http://acropolisreview.com/2008/01/john-edwards-for-president_18.html

Clinton is my second choice.

Obama…well, I’ll vote for him if he’s the nominee. But at this point, I really don’t want to see that happen.

Openly asking Republicans to join Union caucus members in NV and vote [in his flyers, "against Hillary"].

Having lived in Las Vegas for many years I can assure you that these endorsements are from Union busting, pro Bush/Cheney/Iraq and super conservatives.. without any doubt.

Praising Reagan as transformational is a hideous joke. Reagan is responsible for anti union legislation, deregulation of eveything he could put his hands on, and setting us back years. Reagan paved the way for the judiciary swing to the far right and set up the power play of the Republican Administration. Democrats became castrated and spineless, and this “sunny” man promoted the reactionary climate we have been living through.

Obama’s pandering to the Right is appalling.

I decided not to vote in the Michigan primary. It was a very difficult decision for me to make, as it is the first time I have not voted in as long as I have been voting. First, my choice for President at this time is Edwards, with Clinton or Obama as VP. I could not even vote for him as a write in, leaving the only choice Clinton, as Obama was also not on the ballot. To add to the insult, the Democratic National Convention will not even count the Michigan Delegates, unless they decide to change the rules. Another reason is that I recieved several emails requesting Michigan Dems to cross over to Republican for the day and to vote for Romney. I hate the dirty tricks going on throughout this election ’season’, no matter who it is that is doing them…

Each of the Democratic candidates have strengths and weaknesses. We could not dare to hope for that ‘perfect’ man or woman… I pray that the primaries will not serve to destroy the candidates before the actual campaign has even begun. I hate how the media focuses so much on just one or two of the candidates… It’s like they think (and maybe they do!)that they already know who the candidates are… being without cable access isn’t always a bad thing!!! Best to everyone, Marlene

We know who has consistently brought our nations attention to the issue of Vets and others sleeping under bridges tonight

On Air America’s “Clout” they have Richard Schultz addressing Bill O’Reily attack on Edwards

For some mysterious reason, voters thought the former position of Screen Actors Guild president was qualification to be governor of one of the world’s largest economies.

An example of how not to learn from history is our current ‘governator’. First settling the power utilities lawsuit out of court for pennies on the dollar, and now today the “fiscal crisis” suggested solution of gutting stuff across the board.

The Reagan revolution was a failure, a complete and utter failure, a neocon delusion ending in a cultural slump of viscid mediocrity, reaching its nadir with George W Bush, 9.11 and Dick B. Cheney.

For America to move forward, it must renounce everything Reagan, not embrace it.

But the great trojan’s handlers know better, so Reagan it is, anything to sell the soap…

Only because it was a convenient way to frustrate the Soviets…who by the co-opted some of those organizations. Reagan used Poland.

Obama suffered from the outcome of the 60’s and 70’s with his use of drugs. Hell, so did many of us. I understand why he runs away from it but not the direction he takes.

Reagan made it completely acceptable to be outwardly greedy and intolerant.

Good news for John Edwards. I just spent three days with my father (a WWII Vet, Teamster kind of guy) and a bunch of his pals, they are all(7 of them in their 8o’s) and all Teamsters. John Edwards message focused on the middle class, making it better for the next generation, not taking PAC MONEY, one million more jobs, is really resonating with this group of hard working older gents. They were all well aware of the media not covering his campaign.

Obama is ostensibly praising Reagan for reaching across the aisle to get things done, as Obama says he would do if elected president. But I question Obama’s version of history. Also, reaching across the aisle to pander to Republicans, who are against all the things Obama says he’s for, isn’t my idea of “change.”

God, for an actual Democrat on the Democratic presidential ticket. That would be nice. I plan on voting for her, or for John.