Comments on: The Hillary Videos We Played During Our Chat

By: Wisewoman

Wisewoman — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:51:32 +0000

I’mFedUp. Your comments. “By the way, in her trip to the War Zone of Mexico…Hillary just said that “it’s America’s fault” that the drug cartels are waging war on that country. Really?” That is an extreme exaggeration of the gist of Hillary’s comments regarding the violence in Mexico. I saw Bill Oreilly and Hannity say the same thing. Taking words out of context and as usual beating up on Hillary. Republicans need to realize that there might be 10% of the approximately 25% Puma who admire Hillary who might be persuaded to vote for the “right” Repub candidate. We will never vote for any Repub who trashes Hillary or if those two talking heads Repubs keep trashing her as well. That is what I most liked about McCain and Palin they did not trash Hillary and neither did she trash them. She has too much integrity.
As are many here, I am not happy with Hillary in this administration either because I do not think the @$$4!&** will allow her to do the job.

By: Wisewoman

Wisewoman — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:38:16 +0000

politicalidentitycrisis . “I did enjoy watching Hillary mock Obama here”. As I did when I first saw this video, I thought these were words that Hillary actually made up mocking Obama. The truth is that these were almost identical words spoken by Obama to a crowd of his supporters. The MSM did not show Hillary’s comments concerning these words that preceeded her mocking retort. This left the impression that Hillary’s was using her own words to mock Obama. These are the kinds of things that the Clintons faced. If Hillary had dared to say such a thing about herself the MSM would have excoriated her. As as AA female Hillary supporter, white America still don’t seem to understand what happened in this election. Obama “won” because of the following
1. He cheated, especially in the caucaus.
2. He accused the Clintons of racism at an opportune time. The charge was believed by AA, they became angry with the Clintons and it deprived her of her AA support at a crucial time (65% in SC before the racial charges).
3. Far-left Democrats hatred of the Clintons.
4. Repub hatred of Bill and Hillary. They thought if they could get her out of the race, Obama would be easier to beat.
5. The money people backed Obama more so than Hillary or John McCain because they knew he would do their bidding.
6. He had no character or decency and was an accomplished liar. Although he falsely accused Hillary he was actually the one who would say or do anything to win.

By: mira

mira — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:27:54 +0000

John, it looks like Hillary sold out. However, since the election days I’ve been thinking the unthinkable about politics and doing some research.

What if Hillary was in on the Democrats plan? She sold herself very well to 18 million and then stood with Obama and he won the election. Maybe that was the plan all along, create tension, publicity, excitement, drama, a reality tv spectacle in real life.

I came across this thought provoking documentary film recently that might be of interest.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

By: Dreaming

Dreaming — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:03:36 +0000

That sounds about right Seattle.
I bet 2010 will be an interesting election with lots of turnovers.

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:03:53 +0000

I think that we should then investigate anyone who also voted for the war, including Clinton. See, it works both ways. As for Bush and Cheney, why do they immediately come up in a conversation about the Clintons? Did they all get married and I missed the event? No one gave Bush and Cheney a free ride. In fact they still get blamed for Freddie and Fannie and all of the economic destruction by Nancy Pelosi’s disaster of a Congress that is really why we are in the mortgage crisis. So, why doesn’t everyone just blame everyone for who and what they are, what they really did, and stop this nonsense:

Republicans = Bad
Clintons = Good

Everyone had a part in this mess. Everyone.

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:00:26 +0000

By the way…this is OT…But WTF is this all about? Oh my god…if this is true then what in the world is happening to us? Someone look at this and tell me what this means please????

http://pub29.bravenet.com/forum/2442810129/show/998369

Basically it is stating that towards August/September the entire American banking system is going to be shut down, and we will get “vouchers” for everything from food, gas, etc. That they are going to federalize hospitals, the police, etc. There will be checkpoints everywhere, etc. All of this to do with FEMA. Didn’t we already say that there are going to be Fema Camps everywhere? This is the spookiest thing yet. When does the bizarre stuff stop????

By: Seattle Moss

Seattle Moss — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:52:17 +0000

If the Dems do get very ticked at Obama, then who would vote for Hillary as a Democrat.

If that is the case then NO democrat would win

By: Seattle Moss

Seattle Moss — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:47:52 +0000

I guess in your world we should investigate Bush and Cheney for lying about the Iraq war.
I don’t want them investigated because it will cause national suicide.

However,
When Clinton lied…Nobody died!

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:45:27 +0000

tillthen…Can you IMAGINE what this country would be like, and how different our lives would be, if she would have “placed country over party?” Everyone hung on her very word. She could have signaled to the DNC that they couldn’t get away with their crap, and let America in on the joke. What a hero she would have been. Historical woman who changed the course of the world.

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:41:25 +0000

For the LAST TIME to both of you…No one has said she isn’t good at her job, competent, etc. NO ONE. Stop it. We just don’t have the same feelings you do, and believe me I suffered a lot over her campaigning for Obama. It caused me a tremendous amount of heartache and I believe you are wrong about the motivations.

As for Bill Clinton’s personal life. Who cares about a blow job is right? But, breaking the law is breaking the law. What the problem is here, and you don’t see it, is that you have created your very own set of rules and standards for the Clintons. If Bush, Obama, etc. do any of this stuff, they get blasted. My whole point, that clearly no one listens to, is that I hold them all accountable and I will not let them slide for any reason whatsoever. In other words, Clinton does not equal HALL PASS.

By: Seattle Moss

Seattle Moss — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:34:43 +0000

I appreciate your comments also but what you need to understand is that the Clinton’s are held to a different standard than other politicians. Conspiracies are the rule for those that disagree with them.
They are the strongest political couple in history and despite the attempts to destroy them have always successfully stayed on top.
I can just see how the media would have responded if Hillary had not been the team player.

The republicans are out of power in part because of their disgusting behavior in the 90′s where they spent $30 million trying anyway possible to destroy the president with witch hunts and then by entrapping Bill with the Lewinsky stawking.
Bill Clinton’s personal life was nobodies business and the republicans have found out the hard way that Americans view the whole impeachment fiasco as unAmerican and purely partisan.

As for lying to Ken Starr…if was in the same position I would have told that sorry fu*k to shove it up his a**

Look who’s careers have been destroyed going against the peoples wishes
Bob Livingston
Newt Gingrich
Linda Tripp
Ken Starr
All of them are losers for their betrayal of the American people and are class1 hypocrites.

Have a nice day!

By: Peggy Sue

Peggy Sue — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:34:01 +0000

Seattle said:

“Hillary chose country over career. There was considerable risk in her taking the SOS position and leaving her senate job which was very secure.”

Yes, she did choose country and political risk. Staying in the Senate would have been a far safer decision. But she has and continues to be everyone’s favorite scapegoat. Hillary-hate is a national past-time. Either way she jumped the blame would have been heaped on.

It’s sad when we can’t distinguish our competent and loyal public servants from the truly bad ones. We’re reaping what we’ve sowed.

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:32:21 +0000

PeggySue, you really need to stop misinterpreting posts. You keep saying we are all “blaming Hillary for everything.” Where on earth do any of our posts say that? The left always blames AMERICA for everything. We are such self loathing people. We are continually apologetic for being successful, powerful, etc. Well, good thing we are no longer any of that.

But my POINT was how on earth does someone blame AMERICA for the drugs getting here when we won’t close the borders? And, I will agree with you on one thing…Bush could have sent the National Guard (well he did send 2500, but he could have sent more) to the borders. And, then what? Be accused of being a racist, piss off the left who WANT to bankrupt our country with that huge burden? No matter what conversation we have here, it goes back to Bush. He’s long gone, but it’s still about him.

The bottom line is this…what will happen to our borders now? And it still makes no sense to blame America, particularly when the person lobbing the blame on this pitiful country is a member of the party who wants to KEEP THE BORDERS OPEN? Do you not get how WTF? that is?

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:24:34 +0000

Peggy Sue, there’s blame enough to go around. I am just holding everyone to the same standards. The Republicans made huge mistakes, and they also had information on Obama they could have used and chose not to. My personal belief is that they were happy to hand this crap sandwich to Obama, who was clearly always going to fail. I am really not about the party thing, although I did register Republican this year and will never go back. No one involved in this mess ended up acting in the best interest of our country, however they did it. Because the best interest of this country would have been anyone, from my 80 year old mother, to my dog, being President before Obama. And that means McCain, Hillary, even Ron Paul. Jeez.

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:20:53 +0000

Seattle Moss, you know I love your posts and enjoy you very much. Taking the SOS job was as much for HER career as anything. Her senate job was a dead-ender and of course this was a more high profile job for her. Let’s not forget the three day long “back room dirty deal” in Denver in which Hillary agreed to stage the phony “step down” in exchange for….What? Hmmmm…..I am respecting what you all feel for Hillary, please respect the rest of us who don’t agree and never will.