<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NeoCons Go Ballistic on Iran NIE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: by418050</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-123334</link>
		<dc:creator>by418050</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-123334</guid>
		<description>gudos tanimusi gykma
&lt;a href="http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html " rel="nofollow"&gt;bofy&lt;/a&gt; http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html [url=http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html ]bere[/url]  hucuh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gudos tanimusi gykma<br />
<a href="http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html " rel="nofollow">bofy</a> <a href="http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html" rel="nofollow">http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html</a> [url=http://by418050.luos6rc.net/sitemap23.html ]bere[/url]  hucuh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-79672</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-79672</guid>
		<description>And what do you think of the very popular view by a leading Israeli analyst Obadiah Shoher? He argues (here, for example, www. samsonblinded.org/blog/america-arranges-a-peace-deal-with-iran.htm ) that the Bush Administration made a deal with Iran: nuclear program in exchange for curtailing the Iranian support for Iraqi terrorists. His story seems plausible, isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what do you think of the very popular view by a leading Israeli analyst Obadiah Shoher? He argues (here, for example, <a href="http://www" rel="nofollow">http://www</a>. samsonblinded.org/blog/america-arranges-a-peace-deal-with-iran.htm ) that the Bush Administration made a deal with Iran: nuclear program in exchange for curtailing the Iranian support for Iraqi terrorists. His story seems plausible, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75995</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75995</guid>
		<description>By the way, Iran has a wonderful film industry that produces a lot of really terrific films that make universal statements within the context of the current Iranian social and political condition. Creativity in art often reaches its greatest heights when oppressive conditions demand that messages be indirect.

Recently I watched a film called "Children of Heaven". Strongly recommended. It centers on the lives of two children, a brother and a sister, and is so rich and so multilayered that I cannot do it justice with words. Another one that I strongly recommend is Laila. It explores in a devastating way love, marriage, and the influence of family in Iranian life, and if you think it does not have universal ramifications, then you are in a serious state of denial. If those two films do not engage you emotionally and intellectually, and if you cannot see something universally human in them, then I am not sure there is hope for you. 

And then there is "The Colour of Paradise". Visually stunningly beautiful, emotionally gripping, and intellectually engaging. And the characters in this film are clearly not Muslims, by the way, but one of Iran's religious minorities. It is not addressed at all in the film, but from the visuals you can see it. They are, I am guessing, Zoroastrians. I saw this one in a theatre, and because of the lush visuals it would not be the same at home unless you have one hell of a home theater setup, but see it anyway. Even on a small screen it will engage and impress you.

Netflix has all three of these films, and if you don't have Netflix, it is worth signing up for the free trial so you can experience Iranian film making and see what Iranian film makers are capable of. Just don't forget to terminate the contract before they charge your credit card.

End of film review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Iran has a wonderful film industry that produces a lot of really terrific films that make universal statements within the context of the current Iranian social and political condition. Creativity in art often reaches its greatest heights when oppressive conditions demand that messages be indirect.</p>
<p>Recently I watched a film called &#8220;Children of Heaven&#8221;. Strongly recommended. It centers on the lives of two children, a brother and a sister, and is so rich and so multilayered that I cannot do it justice with words. Another one that I strongly recommend is Laila. It explores in a devastating way love, marriage, and the influence of family in Iranian life, and if you think it does not have universal ramifications, then you are in a serious state of denial. If those two films do not engage you emotionally and intellectually, and if you cannot see something universally human in them, then I am not sure there is hope for you. </p>
<p>And then there is &#8220;The Colour of Paradise&#8221;. Visually stunningly beautiful, emotionally gripping, and intellectually engaging. And the characters in this film are clearly not Muslims, by the way, but one of Iran&#8217;s religious minorities. It is not addressed at all in the film, but from the visuals you can see it. They are, I am guessing, Zoroastrians. I saw this one in a theatre, and because of the lush visuals it would not be the same at home unless you have one hell of a home theater setup, but see it anyway. Even on a small screen it will engage and impress you.</p>
<p>Netflix has all three of these films, and if you don&#8217;t have Netflix, it is worth signing up for the free trial so you can experience Iranian film making and see what Iranian film makers are capable of. Just don&#8217;t forget to terminate the contract before they charge your credit card.</p>
<p>End of film review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75971</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75971</guid>
		<description>I should have asked you before which aspect of Iran you are interested in reading about - politics? History? Society? Culture? Religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have asked you before which aspect of Iran you are interested in reading about - politics? History? Society? Culture? Religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75785</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75785</guid>
		<description>Kathleen, there is a general discrepancy as to how many have died in Iraq as a result of the invasion and subsequent civil war.

But I won't split hairs. A great number of people have died unnecessarily to satisfy the lust for oil.

It is no surprise that Bush camp blitzkreig have continued the policy of misinformation even though they have been &lt;em&gt;sprung&lt;/em&gt;. There's not too much time to go, besides the Democrats seem to want this to happen. &lt;strong&gt;Because, by all accounts, they've given Bush the green light &amp; the rest is drivell&lt;/strong&gt;.

Here's an interesting thought &lt;strong&gt;If Japan had not surrendered when she did, how many more nuclear bombs would the US have dropped until they put the excercise down to futility. Would you destroy the World in order to &lt;em&gt;get&lt;/em&gt; the last man?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen, there is a general discrepancy as to how many have died in Iraq as a result of the invasion and subsequent civil war.</p>
<p>But I won&#8217;t split hairs. A great number of people have died unnecessarily to satisfy the lust for oil.</p>
<p>It is no surprise that Bush camp blitzkreig have continued the policy of misinformation even though they have been <em>sprung</em>. There&#8217;s not too much time to go, besides the Democrats seem to want this to happen. <strong>Because, by all accounts, they&#8217;ve given Bush the green light &amp; the rest is drivell</strong>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting thought <strong>If Japan had not surrendered when she did, how many more nuclear bombs would the US have dropped until they put the excercise down to futility. Would you destroy the World in order to <em>get</em> the last man?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakwoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75673</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakwoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75673</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Always willing to learn from those I might not always understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Always willing to learn from those I might not always understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donovan Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75668</link>
		<dc:creator>Donovan Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75668</guid>
		<description>Really Section 9?
    the mossad's whole agenda ( which is the right of any countries Intel agency) is to trick the other country  into killing off the mossad's enemies and for them it's so far so good. we like a dumbass older brother are dicking up the ME according to plan .Iraq maybe Iran, Syria, Lebanon etc.... 
ask yourself this section 9,who is barking the loudest that WE ( the USA) should basically dismantle the middle east? It's the Netanyahu's of the world , or the "Israel firsters" which include right wing Christian fundaMENTAList hell bent on the "end of days". Both make me shudder to think of the pain they are trying to self inflict on all of us Jew, Muslim and Gentile alike. They my friend are just plain dangerous to any possible peace or stability because they aren't stable beings.....paranoid delusional people in high places should scare the shit out of any sane person. 
glad your so comfy with their agenda

I dare you to read the books called :
"By way of deception" or the second book "Beyond deception" written by Victor ostrovsky ( a former Mossad case officer) then come back and repeat that silly claim of how good and just the mossad are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Section 9?<br />
    the mossad&#8217;s whole agenda ( which is the right of any countries Intel agency) is to trick the other country  into killing off the mossad&#8217;s enemies and for them it&#8217;s so far so good. we like a dumbass older brother are dicking up the ME according to plan .Iraq maybe Iran, Syria, Lebanon etc&#8230;.<br />
ask yourself this section 9,who is barking the loudest that WE ( the USA) should basically dismantle the middle east? It&#8217;s the Netanyahu&#8217;s of the world , or the &#8220;Israel firsters&#8221; which include right wing Christian fundaMENTAList hell bent on the &#8220;end of days&#8221;. Both make me shudder to think of the pain they are trying to self inflict on all of us Jew, Muslim and Gentile alike. They my friend are just plain dangerous to any possible peace or stability because they aren&#8217;t stable beings&#8230;..paranoid delusional people in high places should scare the shit out of any sane person.<br />
glad your so comfy with their agenda</p>
<p>I dare you to read the books called :<br />
&#8220;By way of deception&#8221; or the second book &#8220;Beyond deception&#8221; written by Victor ostrovsky ( a former Mossad case officer) then come back and repeat that silly claim of how good and just the mossad are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75548</link>
		<dc:creator>lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75548</guid>
		<description>Cee-  well ther ewas also no al queda in the early 80's.  so an attack like they did on iraq is even less likely now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cee-  well ther ewas also no al queda in the early 80&#8217;s.  so an attack like they did on iraq is even less likely now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Hazeltine</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75538</link>
		<dc:creator>G Hazeltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75538</guid>
		<description>Not sure what this means, but it must mean something:

Denmark — Population: 5,468,120: Area: 43,094 sq km 

Israel — Population: 5,700,000* -- Area: 20,770 sq km**

San Francisco Bay Area (7 counties) -- Population: 7,200,000 -- Area: 4,160 sq km

Iran - Population: 65,397,521 -- Area: 1,648,000 sq km

*excluding Arab citizens and the territories
**excluding the Occupied Territories, I think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what this means, but it must mean something:</p>
<p>Denmark — Population: 5,468,120: Area: 43,094 sq km </p>
<p>Israel — Population: 5,700,000* &#8212; Area: 20,770 sq km**</p>
<p>San Francisco Bay Area (7 counties) &#8212; Population: 7,200,000 &#8212; Area: 4,160 sq km</p>
<p>Iran - Population: 65,397,521 &#8212; Area: 1,648,000 sq km</p>
<p>*excluding Arab citizens and the territories<br />
**excluding the Occupied Territories, I think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75482</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75482</guid>
		<description>My question to that is what is in the redaction's of said report!?  It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in said committee's of congress trying to unredact this and figure out what the hell is really going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question to that is what is in the redaction&#8217;s of said report!?  It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in said committee&#8217;s of congress trying to unredact this and figure out what the hell is really going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75464</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75464</guid>
		<description>Let me get back to you on that. I have TONS of books on Iraq and Palestine/Israel I could recommend, and a few good ones on Islam, but not so much on Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get back to you on that. I have TONS of books on Iraq and Palestine/Israel I could recommend, and a few good ones on Islam, but not so much on Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75422</guid>
		<description>I agree that this administration is full of a bunch of lunatics and I’ve spent countless hours writing letters to my elected officials.  Unfortunately my elected officials were not elected by me, so I’m sure my letters ended up in file 13.  However, I'm always curious when other people criticize Americans for their complacency, so my question is… besides posting your thoughts on the web, what have you done to stop the lunacy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this administration is full of a bunch of lunatics and I’ve spent countless hours writing letters to my elected officials.  Unfortunately my elected officials were not elected by me, so I’m sure my letters ended up in file 13.  However, I&#8217;m always curious when other people criticize Americans for their complacency, so my question is… besides posting your thoughts on the web, what have you done to stop the lunacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakwoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75373</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakwoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75373</guid>
		<description>Got any books you'd recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got any books you&#8217;d recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cee</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75337</link>
		<dc:creator>Cee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75337</guid>
		<description>Is to rational people


 
Yossi Melman, veteran defense writer for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, said that if the U.S. view of Iran's nuclear status is correct, it actually reduces the threat to Israel and the likelihood of independent military action. 

"If Iran is not heading for a nuclear weapon then you don't need a military option," he said, adding that for Israeli officials a strike was never a very likely choice. 

"Israel's ability to carry out a military operation in Iran is limited," he said. "It's possible but limited." 

Such a mission would be far more complex that the 1981 Iraq raid, experts say. 

It would require heavy precision-guided bombs that can slice into underground bunkers, manned aircraft to bombard multiple targets and possibly commandos on the ground to make sure weapons materials are destroyed. 

The neocons are doing this

Melman said Israel's next step could be to redouble its own intelligence efforts in an attempt to prove its case, but that might antagonize the U.S. agencies. 

"If Israel didn't have a smoking gun before, why should it find one now?" he said. "If they had the evidence they would have given it to the Americans and influenced their report." 

__ 

Associated Press writer Steve Weizman has been reporting from the Middle East since 1985.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is to rational people</p>
<p>Yossi Melman, veteran defense writer for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, said that if the U.S. view of Iran&#8217;s nuclear status is correct, it actually reduces the threat to Israel and the likelihood of independent military action. </p>
<p>&#8220;If Iran is not heading for a nuclear weapon then you don&#8217;t need a military option,&#8221; he said, adding that for Israeli officials a strike was never a very likely choice. </p>
<p>&#8220;Israel&#8217;s ability to carry out a military operation in Iran is limited,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It&#8217;s possible but limited.&#8221; </p>
<p>Such a mission would be far more complex that the 1981 Iraq raid, experts say. </p>
<p>It would require heavy precision-guided bombs that can slice into underground bunkers, manned aircraft to bombard multiple targets and possibly commandos on the ground to make sure weapons materials are destroyed. </p>
<p>The neocons are doing this</p>
<p>Melman said Israel&#8217;s next step could be to redouble its own intelligence efforts in an attempt to prove its case, but that might antagonize the U.S. agencies. </p>
<p>&#8220;If Israel didn&#8217;t have a smoking gun before, why should it find one now?&#8221; he said. &#8220;If they had the evidence they would have given it to the Americans and influenced their report.&#8221; </p>
<p>__ </p>
<p>Associated Press writer Steve Weizman has been reporting from the Middle East since 1985.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75335</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75335</guid>
		<description>Great points!  Who else visited?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points!  Who else visited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75333</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75333</guid>
		<description>What worried me before the invasion of Iraq was all of the old timers (older than me 55) who were really worried (Republicans, Democrats, Independents) about this crazed group of thugs in the White House. Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brezinski, General Zinni, General Clark, Madeline Albright, Robert Mcnamara, four of my uncles all retired engineers from  Wright Patterson Air Force base, endless older WWII Vets that I talked with at the anti-invasion marches in Washington the fall of 2002 and in New York in Feb of 2003.

Besides hearing Scott Ritter, Elbaradei, retired CIA analyst and many more on the Diane Rehm show before the invasion, hearing the older timers saying the same thing sure had my ears on alert.

Plenty of warning if you were listening</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What worried me before the invasion of Iraq was all of the old timers (older than me 55) who were really worried (Republicans, Democrats, Independents) about this crazed group of thugs in the White House. Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brezinski, General Zinni, General Clark, Madeline Albright, Robert Mcnamara, four of my uncles all retired engineers from  Wright Patterson Air Force base, endless older WWII Vets that I talked with at the anti-invasion marches in Washington the fall of 2002 and in New York in Feb of 2003.</p>
<p>Besides hearing Scott Ritter, Elbaradei, retired CIA analyst and many more on the Diane Rehm show before the invasion, hearing the older timers saying the same thing sure had my ears on alert.</p>
<p>Plenty of warning if you were listening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75327</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75327</guid>
		<description>Simple and clear..Douglas Feith should be locked up, at the very least impeached (John Dean has written about the impeachment of lower level officials so that they can not roll rack into a future or present (Wolfowitz) administration.

Lock Feith up or Impeach this compulsive liar and psychopathic warmonger!

Refocusing the Impeachment Movement on Administration Officials Below the President and Vice-President:
Why Not Have A Realistic Debate, with Charges that Could Actually Result in Convictions?
By JOHN W. DEAN 

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20061215.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple and clear..Douglas Feith should be locked up, at the very least impeached (John Dean has written about the impeachment of lower level officials so that they can not roll rack into a future or present (Wolfowitz) administration.</p>
<p>Lock Feith up or Impeach this compulsive liar and psychopathic warmonger!</p>
<p>Refocusing the Impeachment Movement on Administration Officials Below the President and Vice-President:<br />
Why Not Have A Realistic Debate, with Charges that Could Actually Result in Convictions?<br />
By JOHN W. DEAN </p>
<p><a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20061215.html" rel="nofollow">http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20061215.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75319</link>
		<dc:creator>lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75319</guid>
		<description>I know this will sound hopelessly naive, but isn't this GOOD news?  Wether you are a neo con or a realist or a nothing, isn't it in general POSITIVE that our best guess is we are safer than we thought we were yesterday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this will sound hopelessly naive, but isn&#8217;t this GOOD news?  Wether you are a neo con or a realist or a nothing, isn&#8217;t it in general POSITIVE that our best guess is we are safer than we thought we were yesterday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudkitty</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75315</link>
		<dc:creator>mudkitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75315</guid>
		<description>Bring back the October Surprise!  

Just ask Christopher Hitchens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back the October Surprise!  </p>
<p>Just ask Christopher Hitchens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wethornet</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75200</link>
		<dc:creator>wethornet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/04/neocons-go-ballistic-on-iran-nie/#comment-75200</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;sorry, meant to do this first.  must. be. careful. when. posting. and. tired. and. rip. sh*t. furious.

short version:  Ya know, if Iran really wanted to f*ck with w. and deadeye dick AND stop any potential war, they would do the following…

release the information about the “october surprise.” the iranians should know, because, um, like, they were there.  like w/ casey in madrid in the summer.  like w/ ghwb and c. boyden gray, etc., in mid october in the suburbs, note not in the city, in the suburbs, of paris.

release the information and watch the mother of all media sh*tstorms ensue.

please jesus.  please.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>sorry, meant to do this first.  must. be. careful. when. posting. and. tired. and. rip. sh*t. furious.</p>
<p>short version:  Ya know, if Iran really wanted to f*ck with w. and deadeye dick AND stop any potential war, they would do the following…</p>
<p>release the information about the “october surprise.” the iranians should know, because, um, like, they were there.  like w/ casey in madrid in the summer.  like w/ ghwb and c. boyden gray, etc., in mid october in the suburbs, note not in the city, in the suburbs, of paris.</p>
<p>release the information and watch the mother of all media sh*tstorms ensue.</p>
<p>please jesus.  please.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
