<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Must-Watch: Brit Hume on &#8220;trouble brewing&#8221; as common-sense Democrats balk at mammoth budget spending spree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry the Lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1153245</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry the Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1153245</guid>
		<description>What 18 million? The 5 pumas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What 18 million? The 5 pumas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry the Lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1153237</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry the Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1153237</guid>
		<description>It is the Republicans that now claim to be against earmarks. McCain said he would end them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the Republicans that now claim to be against earmarks. McCain said he would end them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: to77</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1153120</link>
		<dc:creator>to77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1153120</guid>
		<description>didn&#039;t have time then to write out a longer response. sorry.
 
my point was those type of statements are essentially the same. you say something unprovable like you did and I say your wrong. 
IMO, the same intellectual fodder.

it&#039;s kinda silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t have time then to write out a longer response. sorry.</p>
<p>my point was those type of statements are essentially the same. you say something unprovable like you did and I say your wrong.<br />
IMO, the same intellectual fodder.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s kinda silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beebop</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1153103</link>
		<dc:creator>beebop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1153103</guid>
		<description>I was just taken aback at the idiot savant knee jerk &quot;your wrong&quot; with nothing else.  That&#039;s the kind of retort that gets you ignored ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just taken aback at the idiot savant knee jerk &#8220;your wrong&#8221; with nothing else.  That&#8217;s the kind of retort that gets you ignored &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: to77</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1153091</link>
		<dc:creator>to77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1153091</guid>
		<description>saying most economists don&#039;t think there is enough spending and too many tax cuts is just stupid. I will respond with, most economists think there is too much spending and not enough tax cuts. It is a nonsensical stupid statement.

I will say this: I am not quite sure what the egg-head, theorizing, academic economists who have never had a job in the private sector think, but I will tell you it is pretty clear what real world &quot;economists&quot; think of the &quot;stimulus&quot; package just by looking at what the stock market has done since that stinker passed. 

SPENDING MONEY WE DONT HAVE IS WHAT GOT IS INTO THIS MESS! 
GW increased federal domestic spending by 160% (not including defense and debt service, $1.2 trillion in 2000-3.1 trillion in 2009) over 8 years, 5x the rate under Clinton&#039;s 8 years. He increased spending on education, health, welfare and infrastructure at 3x the rate of Clinton, did it help? And from a &quot;street&quot; level the housing crash is the result of people spending money they don&#039;t have.

btw sorry for the grammatical error, making a mistake while quickly typing on a blog definitely reveals my ignorance so I am sure you will be able to easily refute the argument I am making here since you are my intellectual superior (your stupid assertion about &quot;most economists&quot; not withstanding).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saying most economists don&#8217;t think there is enough spending and too many tax cuts is just stupid. I will respond with, most economists think there is too much spending and not enough tax cuts. It is a nonsensical stupid statement.</p>
<p>I will say this: I am not quite sure what the egg-head, theorizing, academic economists who have never had a job in the private sector think, but I will tell you it is pretty clear what real world &#8220;economists&#8221; think of the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; package just by looking at what the stock market has done since that stinker passed. </p>
<p>SPENDING MONEY WE DONT HAVE IS WHAT GOT IS INTO THIS MESS!<br />
GW increased federal domestic spending by 160% (not including defense and debt service, $1.2 trillion in 2000-3.1 trillion in 2009) over 8 years, 5x the rate under Clinton&#8217;s 8 years. He increased spending on education, health, welfare and infrastructure at 3x the rate of Clinton, did it help? And from a &#8220;street&#8221; level the housing crash is the result of people spending money they don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>btw sorry for the grammatical error, making a mistake while quickly typing on a blog definitely reveals my ignorance so I am sure you will be able to easily refute the argument I am making here since you are my intellectual superior (your stupid assertion about &#8220;most economists&#8221; not withstanding).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JozefAL</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1153042</link>
		<dc:creator>JozefAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1153042</guid>
		<description>Well, squawk all you want about term limits.  Until the CONGRESS sends an amendment to the States establishing term limits, nothing can be done.  The courts have already ruled that the States themselves can NOT impose term limits on any Federal-level legislators.
On the general nature of term limits, however, I live in AL&#039;s 2nd Congressional district, and in the past 100 years, the district has had a grand total of &lt;strong&gt;7&lt;/strong&gt; representatives:  Hubert Dent (1909-1921; 6 terms, lost renomination); John Tyson (1921-1923; 1 full term, died in office shortly after his second term began); J Lister Hill (1923-1938; 6 full terms, completed Tyson&#039;s term, elected to the Senate during his last term*); George Grant (1938-1965; 13 full terms after being elected to finish Hill&#039;s term, won renomination but lost in 1965); Bill Dickinson (1965-1993; 14 terms, retired); Terry Everett (1993-2009; 8 terms, retired); and now, Bobby Bright.   In 100 years, the 2nd District has largely been a case of &quot;once elected, you retire or you die in office&quot; (Grant&#039;s 1964 defeat was due less to personal unpopularity and more to the State&#039;s race-based switch to the GOP).

*The Hill story is even more interesting than it looks.  Hill was elected to the Senate in the wake of Senator Hugo Black&#039;s resignation following his appointment to the Supreme Court.  After Black resigned in 1937, his seat was filled by Dixie Bibb Graves (who became the State&#039;s first female Senator), but Mrs Graves resigned in early 1938 which prompted a special election which was won by Hill (who then continued to serve in the Senate until his retirement in 1969).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, squawk all you want about term limits.  Until the CONGRESS sends an amendment to the States establishing term limits, nothing can be done.  The courts have already ruled that the States themselves can NOT impose term limits on any Federal-level legislators.<br />
On the general nature of term limits, however, I live in AL&#8217;s 2nd Congressional district, and in the past 100 years, the district has had a grand total of <strong>7</strong> representatives:  Hubert Dent (1909-1921; 6 terms, lost renomination); John Tyson (1921-1923; 1 full term, died in office shortly after his second term began); J Lister Hill (1923-1938; 6 full terms, completed Tyson&#8217;s term, elected to the Senate during his last term*); George Grant (1938-1965; 13 full terms after being elected to finish Hill&#8217;s term, won renomination but lost in 1965); Bill Dickinson (1965-1993; 14 terms, retired); Terry Everett (1993-2009; 8 terms, retired); and now, Bobby Bright.   In 100 years, the 2nd District has largely been a case of &#8220;once elected, you retire or you die in office&#8221; (Grant&#8217;s 1964 defeat was due less to personal unpopularity and more to the State&#8217;s race-based switch to the GOP).</p>
<p>*The Hill story is even more interesting than it looks.  Hill was elected to the Senate in the wake of Senator Hugo Black&#8217;s resignation following his appointment to the Supreme Court.  After Black resigned in 1937, his seat was filled by Dixie Bibb Graves (who became the State&#8217;s first female Senator), but Mrs Graves resigned in early 1938 which prompted a special election which was won by Hill (who then continued to serve in the Senate until his retirement in 1969).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wodiej</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152994</link>
		<dc:creator>wodiej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152994</guid>
		<description>lobbyists outfits...LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lobbyists outfits&#8230;LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ford</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152985</link>
		<dc:creator>ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152985</guid>
		<description>MSS is worthless, the swing set, the focus on Rush, the Michelle arms exercises, the dress comments, and the magazines with Obama on the cover.
Our country is going down the hopper, and the Obamas are acting like they are entertainers.
I hope the moderate D&#039;s get together more.
I like Webb too, he is kind of kooky. Is he still supporting Obama&#039;s agenda of bankrupting America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSS is worthless, the swing set, the focus on Rush, the Michelle arms exercises, the dress comments, and the magazines with Obama on the cover.<br />
Our country is going down the hopper, and the Obamas are acting like they are entertainers.<br />
I hope the moderate D&#8217;s get together more.<br />
I like Webb too, he is kind of kooky. Is he still supporting Obama&#8217;s agenda of bankrupting America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew191</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152979</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152979</guid>
		<description>Answer: 69,000,000 other snot nosed idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer: 69,000,000 other snot nosed idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Della Penna</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152973</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Della Penna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152973</guid>
		<description>Term limits - a mixed bag IMO. If we didn&#039;t have the 22nd, Ronald Reagan&#039;s corpse would still be President. I&#039;m more interested in other restrictions:

Congesspeople cannot qualify to run for office if they make more than $100,000/yr.

For every law that is passed, Congress must abolish two current laws.

All lobbyists must wear a uniform when meeting with any Congressperson or with any member of their staff: a clown suit - colors of their choice but must include a fright wig, red ball nose and giant floppy shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term limits &#8211; a mixed bag IMO. If we didn&#8217;t have the 22nd, Ronald Reagan&#8217;s corpse would still be President. I&#8217;m more interested in other restrictions:</p>
<p>Congesspeople cannot qualify to run for office if they make more than $100,000/yr.</p>
<p>For every law that is passed, Congress must abolish two current laws.</p>
<p>All lobbyists must wear a uniform when meeting with any Congressperson or with any member of their staff: a clown suit &#8211; colors of their choice but must include a fright wig, red ball nose and giant floppy shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patience</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152970</link>
		<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152970</guid>
		<description>As is my habit, I watched the evening news with Brian Williams last night and was hoping to hear mention of these moderates, since IMO it&#039;s very newsworthy that fellow Democrats are breaking rank during the presidential honeymoon period.  But no.  I &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; get to see a photo of the new swing set at the WH for the First Children though.

When will network news start reporting the concern that these legislators and others obviously feel about the administration&#039;s agenda and performance, which has caused the stock market (as one big example) to lose over 25% of its value since the POTUS took office?  They&#039;re still in cheerleading mode, choosing instead to report warm, fuzzy features about the First Family (unprecedented in frequency, in my memory), and all-too-anxious to remind us of the POTUS&#039; high poll numbers.  

No wonder Old Media is increasingly worthless to its stockholders and those of us in the general public who want to develop informed opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is my habit, I watched the evening news with Brian Williams last night and was hoping to hear mention of these moderates, since IMO it&#8217;s very newsworthy that fellow Democrats are breaking rank during the presidential honeymoon period.  But no.  I <em>did</em> get to see a photo of the new swing set at the WH for the First Children though.</p>
<p>When will network news start reporting the concern that these legislators and others obviously feel about the administration&#8217;s agenda and performance, which has caused the stock market (as one big example) to lose over 25% of its value since the POTUS took office?  They&#8217;re still in cheerleading mode, choosing instead to report warm, fuzzy features about the First Family (unprecedented in frequency, in my memory), and all-too-anxious to remind us of the POTUS&#8217; high poll numbers.  </p>
<p>No wonder Old Media is increasingly worthless to its stockholders and those of us in the general public who want to develop informed opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beebop</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152963</link>
		<dc:creator>beebop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152963</guid>
		<description>If they wanted to stimulate the spending, they would lift the penalty on spending your 401K and IRA money (if you have any).  This might help people so that buying a car, purchasing a home or a consumer product would look attractive.  Sure, instead why not just borrow government money?  Makes sense to me!  A one year suspension of the 5% penalty and dialing the tax rate down would bring a tremendous amount of money out into the open.  Well ... again, what&#039;s now left of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they wanted to stimulate the spending, they would lift the penalty on spending your 401K and IRA money (if you have any).  This might help people so that buying a car, purchasing a home or a consumer product would look attractive.  Sure, instead why not just borrow government money?  Makes sense to me!  A one year suspension of the 5% penalty and dialing the tax rate down would bring a tremendous amount of money out into the open.  Well &#8230; again, what&#8217;s now left of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanUnPC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152954</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanUnPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152954</guid>
		<description>Term limits are awful.  I am thrilled with my House member and both senators.  They deliver and they are sensible fiscally.  I&#039;m sure that at least one of my senators -- Maria Cantwell, EVER SENSIBLE -- is in with Evan Bayh on fiscal restraint.

Our House member is a MODERATE TO CONSERVATIVE Democrat who has GREAT POWER but you&#039;d never know it.

Unlike Clyburn, Franks, et al., he doesn&#039;t mow people down to get in front of the cameras.  He does everything behind the scenes.  He is #2 on the Appropriations Committee and he does bring us some bacon -- but where we live, we need those earmarks (which are NOT -- NOT! -- per se bad, no matter what numbskull Obama says about them).  

Earmarks are a sideshow, btw -- to divert us from the real agenda of the Pelosi Democrats.  

His name?  Norm Dicks.  Bet you never heard of him.  But he&#039;s one of the most powerful men in Washington, D.C., and he makes sure that the RIGHT THINGS get done.

The MILITARY -- all of them -- know Norm Dicks well.  Norm takes care of the military and veterans (as does Patty Murray, our other senator).

If he were forced out by some stupidly arbitrary term-limit law, this area would fall to pieces economically.

But he is always responsible in the goodies we get -- they are longterm infrastructure projects and veterans&#039; assistance projects that TRULY help us.

His district also includes the Naval Shipyard at Bremerton.  They get taken care of.  And that is a HUGE source of jobs for this area.

-- jumps off soap box --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term limits are awful.  I am thrilled with my House member and both senators.  They deliver and they are sensible fiscally.  I&#8217;m sure that at least one of my senators &#8212; Maria Cantwell, EVER SENSIBLE &#8212; is in with Evan Bayh on fiscal restraint.</p>
<p>Our House member is a MODERATE TO CONSERVATIVE Democrat who has GREAT POWER but you&#8217;d never know it.</p>
<p>Unlike Clyburn, Franks, et al., he doesn&#8217;t mow people down to get in front of the cameras.  He does everything behind the scenes.  He is #2 on the Appropriations Committee and he does bring us some bacon &#8212; but where we live, we need those earmarks (which are NOT &#8212; NOT! &#8212; per se bad, no matter what numbskull Obama says about them).  </p>
<p>Earmarks are a sideshow, btw &#8212; to divert us from the real agenda of the Pelosi Democrats.  </p>
<p>His name?  Norm Dicks.  Bet you never heard of him.  But he&#8217;s one of the most powerful men in Washington, D.C., and he makes sure that the RIGHT THINGS get done.</p>
<p>The MILITARY &#8212; all of them &#8212; know Norm Dicks well.  Norm takes care of the military and veterans (as does Patty Murray, our other senator).</p>
<p>If he were forced out by some stupidly arbitrary term-limit law, this area would fall to pieces economically.</p>
<p>But he is always responsible in the goodies we get &#8212; they are longterm infrastructure projects and veterans&#8217; assistance projects that TRULY help us.</p>
<p>His district also includes the Naval Shipyard at Bremerton.  They get taken care of.  And that is a HUGE source of jobs for this area.</p>
<p>&#8211; jumps off soap box &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: termo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152947</link>
		<dc:creator>termo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152947</guid>
		<description>The economy is in a freefall and Obama seems singularly focused on Rush Limbaugh.

He is quickly turning into the worst President in history and no one is stopping him. 

Expect people like Paul Volker to eventually quit this fiasco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economy is in a freefall and Obama seems singularly focused on Rush Limbaugh.</p>
<p>He is quickly turning into the worst President in history and no one is stopping him. </p>
<p>Expect people like Paul Volker to eventually quit this fiasco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: termo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/16346/a-must-watch-brit-hume-on-trouble-brewing-as-common-sense-democrats-balk-at-mammoth-budget-spending-spree/#comment-1152945</link>
		<dc:creator>termo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=16346#comment-1152945</guid>
		<description>I was actually at a party where a bank executive advised one of the friends there to intentionally default on their mortgage so that they could get a lower rate. They defaulted and are currently negotiating a better rate.

This is a perfect example how this Obama administration is not thinking anything through and when they do are coming up with absurd solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually at a party where a bank executive advised one of the friends there to intentionally default on their mortgage so that they could get a lower rate. They defaulted and are currently negotiating a better rate.</p>
<p>This is a perfect example how this Obama administration is not thinking anything through and when they do are coming up with absurd solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

