Oh Muse, as recompense for my epiphany, I’m sending you one matching set of Obama Bath Towels with the Prince Of Platitudes inscribed in sequins on each and every one. (The Velvet Elvis versions are still on the way from China)

“Yes we can”

And all will be well in the garden.

Thanks for encouraging all of us to read Seymour

The uneven press coverage about Hillary. Went over to WP to check the editorials this morning, and found one by Cohen that’s the most disgusting article I ever seen from a MSM outlet. There’s a clear agenda to crusify Hillary, when editorials are so vile.

Or, how about the Obama bots? Are they really Democrats so sick to kick their party’s own butt? Or is the DK subset Republicans trying to fool they’re Dems?

Want to blog? Blog about the self-evident truths. Be a real revolutionary and defy the status quo, DIG and get the real scoop. Not post for the masses for butt pats from a sheltered community.

For a generation of supposively “progressives” what I see are 20/30 year-old nags. Complain about everything, want everything on a silver platter — and when they don’t get it — threaten to have RIOTS to get their way, like the spoiled brats. They don’t even have patience wait for the primaries to complete, demanding Hillary to quit — no one in their right mind would quit this close to the finish line!

Be the rebel. Be different. Write the truth.

You’re one of many reasons I have abandoned Daily Cesspool.

I don’t blog for Obama, though. That was the point of coming over. I don’t think you could actually establish any kind of record for blogging for Obama. It’s just not there.

That they do have an influence is a problem, and I’d like to see it undone.

If you wouldn’t, that’s fine. We disagree.

People do that. You can even do it without having to pretend I’m some kind of Obamamaniac.

Will I take Obama if he’s nominated? Sure. Clinton? Sure. I’m not worried about either one.

All the white papers, policy documents, web site position papers — they all mean squat in the end, once Congress gets hold of them as legislation. So I don’t tend to fight these primary wars with the same passion as others.

The DLC, though, I watch carefully.

Yes, their positions mesh neatly with many of Obama’s. I’d like to limit that to the extent possible (same would go for Clinton). If it ever becomes possible to actually reverse it, I’d be glad to see that happen too.

That this strikes anyone as insulting or hypocritical seems odd to me. But you’re different people. What can I say? It happens.

I thought you might like to talk about it. Maybe not.

You’re intense about them. I get it. But I’m not.

Not everyone is. It’s just true.

Come on, no memes, explain. It is Strategic so you don’t have to answer for it later.

What is Strategic about not voting to have a set of boundaries between Sex businesses and Schools? “vote present”

I know quit a bit about Parliamentary procedure and the whole Roberts Rules wankdom, and Abstaining is an art for the iconoclasts and ignorant. An occasional vote of Abstention can indicate that to vote Yes or vote No are equally validating of a proposal that shouldn’t even be on the table. But as a habit they show much more about the Abstention Artists like Obama.

Your logic is circular.
1. “A strategic move” (what strategy is it)
2 “since evidently you haven’t been keeping up) Ad Hominem attack based on assumption
3. was worked out with Planned Parenthood. (qua? every time he voted Present he worked it out with Planned Parenthood, what the hell are you talking about)
4. “A NOW Representative” “switched her endorsement from Clinton to Obama based on this factoid.” (appeal to authority fallacy here, who cares if a representative of NOW switched their vote, why does that make this worth a damn? You say it as if it has some merit for Obama’s bullshit.”

and of course then you prematurely run to the endzone and spike your baby as a victory
“But thanks for playing”

Thats it? No wonder you think Obama is the next best thing to sliced bread, but….what the hell point did you make to claim victory on?

Now go and blog for O-Bomba. But if O-Bomba gets the nomination, and loses the GE, only blame yourselves for stabbing your party in the back. Hillary is suppose to whip McCain’s butt, not some junior senator without a clue.

You may want to put in a good word here, since the Obama-o-matics are tag teaming again. It’s probably the worst MSM article on Hillary to date. Only thing lacking is Cohen asking Hillary to commit suicide, or call for her assassination. It’s a slow-drip of cyanide at WP…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/25/AR2008022502422.html

But thanks for playing.