RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Lessons from Bear Stearns

***Cross-posted from my blog, Sense on Cents. Come by and visit!

It was one year ago that the Federal Reserve and Treasury delivered Bear Stearns into the hands of JP Morgan for $2 a share. Bear Stearns stock had traded above $170 a share in 2006. With the passage of time, what are some of the lessons learned and what questions remain unanswered.

1. Although Bear Stearns employees and shareholders may not qualify a price of $2 a share (revised to $10 a few weeks later) as being saved, would the financial system have been better off letting Bear totally fail? Why? If Bear had failed, many people do not believe we would have had the breakdowns in our financial systems that occurred because of Lehman’s failure.

2. Did Dick Fuld, CEO of Lehman, assume that the Fed and Treasury would save Lehman much as they did Bear? Was he less aggressive in pursuing increased capital injections during the Summer 2008 as a result? Many people believe this to be the case.

3. Did AIG take the same approach as Lehman? Or were they so large that no matter what approach they took was their goose already cooked?

4. Will Bear’s fraudulent mortgage lending practices within their mortgage origination business, EMC Mortgage, based in Texas be pursued? JP Morgan now owns this business. A change in ownership should not preclude pursuing criminal behaviors.

5. Are people aware of the totally dysfunctional relationships amongst 3 of Bear’s senior level executives, Alan “Ace” Greenberg, Jimmy Cayne, and Warren Spector? The WSJ reports that Ace and Jimmy have not spoken since Bear’s demise. Spector is strongly suspected of providing the information that the Wall Street Journal used to trash Jimmy Cayne. Where was the Bear Stearns board in the midst of the demise? Who was looking out for the shareholders?

6. One of the initial cracks in the financial system occurred in the Spring 2007 when Bear Stearns Asset Management failed to support two of its funds managed by Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin. These individuals are awaiting trial. What will their fate be? What will their defense be? Will they implicate Spector who oversaw BSAM?

7. I find it amazing that Bear executives, including Cayne, Greenberg, and Alan Schwartz continue to assign blame to the following groups and individuals: hedge funds that spread rumors of Bear’s demise, Tim Geithner for opening the Fed window only after Bear was sold to JP Morgan, Hank Paulson for indicating to Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan that he was the only legitimate buyer and he should lower his bid. Never once have I heard any Bear executive indicate that they were too leveraged, that they were more concerned with their own fate instead of their employees and shareholders, that they had few if any real friends on Wall Street. Never once have I heard any Bear executive indicate what could have and should have been done differently.

8. In reading some recent interviews with former Bear employees, I still see the blind faith in a firm that did not protect and defend its’ shareholders and employees. Bear’s executives consistently paid themselves egregious levels of compensation without regard for properly protecting the franchise.

9. Another critical lesson for employees is not to invest excessive sums in your employer. In the process of doing that you are actually growing your risk exponentially as you are risking both your salary and investment on the same company. Why do people make this mistake? They are chasing the same dollars that senior management is paying themselves. Additionally, although employees may feel they understand the risk embedded in the company, I would maintain that they are actually so close to the risk as to not have enough perspective. Bear Stearns’ employees and Lehman employees each owned in excess of 30% of the company. This degree of employee ownership is a huge mistake.

While the question of the moral hazard created with Bear Stearns’ demise can and will be hotly debated for years to come, the real tragedy of Bear Stearns is the tremendous loss of value for shareholders, employees, and global finance at large. As Shakespeare wrote in Julius Caesar, “our fate lies not in our stars but in ourselves.” In a similar vein, the rise and fall of Bear Stearns was a function of egos and hubris that spun out of control.

That lesson is the real moral of the story.

LD

  • basil

    Could you possibly help me understand the AIG-bank connection?

    Why does an insurance company have to be bailed out?

    Is it because it insures the banks and since all the banks have failed they’re expecting AIG insurance to kick in?

    If there’s an AIG-bank connection why bail out both the insurance company and the banks?

    I am so confused about this.

  • Greg

    Wow, a post at No Quarter that’s detailed, and rational, and does not blame Barack for something…The comments sections most assuredly won’t hold up…

  • http://BREAKINGNEWS!! Oisafraud

    Are the Obamas & company running the country or just robbing it?

  • HARP

    Time is running out for the keystone cops:

    Amid AIG Furor, Dodd Tries to Undo Bonus Protections He Put In:

    Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday night floated the idea of taxing American International Group (AIG: 0.9297, 0.1496, 19.18%) bonus recipients so the government could recoup some or all of the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit. Within hours, the idea spread to both houses of Congress, with lawmakers proposing an AIG bonus tax.

    The move represents somewhat of an about-face for the Senator.

    While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009” — which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are now seeking to tax.

    http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/dodd-cracks-aig—time/

  • basil

    Can someone please explain to me why AIG was bailed out?

    I thought the bailout was for banks.

    AIG is an insurance company, no?

    How would AIG failing effect banks?

    I don’t get it.

  • HARP

    Senator Barack Obama received a $101,332 bonus from American International Group in the form of political contributions according to Opensecrets.org. The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.

    The A.I.G. Financial Products affiliate of A.I.G. gave out $136,928, the most of any AIG affiliate, in the 2008 cycle. I would note that A.I.G.’s financial products division is the unit that wrote trillions of dollars’ worth of credit-default swaps and “misjudged” the risk.

  • CG

    LD, it’s commendable for you to have given considerable thought to the lessons… The public was lulled into believing that after Enron, Tyco and WorldCom that other companies’ executives would be on notice, lessons would be learned, and the culture of corruption eliminated. Obviously, no lessons were learned, and instead bad practices intensified, in my estimation. I personally have no faith in anyone as there is no integrity to be found, and no moral bearing. This is certainly turning out to be the decade of depravity. http://www.forbes.com/2002/07/25/accountingtracker.html for a list of some of the corporate scandals…

  • CG

    Of course there are other lists, but here is a link to the wikipedia compilation… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accounting_scandals

  • Doc99

    It’s amazing Dodd (D-Countrywide) doesn’t reside in Club Gitmo.

  • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

    Thanks for sharing these links. Regrettably it has been one huge $$$ grab at every turn.

    Now we really pay.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    glad you are feeling better L.D.
    happy St. PADDY.S DAY ALL……

  • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

    Thanks very much.

  • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

    Basil,

    In a nutshell, AIG was the definition of “systemic risk.” That risk implies that if AIG went down the entire financial system would go down along with them. Why? AIG wrote insurance contracts (CDS) on a variety of financial instruments that a multitude of banks own. If the insurer goes down then the insured would also go down.

    Sound like a house of cards. In so many words it is. The govt was forced to bail out AIG and the entire system at the same time.

    Hope this helps.

  • Tommy will standand fight ..down with the main stream media

    Please listen and sent it out. The people of America MUST KNOW THIS!!
    This just in -

    http://www.worldviewradio.com/play.php?EpisodeID=11125

    OBAMA’S DOCUMENTED TIES
    TO COERCIONIST
    ORGANIZATIONS & INDIVIDUALS

    From New Zealand -

    Mr. Trevor Loudon, a gentleman in New Zealand, has extensively referenced and documented Obama’s ties to coercionist organizations. As Mr. Loudon explains in a recent radio interview (see link below), he is concerned about America because ultimately New Zealand’s freedom depends upon America’s freedom.

    The original message describing Mr. Loudon’s sixty-nine documents regarding Obama was sent by Mr. Richard O’Leary in the following message:

    A dear friend of mine in Austrailia sent me this link to a radio broadcast
    about Barack Obama’s past. We need to distribute this material to every
    person we know. As you will soon learn, Obama is A VERY DANGEROUS
    MAN! More dangerous than anyone knows, except a few select individuals.

    http://www.worldviewradio.com:80/play.php?EpisodeID=11125

    It is unbelievable that Obama was able to supress this information, but he
    did, with the assistance of the American press. I’ve known Obama was a
    hard core coercionist, but I had no idea that he was this evil. I take almost
    everything I hear about anyone with a grain of salt, but the evidence in this
    matter is irrefutable.
    Please listen and sent it out. The people of America MUST KNOW THIS!!
    OBAMA’S DOCUMENTED TIES
    TO COERCIONIST
    ORGANIZATIONS & INDIVIDUALS

    From New Zealand -

    Mr. Trevor Loudon, a gentleman in New Zealand, has extensively referenced and documented Obama’s ties to coercionist organizations. As Mr. Loudon explains in a recent radio interview (see link below), he is concerned about America because ultimately New Zealand’s freedom depends upon America’s freedom.

    The original message describing Mr. Loudon’s sixty-nine documents regarding Obama was sent by Mr. Richard O’Leary in the following message:

    A dear friend of mine in Austrailia sent me this link to a radio broadcast
    about Barack Obama’s past. We need to distribute this material to every
    person we know. As you will soon learn, Obama is A VERY DANGEROUS
    MAN! More dangerous than anyone knows, except a few select individuals.

    http://www.worldviewradio.com:80/play.php?EpisodeID=11125

    It is unbelievable that Obama was able to supress this information, but he
    did, with the assistance of the American press. I’ve known Obama was a
    hard core coercionist, but I had no idea that he was this evil. I take almost
    everything I hear about anyone with a grain of salt, but the evidence in this
    matter is irrefutable.
    Please listen and sent it out. The people of America MUST KNOW THIS!!

    Maybe even send it to senator-congress- anyone-

blog comments powered by Disqus