If you find the stuff I write here difficult to read, my to be published book will be your worst nightmare and your best dream. Everything written has been constructed to challenge self interest in order to promote selflessness. The more you evaluate selflessness, the more you realise how selfish we all are.

If you go beating up on someone or some group on the basis of your values (not theirs), all you will achieve is the opportunity for another war. Therefore I expose moral sobriety by questioning the judgements of those that support and pioneer that morality. In questioning judgements, I present an alternative truth. At present the Bush administration has presented a case for a war on abnormalcy in its attack on a devilish tyrant, Saddam Hussein. Iraq has been a cult desperate to be rescued. I feel the debate (or lack of) on paedahilia is a brilliant analogy for the subferfuge used in the anciliary arguments in everything done in the interests of normalcy.

I asked Moses about it once and don’t recall that he found out what’s up with that. Will bug him again. He knows a lot of the people in the WordPress world, and hopefully can find out. That’s a pretty necessary feature — imho — for a blog writer to be able to do. And it must make it confusing for readers.

If I weren’t lazy, I could go outside the quote after that happens and make up a sentence — something blah blah blah — to reintroduce the reader to the quoted material. But it’s irritating I’d have to do that.

They all love to point fingers over someone else’s sneaking in ammendments and someone else’s pork; but none look in the mirror. Meanwhile, according to Conyers, most of them don’t read most of what they pass because they don’t have time.

Easy to fix; where’s the rules committees on this? Require change notification, and require a revision history. Then require a continuously updated index of the whole bill.

This is not that difficult. Technical manuals do it all the time.

testing worpress understanding nested quotes

nested quote – looks OK in preview

un-nested – see how it looks in post

back out of the quote

copied/ pasted the text of the blockquote embedded html command, instead of using the button

Let’s see what happen’s after adding comment

You touched on something indirectly, something most people take for granted. But something that is one of the root problems of social justice. This is the pension. You are now officially old at 67, officially a child until you are 18. This is the start and the end of a great chunk of society’s issues. Before I tackle “ageism”, I noticed a sad news item in the small town we call Australia. Well actually, it ain’t that small and this was an event that happened in South Australia.

It concerned the murder of a family. Wait….not by a derranged axe weilding random murderer. It was done by the cute 14 year old daughter, who had been seeing her 24 year old boy friend since she was 12. Most unusual. No attempt to play the “ringing in the sheaths” pedo card. No little child abused by sick adult by the corporate media. Why, because apparently the murder of her parents and her 10 year old brother was extremely bloody and 80% her doing (although her boyfriend aided and abetted). In this case the media, were looking to create an adult out of this “child”, as they felt 10 years behind bars was understating justice. This was heighted by the wissened old hack of a Justice who uttered words to the effect “Her parents were good folks who tried to stop their daughter seeing an inappropiate partner”. Judge, you weren’t paying attention. They paid the ultimate price for dictating the law to someone who wasn’t prepared to follow it. I don’t call that a victory, a resolve, a solution. I call that disaster management. I call that a logical and reasonable outcome of absolute oppression. Not said in any way as a celebration of murder, but as a recognition of how chains of events lead to outcomes. In no circumstances is murder an acceptable outcome. But I both blame the perpetrator and the victim as they are jointly responsible for chains of events.

Society looks at the manifestation, possibly punishes the perpetrator (or anyone who’ll do) and wonders why the problem keeps coming back. The under 18 rule works for many, many people, possibly the majority (although I suspect there’s alot of grudging in the 14-18 band), but it does not work for everybody. Likewise at the other end of the scale, what is old? can I reasonably say someone that is 52 who says they feel old, who in their own opinion is old, isn’t old? Therefore if a social charter is offered to the elderly, why shouldn’t a support mechanism be available for 52 year olds who consider themselves aged.

Conversely the great pianist, Sviatoslav Richter set a punnishing perforance schedule until his death ( into his 80’s). He never retired. Why not set that as the new standard? Accountants standards haven’t, don’t and will never work in defining a fair society and the sooner the polititions on both sides of the house acknowlege this and get on with prodiving a decent new world order, then and only then will we be set for Christendom.

I guess if I believed these were ordinary political times with a lame duck incumbent president (I refuse to capitalize president) and control of
Congress by the Democrats you are right the Republicans wouldn’t have a chance.

But I just don’t believe these are “ordinary political times”

You said the Republicans don’t have a chance”

Ok if that is the case then the Democrats are a shoo in. Right?

So if they are, then why is the Democratically controlled Congress so timid? What are they afraid of?

Am I to believe that even with their shoo in potential they still think they can’t rock the boat by challenging the Bush/Cheney regime on getting us the hell out of Iraq, much less all the other things they have done.

I heard David Gergen on CNN after the debate say something about the surge working because casualties were down and then this profound statement that went something like this

“Iraq is now off the front pages and Iran is on them”

Don’t these people see the forest for the trees? That’s exactly what Bush/Cheney want. Its the old trick to create a diversion away from a problem so you don’t have to deal with it.

Aren’t you amazed how little attention the War in Iraq has gotten in the last six weeks or so. It all began with the farcical presentation to Congress on Sept 15 by the dynamic Praetus/Crocker team.

This is how these people work, not only did they use every trick in the book to win in 2000,and after that they wrote a new book and threw away the old one.

That is the problem with the Democrats, they are still playing with the old book.

Old book==certain set of rules

New book==Only one rule…win at all costs.

If you don’t fight fire with fire you get burned and that is why unless the Democrats come out with a strong well coordinated campaign that puts the Republicans on the defensive as soon as possible after the primaries and carry it all the way through the convention up till election day we are all going to get burned.

One last thought..

Have you heard any Democratic presidential candidate anything about what they would do to investigate and punish those criminals who are currently in office once they are out of office?

Or will they just let Bush pardon everyone he can think of between the election and that cold day in January 2009?

Would any of them call for a new investigation into the failures of the Bush administration to protect us from what happened on 9/11?

What do you think?

But the thing that really needs to be broadcast is this meme:

http://www.talkorigins.org/

The right wing will lie, cheat, steal, or do anything else that will further their agenda. They do not give a fuk about you or me. Watch Newsweak for the Marcos/Rove warfare, Rove will stay true to the cause, Kos will kick his butt with truth (facts) but the dropouts @ NewCorps (1984) will stay true to the Neocon cause. This is the true war for Eurasia.