f8e8d298b0d3cb69f7d0

Thanks again, and keep up the hilarious articles!

Whatever happened to those halcyon bygone days of girly men? Or are “sissy boys/girls” some sort of equivalent transgender concoction?
Ah you kids and your sex changes!

Memo to Fish & Game: Inquire about this season’s fuckwit tags.

In your blog, you didn’t present anything that Obama hasn’t been open about, as far as his political positions. An anonymous source said that Obama has expressed general sympathy for the Palestinians, in an excerpt you quote. and sympathy for the Palestinians is a bad thing because…..?

I hope the people who want to give a try to this rather different kind of candidate will outnumber those who don’t. I think he has a better chance against McCain because of his style and personal skills and qualities. I’ve never thought Hillary could beat a Republican because of her many vulnerabilities and the not so cool way she’s handled attacks in the past. So my hopes are on Obama, and not naive about the attacks that are being planned and timed as skillfully as possible. Sometimes things work out in surprising ways that nobody predicted. We’ll see.

The plan is to out spend Hillary Clinton. Force her to compete with Barack Obama’s endless campaign dollars. Myth number two: Barack Obama is good at raising money.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Obama is not out raising Clinton; he has not had to spend any money in the same way Clinton has because the media is spending millions on anti-Clinton ads and propaganda. Clinton can’t say she as a cold without it showing up in the media, in big bold letters, “Hillary spreads more then her message.” Don’t think I am exaggerating. The other day, in her attempt to honor the words of her fallen heroes, the headlines noted “Hillary Hears Voices.” If she can fight through this endless one sided right-wing rooted attacks, she would have proved she has the “metal” to be president and will get my undivided support.

Barack Obama lost my support when he refused to acknowledge Clinton was being attacked by the MSM. Instead, he tallied up all the negative work and propaganda the right-wing attack dogs put out on Clinton has if he was beating her by himself. If he would of clarified “who” was attacking Clinton 24/7, I would remained an excited Obama supporter. Added to that is his constant reference to Republican politicians and Republican ideologies. Barack supporters act like no one has tried to unite in this way before. He is not a first; many have tried and many have failed.

Obama has to give the Republicans something for their handy work. Don’t forget, the one consistent thing Republicans are good for is greed. They are not helping Obama because he is Black. They don’t do the help the Black guy thing unless it has a return. Does the president of the United States sound like a nice return? I would think so.

Joseph

The owners of the media know that they can find lots of ways to sabotage both a woman whose husband was president and who is behaving rather obnoxiously lately… or a black man.

Demonization will be done….

Kucinich was the preferred candidate but he couldn’t even get into the debates which he deserved to do.

Edwards is a strong white man who threatened to stand up against the corporations.

Sadly the message in the above article is one which cannot be ignored… Obama and his people had better do something to overcome these things…the Republicans don’t play fair…never knew how..never will!

we do need hope and the hope is somehow the public will somehow respond to a democratic candidate and not buy into the republican dirt

The subtext to my post is why is Mahr, who came out for Obama a couple of weeks ago, fiddling with the origins of Obama’s slogan this week on HBO?

Admittedly it is a very small point.

Not so with Clinton.

Also, McCain has changed course so many times his “straight talk express” has run off the road and is running through a corn field destroying a crop of voters.

I wouldn’t be on this website, but for wondering who Barack Hussein Obama was and having to do research to learn anything about the enigma.

Just the fact that he wrote two crappy get rich quick books trying to cash-in on his speech giving powers shows how he’s all about the money yet even these contrived books contain enough reasons to not vote for him.

Add Barack Hussein Obama’s asking Antonin Rezko for a mansion and he’s just a vote for puttng the corrupt Daley machine in the White House.

At least the Bushies pretend to care, but not these flat out crooks from Illinois. It’s all one big pay to play for them. They make Arizona look lame.

The Charlatan from Chicago is an opportunist and the lambs are being drawn to the altar only to be slaughtered by Rove & Co in the fall.

Texas gave us the burning Bush, but I’ll love them if they save us from Obama!

The Texas Primary is MARCH 4. MARCH 4, and I wonder how many Texas voters know about Obama’s deep, personal ties to a crook like Tony Rezko. I’d say, not enough. So this needs to be aired above all in TEXAS. Needs to be shouted from the rooftops, how the original trial date–FEB. 25, which would have allowed full publicity of Rezko’s close association with Obama in plenty of time for Texas primary voters to understand its implications and eliminate Obama from serious consideration by Texas voters–has been instead moved up to THE DAY BEFORE THOSE PRIMARIES, and I bet won’t get any publicity (in Texas, anyway) even before the March 4 TX primary.

Seems like “Yes We Can” is to be the new mantra of corruption in the Democratic Party–and, should the superdelegates be so foolish as to pick Obama as their candidate rather than Hillary, will signal the true death knell for the Democratic Party. The publicity about Rezko, etc. will then come out–when it’s too late to take back the candidacy mantle from Obama–and McCain, now a pathetic lame-duck Republican candidate almost on a par with Huckabee–will win in a landslide.

And the Republican Party, now on life-support, will get a new lease on life that, right now, it only dares to hope that it will. Nice going, Karl…looks like you win again.

I have been commenting on this dynamic since Chris Matthews raised the question can Barack Obama beat Hillary Clinton. He then started his own campaign to make sure Obama did just that.

Recently, the media is making the point Obama has more money then Hillary Clinton. You would to if the media was taking your tap. Right now, if you put a price tag on how much the right-wing media is spending, on Obama’s behave, to see Clinton defeated, you would have enough to run two presidential campaigns. Obama does not have to spend a dime. The media has his back. My hats off to Larry for this article. The Obama hopefuls are like fascist leaders who want to kill any opposition. You better not say anything bad about Obama.

Joseph