RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Treasury Seeks Unprecedented Power

I have written at length about the problems within the banking, insurance, hedge fund, and consumer finance industries over the last 6 months. While the bulk of the media focus has been on the banking industry – and primarily the large money center banks – the erosion in asset values at these other financial companies has been accelerating.

This past Sunday evening on NQR’s Sense on Cents with Larry Doyle, I spoke extensively about the massive financial shortfall within the insurance industry. In addition, relatively early on I warned that the hedge fund industry had likely been severely mismarking many investments. From a piece I wrote on November 12, 2008:

Give it time, because hedge funds do not have to report to anybody as to what their positions are and where they have them marked. There is no doubt they have positions that are grossly mismarked and have many positions that are totally illiquid. For many investors in these funds, these are truly “roach motels.” Hedge funds will sell what is most liquid when they can to meet redemption requests. We should expect a significant number of hedge fund liquidations, consolidations, and out and out disasters.

The same can be said for a number of private equity shops. Consumer finance companies with large holdings of a variety of consumer assets are fighting for their lives as delinquencies and defaults on these assets ratchet higher.

With massive debt obligations along with capital redemptions coming due, a number of companies within these industries will be unable to refinance that debt or replace that capital.

State guarantee funds to support insolvent insurance companies total a mere $8 billion. Who would step in to support some of these other entities as they approach financial armageddon? Are banks in a position to take over these entities and liquidate assets in a quick and orderly fashion? The markets are in no position to provide the necessary liquidity without massive discounts in price.

Enter Turbo-man, Tim Geithner. U.S. Seeks Expanded Power to Seize Firms is not a mere power grab by our government, but an indication that a number of companies are on the precipice of default. The manpower shortage at Treasury to handle these upcoming situations is a very real concern.

A disorderly collapse of a number of these companies could quickly throw our markets and economy into a further tailspin. The cost of the government assuming and exercising this power, though, is not fully known and should not be underestimated.

How are contracts and outstanding liabilities handled? How are assets liquidated? Who has access to purchasing assets? The transferral of assets and wealth presents enormous challenges and opportunities. Will our government promote financial protectionism in this process? Will certain financial entities be accorded preferable treatment?

So many questions to be asked and answered in the weeks and months ahead. Make no mistake, though, this move by Treasury is an indication that a number of companies are close to going down.

LD

  • HARP

    I suppose the next step would be to put Soros in charge of all hedge funds.

  • olivia1998

    Good one Harp. Soros might as well be in charge he more then likely was behind the start of the mess falling last Sept.

    • http://noquarter foxyladi14

      i think soros has been in charge all along.

  • candymarl

    Remember what Mussolini said. To paraphrase: The marriage of government and business is fascism. If the govt owns all major industries then the majority of workers will be government dependent. This is not good.

    The only reason to do this would be another depression. Yet Obama and Geithner keep saying all is well.

    These people are scaring the living daylights out of me. It’s obvious they don’t know what they’re doing.

    • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

      Either that, or they do know what they are doing, and they are doing all this on purpose.

      • Betty

        I am wondering about “Shock Doctrine” my self. Are they pulling that on us?

    • I’m a Linda too

      Combining Socialism and Fascism=Communism. Weary Barry wants to be the all mighty dictator calling the shots.

  • I’mFedUp

    Talk about the rats guarding the cheese.

    Christ are we in trouble.

    I do think it’s on purpose.

    • andrew191

      It is on purpose. 0bama wants chaos in the market to provide him with an excuse to take over more and more of the dissapearing private sector.

      Tax cheat Geithner was rammed through against better judgement not because he was the best man to fix the problem, but because he has the ethically challenged mentality of an Illinois politician. He was brought in to wipe out the paper trail that leads to the source and creation of the current nightmare, the government, specifically Democrat owned government. He remains without a staff on purpose; why bring in a bunch of folks that sincerely want to fix the problem, they would all be potential whistle blowers pointing the way to the ugly truth. Welcome to 1930′s Germany!

      The 0bama, Pelosi, Reid triad are plowing full speed ahead toward a completely Socialist/Fascist state. 0bama may have been high on 60 minutes the other night, he was high on power. His giggling and laughter was directed at US, the interviewer, and the Constitution. He was laughing because he knows that the electorate willingly gave him that power, and that there is little that we can do to take that power back. He was laughing because he doesn’t need to be concerned if his approval rate drops to zero, he still holds the reigns of the most powerful socio/political monster ever to stalk this planet.

      0bama has no more than average intelligence, but he’s a sociopath, and a sociopath with that much power will cause unbelievable destruction.

      • Lillian

        0bama has no more than average intelligence, but he’s a sociopath, and a sociopath with that much power will cause unbelievable destruction.

        When will he have gone too far? What’s the tipping point? Each day brings more of the impossible…

        • andrew191

          In the last week he and his minions have done things that would have been unthinkable not too long ago. His propaganda machine has people cheering for the punitive and unconstitutional attacks on the AIG bonus recipients. If you were to ask me two weeks ago “When will he have gone too far?”, I might have told you something like what just happened. But what should be deafening outrage, is merely a murmer, which encourages 0bama to take bolder and more draconian actions. And you ask “What’s the tipping point?”; when I see angry neighbors and pressure groups like Acorn outside the houses of innocent people, hounding them as though they’re criminals, I’ld say were already off the cliff.

      • I’mFedUp

        He really is a mental case. Having looked at that video of his “punch drunk” giggling on 60 Minutes multiple times, I am terrified for this country. I really don’t understand how anyone can support him after that. I’ve never seen anything so truly frigging bizarre by a “President.” My God, when is America going to get the outrage they should be feeling about now? He needs to fail, get booted out, and Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, etc. need to go with him. Until that happens, this will be our swan song.

      • Docelder

        chaos in the market to provide him with an excuse to take over more and more

        Yes, the “situation room” is going to get overtime use in this administration. Remember “Cloward-Piven” strategy of orchestrated “crisis”. We are going past taking advantage of an existing crisis to drive an agenda and are now well into orchestrating “crises” to drive the socialist and “global governance” agenda. Obama is the mac-daddy global governance “pimp”. He was right about one thing… this never was about him.

        • andrew191

          People need to know what the “Cloward-Piven” stratagy is before it will become clear to them that were right in the middle of it.

          This administration is using “Newspeak” to deflect impressionable minds away from the source of our problems (government), and guide them to the falsehood that the private sector is the problem. While our medical, educational, and energy industries have problems, they’re ALL still pretty damn good, and it can be easily argued that it’s government meddling that’s the main cause of the problems in each of them.

          Think about who 0bama constantly blames for the lion’s share of our economic problems, and how we got here,(medical, energy, education) and how he has focused on them as needing vast reform (read government control) as a solution to our economic problems.

          What do those three industies represent? The medical industry represents our bodies, the education industry represents our minds, and the energy industry represents our environment (our world). 0bama is essentially determined to get iron fisted control of our bodies, our minds, and the world in which we live. What the Hell’s left?

      • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

        Worth watching – the entire Obama Deception documentary available on YouTube. I know some here don’t like conspiracy theories but considering what’s happening, this is making more sense:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

  • d2d

    Larry – I have investments w/Ameriprise. I moved as much as I could over to bonds which I was told was safer than leaving them in the various market funds.

    I lost, like everyone else, investment dollars in several other accounts which I have since closed. However, I kept the Ameriprise investments intact.

    Because your warning above scares the s#$t out of me, and because you have become a reliable source, how might you suggest I proceed with my Ameriprise investments?

    Thank you in advance for taking the time to answer my question.

    • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

      d2d….as long as your accounts are separately held accounts I am sure you are fine. What I mean by that is just double check with your rep/financial planner that the accts are held separately from any money manager that is running the money.

      Bonds overall are probably as good a place as any for the time being, although, I think interest rates are headed higher so I would encourage you to keep your money in short to intermediate bond funds vs longer maturity bonds.

      At my site, Sense on Cents, I have links to a lot of financial information.

  • Diana L. C.

    All I know is that I am very, very worried for my children and grandchildren. I just wish there were someone in charge who seems to really have the answers and the ability to get things done right.

  • chmoore

    RE: U.S. Seeks Expanded Power to Seize Firms is not a mere power grab by our government, but an indication that a number of companies are on the precipice of default. The manpower shortage at Treasury to handle these upcoming situations is a very real concern.

    DAMN, you got that right.

    In spite of this, mysteriously possesed congress people incessantly rant on about bonuses. It’s like if a local business were in trouble, and then all the managers insisted on arguing about which employees stole boxes of pencils from the office supply closet.

    Here’s another one: I keep hearing horror stories about the potential trillions in govt debt that will have to be shared by every one of 300-plus-million citizens for the forseeable future. Those in congress love to spew this crap. Well, sure it’s not a positive thought, but the reality doesn’t work that way, not actually.

    Comparing govt debt to personal loans is apples and oranges. Technically, the government never pays off it’s debt. It rolls it over. (don’t take my word folks, look it up) That’s not to say it’s free money, because it isn’t that either. The cost to the taxpayers is whatever the general cost might be of investing in policy that hurts the economy rather than helping it, and whether that cost is actually reflected in taxes, NOT paying off the debt.

    Borrowing does not in itself cause a bankruptcy danger for the government, because it borrows in the same currency that it creates. The government’s fiat money system has the same access to money with a deficit as with a surplus. Theoretically, there can be an upper limit for govt debt somewhere, but no one knows what it is.

    Note that the record setting govt debt at the end of WWII, did not result in economic disaster. The infrastructure build-up for production in fact contrubuted to economic growth. So the bigger point is less about whether to spend, and more about how to spend well.

    A long way of saying; I agree with Larry Doyle’s general point about the truth being in the details.

  • HARP
  • Lisabona

    As McFarleen( I don’t know if this is the correct name) used to sing: DON’T WORRY , BE HAPPY ……… America should not tune in. We have to do the impossible and fight. Otherwise… anyway I’m scared.

  • QUEENIE

    Tim Geithner worked for 3 years at Kissingers firm..and then the CFR………yes Kissinger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Don’t believe me??..look it up!! If the transparent one hasn’t scrubbed it yet!!

    the Kissinger I have despised as a dem my entire life!!

    This is the same Kissinger so many 9/11 families and families and employees of the airlines involved with 9/11 fought tooth and nail along with most dems to get him removed from the 9/11 commission because of his heavy ties with Saudi Arabia!! And because of his nafarious background.

    Look into the back ground of Geithners dad , Peter Geithner and his ties to Obama’s mom and step dad!!

    Google is your friend!!

    See Obama sent Kissinger To Russia shortly after becoming president to represent the Obama administration in Russia..
    Kissinger who held positions with Nixon, Ford and Reagan !!!!!!!!!!!!

    why did Obama send Kissinger to Russia a few weeks ago , representing his administration and the USA..
    lets see shall we??????

    http://www.answers.com/topic/timothy-f-geithner

    Timothy Geithner
    Career
    After completing his studies,Geithner worked for Kissinger and Associates in Washington, D.C., for three years
    and then joined the International Affairs division of the U.S. Treasury Department in 1988. He was deputy assistant secretary for international monetary and financial policy (1995–1996), senior deputy assistant secretary for international affairs (1996-1997), assistant secretary for international affairs (1997–1998).<

    He was Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs (1998–2001) under Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. Summers was his mentor, but other sources call him a Rubin protégé.

    In 2002 he left the Treasury to join the Council on Foreign Relations as a Senior Fellow in the International Economics department. At the International Monetary Fund he was director of the Policy Development and Review Department (2001-2003).

    this kissinger:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GThfWVCfjVo&eurl=http ://…


    “There is a need for a new world order,” Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose last year, “I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order – because people looking in the abyss, even in the Islamic world, have to conclude that at some point, ordered expectations must return under a different system.”

    This is the Kissinger Obama sent to Russia……..representing his administration..

    http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/82may/hershwh2.htm

    Kissinger and Nixon in the White House
    by Seymour M. Hersh

    http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0611-03.htm

    and that is just for starters!!

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph

    Larry Summers and California Energy “crisis” / Enron

    During the California energy crisis of 2000, then-Treasury Secretary Larry Summers teamed with Alan Greenspan and Enron executive Kenneth Lay to lecture California Governor Gray Davis on the causes of the crisis, explaining that the problem was excessive government regulation. Under the advice of Kenneth Lay, Summers urged Davis to relax California’s environmental standards in order to reassure the markets.

    ……………………………………………………………..

    WSJ: Citi’s Chief Economist Leaves for Treasury Post

    Source: The Wall Street Journal

    Citigroup Inc.’s chief economist is leaving the New York company for a job at the U.S. Treasury Department, according to an internal Citigroup memo.

    Lewis Alexander, who has been at Citigroup since 1999 and before that worked at the Federal Reserve, will head to Treasury “to work on domestic financial issues,” said the Citigroup memo, which was sent Tuesday.

    According to a government official, Mr. Alexander will be a counselor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Mr. Alexander and a Treasury spokesman weren’t immediately available to comment Tuesday. A Citigroup spokesman declined to elaborate on the company’s memo.
    (…)
    Mr. Alexander’s role as Citigroup’s chief economist didn’t entail significant management responsibilities. But his optimistic economic forecasts colored executives’ views that the U.S. was unlikely to face a prolonged slump.

    Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123732747181462245.html

    anyone have warm fuzzies yet?????????

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    who can make this crap up???????????

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/...

    Despite his pariah status with many Left-wingers in Mr Obama’s Democratic Party, the president forged relations with Mr Kissinger during his campaign.

    The compliment was returned when the 85-year-old veteran of the Nixon and Ford administrations said last month that the young president was in a position to create a “new world order” by shifting US foreign policy away from the hostile stance of the Bush administration.

    He publicly supported Mr Obama’s notion of unconditional talks with Iran, though not at the presidential level.

    Further demonstrating his willingness to work with his opponents on foreign policy issues, Mr Obama turned to two veteran Republicans steeped in Cold War experience to press home his plans.


    Shortly after Mr Kissinger’s trip, Richard Lugar, a Republican senator from Indiana who has worked on nuclear disarmament issues for 30 years, also visited Moscow. George Schultz, another former secretary of state, has also played a vital role.

  • QUEENIE

    congress has no “right” to give over their oversight power to anyone..they have a responsibility of oversight..other wise why have a damn congress..isn’t this what we all bitched about with congress giving over the power to declare war under Bush?

    where are all the real democrats anymore???????

    where is my country??????
    where is my consitution now under so called democrats???????

    this makes me sick to my stomach.

  • Doc99

    They laughed when we called Obama a Marxist when he told the Plumber he needed to “spread the wealth around.” Now, Obama is the one who’s laughing now.

  • Ferd Berfle

    What That One has done is unprecedented. If you think of the political spectrum in terms of a line, with the extreme left on one side (communists) and the extreme right on the other (fascists) and take each end of that line and put the them together (at their fringes, by proxy) and where do they meet?

    That One.

    We’re screwed.

  • QUEENIE

    yes folks that would be 9 billion of your money to a UK bank to bilk uncle sam and you!!..wow Geithner ( Kissinger’s guy) is doing a hell of a job brownie!!

    http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/4394

    Barclays Bank, Recipient of $9B from AIG Bailout, Promotes U.S. Tax Avoidance Schemes of Questionable Legality
    By: Janushka Tuesday March 24, 2009 10:23 am

    One of the foreign banks that received a U.S taxpayer bailout through the AIG conduit was the Britsh bank, Barclays.

    They received $9B.

    It has had little coverage in the U.S press, but in the U.K. there is a major scandal breaking about an extremely profitable division of Barclays, the Structured Capital Markets division, whose sole business is to advise clients on tax avoidance schemes for many tax jurisdictions, including the United States.

    A whistleblower from the division provided internal Barclays documents from this division to the British tax authorities, as well as a newspaper, The Guardian.

    Here is a quote from one of the Guardian stories:

    The internal Barclays memos were leaked by a mole to the Liberal Democrats. The new allegations reiterate claims that the bank’s main purpose in entering into these schemes was to make profit from tax avoidance through an intricate circuit of offshore Cayman Islands and Luxembourg companies. The profits are said to be enormous and the deals so complex that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) struggles to unravel them.

    Barclays got an injunction to prevent the Guardian from publishing the documents; but they are all over the internet, including this site