Comments on: Obama Goes Nuclear: Can’t Take the Heat

By: Althor

Althor — Wed, 14 May 2008 04:09:10 +0000

Quote: “While Lebanon’s “300″ Resist Hezbollah, The West Sits On Its Hands”: Hyscience:
http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/05/while_lebanons.php

Response:

“The West Sits On Its Hands”???

What else would you expect, friend?!?! Another “military intervention” from people – so emasculated by secularist socialism, moral relativism, and multi-culturalism in Europe; or so yellow-bellied, anti-war, and leftist, as the Democrats here at home – for whom no Dhimmitude is high enough, no surrender sufficiently servile for their “masochist” ways, for whom no defeat can be humiliatingly achieved fast enough??? Who are but scurrying to lose as fast as we can in Iraq and Afghanistan, in order to achieve two more “glorious” Vietnams, and come back home running to stick their “Code Pink” ostrich heads in the sand – if not their arses… as in San Francisco?!?! Again, what else would you expect?

As for Lebanon’s Muslim Arab neighbors and other Muslim nations around the world, if not openly supporting Hamas, equipping and funding them as in Syria’s case, they at least are “sympathetic” to Hamas (just as Jimmy carter and Obama, here in America?), not Lebanon’s 300 – regardless of their “spiel” to the contrary – and will joyfully sit on the sidelines to watch ( if not to cheer) the slaughter, and shout “Allah Akbar”!

No matter how we may wish to “sugar-coat” it, the reality is 90% of Muslims support Hamas and the Jihadists – if not openly, at least in the most recondite corners of their hearts. The same way 90% of blacks here in America voted for Obama. It’s something deeply rooted in their identities. It seems only the Europeans and us “white gelded bullocks” have been the only ones to “assimilate” other races and “cherish” other cultures and religions after 40 years of unrelenting socialist conditioning, political correctness, and multi-culturalism…so much so that we are marching like lemmings to our own destruction!

Sad as it is. In the world we have wrought with our cowardice and complacency. The valiant Lebanese 300 are on their own. Not even Israel, which has been so maligned in the past for intervening in Lebanon, and which is tired of so much fighting for its very survival for sixty years, will come to their rescue this time…

Althor

Posted by: Althor at May 12, 2008 9:05 AM

Sadly, Althor is right. The Druze are dead men standing.

Posted by: Abdul at May 12, 2008 9:41 AM

What is ironic, is that Obama, staunch supporter of “abortion” he is, had his mother had access to “abortion” the world may have been spared “him” and all of this pain…

Althor

By: tas

tas — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:55:11 +0000

Nuclear? Really? You’ve got to be fucking kidding me.

What’s next: Obama BREATHES! SusanUnPC finds that insulting to Hillary!

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:37:38 +0000

DCDemocrat: BARACK McMONDUKAKERRY!!! Hilarious!

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:33:06 +0000

John: This crap about “doing anything to win” is also ridiculous. She is only behind by 1% of the vote, and millions have voters have not yet spoken. Also, why shouldn’t she play to win?! Do we want someone who will quit? If she were a man, they would praise his determination. And as far as “attacking Obama,” she could have used the Wright controversy, or gone after any number of Obama’s weaknesses, and instead, she has repeatedly challenged him on his lack of experience (which is completely legitimate and necessary–because McCain will be all over it) and inconsistent record. That is what a campaign is all about. And she is not “stealing” the election with superdelegates–they were created to make a judgment based on electability. These arguments are all diversions, and the memo on her site addressing all these myths articulated it perfectly. We just have to stay focused on the goal, and help her any way we can. She doesn’t flinch, so neither should we.

By: TeakWoodKite

TeakWoodKite — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:26:58 +0000

I refuse to believe

I refuse to believe
I refuse to believe
I refuse to believe
I refuse to believe

Bart’s blackboard. Bart with chalk and his ipod & phones listening to Zappa’s “Dumb all Over”

“was cribbed (stolen) from early Malcom X?” (go figure)

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:26:53 +0000

The point I keep making about this is: if Obama is so hypersensitive to every perceived slight, how can anyone expect him to manage himself on an international stage with fierce and aggressive opponents. He’s so whiny–he has not strength for the position. Hillary has clearly proven she has the stamina and toughness to deal with anything. She is formidable, and I am here to declare without reservation that I AM A PASSIONATE AND UNAPOLOGETIC SUPPORTER OF HILLARY CLINTON!!

I had an idea a while ago, and saw it on another site: someone should make a video based on the old Kirk Douglas movie, “Spartacus,” with women of all ages and cultures, standing up and declaring, “I AM HILLARY CLINTON!” Hey, come to think of it–include men too!

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:19:59 +0000

Kevin: last futile attempt to talk to you as a human being. I gave you a whole list of Hillary’s documented experience above in a calm, clear way. Didn’t you read it or are you only hear to act like a child? That’s why Clinton supporters are so negative (now) about Obamotons–they ARE like robots, repeating the same programmed lines over and over again. You can’t talk issues, because you don’t really know the issues or are defensive because Obama doesn’t really have any substance. His policy positions are mostly pirated from Hillary and her advisers anyway. That’s why he always stumbles during the debates–because he doesn’t have a command of the policies. He is best giving a speech to a large audience who doesn’t ask for depth. That can only last so long, as we are seeing now. You need to grow up. And that’s the last time I am going to address you or read anything you have to say–it’s a waste of time. I suggest everyone on the site completely ignore him now and maybe he’ll get bored and go away.

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:12:43 +0000

Kevin, it’s now apparent, after trying to discuss actual issues (a great weakness of Obama supporters) that you are not interested in intelligent conversation, but are just here to be obnoxious. Take care and good luck with that. As others have said, millions more are getting ready to vote–for Hillary. Deal with it.

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:08:53 +0000

Another thing that has been really bugging me is all this talk about the Clinton’s sense of entitlement. As if Obama does not exhibit overwhelming entitlement?! He has only been in the Senate 2 years and he thinks he deserves to be president?!! The arrogance and smugness of this man has always bothered me. In the debates, his attitude and lack of knowledge was, for me, weaker than any of the other candidates. Hillary Clinton HAS earned this after almost 40 years of public service work. I am so tired of the repeatedly disproven meme about her “lack of experience.” If you read anything about this woman you cannot deny her unbelievable work ethic. I saw her speak in a nearby town several years ago: she gave a talk at a luncheon, rode on a bus that broke down for 3 hours during a 100+ degree heat wave. Showed up late for our gathering with many people waiting, and gave a dynamic speech in front of an old historic building being renovated, and then left at around 5p.m. to go to a public dinner for another event. I thought to myself: “Who works like this?! She could be making millions in some blue chip firm or on a corporate board somewhere.” Actions, not words. That’s always the true barometer of character.

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:01:58 +0000

Kevin: p.s. The idea that his speech was “courageous” is also bunk. Like everything else, it’s just another speech. His opposition to the war was just a speech, and he did nothing to oppose it after that. He only stepped forward to speak about race, and it IS an issue that this country desperately needs to deal with, because his back was against the wall after trying to hide Wright for a year. He is a political opportunist, not a visionary leader and uniter as he says. The fall is hard, I’m sure, but you can only deny the facts for so long. His record is clear, and the spotlight on his record and past is only beginning to shine. I shudder to think of what the Republicans will do if he is the nominee–it will be ugly.

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:58:34 +0000

Kevin, you are a riot. Ranting about others who can’t analyze information, and you keep repeating the same tired brainwashed Obama line.

First, the difference between Falwell, Rush et. al. is that they did not mentor a presidential candidate for 20 years. See? He was one of Obama’s closest advisers, not some preacher or talk show host spouting garbage. That’s the frightening part–if Obama was so influenced by this man, as he admits, then how could he not be affected by his ideology?

If we found out Edwards or Hillary or Biden spent 20 years in close relationship with a white supremacist, that too would be cause for grave concern. You can argue and sputter all you want, but the damage is done. Everyone knows it in their gut, and the image of Wright is not going away. The only question now is if the party leadership has the guts to step in, because there is no way that Obama has a chance against McCain now–polls or no polls. It’s sad, but undeniable.

By: Fran

Fran — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:43:04 +0000

Kevin: I don’t know where you have been blogging or what you have been reading, but most Hillary supporters can easily list her many and varied accomplishments, starting with the Children’s Defense Fund in her 20′s. She has worked tirelessly for children, women, the disabled, and the poor, human rights, economic incentives in rural communities (bringing micro loans to Arkansas 30 years ago with recent Nobel Prize winner Yunus), prison and education reform, veteran’s, National Guard and 9/11 First Responders’ health care and employment benefits, etc. etc. She has also served on the Armed Services Committee for 6 years. Nobel winner John Hume, Gerry Adams, George Mitchell and Irish Prime Minister Ahern all praise her decade of work promoting peace in Northern Ireland (they all discredited the Obama camp’s criticism of this), and the list goes on. As far as vetting goes–I don’t think anyone can claim that Hillary has not had every aspect of her life thoroughly examined. Obama has been an unknown, and as the illusion becomes dispelled and people realize he is just a human being, not a savior, they will be disappointed. You may not support Clinton, but if you did your research, you could not deny her work ethic and long list of accomplishment. That is just a distortion to discredit her, because Obama has little experience to promote.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:39:18 +0000

Tell you what Linda, what say we take an indepth look at both candidates… who’s backing them, and perhaps why. What, is it your contention that Hillary can afford to throw stones?

I’m just askin’ people.

Can we as a democratic electorate take a hard critical look at our two supposed nominees????? Come on, how can you make a challenge, statement like that without being open to applying it to yours????

Why do supporters/commenters from either camp sound the freakin’ same????

No thought – just mindless fealty. And if things don’t work out the way they think/hope/believe they will – well you’ll just blame the other guys.

Can we once and for all step outside the GOP framing and try a different approach? LOL

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:35:35 +0000

Give it up for pete sake… geez.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:33:58 +0000

Obviously not you ninny – I come hear because I constantly read no solid positions, but emotional opinions – ones that when challenged aren’t supported. Same as what I see on the Obama supporting blogs. And let me tell you folks – neither approach is helping anyone other than the republicans… something you all and both Dem candidates should be ashamed of if we lose in ’08.