http://www.worldviewradio.com/play.php?EpisodeID=11125

OBAMA’S DOCUMENTED TIES
TO COERCIONIST
ORGANIZATIONS & INDIVIDUALS

From New Zealand -

Mr. Trevor Loudon, a gentleman in New Zealand, has extensively referenced and documented Obama’s ties to coercionist organizations. As Mr. Loudon explains in a recent radio interview (see link below), he is concerned about America because ultimately New Zealand’s freedom depends upon America’s freedom.

The original message describing Mr. Loudon’s sixty-nine documents regarding Obama was sent by Mr. Richard O’Leary in the following message:

A dear friend of mine in Austrailia sent me this link to a radio broadcast
about Barack Obama’s past. We need to distribute this material to every
person we know. As you will soon learn, Obama is A VERY DANGEROUS
MAN! More dangerous than anyone knows, except a few select individuals.

http://www.worldviewradio.com:80/play.php?EpisodeID=11125

It is unbelievable that Obama was able to supress this information, but he
did, with the assistance of the American press. I’ve known Obama was a
hard core coercionist, but I had no idea that he was this evil. I take almost
everything I hear about anyone with a grain of salt, but the evidence in this
matter is irrefutable.
Please listen and sent it out. The people of America MUST KNOW THIS!!
OBAMA’S DOCUMENTED TIES
TO COERCIONIST
ORGANIZATIONS & INDIVIDUALS

From New Zealand -

Mr. Trevor Loudon, a gentleman in New Zealand, has extensively referenced and documented Obama’s ties to coercionist organizations. As Mr. Loudon explains in a recent radio interview (see link below), he is concerned about America because ultimately New Zealand’s freedom depends upon America’s freedom.

The original message describing Mr. Loudon’s sixty-nine documents regarding Obama was sent by Mr. Richard O’Leary in the following message:

A dear friend of mine in Austrailia sent me this link to a radio broadcast
about Barack Obama’s past. We need to distribute this material to every
person we know. As you will soon learn, Obama is A VERY DANGEROUS
MAN! More dangerous than anyone knows, except a few select individuals.

http://www.worldviewradio.com:80/play.php?EpisodeID=11125

It is unbelievable that Obama was able to supress this information, but he
did, with the assistance of the American press. I’ve known Obama was a
hard core coercionist, but I had no idea that he was this evil. I take almost
everything I hear about anyone with a grain of salt, but the evidence in this
matter is irrefutable.
Please listen and sent it out. The people of America MUST KNOW THIS!!

Maybe even send it to senator-congress- anyone-

Sarah Palin has more experience, especially executive experience, than all the men put together. Obama never ran a city or a state, or was responsible for a budget much less any budget that counts.

I’m not sure why Palin is being compared to Hillary or Obama when she was only in the VP spot.

Palin had eight years executive experience, six as mayor and two as governor. She was effective at balancing a budget.

Obama clearly never balanced a budget. We have to pay for it for years to come.

I am still astounded at the instant vitriol that Palin’s candidacy engendered akin to “How DARE She!”
It is still impossible to have any kind of rational conversation with those who harbor this attitude and they are unable to offer any logical explanation for their uncontrollable fury. Very curious indeed.

Excuse me but that’s false. Obama has zero experience. Once you remove his chronic campaigning. That’s all he’s ever done, besides lie constantly. Sarah Palin has more experience, especially executive experience, than all the men put together. Obama never ran a city or a state, or was responsible for a budget much less any budget that counts. The only funds he ever got close to was a plum position on a dubious board handing out millions to their cronies, so dubious that he left it off his half page pitiful resume. I’m not sure why Palin is being compared to Hillary or Obama when she was only in the VP spot. But I will say the best ticket for America’s best interests would have been Hillary/Sarah. Hands down.
……..

LisaB, Thanks for another great article covering these exasperating interviews with the knuckledraggers. BernsteinO can kiss our Goddess asses and slither back to his cave rock.

I think McCain knows how badly women were affected by the sexism. But I do not see anything wrong with him choosing a qualified woman as his VP. The truth is politicans they do this all the time bring in minorities and women into office to set an example for citizens to get over their prejudices and bigotry.

Sometimes as in the case of John Kerry he brought it someone young and interesting to help his campaign.

If John Kerry had chosen Obama back then, nobody would say Obama was being chosen because he is black.

I believe it is the media who put it out there that McCain chose palin only because she has a vagina and I am ashamed to say even I fell for it. Too bad I came to NQ too late. This shows the power of the media when even Gloria Steinem stated that the appointment of Palin was an insult to women.

I defended Steinem’s other article against those who said she was pitting race against gender but I am dissapointed that she and even Rachel Madow were dismissing Palin as just a dumb woman. I believe this was bias on their part since Palin was a republcan and the media was making her look really incompetent and dumb.

The worse part was even I believed that Palin’s criticisms were valid and were not sexist because they did this to Bush as well. You know ridiculing his lack of intellect.

Now I see how wrong I was. It makes me sick to remember that interview that Rachel Madow did with Bill Maher asking him about Palin’s claims of sexism. Sure ask a women hater about sexism that is like asking a racist about racism.

I wish NQ had more of a influence during the elections.

So I just wanted to stress in this comments that even though I do believe Hillary made mistakes in her campaign, I wish she was careful on her Bosnia commentary, she was really ridiculed on that, I think sexism had a huge impact on her loss.

The proof is in the experience. Barack Obama’s community organiser experience was touted as something great. But the same form of experince that Hillary had was reduced to just tea parties. Her time as a First Lady did not just involve helping and dealing with the problems the American people face but also diplomatic experince. So if Obama’s community organising experience is something great and that is valuable experince then so was Hillary’s First Lady experince.

On top of that Hillary Experince pre First Lady and as a Senator was more than Obama’s experince. Those who say Obama is something different and fresh should have asked if that was enough. Clearly Hillary was paitned as the bad guy because if you truly know her as I do now, you would now she also would have been something different and fresh and on top of that she would have the experince. The job of the President of the United States REQUIRES EXPERINCE.

So yes Sexism HAD A REALLY HIUGE PART IN HILLARY’S LOSS.Compared to Palin, Hillary was more capable more experinced and overall better suited for President. But compared to Obama, Palin and Obama had the same level of experince.

What is sad is how even Naomi Klein who I think is a smart woman was fooled by the media about Palin and how dumb they made Palin out to be. A simple person like me would be easy to fool.

I also thought he was very disrespectful (sexist) to Paulie in calling her questions “absurd” and acting like he had had enough. He was for Obama. End of story. Hopefully, he won’t use his “All the President’s Men” credibility to write a book about why Hillary lost!

What Clyburn was actually trying to orchestrate was a guaranteed big win for Obama in the second primary. He planned it for MLK’s birthday week kicked off with a commemorative march to the SC capitol that included candidates Clinton and Edwards (note: Obama couldn’t make the march!) and even got one of the national debates that night whose audience was mostly AA’s.

Unfortunately, Clyburn’s strategy worked like a charm. AA’s were fired up! But because Obama lost to Hillary in NH, they had to pull out all the stops by playing the race/baiting card and making SC AA’s furious to insure virtually no votes for Hillary, Edwards or any of the others. The Obama race man, Jesse Jackson Jr, used Clyburn and Donna Brazile very effectively to denegrate both Clintons. This along with continued race-baiting would dog the Clintons to the end, understandably infuriating Bill Clinton that he had been portrayed, of all things, as a racist!

You are right, though, SC was a game changer – accomplished with the most sinister gutter politics ever used dressed up like a national treasure.

His comfortable edge started to build ONLY after the Sept. 15th banking crisis. Period. The End. Bernstein needs to be asked how the two campaigns differed instead of letting him get away with these broad-brushed generalizations. The ONLY difference was money that afforded him more advertising that was over-kill and only helped him minimally in both the primaries and ge. Hillary had what she needed and was 10 times more effective than Obama ever thought about being.