<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Pentagon Doesn’t Want Me to Testify About Abu Ghraib</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rchap</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-23165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rchap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-23165</guid>
		<description>The blanked out text in the attached PDF document is visible by right clicking. The PDF plugin extracts the text.

Interesting stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blanked out text in the attached PDF document is visible by right clicking. The PDF plugin extracts the text.</p>
<p>Interesting stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cujo359</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22632</link>
		<dc:creator>Cujo359</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22632</guid>
		<description>If you're refering to the "fake news story" comment, no worries. As far as I'm concerned, that comment did its job and died a noble death. Anyone who puts a story here with no attribution, or makes one up, ought to be called on it. "Other Tom" was doing one or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re refering to the &#8220;fake news story&#8221; comment, no worries. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, that comment did its job and died a noble death. Anyone who puts a story here with no attribution, or makes one up, ought to be called on it. &#8220;Other Tom&#8221; was doing one or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjobotts</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22631</link>
		<dc:creator>bjobotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22631</guid>
		<description>The Jews went after their torturers at the end of WWII so I will not be offended or defensive when Iraqis come after those who tortured them so enthusiastically.  Since they know we will not put them on trial or deal with them in a just manner I don't blame them for dealing with Rumsfeld and buddies according to their own justice, do you?  I only hope that innocent people here don't have to die or suffer in the process, though I'm sure many Iraqis outside the prison suffered greatly.
Sometimes, unseen, Justice comes in most unexpected and devastating ways.  Your comments were most accurate and appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jews went after their torturers at the end of WWII so I will not be offended or defensive when Iraqis come after those who tortured them so enthusiastically.  Since they know we will not put them on trial or deal with them in a just manner I don&#8217;t blame them for dealing with Rumsfeld and buddies according to their own justice, do you?  I only hope that innocent people here don&#8217;t have to die or suffer in the process, though I&#8217;m sure many Iraqis outside the prison suffered greatly.<br />
Sometimes, unseen, Justice comes in most unexpected and devastating ways.  Your comments were most accurate and appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22539</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22539</guid>
		<description>Cujo,
Sorry, when I erased Ralph aka Other Tom aka Zeus aka Zogby aka....comment as spam, it also erased your reply to him. Apparently replies to spam are automatically erased also. If you see another Other Tom comment, and want to reply to him, use the &lt;strong&gt;post a comment&lt;/strong&gt; feature instead of reply to comment, OK? Meanwhile, if I see a "reply to comment" to Other Tom, I'll save it next time and repost it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cujo,<br />
Sorry, when I erased Ralph aka Other Tom aka Zeus aka Zogby aka&#8230;.comment as spam, it also erased your reply to him. Apparently replies to spam are automatically erased also. If you see another Other Tom comment, and want to reply to him, use the <strong>post a comment</strong> feature instead of reply to comment, OK? Meanwhile, if I see a &#8220;reply to comment&#8221; to Other Tom, I&#8217;ll save it next time and repost it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cujo359</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22536</link>
		<dc:creator>Cujo359</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22536</guid>
		<description>Is posting fake news articles like this a new trend in right wing trolling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is posting fake news articles like this a new trend in right wing trolling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centrocitta</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22483</link>
		<dc:creator>Centrocitta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22483</guid>
		<description>I'd like to know when Congress is going to start calling the civilians to testify at it's many hearings.  You know, the ordinary, every day, law abiding citizen who may have had his life ruined or nearly ruined because he happened to be an innocent by-stander in the wrong place at the wrong time and now being expected to just LIVE with it.  Something tells me there are plenty of these types waiting to come out of the woodwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know when Congress is going to start calling the civilians to testify at it&#8217;s many hearings.  You know, the ordinary, every day, law abiding citizen who may have had his life ruined or nearly ruined because he happened to be an innocent by-stander in the wrong place at the wrong time and now being expected to just LIVE with it.  Something tells me there are plenty of these types waiting to come out of the woodwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wethornet</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22448</link>
		<dc:creator>wethornet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22448</guid>
		<description>it is inexplicable to me why the dem. congress won't call sam provance, karen kwiatowski, sam gardiner, etc.

disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is inexplicable to me why the dem. congress won&#8217;t call sam provance, karen kwiatowski, sam gardiner, etc.</p>
<p>disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cujo359</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22359</link>
		<dc:creator>Cujo359</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22359</guid>
		<description>Zogby, AKA Winning Side, AKA Tom, has been setting records for dishonesty and obtuseness. Given some of the trolls I've encountered here and elsewhere, that's saying something. It looks like the process of banning him has removed his post there, along with my response and LJ's, but he wrote comments there under two different pseudonyms in the "The Price of Progress" article, meanwhile accusing Larry of intellectual dishonesty.

No Quarter is better off to be rid of him, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zogby, AKA Winning Side, AKA Tom, has been setting records for dishonesty and obtuseness. Given some of the trolls I&#8217;ve encountered here and elsewhere, that&#8217;s saying something. It looks like the process of banning him has removed his post there, along with my response and LJ&#8217;s, but he wrote comments there under two different pseudonyms in the &#8220;The Price of Progress&#8221; article, meanwhile accusing Larry of intellectual dishonesty.</p>
<p>No Quarter is better off to be rid of him, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22346</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22346</guid>
		<description>Sorry Michael,
I wasn't able to ban Zogby and save his comment, I'm still learning. The comment is now gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Michael,<br />
I wasn&#8217;t able to ban Zogby and save his comment, I&#8217;m still learning. The comment is now gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gass</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22339</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22339</guid>
		<description>I actually wish Mr. Johnson would have left the comments made by "Zogby".

They would have been proof positive that Republican hacks troll the internet blogs spouting whatever nonsense they think they must to silence and discredit those who speak the truth.

For the record, one of the removed comments by Zogby was that they wouldn't let Mr. JOHNSON testify... except... the article is about Sam Provance not being allowed to testify, not Mr. Johnson.

I'd have left the comments in place so he could be rightfully ridiculed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually wish Mr. Johnson would have left the comments made by &#8220;Zogby&#8221;.</p>
<p>They would have been proof positive that Republican hacks troll the internet blogs spouting whatever nonsense they think they must to silence and discredit those who speak the truth.</p>
<p>For the record, one of the removed comments by Zogby was that they wouldn&#8217;t let Mr. JOHNSON testify&#8230; except&#8230; the article is about Sam Provance not being allowed to testify, not Mr. Johnson.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have left the comments in place so he could be rightfully ridiculed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22338</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22338</guid>
		<description>Zogby was none other than Other Tom,
Susan ordered him to be gone and he's gone...banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zogby was none other than Other Tom,<br />
Susan ordered him to be gone and he&#8217;s gone&#8230;banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerseyJeffersonian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22337</link>
		<dc:creator>JerseyJeffersonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22337</guid>
		<description>Zogby, old sport, the one desiring to have the chance to testify in the prosecutions of the officers alleged to have been involved in abuses at Abu Ghraib is not Larry Johnson.  Sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but the one who wants to have the opportunity to testify is - wait for it - Sam Provance, the former sergeant who served at Abu Ghraib.  Follow the chain if you will: Sam Provance, former non-commissioned officer writes a post; Alternet puts this post into circulation on the internet; SusanUnPC, thinking that this posting might be of interest to visitors to this blog, acquires the right to repost the article on noquarter. That's right, ace, that's why the phrase "reprinted with permission" appears in the fourth line of the post, right after the credits for both the authorship of the article, and for the website which originally posted it to the internet.  You see, the title of the article refers to the frustration of the AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION with not having been called to testify in connection with the "investigation" and "trials" appended thereto despite his having witnessed crucial events during his duty posting to Abu Ghraib himself.  Larry Johnson didn't write the article, Larry Johnson didn't originally post the article to the internet, Larry Johnson didn't even secure the permission to re-post it on noquarter, SusanUnPC did.  So, Larry Johnson had nothing to do with the article, from its inception to its appearance on noquarter.  So basically, your posting at 20:19:25 is completely without foundation.  You HAVE exposed your prejudices; but still more tellingly, you have revealed yourself to be incapable of absorbing information right in front of your face.  Tell you what, spittle boy, when you have mastered that skill, why don't you come back and have your ass handed to you on your INTERPRETIVE skills, too.  I'm sure you will find plenty of takers for this task, as easy as it may prove to be.  Until then, take your gratuitous insults towards the host of this site, and push off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zogby, old sport, the one desiring to have the chance to testify in the prosecutions of the officers alleged to have been involved in abuses at Abu Ghraib is not Larry Johnson.  Sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but the one who wants to have the opportunity to testify is - wait for it - Sam Provance, the former sergeant who served at Abu Ghraib.  Follow the chain if you will: Sam Provance, former non-commissioned officer writes a post; Alternet puts this post into circulation on the internet; SusanUnPC, thinking that this posting might be of interest to visitors to this blog, acquires the right to repost the article on noquarter. That&#8217;s right, ace, that&#8217;s why the phrase &#8220;reprinted with permission&#8221; appears in the fourth line of the post, right after the credits for both the authorship of the article, and for the website which originally posted it to the internet.  You see, the title of the article refers to the frustration of the AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION with not having been called to testify in connection with the &#8220;investigation&#8221; and &#8220;trials&#8221; appended thereto despite his having witnessed crucial events during his duty posting to Abu Ghraib himself.  Larry Johnson didn&#8217;t write the article, Larry Johnson didn&#8217;t originally post the article to the internet, Larry Johnson didn&#8217;t even secure the permission to re-post it on noquarter, SusanUnPC did.  So, Larry Johnson had nothing to do with the article, from its inception to its appearance on noquarter.  So basically, your posting at 20:19:25 is completely without foundation.  You HAVE exposed your prejudices; but still more tellingly, you have revealed yourself to be incapable of absorbing information right in front of your face.  Tell you what, spittle boy, when you have mastered that skill, why don&#8217;t you come back and have your ass handed to you on your INTERPRETIVE skills, too.  I&#8217;m sure you will find plenty of takers for this task, as easy as it may prove to be.  Until then, take your gratuitous insults towards the host of this site, and push off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanUnPC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22330</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanUnPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22330</guid>
		<description>Begone, fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Begone, fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22300</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22300</guid>
		<description>You're right Zogby.  Once you have driven all the able bodied into refugee status, the disabled old men and women and children don't put up much of a fight.  Why, I believe at My Lai the only injury to soldiers was someone who shot himself in the foot - but they were able to kill hundreds and hundreds by taking that fight to the enemy. 

Sure, now and then there would be a two yo toddler who would, shrieking, try to crawl out of the kill pits when the first round of bullets missed him, but just like we are developing now in Iraq - we had intrepid soldiers like Calley who were able to grab that child, toss him back in and kill him, all without injury.  

Booyah. 

Soldiers eventually fit the face of their commanding officers.  That happened in Vietnam and it has happened in Iraq and whether the officers are named Ware or Mattis or Fay - they all know a thing or two about reconciliation that they can teach the Iraqis.

First - you forgive yourself for your own atrocities.  Then you give a medal to those who cover them up.  Then you attack those who reveal them.  Then you re-write history and bury the bodies deep, with no names - dehumanized for all of time. And you make despised those who stood for doing the right thing.

The Fays are helping to insure an army of Calleys and not of Thompsons. That really is the only reason to stay in Iraq.  To reshape the military in that image. God bless all those who have fought with honor to try to prevent that.  There's nothing to say for the leadership who have done the opposite.  No prayer that won't recoil from having their names invoked.  They've damaged America as much as they have Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Zogby.  Once you have driven all the able bodied into refugee status, the disabled old men and women and children don&#8217;t put up much of a fight.  Why, I believe at My Lai the only injury to soldiers was someone who shot himself in the foot - but they were able to kill hundreds and hundreds by taking that fight to the enemy. </p>
<p>Sure, now and then there would be a two yo toddler who would, shrieking, try to crawl out of the kill pits when the first round of bullets missed him, but just like we are developing now in Iraq - we had intrepid soldiers like Calley who were able to grab that child, toss him back in and kill him, all without injury.  </p>
<p>Booyah. </p>
<p>Soldiers eventually fit the face of their commanding officers.  That happened in Vietnam and it has happened in Iraq and whether the officers are named Ware or Mattis or Fay - they all know a thing or two about reconciliation that they can teach the Iraqis.</p>
<p>First - you forgive yourself for your own atrocities.  Then you give a medal to those who cover them up.  Then you attack those who reveal them.  Then you re-write history and bury the bodies deep, with no names - dehumanized for all of time. And you make despised those who stood for doing the right thing.</p>
<p>The Fays are helping to insure an army of Calleys and not of Thompsons. That really is the only reason to stay in Iraq.  To reshape the military in that image. God bless all those who have fought with honor to try to prevent that.  There&#8217;s nothing to say for the leadership who have done the opposite.  No prayer that won&#8217;t recoil from having their names invoked.  They&#8217;ve damaged America as much as they have Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22298</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22298</guid>
		<description>Nothing about bush prior to his election indicates he understands the concept of 'honor'.  His cowardice in running from Vietnam, lying about his records, on and on, tell of his character or lack thereof.  Much worse, his dishonor has become a malignant disease, spreading throughout the leadership, seemingly infecting even the opposition, who can't seem to find the gumption to ship bush off to the Hague where he deserves to hang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing about bush prior to his election indicates he understands the concept of &#8216;honor&#8217;.  His cowardice in running from Vietnam, lying about his records, on and on, tell of his character or lack thereof.  Much worse, his dishonor has become a malignant disease, spreading throughout the leadership, seemingly infecting even the opposition, who can&#8217;t seem to find the gumption to ship bush off to the Hague where he deserves to hang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22297</guid>
		<description>One of the real eye-opening moments for me in just how low some of the politicians will go, was during the Shays campaign.  I had watched Shays chair a subcommittee hearing on whistleblowers where Sam Provance was one of the witnesses.  It was a shocking hearing and having IG representatives sit there, bored, while the list of retialtions against the whistleblowers - retaliations that the IG's office should have done something about - went on and on.  

But in connection with Provance, a huge part of his time was directed towards, not just the retaliation against him (after guys like Lindsay Graham made a pretense of interest so they could better participate in the later legislative cover up), but also towards his direct testimony about the issues involving MI as opposed to MP and the more substantial and seemingly directly authorized up the chain abuses in which MI engaged.  

Shays made all kinds of noises about being shocked, concerned, convinced, etc. and he scolded the IGs etc.  But a few months later, while in campaing mode, Shays made the incredible statements about Abu Ghraib just being a "sex ring."  Nothing about all the info he had been exposed to on the MI aspects - the "GITMO"-ization, the abuse of a child of a detainee.  Nothing about, even, the fact that 80-90% of those at Abu Ghraib had no business being there at all, but they were treated just the same - with degredation, humiliation and pain all for the sake of inflicting.  He never mentioned the months of family members sobbing outside of Abu Ghraib, without any ability to even find out if their missing family members were dead or at Abu Ghraib or dead at Abu Ghraib.  

No ability until Rumsfeld arrived - post picture release - and like Nero exercised the perogative of the king and authorized the release, without apology, of hundred and hundred.

They have dealt with their torture and war crimes and abuse and joint degredation of the Iraqi people and the US forces by making sure that they have better control over the pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the real eye-opening moments for me in just how low some of the politicians will go, was during the Shays campaign.  I had watched Shays chair a subcommittee hearing on whistleblowers where Sam Provance was one of the witnesses.  It was a shocking hearing and having IG representatives sit there, bored, while the list of retialtions against the whistleblowers - retaliations that the IG&#8217;s office should have done something about - went on and on.  </p>
<p>But in connection with Provance, a huge part of his time was directed towards, not just the retaliation against him (after guys like Lindsay Graham made a pretense of interest so they could better participate in the later legislative cover up), but also towards his direct testimony about the issues involving MI as opposed to MP and the more substantial and seemingly directly authorized up the chain abuses in which MI engaged.  </p>
<p>Shays made all kinds of noises about being shocked, concerned, convinced, etc. and he scolded the IGs etc.  But a few months later, while in campaing mode, Shays made the incredible statements about Abu Ghraib just being a &#8220;sex ring.&#8221;  Nothing about all the info he had been exposed to on the MI aspects - the &#8220;GITMO&#8221;-ization, the abuse of a child of a detainee.  Nothing about, even, the fact that 80-90% of those at Abu Ghraib had no business being there at all, but they were treated just the same - with degredation, humiliation and pain all for the sake of inflicting.  He never mentioned the months of family members sobbing outside of Abu Ghraib, without any ability to even find out if their missing family members were dead or at Abu Ghraib or dead at Abu Ghraib.  </p>
<p>No ability until Rumsfeld arrived - post picture release - and like Nero exercised the perogative of the king and authorized the release, without apology, of hundred and hundred.</p>
<p>They have dealt with their torture and war crimes and abuse and joint degredation of the Iraqi people and the US forces by making sure that they have better control over the pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pookapooka</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22295</link>
		<dc:creator>pookapooka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22295</guid>
		<description>It is my hope that you live long enough to testify at an international war-crimes trial to punish all these criminals who are destroying the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my hope that you live long enough to testify at an international war-crimes trial to punish all these criminals who are destroying the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22277</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22277</guid>
		<description>As a former US Army military police and military intelligence officer, with 5 years of active enlisted experience, a year as a non-commissioned officer in the Hawaii Army National Guard and 9 additional years in the active Guard and Reserve—and, with assignments to combat and combat support units—I am appalled that these gross violations of the Geneva Conventions and Army rules and regulations ever took place. Even more so that there have been relentless efforts to cover up these criminal acts, and to avoid assigning accountablility. With the notable exception of General Taguba, I am embarrased by the reported conduct of all of the flag officers who have handled this matter throughout the chain of command.

I was trained to operate and assigned to a domestic Army confinement facility at Fort Huachuca AZ, and am intimately familiar with the rules and regulations which govern prisoners of war, non-combatant internees and others who might have been confined to Abu Ghraib. I am also familiar with the axiom that an officer is responsible for the care and conduct of all of those under his command. All of the officers and non-commissioned officers involved directly in this matter, save Sergeant Provance, have obviously failed in their duties to prevent such abuse, and report it if discovered.

While the bad acts of these supervisors and commanders don't lessen the bad acts of the enlisted personnel who participated in or conducted torture, it is pitiful that a few lower ranking personnel should be held accountable when all indications are that the unlawful orders to engage in such activities came through their commanders and supervisors, and originated at the highest levels of the Department of Defense. Secretary Rumsfeld, Undersecretary Wolfowitz and others should be held accountable for these crimes. Sadly, it seems that such shall not be the case. Members of Congress should be ashamed that they have not taken affirmative steps to investigate and hold accountable those members of the administrative branch who encouraged and demanded this heinous conduct.

We are clearly as bad, or worse, than the enemies we fight in this faux 'war on terrorism.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former US Army military police and military intelligence officer, with 5 years of active enlisted experience, a year as a non-commissioned officer in the Hawaii Army National Guard and 9 additional years in the active Guard and Reserve—and, with assignments to combat and combat support units—I am appalled that these gross violations of the Geneva Conventions and Army rules and regulations ever took place. Even more so that there have been relentless efforts to cover up these criminal acts, and to avoid assigning accountablility. With the notable exception of General Taguba, I am embarrased by the reported conduct of all of the flag officers who have handled this matter throughout the chain of command.</p>
<p>I was trained to operate and assigned to a domestic Army confinement facility at Fort Huachuca AZ, and am intimately familiar with the rules and regulations which govern prisoners of war, non-combatant internees and others who might have been confined to Abu Ghraib. I am also familiar with the axiom that an officer is responsible for the care and conduct of all of those under his command. All of the officers and non-commissioned officers involved directly in this matter, save Sergeant Provance, have obviously failed in their duties to prevent such abuse, and report it if discovered.</p>
<p>While the bad acts of these supervisors and commanders don&#8217;t lessen the bad acts of the enlisted personnel who participated in or conducted torture, it is pitiful that a few lower ranking personnel should be held accountable when all indications are that the unlawful orders to engage in such activities came through their commanders and supervisors, and originated at the highest levels of the Department of Defense. Secretary Rumsfeld, Undersecretary Wolfowitz and others should be held accountable for these crimes. Sadly, it seems that such shall not be the case. Members of Congress should be ashamed that they have not taken affirmative steps to investigate and hold accountable those members of the administrative branch who encouraged and demanded this heinous conduct.</p>
<p>We are clearly as bad, or worse, than the enemies we fight in this faux &#8216;war on terrorism.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22274</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/02/why-the-pentagon-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-me-to-testify-about-abu-ghraib/#comment-22274</guid>
		<description>Of course the people responsible will never stand trial for their crimes. Because they were "the Decider guy," the veep, Rumpsfeld and the DOJ. 

We don't even know how many prisons like Abu Ghraib exist in Iraq, Eastern Europe and elsewhere, which we created. We don't know how many people have been unfairly incarcerated, tortured, denied their rights under the Geneva Convention, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the people responsible will never stand trial for their crimes. Because they were &#8220;the Decider guy,&#8221; the veep, Rumpsfeld and the DOJ. </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t even know how many prisons like Abu Ghraib exist in Iraq, Eastern Europe and elsewhere, which we created. We don&#8217;t know how many people have been unfairly incarcerated, tortured, denied their rights under the Geneva Convention, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
