Ah, no imagination, no real color, just more drool from the wannabe crowd.

Maybe you should find a real writer, a real talent, instead of these wannbe ops you keep trying to disrupt, with.

You stink, foo.

You have no imagination, no talent, I guess the narcissism of crewbois doesn’t allow them to adequately assess their talent, or lack thereof.

You’re laughable.

You know how Kos and Adam are half assed lawyers, nothing special in Washington, or anywhere, really, a dime a dozen, yet they think they’re pretty hot, because they don’t get it, they just don’t have eyes, they’re narcissistic no talent twits?

You are that.

I kept thinking about the film Being There the 1971 novel written by Jerzy Kosiński. Obama succeeds because he can be everything to everyone — and mainly because nobody seems to know much about him. “He inspires me” is an intellectually vapid reason to vote for someone. I did not think much of him while at Harvard, he spoke well and did . . . nothing. I am at the point where I hope Gore steps in and wins.

On Feb. 9, 2008, the Seattle post-intelligencer ran a column by Kimberly Mills titled Snark Attack. Below is the column:

They all do it. Even Barrack Obama, the bearer of change. In literature handed out at the Winslow ferry terminal this week, prospective caucusgoers were treated to a fair amount of, well, let’s be charitable and call it hyperbole. As in: “He passed $100 million in tax cuts for working families” during his years in the Illinois Legislature. Sorry, not even a governor can do that by himself. And. “He reformed a death penalty system that had sent 13 innocent people to death row.” Again, it takes more than one state senator to achieve that.–Kimberly Mills.

You don’t seem to know who’s who.

Quite frankly Hillary was destroyed in EVERY COUNTY in the state including the 2/3 of the state that is Republican territory.

Has anyone heard that republicans are crossing over in the primaries, and voting for Obama, as they think he will be easier for McCain to beat?

MyDD had a very interesting diary on this topic, but it has yet to be thoroughly investigated.

It certainly would explain a lot, wouldn’t it?

Lincoln bedroom jammie parties?

Hillary won’t get that far.

Word was the DNC put pressure on the Clinton’s to use the White House for donation purposes.

Bush had Abramoff in that role, and Obama, well, Obama just lies, or uses Rezko.

I wonder who Obama’s new Rezko is, still friendly to middle easterner um, money guys?

I suppose I’ll google “Saudi.”

Obama Got Robbed in NYC
by BooMan
Sat Feb 16th, 2008 at 10:49:42 AM EST

Charlie Rangel has some explaining to do:

Black voters are heavily represented in the 94th Election District in Harlem’s 70th Assembly District. Yet according to the unofficial results from the New York Democratic primary last week, not a single vote in the district was cast for Senator Barack Obama.
That anomaly was not unique. In fact, a review by The New York Times of the unofficial results reported on primary night found about 80 election districts among the city’s 6,106 where Mr. Obama supposedly did not receive even one vote, including cases where he ran a respectable race in a nearby district.

City election officials this week said that their formal review of the results, which will not be completed for weeks, had confirmed some major discrepancies between the vote totals reported publicly — and unofficially — on primary night and the actual tally on hundreds of voting machines across the city.

In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116.

Election anomalies have a tendency to help only one party…or only one faction within the Democratic Party. I thought Chicago has supposed to be the place that counted votes this way.

http://www.boomantribune.com/