What a crock.

It took him days to even begin to understand how insane that sounded and God knows the looks he got when he said it again at the breakfast meeting!

People must have been horror stricken!

So no mea culpa about Barack Obama’s dangerous mouth?

Just some sage advice from Hillary Clinton. Gee thanks!

Barack Obama tacked his name on Luger’s Bill formerly known as Luger – Nunn. Much as he was handed the only bills he passed in the IL legislature.

Your pathetic attempt to belittle Bill Clinton’s amazing humanitarian efforts in Kazakhastan whereby got the powers that be there to fork over the funds to do some great works for the people are what I’ve come to expect from Obama supporters.

You are such a waste of time and energy!

Bill Clinton doesn’t get the funds unlike the Charlatan from Chicago. It’s a charity. No Bill Clinton actually believes in helping others.

It’s a concept unexplored by the get rich mansion King of the Corrupt Daley Machine.

I understand that Sen. Clinton wants to leave open the possibility of war with Iran, but shouldn’t we first capture or kill those who attacked us on 9-11?

Why should we trust a military dictator who’s ignored Al Qaeda in Northern Pakistan and not strike ourselves if we have “Actionable intelligence”, as Pres. Obama would do?

…sigh…the dumbing down of America…

God, it’s 1980 all over again!!!!!

I give these kids a clue: Iran. Hostages. Failed attempts to free them — including the hastily organized rescue that caused a mid-air collision that killed MUCH more!!

Guess who helped organize it?????

McCain is going to DESTROY O-Bomba. D-E-S-T-R-O-Y him, and bring down the Democrat party in one single blow if he brings up THAT part of history, again.

DUMB, DUMB, DUMB!!!!

The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf earlier in the same week that he would use U.S. military force in Pakistan even without Musharraf’s permission if necessary to root out terrorists.

Here’s the original question, from the campaign’s transcript: “In Afghanistan or Pakistan, is there any circumstance where you would be prepared or willing to use nuclear weapons to defeat terrorism and Osama bin Laden?”

”I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,” Obama said, with a pause, ”involving civilians.” Then he quickly added, ”Let me scratch that. There’s been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That’s not on the table.”

Nobody forced Barack Obama to mention nuclear weapons and using them to fight terrorists in Pakistan.

Barack Obama’s dangerous words strike – again!

Please help America and volunteer/donate/vote –
for Hillary Clinton!

“Presidents should be very careful at all times in discussing the use or nonuse of nuclear weapons,” Clinton said. “Presidents since the Cold War have used nuclear deterrence to keep the peace. And I don’t believe that any president should make any blanket statements with respect to the use or nonuse of nuclear weapons.”

While Obama has worked extensively on nuclear non-proliferation, including with Sen. Luger- Clinton doesn’t seem concerned with nuclear proliferation.

Could it be because of her husband’s business dealings in aiding the purchase by shady characters of Uranium mines in Kazakhstan? Of course, the Clintons received $131 million for their assistance and undermined much of what Sen. Clinton has publicly said about the horrendous human rights’ record of Kazakhstan!

You not only crossed over it long ago, you’re ready to DIVE off the cliff in your zealotry to defend O-Bomba.

Don’t worry about your parachute opening, O-Bomba will send a few bombs over the cliff to dispatch his followers even more swiftly. Consider it a “mercy killing” a la Saddam Hussein style!

Jokes aside, it’s no joke electing a tyrant to office.

By DENNIS CONRAD Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons ”in any circumstance.”

”I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,” Obama said, with a pause, ”involving civilians.” Then he quickly added, ”Let me scratch that. There’s been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That’s not on the table.”

The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf earlier this week that he would use U.S. military force in Pakistan even without Musharraf’s permission if necessary to root out terrorists.

However, when asked by The Associated Press after a Capitol Hill breakfast with constituents whether there was any circumstance where he would be prepared or willing to use nuclear weapons to defeat terrorism and al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, Obama replied:

”There’s been no discussion of using nuclear weapons and that’s not a hypothetical that I’m going to discuss.”

When asked whether his answer also applied to the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons, he said it did.

Political scientist you’re not! hehehe