RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Brer Libby and the Greymail Briar Patch

by
Larry C. Johnson

Today’s judicial ruling that Scooter Libby’s defense team should get access to highly classified documents probably is a blow to Libby’s greymail defense strategy. “Greymail” is a reference to past attempts by government officials charged with wrongdoing to derail their prosecutions by trying to expose national security secrets. In this case Libby’s lawyers were clearly counting on the judge to do one of two things–either refuse their request or order the CIA and the White House to turnover everything they desired.

If the judge had refused their request then Libby would have had grounds in an appeal that he had not been allowed to defend himself. If the judge granted their request “carte blanche” (i.e., imposing no limits) then the CIA and White House would certainly stonewall, continue arguing executive privilege, and force the entire process into an appeal that probably would wind up before the Supreme Court.

The judge appears to have undermined the ability of the CIA and the White House to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court. He appears to have insulated himself against that course of action by offering up very reasonable conditions for protecting some of the most sensitive intelligence. As noted on the CNN website:

The judge said the CIA can either delete highly classified information from the briefing material and provide copies of what Libby received six days a week, often with Cheney. Or, Walton said, the CIA can produce “topic overviews” of the matters covered in the briefings. The judge also ordered the CIA to give Libby an index of the topics covered in follow-up questions that the former White House aide asked intelligence officers who conducted the briefings.

So, what will Libby’s lawyers find in the PDB and other documents? Nothing that will save Libby’s traitorous ass. In fact, I can’t wait to see the notes reflecting what Cheney and Libby requested at the end of each briefing. Was it Cheney or Libby who asked about the identity of Joe Wilson’s wife? Those notes should help clarify that question.

But, Scooter’s team will not find tidbits that exonerates Scooter. They tried to creat a briar patch and were praying that the judge would toss Brer Libby into it. Looks like the judge has burned the briar patch down.

  • Susan

    Awesome, Larry! I heard this on the news but didn’t know what to make of it. Thanks for interpreting the judge’s decision for us, and in a fairy tale format :)

  • Brenda Stewart

    If it weren’t so serious, it would be funny. Libby is such a hoot. He thinks he has got it made with his connections andhe thinks he can play a good game. But I sense a turn of events on his defense…I am waiting for the big one..I want to see the trial..:o) I think that would be a good thing for a few months to see instead of some missing blonde in some south sea resort. Good catch, Larry and thanks for the interpretation on things.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/MarshaWalsh/ Agathena2

    This is unravelling like a mystery novel. Thanks for the translation and the analogy.

  • robertl

    Alas, this is all moot. After the mid term elections The Dear Leader will simply wait for a decent interval and then pardon Libby in the interests of national security.

  • m

    Cheney claims he declassified the Plame group, had the “right” to do so, but gave no rationale for doing so.

    A policeman has a “right” to use deadly force if he is protecting his own life, or the life of another. But if a policeman kills another for the purpose of preventing himself embarrassment, then the policeman is guilty of murder.

    If Cheney has no viable justification, and he has not presented one, then Cheney has committed an act of treason. He has confessed on videotape, and was clearly under no duress when the confession was made.

    Yet Cheney’s part in this affair is virtually ignored. Anyone care to tell me why.

  • Oilwellian

    Thanks for the interpretation and your vigilance on this matter.

    I have one question though…can’t the CIA and White House still refuse to turn over even a “summary” of the PDBs and claim “national security?” I realize Libby’s trying the ole’ Ollie North defense, and find it hard to believe this administration will follow any judge’s order. It’s quite obvious they think they’re above this nation’s laws. Why do you think they’ll comply with this order?

  • http://www.excaminos.com Brett Forman

    1) Why is it that news of developments in the the LIbby/Plamegate case seem to only come out on Friday afternoons, at least in the MSM? Has anyone else noticed this but me?

    2) Why did the AP/CNN bury the fact that 250 pages of e-mails were “found” by the VP’s office recently in the final paragraph of its Libby coverage, which also was printed/published last Friday afternoon? Why did no other MSM outlet cover this, and certainly no nightly news program?

    3) Was Cheney interviewed by the FBI? Did Fitzgerald confiscate computers to obtain these e-mails? Why can’t I find a reliable, MSM answer to these questions?

    4) Why won’t Fitzgerald do the right thing and indict Karl Rove immediately so that he can be relieved of his “Reconstruction Czar” duties in the wake of Katrina? Wouldn’t that help the long-suffering people of New Orleans get the help (and trailers) they need? It strikes me as no accident Karl Rove is the reconstruction czar and that only a tiny fraction of the money set aside for Katrina reconstruction has been spent, and that thousands of trailers sit empty in Arkansas –this has Karl Rove’s stench about it–the slower the reconstruction, the less likely the Democratic leaning voters will return to vote in Louisiana in time for the fall elections, if at all. The longer Fitzgerald delays indicting Rove, the longer the people affected by Katrina suffer. No?

    4) In regard to the point above about Bush pardoning Libby, doesn’t Libby have to plead guilty first or be convicted first before he can be pardoned?

  • Tap Duncan

    Hey Larry, I also heard this on the news and the first thing I thought was “I wonder what they’ll try next?” My guess is they’ll claim that the parts that have been blackened out are the parts that they need! I’m glad to see this judge has got some balls and doesn’t cow-tow to the white house. We’ll have to wait and see. Time for a Long Island ice tea, gotta go. Hang Tough-Tap

  • zennurse

    Brett-

    Libby can be pardoned without being convicted or pleading guilty. Happened to Nixon.

    zen

  • Mr.Murder

    Libby used the Reagan defense: “I forgot.”

    How sadly this pantomime farce replays itself.

    Death squads in Iraq.

    The terrorists aren’t like us, they hate us for our death squads.

    Central America , redux.

    Iraq/Contra and ambassador Negroponte.

  • Mr.Murder

    He was trying to get enough info fromt his to leverage others, high stakes extortion.

    Too bad Libby destroyed his own documents, homework, archives, to obstruct justice. The judge is being very lenient to allow Libby such measures.

    It means he thinks the case is pretty solid. If he can’t win it at grand jury he’s cooked.

blog comments powered by Disqus