RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

DPW Divestiture a Sucker Punch?

Based on commenters’ speculations in the story below, “Dubai Ports Deal : CNN,” I did some checking. Lo and behold:

The Halliburton Connection . . . followed by the Carlyle Group connection (below the fold) . . .

Of note: James Baker, former Secretary of State under George I, is a senior partner at Baker Botts, among whose clients are the Saudi royal family and Halliburton. A diary at Daily Kos gets into the details of Baker’s connection to the DPW deal and to the Carlyle Group.

1) Thomas DeFrank, the veteran New York Daily News reporter with crampons firmly fixed to his White House sources (and who you often see on MSNBC’s Hardball), writes (via Contra Costa Times reprint):

The White House is quietly pushing a Dubai company to “significantly restructure” and partner up with a U.S. outfit to keep the port deal from sinking, sources told the New York Daily News on Friday. … [...]

One snag to such a deal may be that sources say the U.S. company best equipped to partner with DP World is Halliburton, once headed by Vice President Dick Cheney.

After undergoing so much scrutiny for its no-bid Iraq contract and the handling of some of its duties there, Halliburton may not be able to help DP World land the deal, a source admitted. [...]

… DP World will have to come up with a deal that will pass muster with Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. [...]

[I]n addition to a rigorous investigation, it’s important to look at having an American company administer the contract, and DPW would have to be totally separated out from the U.S. company in terms of access to information that the company would have or could acquire,” King told the Daily News. …

2) Newsday, commenting that Sen. John Warner’s Senate floor statement was “vaguely worded,” reports that:

“The funny thing is that Halliburton may be the one American company with the capacity to do this,” said one congressional Republican, speaking earlier this week on condition of anonymity. “Problem is that the Democrats would probably complain that the Dubai deal was a big ruse to get Halliburton the contract.” Vice President Dick Cheney used to run Halliburton.

3) Corky Siemazko for the New York Daily News comments:

Congress may want American companies to operate the U.S. ports that Dubai has agreed to unload, but good luck finding them.

There’s only a handfull of home-grown outfits big enough to take over the six port operations. … the estimated $700 million price tag may be too steep for firms that specialize in running port terminals like Seattle-based SSA Marine or Maher Terminals Inc. in Elizabeth, N.J. – the largest container terminal operator in the Port of New York and New Jersey. [...]

[S]cratch Halliburton off the list. [Really, Corky? Really?]

Melissa Norcross, a spokeswoman for the controversial U.S. company once headed by Vice President Cheney, called suggestions circulating on the Hill that they might take over “false and baseless.” [Uh huh.]

Siemazko mentions other current U.S. port operators: “Maersk, which is Danish, or Han Jin, a South Korean company.” and “[a] Chinese firm, Hutchison, operates the two other major local port facilities – the New York Container Terminal on Staten Island and the Global Terminal in Bayonne, N.J.”

Below, more on the Halliburton possibilities, and another section on the Carlyle Group’s connections to the DPW deal and future participation in U.S. port administration …

The Halliburton Connection . . . continued . . .

4) Blogger Joe Gandelman of The Moderate Voice lists many of the rampant speculations behind yesterday’s DPW decision:

[S]ome continue to speculate it could mean another contract for Halliburton. Indeed, speculation now runs rampant on what was behind the proposal …

Gandelman then provides a rundown of blog statements from Andrew Sullivan (who decries Americans’ xenophobia) to Glenn Reynolds (“If Halliburton gets the deal, will people think the whole thing was a sucker-punch?”), all of the blog excerpts worth a read. Among them:

James Joyner on Halliburton speculation: “Now that would be sweet! And here you thought Rove and Cheney were losing their touch!”

5) Time Magazine today discloses another already implemented foreign deal, and mentions Halliburton as a possible American firm to take over DPW’s divestiture:

Yet while one Dubai company may be giving up on U.S. ports, another one shows no signs of quitting the U.S.—or of giving up a contract with the Navy to provide shore services for vessels in the Middle East. The firm, Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS), is an old British company that last January was sold to a Dubai government investment vehicle for $285 million. ISS has more than 200 offices around the world and provides services to clients ranging from cruise ship operators to oil tankers to commercial cargo vessels. In the U.S., the company operates out of more than a dozen port cities, including Houston, Miami and New Orleans, arranging pilots, tugs, linesmen and stevedores, among other things. The firm is also a defense contractor which has long worked for Britain’s Royal Navy. And last June, the U.S. Navy signed on too, awarding ISS a $50 million contract to be the “husbanding agent” for vessels in most Southwest Asia ports, including those in the Middle East, according to an unclassified Navy logistics manual for the Fifth Fleet and a press release from ISS.

There are many more such speculative articles.

The Carlyle Group . . .

1a) Washington Business Journal headlines this story: “Carlyle Group explores acquisition of port operations,” a particularly helpful article on what’s coming next:

Private equity firm The Carlyle Group established a team to acquire public-purpose facilities such as ports a day after a United Arab Emirates company said it would transfer newly acquired operations at American ports to a U.S. organization.

D.C.-based Carlyle Group announced an eight-person team would invest in public-purpose infrastructure projects such as ports, transportation and water facilities, airports, bridges and stadiums. The team will begin work March 13. [...]

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., and others in Congress are considering legislation that would block any foreign company from operating ports and other key U.S. infrastructure. If that legislation is approved, it could give The Carlyle Group and other private equity firms opportunities to buy foreign-owned operations at a discount.

The new public infrastructure investment group is co-headed by Robert Dove, former executive vice president at Bechtel Enterprises, and Barry Gold, former managing director and co-head of the structured finance group at Citigroup/Salomon Smith Barney.

“We are at a crossroads of the right market, right private equity firm and right team with complementary skills and experience,” Gold says in a statement. “As a U.S. firm with exceptional experience in government contracting, Carlyle is now well positioned to invest in U.S. and other infrastructure either alone or as part of a consortium.”

Carlyle’s infrastructure team will invest primarily in U.S. infrastructure in transactions ranging from $100 million to more than $1 billion. It will enter into public-private partnerships with federal, state and local governments by purchasing projects outright or through long-term concessions

2a) The Kansas City Star weighs in:

One potential private buyer would be Washington’s Carlyle Group, which bought the U.S. container shipping business of CSX Corp. in 2002 for $300 million, selling it two years later for $650 million. Also, the Dubai government has been an investor in Carlyle’s investment funds, and put $100 million into its latest, $7.85 billion buyout fund.

A source at Carlyle, however, said the firm probably would not be interested in P&O’s port operations, given the political scrutiny such a deal would invite.

3a) Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Oh) has introduced a “rarely used Congressional procedure called a Resolution of Inquiry to demand documents from the Administration about the security review of the port deal that would have allowed a United Arab Emirates (UAE) company to take control of six US ports …” The press release says:

Kucinich’s resolution requires the President, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, to turn over to Congress:

  • All documents in their possession regarding the December 13, 2005, Coast Guard Intelligence Coordination Center document.

  • All documents in their possession regarding discussions between the White House and Dubai Ports World relating to the Committee on Foreign Investment process for approving the acquisition.

  • All documents in their possession regarding discussions between the White House and the Carlyle Group between October 1, 2005, and March 2, 2006.

Kucinich’s resolution is bound to go nowhere fast, but it is interesting.

Of note: Alice Albright, daughter of ex-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, is connected to the Carlyle Group. Madeleine Albricht was hired by DPW, along with former Sen. Bob Dole, to lobby Congress on behalf of DPW, before yesterday’s announcement.

Also: The Albricht Group is allied in deals with the Carlyle Group, including the administration of $57 billion in unpaid Iraqi debts “now owed to the government of Kuwait [and] assigned to a foundation created and controlled by a consortium in which the key players are the Carlyle Group and the Albright Group, which is headed by another former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright.” (DN!, Oct. 13, 2005) The Albright Group was brought in as “political cover” for the Carlyle Group deal.

And: “Also aiding the Dubai port company is the lobbying firm of Clinton’s former secretary of state, Madeleine Albright.” (WSWS.org – yes, it is from the World Socialist news site, but they do have good stories from time to time)

The Bush family’s own ties to the Emirates are longstanding and intimate. The Carlyle Group, the private equity firm that employed both Bush and his father, as well as a number of other former top Republican officials, has profited off of hundreds of millions of dollars in investments from a UAE state-owned investment firm. The president’s brother, Neil Bush, has forged his own lucrative connections with the UAE, making regular visits to Dubai and reportedly raising some $23 million in state investments for his educational software company, Ignite. …

Anyone think we’ll get to speak out on this before it goes down?

  • Brenda Stewart

    Actuallu Susan, I really do not know who will be the grear one; however, I do think it was a rouse. Every step we take here in the USA, we are getting snookered by this WH and it’s master of the house. I am so frankly so sick of this sly hand doing things to America, I can hardly stand it much longer. This Halliburton takeover has been talked about all over the net today. I would not be surprised if they didnt do it. IMHO, it was all a bait and switch maneuver all the time.

  • Susan

    Brenda, you inspired me to do more checking. I found much more on the Carlyle Group’s possible entry into this deal, as well as some background on Madeleine Albright’s ties through her company, the Albright Group, as well as her daughter Alice’s involvement with the Carlyle Group.

    Oh, I suppose we could make a chart of all these cross-involvements. But it’s all really quite clear, isn’t it.

  • Susan

    I meant to add: I have updated this post within the last couple minutes to give you more background info on the U.S. firms — Halliburton and Carlyle Group — which may be involved.

    And, even if they’re not overtly involved, there’s always “political cover” groups, as The Albright Group provided for the Carlyle Group recently in the Iraq debt deal with Kuwait.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/CharSSmith/ Arcturus

    “considering legislation that would block any foreign company from operating ports and other key U.S. infrastructure. If that legislation is approved, it could give The Carlyle Group and other private equity firms opportunities to buy foreign-owned operations at a discount.”

    Cozy & convenient . . .

  • Brenda Stewart

    The Carlyle gp is always with their hands and noses into things, everywhere! They go and buy up and then diversify. That is there mission statement..

    Interesting to say the least.

  • Susan

    Hi, Arcturus! I think the GOP is trying to get Hunter to drop that nasty bit of legislation. Or so I heard on NPR today.

  • http://ajbenjaminjr.blogspot.com/ James

    Susan, for what it’s worth I made mention of this in one of the BooTrib open threads. I don’t know if you plan on cross-posting any of this to the frogpond, but it’s good stuff deserving as wide an audience as possible.

  • http://papertigertail.blogspot.com Other Lisa

    I’m shocked…SHOCKED to hear that Halliburton/Carlyle might be involved…

  • Susan

    Yo, Lisa. We’re no turnip-truck bumpkins, are we, when it come sto the “Bush crime family.”

  • Susan

    It is key to recognize, though, that former Democratic administration members and presidents also partake.

    Digressing here …

    It’s typical beahvior or most of us, though. Rare are the Tom Foxes and the Buddhist monks of the world who seek a peaceful world.

    Depressing to me is that their rarity is what makes a peaceful world impossible at this juncture in the history of the human species. We can always try. But, … more about that later.

  • tom

    I can not see why you Americans are so open to CNN people like Lou Dobbs and others who try to distort and put fear into the American people.Why has there been little or no coverage on Mafia connections with unions that are already running your ports.Where is all the uproar from Lou and the democrats over this security problem. Somebody please answer this.Thank you.

  • Rob Gargett

    I’m really not paranoid. But it just occurred to me…why shouldn’t we worry about the UAE’s sudden interest in ports? P&O, Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS)? I’m also not bigoted. Just scared. Doesn’t it seem odd? The wholly (UAE) owned DPW could easily enable any terrorist thrust, anywhere, if it continues to grow and consume venerable old port operators. Is it just me?

  • Rob Gargett

    PLEASE RESPOND TO MY ‘TIP’. I’M REALLY WORRIED. THANKS. ROB

  • katymine

    Also do not forget that one of Katherine Armstrong’s (of the tiny little VP shoots man in face incident) is a lobbiest and one of her clients is Baker Botts. James Baker was a frequent guest of the ranch.
    Cheney + Baker Botts + Halburton = Big swindle and fraud against the American tax payer.

    Who and what was going on on that ranch that weekend and why?

  • PrchrLady

    my, my, the web they weave just gets bigger and bigger. Hopefully, the Nation will wake up before the spiders inject their prey with the poison that will kill them…

    Susan, I am so glad that Larry has had you start posting on this board. Your knowledge and insight on such a variety of issues and topics, and your clear, concise way of writing makes the tangled web they weave a little clearer in perspective… Thanks, again. M

  • PrchrLady

    susan, et al, just reAD this today, and seems to fit in…

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060309/ap_on_go_co/airlines_foreign_owners;_ylt=AtyBMzQcbxM6v4fW16W8y7FeW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

    Yes, ports are a very important issue, but I hadn’t given much thot to airlines. How about some of the other areas where foreign nationals are taking over our national security? Very, very scary, indeed. M

  • Susan

    Then there’s this:

    [quote] Frist: Ports Deal Could Work Without Buyer

    By HOPE YEN
    The Associated Press
    Sunday, March 12, 2006; 3:32 PM
    WASHINGTON — Congress will closely watch a Dubai-owned company to be sure it transfers its U.S. port operations to an American company, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said Sunday.

    But Frist, R-Tenn., acknowledged that if an American buyer is not found, and the Bush administration determines there are no security risks, a deal for DP World to manage and operate major U.S. ports still could go through.

    A container ship passes the New York skyline Friday, March, 10, 2006. President Bush today expressed concern that a scuttled deal for a state-owned Arab firm to manage some U.S. port facilities would send the wrong message to Middle Eastern allies in the global war on terror. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan) (Mark Lennihan – AP)
    Save & Share

    Tag This Article

    Saving options
    1. Save to description:
    Headline (required)
    Byline
    2. Save to notes (255 character max):
    Blurb
    3. Tag This Article

    “If everything that the president, the administration has said, and that is that there is absolutely no threatening or jeopardy to our security and safety of the American people … I don’t see how the deal would have to be canceled,” Frist said on ABC’s “This Week.” [end quote]

    - printed in the WaPo

  • Susan

    Ignore the “tag this article” options in the middle …

    BY THE WAY: Am I the only person who’s gotten the impression that Bill Frist is in over his head as Senate majority leader?

  • Mr.Murder

    Halliburton uses the Caribbean to loophole tax olbigations despite its texas connections.

    Technically they’re still foregin, the casinoboats Abramoff laundered from used the same kind of offshoring to hide sourcing monies.

    The reason foreigns even get port contracts is to minimize unions.

    They need to control at least a third of the cranes with foreign interests so that ports can run to stop a general strike in reaction to outsourced jobs.

    People calling Unions gangsters are part of the long running media campaign to do such. It took decades to smear the collective blue collar efforts of workers.

    Meanwhile Bushco. operates unrestrained in scales far in excess of any previously witnessed.

    As for Carlyle, look up GH Venture Partners. They were behind the pipeline deals in the gas-stans that led to northern alliance/taliban funding from the state department(43 million) which CHeney had stricken from the record on 9-12-01.

  • Mr.Murder

    The UAE were formed when land from Iraq was ceded to form a new gov’t and give swing votes within OPEC and the UN to the West leaning entities and steer things away from Syria,Jordan, the uncertainties Iraq and Iran…

    follow the money.

blog comments powered by Disqus