RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama’s First Signing Statement

President Barack W. Obama issued his first signing statement according to the NYT.

President Obama on Wednesday issued his first signing statement, reserving a right to bypass dozens of provisions in a $410 billion government spending bill even as he signed it into law.

In the statement — directions to executive-branch officials about how to carry out the legislation — Mr. Obama instructed them to view most of the disputed provisions as merely advisory and nonbinding, saying they were unconstitutional intrusions on his own powers.

Mr. Obama’s instructions followed by two days his order to government officials that they not rely on any of President George W. Bush’s provision-bypassing signing statements without first consulting Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. In that order, Mr. Obama said he would continue the practice of issuing signing statements, though “with caution and restraint, based only on interpretations of the Constitution that are well founded.”

Well, the more things CHANGE the more they stay the SAME, eh? Ok, that was awful, but I couldn’t resist.

But, snark aside, there is something to watch. Obama apparently wants to reserve for himself the right to assign U.S. troops to UN command.

One of the budget bill’s provisions that Mr. Obama said he could circumvent concerns United Nations peacekeeping missions. It says money may not be spent on any such mission if it entails putting United States troops under a foreign commander, unless Mr. Obama’s military advisers so recommend.

“This provision,” Mr. Obama wrote, “raises constitutional concerns by constraining my choice of particular persons to perform specific command functions in military missions, by conditioning the exercise of my authority as commander in chief on the recommendations of subordinates within the military chain of command, and by constraining my diplomatic negotiating authority.”

And Obama didn’t like the protections granted to federal employees who give information to Congress.

“I do not interpret this provision,” he wrote, “to detract from my authority to direct the heads of executive departments to supervise, control and correct employees’ communications with the Congress in cases where such communications would be unlawful or would reveal information that is properly privileged or otherwise confidential.”

Ahhhh. The privilege argument! Whew! I was beginning to think as a new kind of president Obama wouldn’t invoke the “I’m not gonna tell you ’cause I don’t gotta” gambit.

Obama is keenly aware of his powers and not, surprise, willing to give any back. He actually used the phrase “impermissible forms of legislative aggrandizement” to describe what Congress was trying to do.

Wow. Pot, meet kettle.

The WSJ covered this today as well.

At the same time, after Democrats criticized former President George W. Bush’s signing statements, Mr. Obama issued one of his own, declaring five provisions in the spending bill to be unconstitutional and nonbinding, including one aimed at preventing punishment of whistleblowers.

Presidents have employed signing statements to reject provisions of a bill without vetoing the entire legislation. Democrats and some Republicans have complained that Mr. Bush abused such statements by declaring that he would ignore congressional intent on more than 1,200 sections of bills, easily a record. Mr. Obama has ordered a review of his predecessor’s signing statements and said he would rein in the practice.

“We’re having a repeat of what Democrats bitterly complained about under President Bush,” said Sen. Arlen Specter (R., Pa.), who drafted legislation to nullify Mr. Bush’s signing statements.

Well, time to start the “signing statement” count. Change you can believe in!

  • ZappaDappa

    Except that these signing statements actually have a lot of constitutional precendent. Nice try though…

    • http://BREAKINGNEWS.COM Oisafraud

      Hi ZappaDappa.
      Sound like you are still in a coma after drinking the Okoolaid. Its take a brain dead and completely blind person not too see that Obama is worse than Bush, a lying fraud, lazy, completely uninformed, and with zero knowledge of governing.

    • Donna Brazile

      Zippity Doo!

      How about those EARMARKS?

      Stop the lovefest!

    • TeakwoodKite

      They are not mentioned in the Constitution so please explain. Yes, I understand why they are done. They are not legally binding in the constitutional sense.

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

        Is there ever going to be a time when Obamaphiles will EVER admit that Obama is more like Bush than they want to accept? I mean, really – we all screamed abt those signing statements of Bush’s. OBAMA complained abt them. And now HE’S DOING THE SAME THING!!!

        To give him a free pass on the exact same things we complained abt with Bush is hypocrisy, pure and simple.

        Thanks for the post, LisaB!

        • TeakwoodKite

          Rev Amy, I second that, LisaB thanks.

          Also, you rock. :)

          The statements are official documents, recorded in the Federal Register, in which the president lays out his legal interpretation of a bill for the federal bureaucracy to follow. (The Globe stories won a 2007 Pulitzer Prize, journalism’s highest honor, for Charlie Savage. Now with The New York Times, Savage first reported Obama’s memo on the newspaper’s website yesterday.)

          I do not see any Dems taking up the issue of Signing statements on the Hill…

          • LisaB

            Awww. Thanks both of you!!!

    • barry bums a ciggie

      Funny how your president signed this bill in hiding. Where were the cameras? The press? The fans? Barry was embarrassed because he knew he bamboozled y’all. BO=Dubya. George can’t speak a sentence and neither can bobo without his teleprompter. Sheesh, wake up already.

      • Obama: Dubya II Electric Boogaloo

        At least Dubya tried to think quick on his feet, albeit it was a disaster most of the time. Obama can’t even take a leak without the teleprompters set up at the urinal.

      • QUEENIE

        You got that right ..barry bums a ciggie!!!

        No trip to denver to sign his signing statement..no siree..all hidden in a closet..he didn’t want his followers to blow their brains out on Hopium!!

        Obama’s Signing Statement Disappears Whistleblowers
        Thu Mar-12-09 10:22 AM
        Obama’s Signing Statement Disappears Whistleblowers
        By: emptywheel Thursday March 12, 2009 6:55 am

        ………………….

        The provision I’m most worried about, however, is one on whistleblowers. You see, the President who has promised transparency, apparently doesn’t want transparency to Congress when an executive agency fucks up.

        http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/us/politics/12signing….

        WASHINGTON — President Obama on Wednesday issued his first signing statement, reserving a right to bypass dozens of provisions in a $410 billion government spending bill even as he signed it into law.

        …………..

        He also raised concerns about a section that establishes whistle-blower protections for federal employees who give information to Congress.

        “I do not interpret this provision,” he wrote, “to detract from my authority to direct the heads of executive departments to supervise, control and correct employees’ communications with the Congress in cases where such communications would be unlawful or would reveal information that is properly privileged or otherwise confidential.”

        This strikes at the heart of efforts to fix some of our intelligence failures and abuses by making it possible for Congress to learn about them before it’s too late.

        I guess all that transparency Obama talked about was only for the things he wanted us to learn about.

        more at:
        http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/03/12/obamas-sig…. /

  • bayareavoter

    I’d like to see how his devoted lefties address this. I never understood how they thought this guy was a real progressive. Ha!

  • http://deleted Buzz Latte LaRue

    BREAKING

    FBI sting at Offices of Obama appointee

    http://www.wtop.com/?nid=596&sid=1622618

    Search warrant being served on Obama appointee.

    Sorry for the OT

    • http://BREAKINGNEWS.COM Oisafraud

      We might get leads to the fraudulent campaign contributions…. One by one they will hit the dust.

  • TeakwoodKite

    Why am I not surprised?

    Signing statement or press release?

    After reading the release looks like Congress is attempting to gain what power it has ceded to POTUS.

  • Peggy Sue

    Well, well, well. Guess that’s why this signing was “not” given the public showcase the rest have received: the flags, the smiling minions and the spotlight on the signing pen.

    Loved this Lisa:

    “Obama is keenly aware of his powers and not, surprise, willing to give any back. He actually used the phrase “impermissible forms of legislative aggrandizement” to describe what Congress was trying to do.

    Wow. Pot, meet kettle.”

    Indeed!

  • I’m a Linda too

    In the statement — directions to executive-branch officials about how to carry out the legislation — Mr. Obama instructed them to view most of the disputed provisions as merely advisory and nonbinding, saying they were unconstitutional intrusions on his own powers.

    OHHHHHHHH! Now that is funny in a sick, narcissistic, dictator sort of way.

    Now Barry Weary BOberry is telling Congress they don’t make the laws? This guy should be pissing off E VERY ONE pretty soon. He is on total meltdown. Did something just snap in that head of his?

    • I’m a Linda too

      OUCH!

      …More CHANGE you CAN believe in,
      “ner, First President Since Cleveland to Miss

      A Gridiron Club member tells FBDC first that President Obama will not attend this year’s dinner next Saturday, March 21st. He will be the first president since Grover Cleveland not to attend the first Gridiron Club Dinner of his presidency.”

      Not good Weary Barry!

      …SNOB!

      And how dare you use your daughters as excuse because Spring Break starts Saturday. Is the presidency to be put on hold at your every excuse making wim? Something tells me the President, who has taken a flights by himself for a Presidential duty before, can attend this dinner and fly to Chicago when he’s done.

      http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/events/pres_obama_will_not_attend_annual_gridiron_dinner_first_president_since_cleveland_to_miss_111152.asp

  • Ellen D

    Why didn’t he just say “Here’s a bunch of laws Congress passed – just ignore them.”

    • QUEENIE

      Ellen D ..that is basically what he said!!

      • Linda C.

        Bush did it for 8 years with only a whine from Congress. NOw every president is going to do it unless Congress stops it.

  • http://deleted Buzz Latte LaRue

    All the lug nuts on one wheel of the Obama bus have come off. The wheel is wobbling dangerously and the bus is on a curve.

  • helenk

    I said this on another blog but it fits here.
    Axis Sally Pelosi and Lord HaHA reid gave away two branchs of government to get backtrack.
    They wanted a puppet but instead stuck the American People with Chuckie.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE, MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • lark

    Oh goody, oil is going up and the markets too as everyone is getting used to ‘business as usual’ since Obama = Bush 3.

    Soon enough everyone can return to their old chicanery and hopefully we will be able to buy the latest GM SUV with a 24 or 36 inch plasma tv screen as part of standard equipment, with down payment borrowed from a good home equity line of credit.

    • NoBamaNoWay

      heh. spot on.

  • Citizen70

    Talk about chutzpah! How long will it take before more Americans get wise to this snake-oil salesman?

  • obamaphobe

    Obama made a promise on the trail that there would be no signing statements when he is President. He put Bush down for it. Two promises broken as he signed the Pork bill.

  • beachnan

    Hey, wasn’t somebody out there keeping track of the promises Obama made on the campaign trail, and how many he has kept, and how many he has broken? I wonder how that record looks right now. I imagine it’s not looking too good for the Prez. As far as the Gridiron Dinner goes, of course he thinks he’s above all those journalists and doesn’t see how this could negatively impact him in the future. I think he’s being a bit shortsighted. I think our Prez is going to need these guys down the road, and I hope that they return the favor, and snub Obama. Karma is something that is going to come back to haunt Obama.