in the eye, kept looking down, which seemed “creepy” to him. If someone can’t look you in the eye, doesn’t that mean they are lying to you?

  • Chris

    Too easy to just blame “some big players”. The entire country went on a buying binge on credit for the last 25 years, really since Reagan. We are now having to pay for it as the economy de-leverages and assets value deflate.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    No, no, no. Everything that is good and glorious and holy in the universe is due to Obama’s election and the amazing perception of his followers.

    Any bad is “not his fault” but belongs to Bush, Clinton, rich people, etc., etc., etc.

    Borrrrrring. He makes Bush look accomplished and intelligent and he isn’t.

  • cynic

    Maybe it goes like this:

    We can’t afford a restoration of confidence if the price of that is the success of Barack Obama and the democratic party.

  • beebop

    I just figured there wasn’t room for their egos in one room ….

  • Ferd Berfle

    I’m surprised there’s room enough in the entire place. They are certainly an unjustifiably smug duo.

  • Sassy

    Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist at Federated Investors:

    “We could be down by 50% from here over the next couple of quarters depending on how much Washington disappoints us”.

  • Wisewoman

    anne. I don’t think we will be getting a check. Working people will see about $8 to $13 less taken out of their “take home pay” per week.

  • Ferd Berfle

    How about your statement being leading, an oxymoron, and a false dilemma all at the same time, hmm? You just made a new record on NQ for the most fallacies in a single sentence.

    Your rapturous state vis a vis That One is not serving you well, cynic.

  • cynic

    58 TRILLION in credit default swaps quietly slipped into the bloodstream of the global economy strikes me as pure piracy. Imaginary dollars were being used to accumulate real dollars.

    The bundling and reselling of billions in credit card, auto, and mortgage debts never likely to be repaid was also deliberate and calculated.

    The responsible, hard-working people of the world have been secretly robbed on a scale that’s almost inconceivable. The problems we’re now dealing with are the effects of the crime.

  • Ferd Berfle

    But hey, I’m an Obama fan.

    That is self-evident from the all the delusory statements just jam-packed there in that comment of yours.

  • cynic

    Huh. I thought it was pithy. I’m trying to work this stuff down to a size that can be conveniently fit into a fortune cookie.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    I do believe some men are jealous because he is attractive to women…specifically my friend. I know the white trash label is tossed around but that’s pretty hard to take seriously what with the Rhodes Scholar thingey and all.

    Any sleazebag element for me was from the Republican Party and their constant and joyous outing of every personal detail. No one could come out looking good after details of your life not meant for prime time time are used to smear. And I was extremely angry with the President for not dealing with this failing prior to the WH. He let us down but nevertheless, life for me and mine was pretty good due to his policies in the 90′s.

    BTW, MEchille showed their trashy side when she told us more than we needed to know about Barack’s personal habits. She was trying to picture him as “everyman” but it came out as simply gross. However, you’d never hear Hillary or Jackie O speaking of their husbands in this way…

  • Ferd Berfle

    You’re forgetting that That One inspires no confidence in anyone with the exception of the Kool-Aide crowd who can’t find their own backsides with two hands, a map, a flashlight, a compass, a mirror, and a GPS.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    If someone can’t look you in the eye, doesn’t that mean they are lying to you?

    I would certainly interpret it as that.

    And GWB had that same boring element in repetitious timbre and tone. His would often be condescending which was really hard to take. BHO does this too. He loves to try to elevate himself by demeaning others. Sign of a weak, weak man.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Personally, I have no jealousy towards That One. I know him for what he is–a sorry excuse for a real man. A real man doesn’t denigrate women; a real man doesn’t scratch his face with a middle finger; a real man doesn’t hide his past; a real man doesn’t play the race card to get a leg up on the competition; a real man doesn’t surround himself with fawning minions. He’s no man at all, at least not a real one.

  • BARB

    Larry thinks Obama is a good looking man!!!!!!! I do not find a man with purple lips and ears that stick out all over the place the way his do…… the least bit attractive…Oh well…..different strokes for different folks.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    I love my country more than any President or political party on earth. If I had the vaguest hope that he could deliver anything to lift the country or that any of his followers had a clue as to who he really is, I’d take heart. Unfortunately, not.

    And you, Sonny, are an example of how polarizing the Democratic Party (of which I once belonged), has become. You actually don’t need to come to a site such as NQ to pimp your attitude and draw reactions. We’ve already read the tea leaves.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Larry tries to be kind and positive. I sometimes get sick of complaining about Bama too but I can’t find anything positive about this caucus stealing, primary cheating politician. As said earlier, start with a mistake and there’s no way to make it right.

  • FLDemFem

    Bill Clinton has the kind of charm that knocks you off your feet, almost literally. And when he is talking to you, it’s like you are the only other person in the world and what you have to say is the most interesting thing he has ever heard. I met him at a fundraiser that my grandmother gave for him in 91 when he was starting his first run for the White House. I still get a smile when I remember it. That’s the kind of impact he has on people. Obummer isn’t even in the same universe as Bill Clinton when it comes to connecting with people.

  • EWard

    Cynic

    Take your Obama BS somewhere else!

    Obama’s agenda is to turn this nation into a socialist dependent welfare state.

    Case in point -
    The “nationalization” of banks scares many people. So what do the Dems propose? Let’s change the language and call it revitalization.

    2nd case in point – the Dow is tanking because Obama’s lack of experience is showing. Surprise, surprise! This so called stimulus doesn’t take effect until 2010/2011- just around the time of the next Presidential election.

    3rd case in point – Health care under Obama would be rationed- read Daschle’s book – In MA and HI- mandated HC did not work – In Hawaii’s case- the state mandated health care for children went bankrupt because people that could afford care for their children opted for the free HC that Hawaii provided.

    In MA, the health care was saddled with unnecessary health care options that everyone had to pay for – now there is a long wait to make appointments with specialists just like Canada.

    Footnote: Daschle is gone but Obama’s agenda is to have a single payer system. Look at Canada – Canadians come to this country to seek medical treatments and to buy drugs that are not available within a reasonable time.

    4th case in point- any rational person outside the Obama cult can see that his economic conference and town hall meetings are distractions. BO takes phony questions from hack Obama reporters and displays his ignorance and contempt of the Constitution and our way of life. The states formed the federal government and not the other way around.

    Obama is downplaying our economy and running a fear campaign to get his agenda passed. Over 90% of homeowners are paying their mortgages on time. But, with Obama everything is doom and gloom.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Maybe so but I thought I had heard (last time around) that it would be $1000 for families and $400 for singles and $250 for seniors. I don’t know if working Seniors get a double hit or not. Probably not. As I said, it keeps changing.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Your fortune:

    Harsh words break no bones; kind words butter no parsnips.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    He and MEchille are very good at scolding those beneath them…that means everyone.

  • Ellen

    Most of the people he hired are from the Cinton administration – including Geitner and Rahm – so what are you trying to say?
    Bill Clinton as his economic advisor?? are you joking? And what exactly would Mr. Clinton do to solve these problems? How would he fix it? Please clue us all in on what the magical Bill would do to make things better – you people ae quick on your hate but that’s all – and not only that, the general public does NOT agree with you at all.

    In thirty days you expected a quick fix???

  • Ferd Berfle

    Being a Stepford President, he regurgitates programmed content well.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Cardboard cut-out.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Ferd…that was jealous of President Bill.

    And, I completely agree about Obama. He outs himself all the time to anyone who actually casts an objective eye…which I believe all of us did at the start. He lost us for all of the reasons you state along the way. I wanted to vote for my Democratic Party. I just couldn’t do it after all of it came down.

  • FLDemFem

    If Obummer hadn’t gone on his doom and gloom tour, then the markets wouldn’t have responded in the manner that they did. After all, this is the stock market that went up when Alan Greenspan got married, for crying out loud! The success of the markets are based a lot on confidence, and having the President flying around the country whining about the economy to get a bill full of pork passed isn’t the sort of thing to engender confidence. The problem with Obummer is that he doesn’t think before opening his mouth. He sees his own agenda without considering how he promotes it will affect the other people in the room. He has tunnel vision. That is not a good thing for encouraging the stock market investors.

  • Ferd Berfle

    I stand corrected. I neglected to go up-thread. Me culpa and you’re spot on.

  • Kat5

    Nor do I see Mr. Happy Face, other than when Barry’s getting his own way or having his butt kissed in public. Otherwise: the lemon sucking look is most prevalent.

  • EWard

    Chris & Cynic

    Take your Obama BS somewhere else!

    When Reagan took office the interest rates for home loans and other loans were at 11 to 13%. Unemployment was higher, but Reagan made you believe that Americans could overcome anything. (I did not vote for Reagan)

    With Obama the Fraud – his passive/aggressive style is to create panic and chaos and make us dependent on the government. It is the taxpayers that are paying for this.

    The Dow is tanking because no leadership is coming from the WH. You talk about the fraud and greed on Wall Street – what about the greed and pay for play from Obama and Congress?

    Reid – a train from LA to Vegas
    Obama- money for Acorn
    Franks – money for failing banks in MA
    Obama/Dems- replaced the SCHIP program for low-income children to entice 2.4 million people to drop their private health insurance for a taxpayer funded program
    Obama/Dems – having several thousand dollars in every American’s pocket does not stimulate the economy
    Obama/Dems – creating a multitude of government agencies to oversee transparency and accountability
    (the size of our government is growing but that does not create jobs in the private sector)

    He needs to cut corporate taxes/capital gains and provide incentives for private businesses to hire instead of these phony Dem mandates….

  • Ferd Berfle

    I always thought he was a surly character, especially when he didn’t get his way. The adjectives petulant and adolescent come to mind.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    You are correct. He had the same effect on people when I saw him during the first campaign in ’91 during a stop in the Mission district in SF. And again, post WH in Monterey. The same old magic.

    I remember how protective the crowd of, primarily Latinos, were of candidate Bill. It was a really hot day and he ran late (as usual) coming from Silicon Valley. His face was beet red from the sun and someone yelled out in a heavy accent from the crowd: “Put on some sunscreen, Meester. President.” Two men behind me (5 deep) on the street noticed the Secret Service on the rooftop across the street and began to talk about wanting to protect him from any potential shooters. It was extraordinary.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Yet still a waste.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Oh and BTW, one reason that Bill is so endearing is that he engages the people with whom he speaks and even while displaying sharp intelligence and grasp of the issues, seems humble. He never speaks down and he elevates his audience to his understanding of the issue. Hillary has this same gift. Obama, no.

  • MBC

    FLDemFem, you sound like such a sweetheart. I am praying things work out for you and your trust fund. I hope you contacted your lawyer. Take care.

  • Donna Brazile

    Smellen:

    I call foul! You can’t use the he’s only been in office thirty days excuse! He said he was ready on day one so he can be judged accordingly.

    We got a quick fix alright. Another trillion in debt in less than a month.

    Can I send my bills to you to pay since you love the solution so far?

    Stop the lovefest!

  • Karma

    Wow…do you seriously believe that people here don’t want America to succeed? No matter who is president?

    That is where the Obots don’t get it and are still caught up in their Obamaprism. I would oppose Hillary if she had this exact stimulus package.

    Bad policies are bad policies no matter which person, party, or president is implementing them.

    This stimulus package was Obama’s 9/11 and his blew the opportunity on several levels. Much like Bush blew his opportunity after 9/11 with invading Iraq.

    Obama could have set the course based on his campaign platforms. Instead of letting this become the same pork bill we’ve all seen out of DC.

    Believe me, it would have been a whole lot easier to believe Obama was elected and not selected like Bush was. But I never wished Bush failure either.

    While Obots might think that failure argument is great for a rhetorical debate. It just doesn’t track in reality. Who really wants failure from their govt?

    Try again.

  • Ferd Berfle

    LMAO, Donna. Glad to see you back.

    Ferd.

  • TeakwoodKite

    He said he was ready on day one .

    Lord knows what he was ready for, not having a clue to begin with, but for hope and change and FEAR.

    Stop the lovefest; you are an island, Donna, in a stormy sea. Only fools would not anchor on your lee shore.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    Oh, look. They keep on coming. Silly bots. You’re on the wrong page here. Guess, they’re preparing propaganda pre-speech.

    As for the complete destruction of the GOP…no, he’s becoming a rallying point.

    As for obstructing the will of the people? How’d that work under GWB who had no support of the people and did what he wanted anyway.

    Why would anyone consider the destruction of the opposition party a success? A Fascist dictator, that’s who…you little Storm Trooper you.

  • Karma

    Hmmmm….and Obama sued banks to implement these type of loans.

  • TeakwoodKite

    BO only thinks he is the Doctor.

  • TeakwoodKite

    Swiggin!

  • FLDemFem

    He was ready for the perks…like that “spiffy ride”, Air Force One.

  • Ellen

    What the heck are you talking about? Donna?? A hack you are!

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    You are exactly right. I didn’t vote for GWB and I wanted him to be telling us the truth. I just held my breath because to be wrong was unthinkable. Even congress and Hillary were taken in. No one wants anyone to fail…even a competitor you wish well because that causes your ship to rise as well.

    When all was said and done, no one could continue to believe the excuses and fear GWB made for himself and the same goes for Bama. I love Bill Clinton but I don’t dismiss reality and can call him on any mistakes. Unlike the Bots.

  • FLDemFem

    Thanks…I talked to my trust person today and she outlined the things they are doing to preserve my capital. And the market going up a bit today made me feel a little better.

  • cynic

    Only in your alternate universe.

  • snosandy

    Remember when Ed Rendell said that when Obama had a fundraiser he said something like “we don’t need the people, just the checks.”

  • beachnan

    Since Moonette, and KCinTX, both stated the same exact thing, I guess we know what the marching orders are for our little bot friends. Hey guys, you might want to mix it up a little bit, so you don’t sound like the brown shirts you are. I give him 4 more months before he implodes. The job is way over his pay grade, and even he will realize he is not up to the task. Maybe he will do us all a big favor and step down.

  • snosandy

    I see they got the same talking points, word for word.

  • moonette

    sorry about the double post. it was not intentional. My posting didn’t go through for quite some time and I thought that perhaps my username was taken by someone else so I tried something different. No deceit or duplicity intended, just an honest mistake – we are all human… now I know that there is some lagtime on a busy topic.

  • Snickers

    Yes, Basil. Perfectly articulated. I agree with everything.

  • masslib

    You have to be kidding me. Americans who earn cash dividends are still by and large uber-wealthy. The top 1% owns 47% of the wealth in this country. That hasn’t been the case since 1928 and it’s directly related to the fact that they pay 15% income tax. You want to protect these people from having to pay a whole 20% in income tax? My God, what has happened to common sense?

  • http://tojo toni

    ROFL

  • nancy sabet

    Because he is loser. He has no idea, neer worked in his life and got to where he is by cheating and by media who loves him.

  • Murray

    He “pops his ‘p’s”; (an affectation in which he puffs his cheeks out a little, from time-to-time).
    Back in the day, it was considered attractive in males; Humphrey Bogart did it.
    My dad was on Broadway with Mr. Bogart, and picked up the affectation from him. I spent my childhood watching my dad sit in his easy chair, practicing his “P’s” while running thru his next speech.
    So phony.

  • Thinker

    but it still seemed like an act.

    - Exactly!! There just something about Obama that screams, “it’s all an act!” He comes across as extremely fake.

    Glad I’m not the only one that noticed this.

  • Thinker

    Very true.

    He’s nothing without his teleprompter.

    “He reads so well!!” lol

blog comments powered by Disqus