Comenzar con poker card game juego casinos poker internet gratis hold em poker juegos polly poker

E” free mp3 ringtones editor jeux virtuels casino blackjack game internet kasino casino depot gratuites

The only remotely plausible explanations that I can think of are:

1. The beard is fake, but the OBL is real. OBL had some disease that caused his hair to fall out (maybe he’s undergoing chemo). Facial hair in men is an Islamic religious observance, so maybe OBL put on a fake beard (and fake temple hair) so as not to allow his appearance to detract from his message. In any case, that is not just a dye job.

2. The beard is real, but the OBL is fake.

Supporting #2 is that the nose doesn’t look right, bulbous rather than aquiline (but maybe OBL broke his nose somewhere along the way). Also the talking points he uses are more like what a wingnut blogger would put in OBL’s mouth than what a Salafi radical would say.

Tentative conclusion: the video was fabricated by amateurish neocon elements, perhaps related to the same ones that fabricated the yellowcake memo (Michael Ledeen was in on that one). The US government knows it is fake, but is telling everyone it is probably real because they like the message it delivers. Most likely, elements of the US government were active parties to the forgery.

How do you have a fifty year war on terror if you kill all the leaders right off the bat.

Ain’t that right, Yasser.

This will never happen because this same main stream media serve as tools for Bush/Cheney and the reich-wing republicans.

The only thing gaining strength is the repetition of the lamestream media’s lies which are usually planted stories via the White House.

A couple examples are below and you can find your own by simple research. I have found that same headline and story going back 3 years.

A story from July, ‘07:

http://www.bestsyndication.com/?q=071107_al-qaeda_as_strong_before_9-11.htm

A New York Times story from February, ‘07:

http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/02/ny_times_alqaeda_gaining_stren.php

I stand corrected that Bin Laden was 6′4 and needed daily dialysis. I read that he did need dialysis when he had Hepatitis C.

However, I still believe that our government knows right where OBL is and always has. But, there has just never been an appropriate time to roll him out - too much time has gone by and I think most people would see right through it. My the Bush Adm has gotten themselves into such a pickle over that one!

By the time each and every US company involved in the shipping, handling and customs brokerage and each tin-pot government functionary in Pakistan gets done taking “a dash” out of your gross of doughnuts, all Osama would be getting is two pounds of very stale crumbs and six tablespoons of sugar in a mangled box.

PS. I saw someone post this comment a while back and I would like to reiterate this point: When the next President is elected and I feel certain it will be a Dem this time around, I hope he or she makes Valerie Plame head of the CIA. God Almighty, the dirty little neo-cons and a few others would be jumping out of windows.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord, but I want a front row seat! Have a great weekend everyone!

The Sauds, if there is war in Iraq and Iran, stand to have much power to be gained if the US takes on the entire ME… what is left of the region will be up for grabs, and the US will not benefit. Except perhaps a few of Saudis ’special friends’. A terrible ugly thought, but bushco and his neocon friends are so capable of anything, I would not put it past them any longer.

Bin Laden Unplugged
Analyzing the latest video.
by Daveed Gartenstein-Ross
09/08/2007 2:14:00 PM

“…OSAMA BIN LADEN’S STRENGTH as an orator has always been his ethos. He is an eloquent and seemingly honest speaker, proud of his role in the attacks of 9/11, a principled spokesman for radical Islam’s war against the West. Though bin Laden may not have penned all his words personally, the force of his ideas always shines through. As Bruce Lawrence notes in Messages to the World, “these messages are not ghostwritten tracts of the kind supplied by professional speechwriters to many politicians in the West, whether American Presidents, European Prime Ministers, or their Middle-Eastern counterparts.”

In bin Laden’s last video–released on October 29, 2004, on the eve of America’s presidential election–bin Laden mocked President Bush: “Free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush’s claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don’t strike–for example–Sweden?” But even while skewering President Bush for his simplistic framing of the conflict, bin Laden has been hesitant to explain the roots of the struggle to a Western audience. (His rhetoric differs when the target audience is Western rather than Muslim.) The closest he has come was the October 2004 video, where bin Laden outlined his grievances at length and urged his audience to look for 9/11’s “causes in order to prevent it from happening again.”

This vagueness has led some commentators to conclude that bin Laden is fundamentally a political terrorist rather than a religious one. The sociologist Michael Mann wrote, “There is a simple reason why he attacked the United States: American imperialism. As long as America seeks to control the Middle East, he and people like him will be its enemy.” Doug Bandow of the American Conservative Defense Alliance–after quoting bin Laden’s quip about Sweden–declared that al-Qaeda’s attacks are “in pursuit of specific geopolitical objectives. The evidence is overwhelming that they attack Americans because they believe Americans are at war with them…”

I also agree that he is used very conveniently, every time Bush wants to instill fear. Although it isn’t working so well with most of us lately.

By the way, this is one site I visit every day and not only like it but learn a heck of a lot from it. Thanks Larry and all who post here.