My Right Breast, Michigan Healthcare and the Presidential Primaries
By Ricardo4 on February 21, 2008 at 10:19 AM in Health Care, Hillary Clinton
This diary was originally posted at www.MichiganLiberal.com and at MyDD.com. I am pleased to post my story at NoQuarter, and will be available in the comments section to talk with you.
I was living in a bubble before December of last year. I believed I had no chance for contracting cancer. My family was cancer free on both sides for generations. I ate healthy and exercised. I was feeling great. I was so confident that after a series of mammograms with no problems, I decided to skip the yearly mammogram three times. I was too busy taking care of kids and ailing parents.
On February 7th I had a mass removed from my left breast. I was extraordinarily lucky. The mass was removed and the surrounding tissue was benign. But now I am no longer in the low risk group. I am also lucky because I live close to Breast Centers with the expertise and technology to get the care I need. Not every woman in Michigan is so lucky.
This report shows that a number of counties in Michigan have no mammography or radiation facilities. The maps will give you an idea of what it means to get a yearly mammogram or cancer treatment if you are in rural Michigan. Imagine if you are working two jobs or like me you are taking care of kids and elderly parents.
I am also lucky because I have insurance coverage. According to the American Cancer Society,
Only about 38.1 percent of uninsured women aged 40 to 64 have had a mammogram in the past two years, compared with 74.5 percent of insured women. In addition, 20 percent to 30 percent of uninsured women are diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer, compared with 10 percent to 15 percent of women with private insurance, according to the study.
From a report in the January/February issue of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2007. The numbers are probably higher now.
In my recovery time I have been reading the health plans of both Democratic candidates. My research was based only on the websites of the candidates and the healthcare plans provided through their websites. www.hillaryclinton.com and www.barackobama.com. The bolding is mine to break up the information. The wording is right from the websites and plans. This is what I found at Hillary Clinton’s site:
Double the NIH and NCI budgets. She has proposed to increase the NIH budget by 50% over five years and double the budget in ten. She will call for comparable increases to the National Cancer Institute’s budget. Expand the Cancer Centers program so that every American lives within the service area of an NCI Cancer Center. Today, there are 18 states with no Cancer Center. Increase by fivefold the number of patients participating in cancer clinical trials. Preserve Medicare coverage of clinical trials. Put physical education and sports programs back in schools and take the junk food out. Improved Quality of Care for Americans Living with Cancer. She will propose $50 million to support the development of comprehensive care and communication plans (plans that let patients know what to expect with respect to their treatment) for patients in underserved areas and those enrolled in Medicare. Develop patient-friendly decision aids to promote informed patient choice. She will provide $25 million in federal funding to encourage the development of new programs that ensure that patients have access to up-to-date information and tools to help them understand their treatment options and make decisions that reflect their values. Reduce racial and ethnic disparities in care. She will provide $50 million in federal funding for the development of culturally and linguistically competent clinical care programs, to ensure that our healthcare providers can communicate with their patients and have training and skills to fully understand and respect cultural differences in the patients they serve. New “Paperless” Health Information Technology System. Environmental Health Tracking. Hillary will expand the Centers for Disease Control biomonitoring work, establish a nationwide tracking network to help identify connections between disease and environment and develop a response system for addressing public health threats. This plan will enable us to identify the linkage between cancer and other chronic diseases and environmental factors. (My note: Michigan has one of only 4 Centers for this important monitoring.) Enhanced Support for Survivors.Increase our Understanding of Survivor Health. By developing a survivorship study – an epidemiologic tracking of cancer survivors – Improving Access to Support Groups. The CDC will provide $25 million to community-based groups. This is in addition to her Health care plan: Guaranteed, high quality health care coverage for all.
You can download those details at her website.
This is what I found on Barak Obama’s website:
Advance the Biomedical Research Field: As a result of biomedical research the prevention, early detection and treatment of diseases such as cancer and heart disease is better today than any other time in history. Barack Obama has consistently supported funding for the national institutes of health and the national science foundation. Obama strongly supports investments in biomedical research, as well as medical education and training in health-related fields, because it provides the foundation for new therapies and diagnostics. Obama has been a champion of research in cancer, mental health, health disparities, global health, women and children’s health, and veterans’ health. As president, Obama will strengthen funding for biomedical research, and better improve the efficiency of that research by improving coordination both within government and across government/private/non-profit partnerships. An Obama administration will ensure that we translate scientific progress into improved approaches to disease prevention, early detection and therapy that is available for all Americans.
and
Women’s Health: Obama worked to pass a number of laws in Illinois and Washington to improve the health of women. His accomplishments include creating a task force on cervical cancer, providing greater access to breast and cervical cancer screenings, and helping improve prenatal and premature birth services.
and this in the plan itself:
The Obama plan would reimburse employer health plans for a portion of the catastrophic costs they incur above a threshold if they guarantee such savings are used to reduce the cost of workers’ premiums. Offsetting some of the catastrophic costs would make health care more affordable for employers, workers and their families
This was the only part in the Obama plan that I could find that addressed the lack of access to adequate screening, care and clinical trials such as in rural Michigan:
Obama will tackle the root causes of health disparities by addressing differences in access to health coverage and promoting prevention and public health (see below), both of which play a major role in addressing disparities. He will also challenge the medical system to eliminate inequities in health care by requiring hospitals and health plans to collect, analyze and report health care quality for disparity populations and holding them accountable for any differences found; diversifying the workforce to ensure culturally effective care; implementing and funding evidence-based interventions, such as patient navigator programs; and supporting and expanding the capacity of safety-net institutions, which provide a disproportionate amount of care for underserved populations with inadequate funding and technical resources
In the end, the differences were clear one candidate’s solutions were concrete and specific. The other candidate relies on employers to pass on the savings for reduced healthcare premiums to employees and challenges the medical system to fix it’s own inequities instead of coming up with a plan to address them. Based on what I have learned, I donated money to the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton.






















