RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Oppy’s Pain in the ARS!!

There is little doubt the American populace is getting increasingly frustrated with the pace and level of government bailouts. Are we about to literally “go over the line?”

Is the United States about to allow a Canadian company to incorporate itself here in the U.S. for the purpose of receiving a bailout? Is this the height of hypocrisy or what?

I refer to the fact that Oppenheimer Holdings, a Toronto-based investment company involved in the travesty surrounding the sale of ARS (Auction Rate Securities) is looking to incorporate in Delaware in order to receive federal bailout funds. From Bloomberg’s “If Oppenheimer Gets Handout, Blame Canada“:

Oppenheimer “is exploring becoming a U.S. corporation and a U.S. bank holding company in order to help resolve the ARS problem for our clients,” the company said in its annual letter to shareholders released last week. (Toronto’s Oppenheimer & Co. isn’t related to OppenheimerFunds Inc., a unit of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.)

The “ARS problem,” of course, is the nasty pickle Oppenheimer has gotten itself into with customers who hold $929.6 million in auction-rate securities, the ill-fated investments that flat-lined in February 2008. The auction-rate meltdown left investors at Oppenheimer and many of its Wall Street brethren unable to liquidate positions that had been marketed as, well, pretty darned liquid, to customers who often had no clue about the product’s risks.

Why should U.S. taxpayers bail out an investment company that improperly marketed securities? Why shouldn’t Oppenheimer, and every other investment manager or bank that improperly – if not fraudulently – marketed ARPS, be forced to make their own investors whole?

Some managers did make some investors whole. Meanwhile, there are still thousands of investors holding in excess of $100 billion in ARPS also looking to be made whole. What about them? Why has the Madoff situation, a $60 billion scam, received extensive coverage while this hundred billion dollar scam gets very limited coverage? Kudos to Bloomberg for shedding light on it.

While some fund managers did not actually underwrite these deals but were merely part of a “selling group,” they still need to be held accountable. Some fund managers get this but seemingly not Oppenheimer. Bloomberg writes how some mangers have caved to investor pressure:

Downstreamers said that they weren’t responsible for the mess to the same degree as underwriters like Merrill and Citigroup were. Hey, all they did was sell the stuff, not underwrite it. Over time, though, some downstreamers such as Fidelity Investments bowed to pressure and made customers whole, which increasingly makes Oppenheimer look the part of the piker.

And don’t think they don’t know it. If ARS markets stay frozen, more client claims may come, the company said in its annual report filed with regulators on March 3. Worse, it could mean “a competitive disadvantage” now that competitors have settled similar litigation with clients, Oppenheimer wrote.

Obviously Oppenheimer is feeling the pressure. As that heat rises, a move to the good old U.S. of A is looking more and more appealing:

Come one, come all, to America. Because it is only here that you can peddle a product that blows up on customers, fight the regulators who tell you to give customers their money back, and then rush to the government breadlines when you see Uncle Sam whipping out his checkbook. Presto, before you know it, taxpayers are paying one another back for money they lost at the hands of their trusty brokers — even if the brokers work for companies based outside the munificent U.S.A.

Let’s not be too generous, though, to the regulators. As I have written here extensively, FINRA owned $647 million in ARPS and has turned its back on many investors who remain with ARPS positions.

LD

  • mountainaires

    I see peasants with pitchforks coming over the horizon…

    But, not to worry! Thanks to our new mandatory civic service corps, we’ll be ready to meet them head-on to defend the US of Oligarchy!

    ;-)

    http://www.infowars.com/mandatory-service-bill-lives-on/

  • diane

    http://www.poorrichardsalmanac.biz
    americans have to be frustrated.
    BORAT’S NEW MOVIE GETS NC-17!
    apparently sacha boren cohen’s gay sex scene with a baby in a hot tub was too much for ratings board!

  • Tricia Spiegel

    This is outrageous. I had no idea.

  • JozefAL

    Well, other than the fact that this is OT, I’ll point out that the FINAL film has not received a rating. SOP in Hollywood is to show the MPAA “ratings board” (ostensibly made up of parents, but as shown in the documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated, some of those “parents” were parents of GROWN children, some of whom had their own children, and some of the board members weren’t even parents at all) a “rough cut”–almost no film that receives an “R” gets that rating in its first effort.
    The Board also is notorious for NOT revealing what leads it to its decisions. Using the “f”-word one too many times can turn an otherwise PG-13 film into an R. Similarly, a single shot of a human penis can result in an R while a full-frontal nude shot of a woman can be given a PG-13 if the shot is considered “vital” to the story. Many directors have reported that the Board will tell them if they’ll trim certain spots they can get an R, but won’t explicitly tell WHAT spots. John Waters has learned how to get around this farce–he shoots footage that he has no intention of actually using in the final cut. He only includes it in the cut shown to the Board, because there’s other offensive material that he wants. He’s even noted that it’s worked every single time (and he’s also admitted surprise that the Board has let him include some stuff that he had intended to for the Board’s trash heap).
    Incidentally, the documentary I mentioned is VITAL watching.

  • Doc99

    Mr. Doyle … it seems for all intents and purposes, CITI is a subsidiary of the UAE. Not to mention the observation the USA, vis a vis debt, is now pretty much a wholly owned subsidiary of the Peoples’ Republic of China. We are so screwed.

  • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

    Still trying to determine the overall percentage of shareholders interest from those partners but I can see where you are going with this.

    Actuall, I look at it as we are all non-voting members in one massive hedge fund. Plus we can not redeem our investment. The ultimate roach motel.

  • Doc99
  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    we got a lemon..we want our money back…

  • mountainaires

    Their frustration will soon turn to fear.

    This is bad.

    Pension insurer shifted to stocks

    Concern increases as losses mount; Failing plans could overwhelm agency
    By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff | March 30, 2009

    WASHINGTON – Just months before the start of last year’s stock market collapse, the federal agency that insures the retirement funds of 44 million Americans departed from its conservative investment strategy and decided to put much of its $64 billion insurance fund into stocks.

    Switching from a heavy reliance on bonds, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation decided to pour billions of dollars into speculative investments such as stocks in emerging foreign markets, real estate, and private equity funds.

    The agency refused to say how much of the new investment strategy has been implemented or how the fund has fared during the downturn. The agency would only say that its fund was down 6.5 percent – and all of its stock-related investments were down 23 percent – as of last Sept. 30, the end of its fiscal year. But that was before most of the recent stock market decline and just before the investment switch was scheduled to begin in earnest.

    No statistics on the fund’s subsequent performance were released.

    Nonetheless, analysts expressed concern that large portions of the trust fund might have been lost at a time when many private pension plans are suffering major losses. The guarantee fund would be the only way to cover the plans if their companies go into bankruptcy.

    “The truth is, this could be huge,” said Zvi Bodie, a Boston University finance professor who in 2002 advised the agency to rely almost entirely on bonds. “This has the potential to be another several hundred billion dollars. If the auto companies go under, they have huge unfunded liabilities” in pension plans that would be passed on to the agency.

    In addition, Peter Orszag, head of the White House Office of Management and Budget, has “serious concerns” about the agency, according to an Obama administration spokesman.

    Last year, as director of the Congressional Budget Office, Orszag expressed alarm that the agency was “investing a greater share of its assets in risky securities,” which he said would make it “more likely to experience a decline in the value of its portfolio during an economic downturn the point at which it is most likely to have to assume responsibility for a larger number of underfunded pension plans.”

    However, Charles E.F. Millard, the former agency director who implemented the strategy until the Bush administration departed on Jan. 20, dismissed such concerns. Millard, a former managing director of Lehman Brothers, said flatly that “the new investment policy is not riskier than the old one.”

    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/30/pension_insurer_shifted_to_stocks/

  • Peggy Sue

    Why, oh why would the United States approve Oppenheimer Holdings incorporation in Delaware, Larry? It just flies in the face of common sense. Allow a Canadian company to come here and suck up American tax dollars?

    Am I missing something? It may look attractive to Oppenheimer but why would we allow it? I read the Bloomberg article and my jaw is still on the keyboard.

    The world has literally turned upside down!

  • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

    I am asking myself the same thing.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Unbelievable.

    Thanks for the info LD

  • Baba Rum Raisin

    Barack Obama: the Emily Litella of presidents!

  • TeakwoodKite

    LD, The one at 1600?

    We are all non-voting members in one massive hedge fund. Some in this administration would call that American Democracy.

    :)

  • TeakwoodKite

    He is a Lolita everybody wants to be on his dance card but no one wants to be caught.

  • http://hot-news.dreamhosters.com/thomas-doyle Hot News » Thomas Doyle

    [...] Century Thomas Paine” Summoned to White House (Update)…Trust Tommy » RTE screws up…Oppy’s Pain in the ARS!! : NO QUARTER…Hope in the Middle East « Themessianiccenter’s Blog…amirahs blog » Blog Archive [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus