RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Media’s Panderbears, Part II: Hillary’s Campaign Has to Do the Job of the Fourth Estate

[See Part I.]

While Barack Obama has resurrected his now-infamous “bamboozling” line that he exploited in South Carolina — this time today in Mississippi — Hillary Clinton’s press team has produced two top-notch press releases today that 1) hit Barack Obama’s vote for Dick Cheney’s energy bill and 2) Obama’s fifth waffling excuse for NAFTA-gate.

“You all know the okey-dokey, when someone’s trying to bamboozle you, when they’re trying to hoodwink you?” Obama said [today] to the crowd at the Mississippi University for Women. “You can’t say that, ‘He’s not ready on day one unless he’s willing to be your vice president, then he’s ready on day one.’”

From Hillary Clinton: Sen. Obama Offers 5th Explanation of NAFTA-Gate

After days of misleading denials, Sen. Obama has finally acknowledged that a meeting took place between his senior economic advisor and Canadian officials regarding NAFTA. But Sen. Obama now claims that the detailed memo obtained by the AP describing the meeting – and Goolsbee’s downplaying of Obama’s anti-NAFTA rhetoric – is inaccurate. This is at least the fifth different explanation offered by Sen. Obama and his campaign.

Somebody has to do the actual reporting (especially today while the media obsess over Spitzer, a story that writes itself [and the media love those because they needn't lift a finger]).

The factual history of Sen. Obama’s various evasive explanations for NAFTA-gate is below — as is Hillary Clinton’s statement today, “Hillary Clinton Statement on All-Time High Oil Prices,” which references Sen. Obama’s vote FOR Dick Cheney’s energy bill (and, yes, Sen. Clinton voted against that bill):

More history on NAFTA-gate:

1. 2/27/08 – ‘No conversations have taken place’ with the Canadian government on NAFTA. “Earlier Thursday, the Obama campaign insisted that no conversations have taken place with any of its senior ranks and representatives of the Canadian government on the NAFTA issue.” [CTV, 2/29/08]

2. 2/27/08 – Obama advisor just said ‘hello.’ “Goolsbee: Canada’s consul general in Chicago contacted him ‘at one point to say ‘hello’ because their office is around the corner.” [ABC, 2/29/08]

3. 2/28/08 – Rice: ‘There had been no contact.’ “The Canadian ambassador issued a statement that was absolutely false. There had been no contact. There had been no discussions on NAFTA. So we take the Canadians at their word…period.” [MSNBC, Susan Rice, 2/28/08]

4. 2/29/08: Sen. Obama: ‘It did not happen.’ Anchor: “So, completely inaccurate, did not happen, end of discussion.” Sen. Obama: “It did not happen.” [WKYC TV, 2/29/08]

5. 3/10/08 – Sen. Obama: The meeting did happen, they did discuss NAFTA, but advisor just said Obama wanted to make NAFTA ‘stronger for U.S. workers.’ “So here’s what happens. You’ve got one of my economic advisors goes and visits a Canadian embassy and they’re asking him questions and he says, ‘Well, Senator Obama isn’t planning to repeal NAFTA, but he wants to amend it to make it stronger for U.S. workers.’ The Canadian embassy writes it up as, ‘Well, maybe Obama is not as tough on NAFTA as you might think.’ And the Clintons start waving this and saying, ‘See? Actually, he’s the one.’” [Mississippi Rally, 3/10/08]

Check out more NoQuarter stories on NAFTA-gate.

Hillary Clinton Statement on All-Time High Oil Prices

Today’s record setting oil prices underscore the stakes in this election. The soaring cost of oil is dragging down our economy and driving up prices on everything from gas at the pump to food on families’ tables. Gas is approaching $4 a gallon in some parts of the country and the average American family is spending $2,000 more a year on their energy costs than they were in 2000. Americans need a president who is ready to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and fight global warming from day one, not someone who voted to provide new special interest tax breaks and giveaways to big oil companies. My opponent voted for Dick Cheney’s 2005 energy bill; I knew it would take us in the wrong direction.

For seven years, the Bush Administration has stood by as the price of oil has skyrocketed, now breaking $107 a barrel. As a result, companies like Exxon are reaping the highest profits in the history of the world-$40.6 billion in 2007 alone-and we are more dependent on foreign oil now than we were before 9/11.

As President, I will create a Strategic Energy Fund that will require big oil companies to reinvest some of their huge windfall profits in clean, renewable technologies. I will reduce the amount of oil we import by two-thirds from projected levels by 2030, or more than 10 million barrels per day. These steps are part of my overall plan to transition to a clean, green economy and create at least 5 million new green collar jobs in America.

Check out more No Quarter stories on the Energy Act of 2005 as well as Obama and Clinton’s statements on the energy issue.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/10/the-medias-panderbears/ The Media’s Panderbears, Part II: Hillary’s Campaign Has to Do the Job of the Fourth Estate : NO QUARTER

    [...] [See Part II] [...]

  • http://noquartersusa.net/blog/2008/03/10/the-medias-panderbears-ii-hillarys-campaign-has-to-do-the-job-of-the-fourth-estate?#more-1768 Peter

    I like the ‘if he’s not willing to be your vice-president’ which goes to tone. Let’s see how Obama is able to get in the media for Mississippi. MSNBC is worried Obama won’t get the appropriate adoration as other things are getting too much media attention.

    I hate the bamboozle schpiel. Hence the derogatory comment Obambi-oozle.

  • apishapa

    Obama is worrying about us-all being “bamboozled”. Well, he’s the Flim-Flam Man doing the bamboozlin’. We know a con man when he comes around.

    Personally, I think Hillary has made an offer to Obama for the Veep position. He turned it down. Great, she should stop mentioning it, and choose someone more qualified than Obama. There are many highly qualified Democrats who would be honored to be her running mate and who would be better for the ticket than a sore loser.

  • Fleaflicker

    So Obama spends his day bamboozling and Hillary is out talking about real needs of real Americans. Sounds fairly typical to me.

  • anna shane

    The NYT front page story on Obama’s rise to personal ambition said a lot, why why so late? There are real issues, like why Obama’s Iraq exit plan is only troops. while hers includes exiting everyone and everything. How can we let American business stay there and profit from our dead and their dead? Why does Obama want private armies to stay to protect them? Hasn’t it taken enough lives and treasure, it’s time to stop the occupation and just get out. But, media doesn’t write about their differences any more than it covers his history. It’s always the girl that has to do it all? Well, she’ll do it all when she’s president, she’ll clean up after Bush, someone must be willing to do the gritty dirt and take the ‘blame’ for ‘losing’ a war. She’s ready.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    I didn’t see that article, Anna. Is it today? Frankly, I’ve gotten so I read less and less of the NYT — except Krugman. (I refuse to read that nasty crap from Dowd.)

    Anna, you have it right re girls having to do the cleaning up. And GOD HELP US if we don’t have OUR GIRL in the White House in 2009…. the messes are so many, and so deep, that only a rare human being like Hillary Clinton can tackle it all.

  • TeakwoodKite

    Why does Obama want private armies to stay to protect them

    BlackwaterUSA was responsible for getting Rezko’s power planr buddy out of an Iragi pokey. Obama is aware of this. BlackwaterUSA has and facilities in Illinois.

    Obama is back to preaching BS, freaking lighting bolt effect between the ears

  • TeakwoodKite

    Sorry
    plant buddy out of an Iraqi pokey.

  • AF

    Maybe she means yesterday’s Obama in Senate: Star Power, Minor Role.

  • http://theflatlandalmanack.typepad.com/versus/2008/03/no-quarter-comp.html “I Don’t Like You Either.”

    No Quarter Compiles a Little List of Obama’s NAFTA-gate Statements…

    I couldn’t love No Quarter any more than I do—-first, for providing expert information on intelligence and national security issues without requiring me to believe that torture and acts outside the limit of the executive branch’s authority are esse…

  • IndyRobin

    ” Sissy, he talks purdy, but his two cent’s ain’t worth a dime”

    My 84 year old grandmother

  • mel

    So now blaming the Canadians again, this guy is dangerous as can be!

    This seems to follow the same pattern as the Rezko denials!

    But the media won’t do a thing about it, will they!

    The real unfortunate thing about it all is that people still love the guy, Republicans that is!

    No one realize that the entire world is watching this guy?

    Dictators are waiting to call Jan 22/09

    Allies are being attacked and going to throw what support to a guy who blames them as incompident

    When will the DNP and Super elegates wake up and set things straight before this guy destroys what friends America has left and hands the White house over to McCain?

    When will Sen Edwards come out of hiding and blast this guy as he tried doing in the NH debate to Clinton?

    Is everyone scared of being accused of being a racist by Michelle?

  • JoeySky

    i think as the novelty wears of, the effect of his stump speech is less over time. we will know the real result tomorrow.

  • IndyRobin

    For those of you who have yet to read this stunning piece of writing, I highly suggest you do so.

    http://www.womensmediacenter.com/ex/020108.html

  • http://www.despair.com/idiocy.html Smilin’ Jim

    Wednesday of last week, on the heels of Clinton’s SECOND comeback miracle, did the Washington Post report an event equivalent to the loaves and fishes story? Evidently not for they did thusly warble:

    Even in Victory, Clinton Team Is Battling Itself

  • IndyRobin

    And then respect. There’s that mutuality of respect between people where you don’t see people as percentage points. Where you don’t manipulate people. Where you’re not interested in social engineering for people. The struggle for an integrated life existing in an atmosphere of communal trust and respect is one with desperately important political and social consequences. And the word “consequences” of course catapults us into the future. One of the most tragic things that happened yesterday, a beautiful day, was that I was talking to woman who said that she wouldn’t want to be me for anything in the world. She wouldn’t want to live today and look ahead to what it is she sees because she’s afraid. Fear is always with us but we just don’t have time for it. Not now.

    Hillary Rodham Clinton 1969
    age 21
    Our next President

  • Andy

    Last Tue. was too much for the 4th state to swallow
    Hey even Frank Rich went “on leave” last Sunday … sure ;-)
    So this week they have been in full force eithe rpounding on Hillary or
    by letting Obama’s lies fly and rehashing old ones themselves (ie.
    Canada, Clinton, etc etc AGRRRR). And sure enough here is the what they want: look closely

    Poll Tracker

    *
    Pres ’08 (D)
    Mar 10 Gallup
    Obama 49%, Clinton 44%
    *
    Pres ’08 (D)
    Mar 9 Gallup
    Obama 47%, Clinton 45%

    *
    Pres ’08 (D)
    Mar 8 Gallup
    Clinton 46%, Obama 45%

  • Andy

    meant 4th estate .. sorry.

  • bert

    Finally an issue (gasoline prices/energy prices) where being right from day one really means something to the American people and not just to the far left/ultra left, elite, anti-war faction of the Democratic Party.

  • simon

    well, we don’t want her to peak too early, now, do we?

    I just wonder what the contingency is for the democrats, now that Rezko is known, as are the implications for Obama.

    Since Dean seems to have fizzled as a leader, I wonder who will pull it together for them, and call it?

  • Jay

    Lose which war? The war on Terror?

    Let me ask you…has anything close to 9/11 happened in the US since that horrible day?

    Do you remember how you felt that day? Do you remember the feelings of your family, friends, neighbors?

    Do you feel safer today?

    If you answer yourself honestly, the answer is yes, I do feel safer today than I did after 9/11. Not as safe as 9/10/2001, but definitely safer.

    We Americans are stupid. As soon as we feel safe, we start feeling invulnerable. Every man and woman who has given their life in the War on Terror is a hero, not a statistic. Those service men and women who are fighting the fight right now are fighting to keep YOU SAFE.

    Now that you feel safe you want others to enjoy that same feeling and if anyone DESERVES to feel safe its our armed services, right? Bring them home.

    Don’t you understand that the real fight will come home and unless we remain vigilant another even more terrible 9/11 awaits us?

    If we leave before Iraq is internally strong enough to survive, we will leave it in worse shape than we found it AND we will lose credibility on the world stage. It will fall back into the hands of tyrants and warlords allowing unstability to rock the region and then the rest of the world.

    Whether we should’ve or shouldn’t have gone into IRAQ doesn’t matter anymore. What matters is that we are there now and things are improving. If we stay, we’re helping Iraq become a better place for its people and we’re developing an ally instead of an enemy. If we leave before the time is right, very bad things will happen.

    When America says we’re going to do something, we have to follow through. We can’t flake out. When we do leave, we have to leave a strong Iraq. This will take time and unfortunately, lives.

    Do you remember how you felt that day?

    How do you feel now?

    Do you ever want to feel 9/11 again?

    I know it sounds fearmongering, but it’s really appreciation because I do feel safer now. Thank you to every service man and woman who reads this post. Thank you.

blog comments powered by Disqus