<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:34:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: [Classic NQ] What Hypocrite Obama Should Have Discussed in His Wesleyan Commencement Address : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-1111641</link>
		<dc:creator>[Classic NQ] What Hypocrite Obama Should Have Discussed in His Wesleyan Commencement Address : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-1111641</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BREAKING: Obama Land Deal with Rezko and Mutual Bank Subject of New Court Complaint : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-925241</link>
		<dc:creator>BREAKING: Obama Land Deal with Rezko and Mutual Bank Subject of New Court Complaint : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-925241</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About the Financial Institution Mentioned in the Sun-Times: Obama, Tony Rezko, Amrish Mahajan, the Kenwood Mansion &#38; Rita Rezko : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-891459</link>
		<dc:creator>About the Financial Institution Mentioned in the Sun-Times: Obama, Tony Rezko, Amrish Mahajan, the Kenwood Mansion &#38; Rita Rezko : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-891459</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CORROBORATED: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-862677</link>
		<dc:creator>CORROBORATED: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-862677</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-807122</link>
		<dc:creator>Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-807122</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;CHICAGO MACHINE&#8221; : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-763182</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;CHICAGO MACHINE&#8221; : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-763182</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Clemons on Tonight&#8217;s Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BernieO</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114735</link>
		<dc:creator>BernieO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114735</guid>
		<description>Funny how this gets overlooked by the media. They are really on his side, at least for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how this gets overlooked by the media. They are really on his side, at least for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Gard</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114575</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Gard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114575</guid>
		<description>Obama can&#039;t hammer too much on Hillary for taking funds raised by Norman Hsu, as he received contributions from Mr. Hsu as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama can&#8217;t hammer too much on Hillary for taking funds raised by Norman Hsu, as he received contributions from Mr. Hsu as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BernieO</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114521</link>
		<dc:creator>BernieO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114521</guid>
		<description>Since Obama is all about a different kind of politics, not the bickering of the past that he so decries, isn&#039;t his &quot;kicking butt&quot; a repudiation of what is so appealing about him to so many? Seems to me like he is undercutting his own message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Obama is all about a different kind of politics, not the bickering of the past that he so decries, isn&#8217;t his &#8220;kicking butt&#8221; a repudiation of what is so appealing about him to so many? Seems to me like he is undercutting his own message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcricket</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114519</link>
		<dc:creator>jcricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114519</guid>
		<description>Jay,
Then certainly we cannot blame you if you do your reading elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,<br />
Then certainly we cannot blame you if you do your reading elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114478</guid>
		<description>This post, is evidence, that Obama kicked butt last night. Everything I&#039;ve read here drips of incoherent desperation. 

Obama 08&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post, is evidence, that Obama kicked butt last night. Everything I&#8217;ve read here drips of incoherent desperation. </p>
<p>Obama 08&#8242;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114467</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114467</guid>
		<description>I was singularly unimpressed with Obama last night.  I felt that, as Clinton pointed out, every time he was attacked on his record, he came up with a lame excuse.  As much as I instinctively dislike Clinton, she was sharp, focused, on target, and had well thought out positions on every issue discussed.  My preference is Edwards, but besides being largely ignored, I didn&#039;t think he was very effective when he did get a chance to speak.

I fear we are facing a Clinton/McCain race in the fall, and it will be very tough for a Democrat to win that contest.  Clinton is correct that it will be about National Security, and frankly her record doesn&#039;t provide enough clear difference with McCain to inspire the kind of mass turnout we need to defeat the Republican machine.  I think she would do much better than Obama though.  Obama has the capacity to become the next Dukakis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was singularly unimpressed with Obama last night.  I felt that, as Clinton pointed out, every time he was attacked on his record, he came up with a lame excuse.  As much as I instinctively dislike Clinton, she was sharp, focused, on target, and had well thought out positions on every issue discussed.  My preference is Edwards, but besides being largely ignored, I didn&#8217;t think he was very effective when he did get a chance to speak.</p>
<p>I fear we are facing a Clinton/McCain race in the fall, and it will be very tough for a Democrat to win that contest.  Clinton is correct that it will be about National Security, and frankly her record doesn&#8217;t provide enough clear difference with McCain to inspire the kind of mass turnout we need to defeat the Republican machine.  I think she would do much better than Obama though.  Obama has the capacity to become the next Dukakis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BernieO</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114454</link>
		<dc:creator>BernieO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114454</guid>
		<description>I still do not understand why the Clinton campaign does not hammer Obama for not holding any policy meetings of the Foreign Relations Subcommitte on European Affairs, which he chairs. Does anyone have an idea why this is not a big deal? It seems to me that after the Democrats took over last year and Obama got the chair of that committee he would have gone out of his way to use it to begin to repair our tattered relationship with our European allies as well as learn more about these issues, get to know the leaders etc. to better prepare himself to be president. That he did not bother at all looks like the actions of a man who is a bit of a slacker. 
Can anyone speak to this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still do not understand why the Clinton campaign does not hammer Obama for not holding any policy meetings of the Foreign Relations Subcommitte on European Affairs, which he chairs. Does anyone have an idea why this is not a big deal? It seems to me that after the Democrats took over last year and Obama got the chair of that committee he would have gone out of his way to use it to begin to repair our tattered relationship with our European allies as well as learn more about these issues, get to know the leaders etc. to better prepare himself to be president. That he did not bother at all looks like the actions of a man who is a bit of a slacker.<br />
Can anyone speak to this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob h</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114409</link>
		<dc:creator>bob h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114409</guid>
		<description>With Hillary, it will be Giuliani Time on Republicans this Fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Hillary, it will be Giuliani Time on Republicans this Fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Murder</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114274</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Murder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/01/21/steve-clemons-on-tonights-debate/#comment-114274</guid>
		<description>You cannot cut the rates, we don&#039;t need 50 cent on the dollar buyouts of the underwriting creditors, either.

&lt;strong&gt;Instead table new payment plan for loans based upon a cap formula&lt;/strong&gt;.

The &lt;em&gt;more on time payments you make, the less your payment becomes, extended additionally, with incentive reward interest&lt;/em&gt;.

This can even be shaped to reflect cyclical concerns within markets that feature cyclical work and production surges for rural or factory regions, in accordance with other lending value from said institutions as well(school or car loans).

Since it&#039;s a cap formula the bank wouldn&#039;t have to count some its lower loans, an incentive to distribute across the spectrum and evaluate fairly, and the loan rewards would give incentives in both to meet more equitable payment arrangements.

Loans reaching critical stages could have their deferred counting costs applied to the upper cap structure in three year deferments restructures, provided they accompany adequate job creation numbers to insure extra market value or meet other evaluative norms.

It&#039;s not that we lose money, we just extend it over a longer span of time, and can apply rich interactive terms to them that stimulate demand and incentive supply of them to people best able to work with the bank at both ends of the buyer/lender transaction.

Win-win situation, although the payment scale will shape out differently. Reducing some of the volatility can probably shape better results, without discouraging market activity to static levels.

Meanwhile, world markets are tanking. Bush went to the Mid East wanting loans for the tax cut as a way to rally GOP election chances and background his State of the Union. The Saudis told the warmonger where to go.

He hoped to put the blank check to the tax deal, one that still overlooks 28% of taxpayers, and do it on IOU&#039;s from overseas. Now he&#039;s asking Asian markets to match, many places already vested in production of jobs outsourced from us. The constraints on purchase here and the tense background of many emerging market sectors there aren&#039;t meeting expectations, based on the currency juncture resulting from weakened dollars and diminished earnings.

This may be the one chance James Baker can kick back in and pulse the phone lines. It would be unique to see how someone like John Edwards could perhaps benefit from some of that based on prior proxy interests that parallel their foreign policy discussions at places like the Bilderburg Group meetings...

Dubya having to see daddy&#039;s consigliere undo his mess, and do it be working with parallel interests from emerging democratic majorities.

Irony is thy name, translated as schadenfreude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot cut the rates, we don&#8217;t need 50 cent on the dollar buyouts of the underwriting creditors, either.</p>
<p><strong>Instead table new payment plan for loans based upon a cap formula</strong>.</p>
<p>The <em>more on time payments you make, the less your payment becomes, extended additionally, with incentive reward interest</em>.</p>
<p>This can even be shaped to reflect cyclical concerns within markets that feature cyclical work and production surges for rural or factory regions, in accordance with other lending value from said institutions as well(school or car loans).</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s a cap formula the bank wouldn&#8217;t have to count some its lower loans, an incentive to distribute across the spectrum and evaluate fairly, and the loan rewards would give incentives in both to meet more equitable payment arrangements.</p>
<p>Loans reaching critical stages could have their deferred counting costs applied to the upper cap structure in three year deferments restructures, provided they accompany adequate job creation numbers to insure extra market value or meet other evaluative norms.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that we lose money, we just extend it over a longer span of time, and can apply rich interactive terms to them that stimulate demand and incentive supply of them to people best able to work with the bank at both ends of the buyer/lender transaction.</p>
<p>Win-win situation, although the payment scale will shape out differently. Reducing some of the volatility can probably shape better results, without discouraging market activity to static levels.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, world markets are tanking. Bush went to the Mid East wanting loans for the tax cut as a way to rally GOP election chances and background his State of the Union. The Saudis told the warmonger where to go.</p>
<p>He hoped to put the blank check to the tax deal, one that still overlooks 28% of taxpayers, and do it on IOU&#8217;s from overseas. Now he&#8217;s asking Asian markets to match, many places already vested in production of jobs outsourced from us. The constraints on purchase here and the tense background of many emerging market sectors there aren&#8217;t meeting expectations, based on the currency juncture resulting from weakened dollars and diminished earnings.</p>
<p>This may be the one chance James Baker can kick back in and pulse the phone lines. It would be unique to see how someone like John Edwards could perhaps benefit from some of that based on prior proxy interests that parallel their foreign policy discussions at places like the Bilderburg Group meetings&#8230;</p>
<p>Dubya having to see daddy&#8217;s consigliere undo his mess, and do it be working with parallel interests from emerging democratic majorities.</p>
<p>Irony is thy name, translated as schadenfreude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
