California must be rescued. It really is too big to fail.
By NewHampster on March 1, 2009 at 6:50 PM in California, Economic Stimulus
I’m no economist and this is just my personal un-educated opinion, not the Noquarter management. But that’s never stopped me from writing about other subjects I take seriously. I take California seriously and sometime early this morning I awoke with a thought I can’t get rid of. California must be rescued at all costs.
This started in the car last night while listenning to the replay of Diane Rehm and guests discuss the weekly news roundup and they kept coming back to that phrase, “too big to fail”.
Too Big to Fail.
Most notably they mean Citi Group and GM. Now I for one think that size does matter and these huge banks should never have gotten so big. But we have them and their 100s of millions of depositors to deal with. That does not mean the Obama administration won’t break them up before they’re done and I do hope they do so I can get my little NH based bank back.
But these entities are so large and effect so many town’s and people that we have to save them. I really believe that. Once again saving GM for instance does not mean it won’t be broken up and the pieces sold to Toyota. More realistic is that Chrysler, not too big to fail, will be broken up with Jeep going to one of the Japanese firms that needs 4x4s.
But back to California. I speak from a mini, wee little state that would barely be missed if it was to be covered by the next ice age. Most of our states are like that, but certain ones are too big to fail. I’m thinking of New York, California and maybe the industrial heartland as a region.
But when we rescue GM we in essence rescue the heartland. Heck, by rescuing GM we’ll be helping a few smaller manufacturers in NH who supply the auto industry. Those suppliers all over the country are the main reason to save GM. I saw the figure once but can’t find it, how many non-GM jobs are there for every GM employee. It’s a big number and they all pay taxes to their states.
And what of New York? New York reaps billions in tax revenues from the financial bailout. So do CT and NJ. Those multiple bailouts don’t just trickle down, they are like a waterfall of cash for New York.
But California is not one industry that we are rescuing. I don’t hear about saving the CA defense contractors because they are already busy building for Iraq, Afghanistan and our future planes. The Silicon Valley? Nope, I don’t think we’re rescuing anyone there. The central valley where my lettuce comes from? Nah. And Hollywood is having a great year as they tend to do in bad times.
California has nothing we will be pouring zillions into that will pass the dollars down to the state and local governments. Nada, zilch. Yet California is the 5th largest economy on Earth!
We should take seriously what Governor Schwarzenegger jokingly said. If some states truly can’t use portions of the stimulus funds, send them to California. If we can throw $850 billion into the stimulus package it seems like we can manage another 50 or so for California.
I’m hoping someone with more economics sense than me will jump in because all I can think is to replace that old saying with this, What’s good for California is good for the country.
Cross posted from Partizane






















