Finished your daily rounds of trolling yet?

All you need to know about winning the propaganda wars is in the Constitution.

Of course law should always address the new thechnologies.

It isnt always about fairness, sometimes people are banned or censored in the way Cheney would go after terrorists, say, because he’s so fearful, any disagreement is a threat, so he goes for what is most obvious, the blanket paranoid approach, defeating himself. Most site administrators cant recognize a real troll.

Someone who disagrees is not a troll, say, someone who constantly steers the site toward hopelessness, or paranoia, or specious reasoning most likely is…Trolls have a very hard time explaining their reasoning.

They post more to affect mood, adversely,their simple minded army techniques, showing. Some site admins cant tell the difference between an honest colorful discussion, and manipulation, the worst of the trolls are left to romp, uninhibited.

Sort of like the AIDS virus, some site administrators kill the immune system, unknowlingly, leaving the virus free to control.

–approximately 6,500 people showed up for the rally. Hardly an empty stadium…

–umm…Obama was not there. This was billed as a rally with Michelle Obama, Oprah, et al. and Maria Shriver was a surprise guest. His rallies have repeatedly drawn five-figure crowds–are you really somehow suggesting that his popularity isn’t all that his campaign claims? The facts are stacked against you. I was planning to go to the rally in Boston last night but got a call from a friend who was already there–apparently the line stretched over a mile, all the way across a bridge back into downtown Boston.

Why not stick to actual issues or facts as opposed to this kind of indulgent silliness?

It’s scary to think critically strategic decisions in regard to US position were made based upon the judgement of a man unable to properly reason.

I guess we will find out after they leave office.

Democrats aren’t perfect, in fact many are like their Republican counterparts.

But the best of the democrats, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr, Franklin Roosevlet, even Bill Clinton, that’s who I admire, for their open minded commitment to the American people, for their incisive, brilliant intellects.

It’s good politics, and it’s great leadership, a united, heterogeneous country is a strong country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_the_United_States

Military Donors Back Ron Paul & Obama
February 04, 2008 3:19 PM

The Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign cash, looks at the 2007 money-raising and finds the following:

In 2007, the 2008 presidential candidates raised $582.5 million and spent $481.2 million.

In the 4th quarter of 2007, individuals in the Army, Navy and Air Force made those branches of the armed services the No. 13, No. 18 and No. 21, contributing industries, respectively. War opponent Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, received the most from donors in the military, collecting at least $212,000 from them. Another war opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, was second with about $94,000.

Soldiers love Ron and Barack, and lobbyists love Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, the No. 1 recipient of lobbyist cash, receiving $823,000 in 2007 from the lobbying industry, which gave about $2.7 million overall.

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/1/27/72417/8822

That said, I have nothing against or for Oprah. I don’t watch her show, I find her largess programs particularly arrogant and condescending. It seems to me that kind of thing is saying, “look I’m rich and you’re not and I will toss you a few crumbs from the table of this incredibly wealthy person.” She earned her wealth, I know, it just doesn’t sit well with me when she’s acting like the Chatelaine of the Castle.

I don’t need her to tell me which books to read and I sure as hell don’t think she’s qualified to tell anyone how to vote. Maybe it’s just me being a cranky old lady again. But I didn’t like being condescended to when I was young either.