Great site - this info is great! Looking forward to reading the rest.

If we all loudly and continuously demand action, some military officers will summon the courage to act.

Their oath is to the Constitution, not the President.

They haven’t acted before now because they don’t feel the people would be with them.

“Restore democracy - Arrest the 9/11 traitors.”
Say it loud. Say it often.

If we all loudly and continuously demand action, some military officers will summon the courage to act.

Their oath is to the Constitution, not the President.

They haven’t acted before now because they don’t feel the people would be with them.

Restore democracy - Arrest the 9/11 traitors.

The story passed through several relatives and crossed the country coast to coast and back before it came to us, so I was more than a little skeptical.

I told my wife that I found it hard to believe.
1. That whole area would be Kurdistan if the PKK had their way.
2. Turkey has it’s own army. Why would they want us mucking about in their back yard?
3. The Kurds are our best ally in northern Iraq. Why would we want to risk that?
4. He wouldn’t be going into Iran unless we’re deliberatly trying to provoke another war.

Besides, if any of this were true, he would never tell his mother. He was in the Pentagon on 11 Sep 2001. I’m sure he understands security better than that.

Two days later, I saw “Novak Leaking More Secrets” on No Quarter.

I’ve been sitting on this for over a month now and I just don’t know what to do. I have tried to tease more info out of the grapevine but it seems that each step along the way was told not to say anything to anyone else (you know how that goes) so they are a little embarassed to hear from me about it. I could try the dirrect approach but I’m affraid that would just dry up the source for good.

The one thing I was able to find out is that he has decided to take his wife and kids to Turkey with him and his parents are very upset about it.

Either he plans to be there a long time doing a mission he dosen’t believe in or he knows his family will be safer in Turkey than here.

You are completely wrong with your unfounded claim that Iran intends to use nuclear weapons. You need to stop buying into the propaganda.

Sorry to break THIS to you, but attacking Marines on your own soil is by definition NOT terrorism.

Unfortunately for you, there is no evidence whatsoever that the Iranians intend to make nuclear weapons, and even less evidence that they would be more likely to use them than any other small country surrounded by countries with nuclear weapons.

As for freedom and human rights, why don’t you take THAT bit of horse poop and spread it among the Iraqis you have “liberated”. They’ll find it tres amusant. And after that, you might tell that one to the thousands of human beings whose freedom and human rights were violated when they were hauled off to any of the secret prisons the U.S. have all over the world. Or tell it to Maher Arar, whose freedom and human rights were violated when he was sent off to Syria to be tortured.

More and more the greatest global threat to freedom and human rights is the so-called Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.

Iran must NOT be permitted to have nuclear arms. This would be a disaster for everyone who cares about freedeom or human rights. YES they intend to make weapons, yes they intend to use them. Take Achmadinejad at his word, “we will bring down the great Satan, the world doesn’t need the US”

As for the history of the Persian empire, come on! That was over centuries ago, and has no connection to what we are talking about now, which is the history of the modern-day nation state of Iran.

According to my sources, by the way, the Gulf states, and the Saudis in particular, do not actually see a threat from Iran, though the Bushies are working overtime to convince them that there is one - kind of like Poppy Bush in 1991 using fake satellite photos to convince the Saudis that the Iraqis were about to invade so they’d allow the U.S. to set up bases.

As for Hezbullah and Hamas, I know it is becoming very popular to blame Iran for their actions, but they are not instruments of Iran, but are using Iran to achieve their goals more than Iran is using them. They are home-grown, local national liberation groups, and will act in what they see as their own interest. Whether Hezbullah is even a terrorist group is debatable. Of course, every move either group makes will now be directed by and for Iran.

We also agree that whatever threat Iran may or may not pose now, if Bush attacks one likely result is that Iran will be strengthened, as it already has been by Bush’s aggression against Iraq, and by the attack on and occupation of Afghanistan.

I have a real fear that Bush is about to start WW III. And I don’t see what I can do about it. Ray McGovern exhorts us to “roll up our sleeves” today, and once again I ask, and then what? Do precisely what? where? with whom? I feel utterly helpless. I feel paralyzed.

Iran is also likely to use groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas to launch attacks on US/Israeli interests. Because Israel is viewed as a proxy for the US, and Iran can attack Israel far more easily.

Pat Lang has written a lot about the threat Iran poses to the region. I believe that threat is very real, made more so by the lunatic policies of the Bush administration.

Really…why is war with Iran necessary? Why now? What about diplomacy? What about reaching a non-proliferation agreement? None of it makes any sense. But if the US attacks Iran, we will be empowering Iran in the region and creating a disastrous mess.

I am not so sure attacking Iran will be viewed as “a clear act of aggression”, unfortunately. The UN and the EU have, after all, gone right along with the Bush regime’s manufactured Iran crisis much more than they did with the manufactured Iraq crisis.

And make no mistake. THIS IS A MANUFACTURED CRISIS just as surely as the “Iraq crisis” was manufactured to provide a pretext for an act of pure, naked aggression. There was no more need to “deal with Iraq” in 2002-2003 than there was in 2000-2002. There is no more need to “deal with Iran” now than there has been previously.

Iran has no history of aggression. The “terrorist groups” Iran supposedly supports all have very specific, limited local goals, and their designation as “terrorist” groups is, in some cases, highly questionable. The complaints about Iran “interfering” in Iraq’s affairs is simply laughable.

The only crisis here is not related to Iran’s actions, but those of the Bush regime.

It’s all part of the ongoing Third World war (not WW3). The blue eyes against all the other people.

They got the guns but we got the numbers. Jim Morrison

I remember back before the Iraq war began. It must have been after Afghanistan started, though. I was watching some speech by Bush. He was declaiming something to the effect that: “Nothing can stop us. Because we are the greatest and most powerful nation in the world!” And I thought, “Oh, God, I hope I’m not standing near him when retribution hits him for that hubris.” But of course, we’re all standing near him. That’s the problem.

As many Israelis have acknowledged, the only real threat to Israel’s existence is Israel’s policies and actions.