RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

How Much Lipstick Can a Pig Wear?

Five years after the start of the war in Iraq–a war of our choosing–peace, reconciliation, and tranquility throughout Iraq remain elusive goals. The surge in U.S. troops starting one year ago was accompanied, eventually, by a decline in the number of attacks on both civilians and U.S. forces. However, it was not the increase in the number of troops that achieved the drop in violence, but a change in strategy. The core of that strategy focused on engaging the Sunni chieftains throughout the Anbar province and paying for the militia to protect their local areas.

Despite the best efforts of Senator McCain and neocons to proclaim the surge a success, even General Petraeus now acknowledges that the Shia led government of Maliki has failed to take advantage of the drop in violence. Moreover, the number of attacks and murders is moving up again. Adding to the gloom is this report in today’s Los Angeles Times by Garrett Therolf about his efforts to report on “good” news. He tried to report, for example, on the opening and operations of a state bank in Amariya. According to Therolf:

“The unit operating in the same area as the bank doesn’t categorize the bank operations as a top priority because they don’t directly affect the good of the community of Amiriya,” an Army spokesman, Maj. Mark Cheadle, wrote in an e-mail. “So, the bottom line is they would rather not sponsor an embed or visit for something they don’t deal with on a regular basis.” My request for a follow-up “embed” was denied.

I tried to arrange a visit that would not involve the military, but the neighborhood is surrounded by checkpoints that were judged too dangerous for us to pass. Without being accompanied by soldiers, there was no way for me to tell the story.

Cheadle proposed that I instead write about a videoconference that allowed schoolchildren in Baghdad and Texas to ask questions of each other. I declined.

A few days later, the restaurant employees said they had changed their minds about the interview. They were too scared to raise their profile through a news story. And a Chinese Embassy spokesman said his office had persuaded them to return home, although they were still operating in recent days. “The situation is far too dangerous for them to work here,” the spokesman said.

Because of such fears and the inefficiency that pervades the capital, these “good news” stories evaporated before I could tell them. After only a month in Iraq, I once again left having filed mostly “bad news” stories.

The crazy fantasy of John McCain that things are swell in Iraq and headed toward nirvana will not survive the fall campaign. No matter how much lipstick you put on a pig it is still a pig. You can dress a pig in a negligee or pants, but it is still a pig. And Iraq’s quest for unity will remain a fools errand.  Iraq will remain a country controlled largely by Shias, which is riven by sectarian strife. The options confronting the next President, be it McCain, Obama, or Hillary are daunting. The following will constrain what can be done:

The Economic Crisis: The US economy is tied to the financial markets like an anchor to a ship. And the anchor is dragging the ship of state under water. Financial institutions, like Bear Stearns, are struggling to survive, and foreclosures on overdue mortgages are mounting. Given these facts, it is likely that the U.S. budget deficit will balloon rather than shrink in the coming year. How then will Congress be able to continue to spend $9 billion dollars a month in Iraq when U.S. taxpayers are hurting? I don’t see any way out but a cut in spending on projects in Iraq. That means are ability to influence events with our checkbook will shrink, not grow.

The Army Manpower Crisis: Our Army, Army Reserve, and National Guard are worn out. Units and equipment have been degraded significantly because of sustained deployments. The U.S. Army has met recruiting goals by accepting for enlistment men and women previously considered not not qualified. For example, only 72% of those enlisted are high school graduates. Prior to 9-11, the figure approached 100%. The rebuilding of the Army and restocking the vehicles, weapons, and aircraft burned up during the course of the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan will be an expensive proposition. And lets not forget the costs of health care for veterans carrying grievous physical and psychological wounds.

The best way to address the manpower issue to rebuild the Army is to institute a draft. But that is a political impossibility. The majority of Americans would not support such a move. The efforts of the next President and Congress will be focused on trying to restore the Army to its pre-911 strength.

The Iraq Security Challenge: With 250,000 to 400,000 troops on the ground in Iraq the United States would be in a position to help the Iraqi government restore public order. But we do not have the troops available to achieve that objective. Moreover, to acquire the necessary number of soldiers, assuming a draft was imposed, would put us at least two years away from being able to field new divisions that would allow us to achieve 250,000 boots on the ground. Bottomline–there is no viable short term solution available that would allow any President to boost our troop presence in Iraq.

Foreign fighters account for a very small percentage of the violence in Iraq. The vast majority of the foreign fighters are Sunni extremists and want to target U.S. troops, Shia populations, and Sunnis disposed to cooperate with the United States. So far U.S. Special Operations forces have been playing a critical and effective role in locating and killing these extremists. It appears that the Maliki government remains favorably disposed to let U.S. forces take this part of the fight to the radical Islamists. It is at a minimum an acknowledgment that U.S. forces are helping protect the Shia government from Sunni extremists bent on eliminating the Shia influence.

During the coming year the number of U.S. casualties will be lower than the numbers racked up in 2007. But the numbers will still hover around 30 dead and 100 wounded American soldiers every month. Though small relative to the losses during the height of the Vietnam war, the economic and psychological toll on the U.S. forces will be severe.

A rapid pullout of U.S. forces is likely to be accompanied by a significant surge in sectarian violence. Population displacement will accelerate throughout Iraq, as the Sunnis, Shia, and Kurds seeks the safety of traditional tribal areas. The likely result is a more balkanized Iraq.

The Regional Foreign Policy Challenge: The weakening of the U.S. economy will be accompanied by growing concern among our Middle East allies about our ability to play a constructive role in the region. A precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq will heighten those concerns. At the same time, Iran’s influence in Iraq will remain strong, and possible expand.

There is no doubt that the United States is doing heavy duty saber rattling towards Iran. So far Iran, wisely, has recognized it is winning the political battle and has shied away from an open confrontation with the United States. If we escape the Bush Administration’s lust for a new war, the next President will face the task of engaging Iran. We should harbor no illusions that the perception that the U.S. is retreating from Iraq will not help us attain political leverage with Iran. The question of Iran, regardless who is selected as the next President, will likely be a top priority foreign policy issue during his or her term.

Bottomline–there is no silver bullet, no magic pain free solution on the horizon. We need to think carefully about what our national interests are in the Middle East and construct a policy capable of achieving those goals.

  • Fleaflicker

    I have this image of a pig in a negligee wearing lipstick. It’s burnt into my mind. Thanks a lot!

    :o )

  • Sam Copeland

    Brilliant analysis.

    I strongly urge everyone to commit the major points of Mr. Johnson’s analysis to memory and to make them your talking points about the Iraq war.

    Part of the solution in Iraq is political will. In order to develop that political will, we will need to have a consensus in this nation on the problems we face in Iraq. Without such a shared consensus, it will be impossible for the next President to take the right action in Iraq. Without such a shared consensus, she (or unfortunately he) will have policy options restricted by a neo-con propaganda noise machine.

  • Patrick Henry

    LARRY..

    Thanks for Your Comments..Very well Done..You remind us that The PIG not only wears Lipstick..But has put on Sun glass’s too..( Disquise The Pig)

    We cannot let this needless Five Year War..be forgotten..things are Just as Bad as Ever..A the Standard of Living has not improved that much..he Iraqi People are not Very happy..with the Imperial Liberator..King George..

    Sure..George had someone kill the Dragon..but like the Commercial on TV…Everyone gets Stuck with King Georges Ugly Daughter..annd King George wants to hang onto the Dragons Den..

    So..here we are..Five years later…things are worse everywhere..No One is Cheering..Everyone is fighting..The Kingdom is Pillaged..The Pheasants are Revolting..The Treasury is Empty..4000 Fine American troops are Dead..29,395 Troops are Wounded..and would have been killed if not for excellent Trauma care..158,000 more Troops are being deployed ovwer and over and over again ..and We are borrowing $12 BILLION Dollars a Month from China to Finance King Georges War..Bringing the Total Number of Deaths..Damage..Displacement..into the Millions..

    These Regional Problems are HUGH..

    Our NATIONAL Problems are HUGH..

    Finding ways to Stabilize Things is HUGH..

    The Challenge is HUGH..

    These are Dangerous Times…They require great Leadership..and Skills..

    Great Organizational Skills..(which Obama admits he Lacks)

    This is not a time for Politics as Usual..or PIGS..

    Its a time for PROBLEM SOLVING..and there are Many Problems..and as You Said in your Summary Larry..

    A~ POLICY Capable of Achieving Our Goals..

    Thanks again Larry..

  • Montag

    If you want to read something truly frightening, read the article about John McCain at THE NATION’s website. Larry is warning us about mines in the water ahead while McCain’s game plan is, “Full speed ahead!” This guy is Hell bent on starting more wars when we’ve already got two perfectly good ones simmering on the stove. How many burners does McCain think there ARE on the stovetop, anyway? He gave us fair warning, too: “Bomb, bomb, bomb–bomb, bomb Iran.”

  • Michael Lafferty

    Succinct. Structured. Reasonable and defensible.

    So, why are people still asking ass-hats like Michael O’Hanlon and Fred Kagan which end is up? For heaven’s sake, even the ‘proconsul of Baghdad’ has spoken, inferring that his vaunted ‘surge’ has failed to achieve its objectives.

    My wise father would shake his head when confronted with such idiocy, and remark that such individuals we of the ‘…don’t confuse me with facts: my mind is made up’ mindset. Fools…

  • Michael Lafferty

    …er, individuals ARE of…

    So much for my ability to rapidly proofread.

  • Montag

    And don’t worry about the War Debt, we’ll be swimming in money once McCain finds that Fairy Gold.

  • http://cujo359.blogspot.com Cujo359

    I think your bottom line has been true since at least 2005, Larry. The only choices are bad, worse, and worst. Which one is which might be open to debate, but any talk of “victory” here is specious. We won the war, and we’re losing the aftermath. How much we lose and how badly is the only question, it seems to me.

  • http://cujo359.blogspot.com Cujo359

    It fell behind the barrel of pig lipstick. They’ll find it eventually.

  • http://cujo359.blogspot.com Cujo359

    Sorry, I was imprecise. That should read “a barrel of pig lipstick”.

  • http://www.despair.com/idiocy.html Smilin’ Jim

    There is a confusion here between strategy and tactics.
    The tactical part of the operation was to use locally overwhelming force to reduce the level of violence to allow the Iraqis to operate in a politically effective manner. We found that buying the Sunnis off and rearming them was more effective than kicking the shit out of them. The Sheites opted for the long game.

    Our strategy was to use this lull in the bloodbath to use the legislative process to bring the Sunni and Sheite factions together. They have spurned this opportunity.

    We face tactical success and strategic failure. Full stop.

  • simon

    We won the war, and we’re losing the aftermath. How much we lose and how badly is the only question, it seems to me.

    I think it might help to look at Iraq as part of a much larger battle.

    What problems are we facing with China, say, under the radar? Drugs? Arms? Corruption? Money laundering?

    How would the war, and it’s current status, affect those conditions?

    The war is very real, unfortunately, none of the people handling it are capable of seeing it, dealing with it as real, IMO, they simply are unqualified, which is what happens when you let Karl Rove and Dick Cheney pick the President.

    But I would say others are AWARE of this problem.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Larry, At some point we will be forced to retrieve the lipstick from the pig so it can’t be used.

    I didn’t think you were talking about Torie clark’s book.
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0743271165/ref=sib_fs_top?ie=UTF8&p=S00H&checkSum=jaaqcasgOfi4x1X2Sh5lPn9O5vr2%2Bi1kC4tePzWxMzg%3D#reader-link

    Henry Drummond: As long as the prerequisite for that shining paradise is ignorance, bigotry and hate, I say the hell with it.
    He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inherit_the_Wind

  • simon

    What did the army want, say, outside of Cheney and Bush?

  • jwrjr

    Larry’s post is a description of bush’s (and the republican party’s) legacy. What makes it worse is that the next time there is a republican administration, ‘poof’, all memory of it will be gone … until it happens again.

  • simon

    We face tactical success and strategic failure. Full stop.

    I thought about this, and I disagree.

    Our tactics were only successful in as much as we were led to believe.

    Hezbollah threw Israel in Lebanon.

    So, say , for instance, you think “we have superior fire power.”

    Well, the army is broken, with no remedy in sight.

    So, the middle east, and say, Asia, continue to bleed America, and we continue to elect no talent narcissistic Presidents, ala Bush, Cheney and Obama.

    Obama not able to govern, not even interested, his first allegiance to some corporate master, who only wants to earn money. Like Bush.

    So the army bleeds another two years, the economy mismanaged, all Larry mentioned, and then one of the middle east terrorist groups launches an assault.

    We don’t have the fire power, our superior armament, gamed.

    So, I cant agree with certainty our tactics DID work, even momentarily, we didn’t win the war, perhaps it was simply a period of waiting, being drawn to a trap.

  • simon

    It’s an asymmetric victory, but for the other side.

  • simon

    What makes it worse is that the next time there is a republican administration, ‘poof’, all memory of it will be gone … until it happens again.

    The republicans didnt change, they’re still as clueless as ever,they’re being beaten in the Middle East, hands down.

    But the democrats?

    Look, we see what’s happening, Pelsoi knows, she instead chooses to pretend Obama’s stench is irrelevant.

    So it’s their fault, they just SUCK as leaders.

  • http://www.despair.com/idiocy.html Smilin’ Jim

    Whatever your’re on, kid, I would give my right nut to get of kilo of.

    Party on.

  • jwrjr

    Agreed that the Democrats are, at best, not much better than the republicans.

  • Shirin

    Then why, oh why are Larry and Susan waging war against the person who very possibly will be the Democratic nominee? The story that it is all about bringing it out in the open before the Republicans do does not ring true at all. If that were the case the tone of this site would be very different.

  • Shirin

    Overall, the Democrats are every bit as empire-driven as the Republicans. The main difference is the Bush II regime has been more lunatic and brazenly in-your-face about it all.

  • Shirin

    Iraq will remain a country controlled largely by Sunnis…

    HUH?!

  • Michel

    the Democrats are every bit as empire-driven as the Republicans.

    That’s the gist of it.
    There is no difference in Imperial lust between either party and their elite managers.
    Democratic opposition to Bush’s war exists only because he failed to secure the “mission accomplished” victory: a compliant puppet regime in Baghdad, and no Iraqi opposition to US control of the oil and permanent bases.
    Had he achieved that, you would see the most completely bipartisan love fest in DC with the Bush WH and the Democratic Congress walking hand in hand toward a bright and sunny imperial future!!!
    But he fucked it up bad, and now the Democrats want a go at trying to build THEIR kind of Empire!

  • http://NoQuarterUSA.net Larry Johnson

    I knew I needed you as an editor. I’ve corrected the misstatement.
    LJ

  • CK

    I understand that the rank and file in the US military in Iraq have asked to be paid in Euros.
    ( Above sentence is a wee bit of Irish snark, maybe.)

  • CK

    As a bankrupt nation, we have no regional policy standing left. Do you listen to the bum on the streetcorner cadging a handout as he explains his regional policy theories? Does anyone listen to Zimbabwe’s Middle East Policy?
    The Bush/McCain depression marches forward. Bear Stearns yesterday, Lehman bros, Citi, and JP Morgan soon. Since there is limited economic production and no economic growth in the USA, the only way to bail out their friends is to print more paper money.
    Poof goes the value of the dollar yet again. $5 a gallon gas before the end of the summer, probably gasoline shortages as foreign nations make “other arrangements” among themselves with currencies that have some residual value.
    Did you notice that the new, overpriced, and unnecessary air tanker will not be made in the USA?
    Whatever do we have left that we produce: scrap metal, laughable movies, brittney songs, outdated weapons, cattle hides, soybeans, coal for China and government payroll jobs. ( oh yes and pirateable software ).
    Should be a long hot summer, maybe the demand for yardarms, portable guillotines and lampposts will become rapidly stronger.

  • Shirin

    Glad to know it was a mistake and not some new overnight development that I had managed to miss!

  • simon

    Whatever your’re on, kid, I would give my right nut to get of kilo of.

    Why do you disagree?

    How does another commander think?

  • simon

    There is no difference in Imperial lust between either party and their elite managers.

    Do you think it’s a matter of empire building, and profit, on behalf of the democrats, or a mistaken notion of security?

    Do you think they even give it much thought?

  • simon

    The Bush/McCain depression marches forward. Bear Stearns yesterday, Lehman bros, Citi, and JP Morgan soon

    How does the loss of capital affect the greater global picture?

  • Shirin

    It’s good to know that it was only a mistake and not some sudden overnight change that I managed to miss!

  • Shirin

    I think, like all empire-driven conduct, that it is mainly driven by a desire to control critical resources that belong to other countries, and to gain/maintain political and economic hegemony in a way that serves what they believe are American interests. I don’t think it has very much to do with security at all. I think security is just a pretext.

    I do not think they stay up nights plotting how they are going to build an empire. I think empire building is a natural consequence of the desire to “project power around the globe”, and to induce or force the rest of the world into line with what they perceive as “American interests”. I think if you told most of then they are imperial-minded, and that empire-building was what they are up to they would think you are nuts.

  • TeakWoodKite

    serves what they believe are American interests

    I don’t think it is about American interests. These folks are “globelist” and are about co-opting what is not theirs.

    Us plebs just get to “vote” about it.

  • Michel

    Do you think it’s a matter of empire building, and profit, on behalf of the democrats, or a mistaken notion of security?

    High-level party officials and hierarchs in both major parties along with the nation’s ruling elites share the same worldview: America is number 1, must lead the world and control its resources in America’s interests. There is no strategic disagreement between them on those defining terms.
    The differences are purely tactical, it’s the methods used they feud about: how, when, where, how it is framed and sold to John Q., etc…
    The content of the package is the same, they only disagree on the wrapper.

    If you believe that a President Clinton or Obama will rapidly withdraw all the troops, leave Iraq with no strings attached (the least we can offer the Iraqis after what we’ve done to them!!!) and extends brilliant arcs of diplomacy to “mend fences” around the world are in for a major disappointment!!! :-D

  • Michel

    Do you think it’s a matter of empire building, and profit, on behalf of the democrats, or a mistaken notion of security?

    High-level party officials and hierarchs in both major parties along with the nation’s ruling elites share the same worldview: America is number 1, must lead the world and control its resources in America’s interests. There is no strategic disagreement between them on those defining terms.
    The differences are purely tactical, it’s the methods used they feud about: how, when, where, how it is framed and sold to John Q., etc…
    The content of the package is the same, they only disagree on the wrapper.

    If you believe that a President Clinton or Obama will rapidly withdraw all the troops, leave Iraq with no strings attached (the least we can offer the Iraqis after what we’ve done to them!!!) and extends brilliant arcs of diplomacy to “mend fences” around the world, you are in for a major disappointment!!! :-D

  • Donovan Fraser

    Fairy Gold, buried in his lucky charms..

    McCain, it sounds Irish and he like acts just like a drunken warlord/
    leprechaun .
    ———————————————————-

    John McCains St Patrick’s day blues:

    you take the high surge
    and i’ll take the low surge
    and i’ll be in Iran before ya..

    of course you’ll have to add ( in your mind) bagpipes and fiddle to this tired old song sung by an out of touch old coot.


    thats all i got for St. Patrick’s day
    :)

  • simon

    I read one way to piss John McCain off is to remind him he left his handicapped first wife for a babe with beer money.

    I know this guy who has temper problems, completely irrational, as near to psychotic, irrational rage as I have ever seen.

    I hope McCain is not that temperamental, though I was reading he’s had rage issues since childhood.

    I’m not looking forward to this Presidential campaign, apparently, it won’t take much to provoke him.

  • Patrick Henry

    Well Simon..

    Could Be ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.(The Beast).

    Chip Implants..Mark for Scanning..

    Strict Control of all Commoditys..

    Rationing..Gas Lines..Food Lines..Bankrupcy..

    Remember germany..Remember Japan..Remember Boycotts and blockades..remember Currency devaluation..??

    The Trend is Consistent and Obvious..

    You can’t deny the DATA or Trend Lines or News..

    The FIT is Hitting the SHAN…

    We have so Much to Thank the Bush Administration for.

    Mr. Murdcer had it Right ..earlier Today..

    TRIANGULATION..

  • Shirin

    These folks are “globelist” and are about co-opting what is not theirs.

    That’s what I meant by “what they believe are American interests”. It was my “nicer” way of saying that. :o }

  • Patrick Henry

    Or..Perhaps..

    STRATEGIC STRANGULATION…??

  • simon

    and to gain/maintain political and economic hegemony in a way that serves what they believe are American interests.

    Limited to a certain small group, though, that unfortunately was let to have power.

    So it’s basic selfishness on the part of those people, coupled with an ideology that is incompatible with a winning strategy.

  • http://www.despair.com/idiocy.html Smilin’ Jim

    “Why do you disagree?”

    Your comment was incoherent: The subject is specifically the successful application of force in Iraq in a specific program yet the text in the reply jumped in haphazard fashion from Hezbollah to Obama and on to economic mismanagement. I found Finnegan’s Wake easier to follow.

  • simon

    But Jim, what is it about connecting the dots, and asymmetric war?

    If I’m planning a war, and I don’t have a traditional force to fight, but I do have cash ( I’m a foreign government like China, say), and I can influence foreign elections, America’s say, electing a candidate who owes me, or a proxy, and I can ship arms to group like Hezbollah, to ship to Iraq, say, fueling the insurgency, aiding my enemies enemy in a trojan war, (think a government like a multinational corporation) I am FIGHTING a traditional war, but with different forces. Using Iran to channel guns to Sadr say, is my left flank.

    Do you understand how the asymmetric battle field is different from the traditional one?

    BTW, your thinking is why we’re losing.

  • Taters

    Excellent Larry.

  • simon

    If I’m planning a war, and I don’t have a traditional force to fight, but I do have cash ( I’m a foreign government like China, say), and I can influence foreign elections, America’s say, electing a candidate who owes me (OBama, donations through Blackstone, say), and my army ships arms to group like Hezbollah, to ship to Iraq, say, fueling the insurgency, aiding my enemies enemy in a trojan war, (think a government like a multinational corporation) and meanwhile I am buying up the American T Bills, I am FIGHTING a traditional war, but with different forces. Using Iran to channel guns to Sadr say, is my left flank.

    Asymmetric war involves the political, the military and the economic.

    Is it really that hard for you to understand?

    Wow.

    I assumed you were familiar with the concept.

    Sorry.

  • simon

    Who would benefit from such a thing, though?

    The world is like a giant domino game, the more you understand HOW the disparate pieces fit together, the easier it is to knock them down, and NO ONE walks away, unscathed.

    I have faith in the Pentagon, you know?

    I see Iraq as part of a larger asymmetric war, I do not isolate it.

    So, if, for instance, China is attacking us, buying all our currency, and arming our enemies in Iraq, how is China ultimately affected if the US economy fails, or if the US adopts a green energy, and investment swings back here, with regulation, this time?

    (They steal the techology, and induce manufacturing in China, right…)

  • simon

    STRATEGIC STRANGULATION…??

    How would see that play out?

  • simon

    How would YOU see that play out, sorry.

  • simon

    High-level party officials and hierarchs in both major parties along with the nation’s ruling elites share the same worldview: America is number 1, must lead the world and control its resources in America’s interests.

    American leaders who think like this are in for a rough time, this country won’t survive if they don’t change their point of view.

    And yes, you’re right.

    Our greatest strength is our democracy, in terms of fighting for human rights, that’s what the PEOPLE of the world admire us for, by and large.

    Really.

    But the Cheney world view you articulated fuels the hatred toward us.

  • simon

    I do not think they stay up nights plotting how they are going to build an empire

    Michel made a point regarding SOME Americans and a god given attitude of entitlement, America should control all the world’s resources.

    In a way, as a small child, I just took that for granted, if we needed it, we took it, for business purposes, but we paid, we created jobs.

    As you grow up, you understand how wrong this is, America is NOT entitled, we MUST respect other countries, win -win.

    But now I see in China an attitude of entitlement, and I really wonder how it’s going to play out for them.

  • Shirin

    I don’t see any way out but a cut in spending on projects in Iraq.

    Great! Cut out ALL of your projects in Iraq, please. You owe reparations, you are not entitled to enjoy the benefits of your “projects”.

    That means are ability to influence events with our checkbook will shrink, not grow.

    Haven’t you done enough with your ability to influence events?! Your influence on events has thus far been an unmitigated disaster. The United States has no business attempting to “influence events” in Iraq. Any “projects” and any “influence” are bound to be tied to your real project of gaming Iraqi to your benefit. Any benefit to Iraqis is purely coincidental.

    Please take your checkbook, your “projects”, and your “events influencing” and put them in a dark, warm, moist place.

    We need to think carefully about what our national interests are in the Middle East and construct a policy capable of achieving those goals.

    Oh yes – YOUR national interests and YOUR goals are what matter. Iraqis’ national interests and Iraqis’ goals are irrelevant unless they just happen to coincide with yours. Why am I not surprised to hear this from you, Larry?

    This analysis from Helena Cobban is far superior to anything I have seen on this page, has its basis in a real understanding of and concern for the Middle East and the Arab world, and comes from a far more practical – not to mention less self-centered – point of view:

    The harmful effects of this war on the peoples of Iraq and the Middle East are still continuing, day after day after day. And they will continue so long as the US military continues to stay there, continually sowing its seeds of divide-and-rule and distrust, and continually pumping into the country both military tools and a militarized mindset. The moment a US President states clearly that he or she intends to pull the US troops out of Iraq completely, defines the timetable within which s/he will achieve that, and calls on the UN to convene the negotiating processes– at the intra-Iraqi level, and at the regional level– required for this to happen in a calm and orderly way, then the dynamic in the country and in the region will change. [Got that, people? Only then will the dynamic in Iraq begin to change. Iraqis know this, people who understand Iraq and the Arab world know this. Unfortunately, the people who drive U.S. policy are only thinking of U.S. "national interests".]

    “It is quite unrealistic (and therefore quite dishonest) for any US leader or official to claim at this point that the US on its own can “control” the modalities of its own exit. But exit there must be– primarily for the good of the Iraqis, whose sufferings over the past five years have been vast; but also for the good of the US and for many other actors. [Oh no! Can it actually be that a quick, rapid, and complete withdrawal is also in American "national interests"?! Say it isn't so!]

    “If this whole, grisly tragedy has had a “silver lining”– and I hesitate even to raise the idea this might be so– then that is that surely it has amply demonstrated to the US citizenry and the world, once again, that military power on its own, however technically “awesome” (and shocking), is in the modern world quite insufficient as a means to securing strategic goals of any significance.

    “I had hoped that US citizens might have learned this from the war they waged on Vietnam in earlier decades? Or from the outcome of Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon? But no. The curve of learning of actual, useful strategic lessons– as opposed to those that are handily “packaged” in Power Point slideshows by the arms manufacturers and their armies of well-paid cheerleaders in the think-tanks and academe– seems notably flat, or perhaps even downward-trending over time.

    “…let’s try to make sure that this time around, the ‘Lessons from the failure of US military power in Iraq’ are properly learned and properly (and irreversibly) integrated into the practice and planning of the US government. That is: we need a drastic redirection of resources from military hardware, military “preparedness”, and global power-projection capabilities into supporting all the many tools of diplomacy and international cooperation that already exist, and some new ones that we should now work with the rest of the world to build from scratch.

  • Patrick Henry

    Simon..

    Seems to be going thier way..doesn’t it..We Made them Rich..Financed thier economy ..supplied them money for thier military…They have HUGH Cash Reserves..and are making strategic deals all over the World..Including OIL Contracts..and are aligning with those in the Midle east and Asia who will help them Triangulate that part of the world..

    They still cnsider US the enemy..when we don’t buy thier goods..stand up to them..with sanctions..or Regulations..or move Jobs back to the United States..I think China will just Move to the EU..and Quite buying Our Debt..thwey will look elsewhere for Strategic and corporate partnerships..

    Strategic Strangulation..

    Similar to what Ronald Reagan claimed HIS Administration did to the Russians..(Who have Not Forgotten) and the Industrialized nations did to germany…Ruined the Currency..and to japan..Embargoed and Cut off thier OIL..

    Reagan and Bush One should have gone Green Years ago when the United States got Bitch Slapped..

  • Patrick Henry

    SIMON..

    its Also Called CHINESE CHECKERS..

    Dominos..Hmmmm..Haven’t about that since Biet Nam..

    Yes..The US is caught up in a ASS~O~METRIC WAR alright..They measure us in METERS..We Measure them in Feet ..

    Same Old Strategic Game that warring Nationsw and People have always Played..

    The Tools of War Change but the Human Mind is the Force that Controls them..

    Its All about WINNING..Pissed Off Players and Coming Back with Your Next Strategic Move..

    The Idea is the same..Logistics..Power and thinking You have the Winning Hand..

    SO Simon..You Have Faith in the Pentagon..??

    The same Pentagon that allowed a Terrorist to fly a Plane into it..??

    High Tech..Super Power Arrogance against Your Basic Kamakazi Attack..and Fighters walking right up to you with a Bomb on thier Ass..

    I am said to say I agree with a Eurpoean Friend who once told me..”The Americans are th Most Naive people in the World”..

    I also might add..The Most Spoiled..

    I suggest you start saving your money..or buying gold..

  • justsomeone

    By any chance has anyone seen the March issue of Conde Nast PORTFOLIO Magazine? There’s a travel article about Iraq, color photos of new “McMansions” & a speil about “All anyone talks about is Dubai”. Also wonder if anyone watched Arwa Damon’s documentary about “The Woman of Iraq”, it aired last night on CNN.

  • Patrick Henry

    Larry..

    I figure the Pigs got about 100 Kilos of Lipstick Now..

    The next question is..How Deep can the Pig Poop Get.

    Just someOne…I regret to say I missed that..

  • http://www.despair.com/idiocy.html Smilin’ Jim

    You have too much time on your hands.

    The subject is still the reduction of violence below the levels of last year due to the imposition of more military force.

    Deal with the subject or shut the fuck up.

  • Michel

    American leaders who think like this are in for a rough time, this country won’t survive if they don’t change their point of view.

    Survival is the keyword here. This strategic thinking has been in place for quite a while. At least since the closing of WWI, definitely since the end of WWII.
    It’s hard teaching an old ruling class dog new tricks. For instance, real and profound changes in the industrial/economic order vitally necessary to the planet’s survival, changes such as the complete jettisoning of the “economic growth” concept and the immediate abandonment of the “compete and consume more and more, always more” paradigm of the dangerously obsolete “free market” system, to name only two, well these crucial 180s will NEVER happen, at least as policies coming down from the political/industrial/financial elites, whether they be aligned with the Democratic or the Republican parties.
    If anything is to happen, and it must, it’ll have to come from us the people, organized and focused on OUR solutions.
    As long as we keep placing our hopes and trust in “prayer” or some nonsensical “leadership qualities” from a variety of corporate-Wall-Street shills like ‘Presidents’ McCain, Clinton, or Obama, we’re in for yet still more disappointments!

  • Michel

    But the Cheney world view you articulated fuels the hatred toward us.

    The “Cheney world view” is remarkable because it is so ‘outré’, so excessive, so evidently brutal and merciless. But it is in no way unique or limited to some Republican extremist fringe. Again, Cheney and Clinton/Obama share the same view, the same concepts of strategic interests. The difference is in the way it’s presented to the populace. Clinton/Obama might be subtler, might appear more reasonable, less strident in their pursuit of wealth and profits for their friends/sponsors/cronies, but the end result is the same.
    From the victim’s POV, the bombs fall just as hard, but a Dem admin might spare us that “balls-to-the-wall”, “in-your-face-till-you-bleed”, “fuck-’em-ragheads” attitude. It will all be couched in some feel-good, warm and fuzzy human-rights-first-and-foremost packaging. Maybe!
    These attitudes and pseudo-differences used to be pretty sharply defined. They’re less so now, in a post-9/11 world where “everything has changed”.
    Also, the pressure on the Dems/Reps to deliver the goods to the powerful (control of resources, creation/maintenance of a safe and desirable investment climate, the acquisition of international market share via diplomacy or bombs as required,…) has increased sharply.
    The hatred you speak of is not necessarily directed at the mythical concept of “America” (cue heavenly choir of cherubs and seraphims singing hosannas to the divine greatness of our god-chosen land), but to the harsh reality on the ground affecting the unfortunate people currently benefiting from our wondrous Democracy. I don’t doubt for a second that the Iraqi population yearns for and likes NY Yankees baseball hats, hip hop and rock’n'roll, Hollywood shoot’ em up movies, Nike sneakers and 501 jeans.
    They’re likely a whole lot less enthused by Exxon-Mobil originated oil “laws”, western privatization of all aspects of their lives, massive bombardments of their cities, and the force-feeding of some nebulous concept of “democracy” which we ourselves have a harder and harder time getting for ourselves!

  • Shirin

    Nope, didn’t see either of them (don’t watch CNN). Where were these McMansions? Not Baghdad, I’ll wager. Perhaps – MAYBE – in Dohuk or some other less mainstream town in Kurdistan? Things aren’t exactly all roses and chocolate in Kurdistan, but the American military has mostly stayed out of there, and kept a lower-profile presence, so there IS less violence, at least the kind of violence that is visible.

    As for “all anyone talks about is Dubai” – yeah, right! Maybe – MAYBE

  • Shirin

    Nope, didn’t see either of them (don’t watch CNN). Where were these McMansions? Not Baghdad, I’ll wager. Perhaps – MAYBE – in Dohuk or some other less mainstream town in Kurdistan? Things aren’t exactly all roses and chocolate in Kurdistan, but the American military has mostly stayed out of there, and kept a lower-profile presence, so there IS less violence, at least the kind of violence that is visible.

    As for “all anyone talks about is Dubai” – yeah, right! Maybe – MAYBE – that’s a favourite topic among the traitors, collaborators and profiteers, but hardly among mainstream, “ordinary” Iraqis.

  • Shirin

    “Limited” to a very small group that was “allowed to have power”? Are you under the illusion that the phenomenon I described has been “limited” to Georgie and the Neocons? If so, you need to take a closer look at every administration, Republican and Democrat, of the 20th-21st century, and beyond. And you need to listen more carefully to statements from people like Larry, for whom pursuing and achieving “American interests” by the most effective means is the number one goal.

    Look closely just at at Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II. Their foreign and military policies were ALL about achieving military, political, and economic hegemony throughout the world, and about “co-opting what is not theirs”.

    And listen to yourself because you are all about the same thing – a “winning” strategy, and making sure that only the U.S. gets to “game Iraq” (or Iran, or Syria, or Pakistan, or fillintheblank) to its benefit.

  • GINA

    Obama’s lip stick / pig remark … and, Biden’s unsavory children with special needs remarks show us what a couple of creeps these two candidates are. In lieu of Sarah Palin’s comment about hockey moms, pit bulls and lip stick, Obama’s lip stick/ pig remark was extremely demeaning. Even though I am not an Obama supporter, at least I thought he had some degree of class and sophistication. He can try to cover his tracks by saying that the lip stick remark was not directed towards Governor Palin, but anyone with half a brain knows that’s exactly what he meant. I think Obama knows his campaign is in real trouble, and that’s why he’s stooping to such desperate, insulting and distasteful attacks. Obama is definitely not Presidential material.

blog comments powered by Disqus