You and Taylor Marsh share my nomination for the most Shrill Shill.

You might consider changing the name of your blog to ‘No Quarter to Obama”

This quote of yours, relative to your 2005 meeting with Clinton, is all I needed to hear to know that you’re really a dope.

“Sadly, much of my initial opinion about Senator Clinton was based on the filth I had heard about her lack of character and private behavior.”

Anyone who would take the least bit seriously the nonsense proffered during the 1990s by the multi-billion dollar Clinton hate industry has got to be a real dumb ass. And the more I read about you and what you write the more I am convinced that you are indeed a dumb ass.

Makes a tough case AGAINST Unrestricted Reproduction, doesn’t it?

If Obama becomes the nominee, I hope us Democrats aren’t going to throw up our hands and run around the room like scared little girly-men every time he makes a gaffe. Let’s put things into perspective:

Even though, thanks to Bush, the bar for misdeeds is much lower for Republicans, they will lose against a dead man.

Hillary may have used the words of others.

Late Update: Jake Tapper reports on the same conference call I referenced above:

I asked Clinton communications director Howard Wolfson and Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass, if they could assure the public that neither Clinton nor McGovern has ever done what Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, did when he used the rhetoric of Gov. Deval Patrick without footnoting him.

They would not.

In fact, Wolfson seemed to say it wouldn’t be as big a deal if it were discovered that Clinton had “lifted” such language.

“Sen. Clinton is not running on the strength of her rhetoric,” Wolfson said.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

“In a speech to the graduating class of the California Institute of Integral Studies, Walker urges that we not fear the pause that ‘wisdom requires’ when ’something major is accomplished,’ despite our eagerness to rush into ‘The Future.’”

- compared with her view of Obama,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3-9gq_htUo
“He knows he has what it takes, I know he has what it takes. Well the other people have had so much experience in misleading us, in disappointing us, and never telling us the truth hardly ever about why they’re doing things, so we don’t need any more of that.”

From the few other items I’ve read of Walker’s, she seems capable of offering useful insight. But in this case, she might want to use her own advice RE the pause that wisdom requires before rushing into the future.

Dismissing experience because other’s experience was used negatively, amounts to throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Let’s not lose focus here, people. This is the bigger issue. How a well-spoken candidate, with a glaringly similar campaign has done nothing but stumble his first year. Interesting that no media outlet has interviewed the good citizens of Mass. and asked them: “How’s Deval Patrick worked out for ya?” This really strengthens the contention that Obama at this point in time is the wrong person to be President. We don’t need an on-the-job trainee feeling his way around for the first year with the economy in the shape that it’s in.

To me, this is BIGGER than the words controversy that the Obamatons are already trivializing. Time to instill reasonable doubt in the voting populace. Deval Patrick’s example will do that. Maybe that’s the reason why the good people of Massachussetts went for Hillary in spite of Kennedy and Kerry.

You know, I understand that people can develop blind spots about their preferred candidate, can part company with logic in order to defend their candidate, but…

am I crazy to think that, for the most part, those supporting Hillary know what her faults are, what her weak points are, where she has been inconsistent – and can admit them in public. She’s the human candidate in the race – the one like all the rest of us who have never been perfect, have done things we regret, hae learned from our mistakes. We are people like this, we love people like this - these are our families.

What I see from Obama supporters is no willingness to see his flaws, or to even admit that he has flaws – so any questions are turned away because, well, Obama can do no wrong. Which makes him not human. Which means those that dare to question must be punished for their heresy.

What continues to astound me is the irony of someone who preaches (and yes, he does preach, and I’m getting really, really tired of the pastoral inflection and tone of his voice) unity and the end of bitterness, and who has the most divisive, bitter and cruel supporters out there. I just fail to see the positives in people getting out the long knives for those who do not support Obama – but I think the Obama supporters are completely and utterly irony-proof.

Susan, I applaud your willingness to take on the gangs roaming Daily Joke with their pitchforks and clubs, looking for errant Clinton supporters to beat up on and drive away. I always thought that to be progressive meant a willingness to listen and engage - this closed-mindedness that Obama has inspired in people does not bode well for the cause, does it?