Comments on: He Was Too Busy, But Hillary Got Help for Veterans [UPDATED x2]

By: mwejutxj

mwejutxj — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:22:16 +0000

VUE9w2 ynrpbfgweycy, [url=http://jxxoassdsegs.com/]jxxoassdsegs[/url], [link=http://djupduadxjyg.com/]djupduadxjyg[/link], http://bzixwvmsfbju.com/

By: Just Words, Just Speeches (+ TGIF Open Thread) : NO QUARTER

Just Words, Just Speeches (+ TGIF Open Thread) : NO QUARTER — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:04:36 +0000

[...] “He Was Too Busy, But Hillary Got Help for Veterans [UPDATED x2]“ [...]

By: Score One For Hillary « The Krile Files

Score One For Hillary « The Krile Files — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:43:30 +0000

[...] He Was Too Busy, But Hillary Got Help for Veterans [...]

By: Eurogirl70

Eurogirl70 — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:10:08 +0000

While I was at the gym, I listened to a part of Lou Dobbs which dealt with this very issue. Now before I go into what (2) members of the panel said, I must address first the sheer hypocrisy of the “progressive and MSM” outlets.

For the past 8 years there has been a cry from the left wing bloggers that the Democrat’s in Congress have provided no oversight. They have laid down and died in the face of a President with a 27% approval rating. They cried that Nancy Pelosi was a sellout for saying that impeachment was off the table.

Now, getting back to the Lou Dobbs show, Lou actually said that it was unconscionable that Barack Obama held not one committee hearing…

We here on this blog know that Obama likes the “trappings” of position. Being a subcommittee chair gives him prestige; another feather in his cap. But, when it is all said and done he uses every position as a spring board to something else. He doesn’t nor desire to do the “heavy lifting” required of someone in

So, It should come as no surprise then that the panelist from Politico.com and the New York Daily New found nothing wrong with Senator Obama not having held one committee hearing; after all in their words, nothing of any real substance comes out of these committee meetings to begin with.

Again, please explain to me the difference between inexcusable rationalization on the right and inexcusable rationalization on the left? Other than one has an (R) after it and the other a (D)

By: Nellie

Nellie — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:14:53 +0000

Susan,

Over at MyDD they are saying Hillary is droppin gout Friday. Is this true?

By: CognitiveDissonance

CognitiveDissonance — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:47:05 +0000

Nice try, but no cigar. If Obama gets elected after his slimy race-baiting for votes, his thuggish tactics against super delegates, his blatant use and approval of misogyny, and his disenfranchisement of FL and MI voters – the democratic party is going to be torn apart. I can just about guarantee that the resulting McCain Democrats will dwarf the number of Reagan Democrats.

By: apishapa

apishapa — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:42:49 +0000

Obama is the one saying “I am not a liberal” . Hillary has never turned against her liberal roots. Obama is the one who keeps talking about how he will “unite” the country (code for move to the RIGHT). Obama is the one preaching to Democrats about not being “religious” enough. Obama is the one who drags homophobic preachers on his campaign trail. Obama is the candidate who is working to attract Republican voters into the Democratic Party nomination process and bragging about it. Obama is not going to bring us Universal Health Care.

He isn’t even going to try. Obama isn’t going to do a damned thing for democrats. Obama is not going to deliver a unified country. He is lazy and he doesn’t care. He just delivers the same old reruns of other peoples’ speeches again and again. He is going to lose the election for us.

By: BernieO

BernieO — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:26:29 +0000

How can you say that? He is bipartisan. There is a big difference! When Obama compromises it is bipartisan and when the Clintons do it is triangulation. Got that? You need a copy of “the Obama Rules”.

By: ChrisXP

ChrisXP — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:33:43 +0000

Precisely.

Cafferty is bending over backwards to not be considered racist (or anti-semitic). Same applies to every other so-called journalist. The backlash from every special interest group could cost them their jobs.

For what? Talking about race and ethnicity without the PCness.

By: AF

AF — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:25:26 +0000

The white pundits are too afraid to aske these questions even in the privacy of their own office. Whites, especially older whites not as accustomed to interacting with people of color, will dismiss any concerns about Nation of Islam staffers because they want to prove they’re not racist.

Which is exactly why MSNBC and other big corporations need diversity in the newsroom! So reporters of color can ask the questions the whites are afraid to do! CNN has done a better job on this point, but they’ve got some Obama cheerleaders on their panels.

By: ChrisXP

ChrisXP — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:56:52 +0000

What I found astonishing, from being biracial myself, is that he literally decided to cut off his white identity. That’s not possible without hating yourself. You can identify more with one side than another, but to deny the other self, is like a puzzle missing half it’s pieces — and what folks will get is but an actor playing a part.

Folks can see the same dichotomy with his religious affiliation, too.

By: AF

AF — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:49:52 +0000

To some, the more establishment somebody is, the less progressive they must be. It's counterintuitive to these folks, but on the Drumm Major Institute's Middle Class Scorecard: Obama: 75, C Clinton: 100, A

By: Andy

Andy — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:46:08 +0000

It might come as a surprise to you but Obama is even a bigger triangulator. He will sell out in a NY second to the republicans as he has done for example in the Exelon case. I happen to believe it is better to pass no bill than a really bad one.

By: Andy

Andy — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:45:30 +0000

It might come as a surprise to you but Obama is even a bigger triangulator. He will sell out in a NY second to the republicans as he has done for example in the Exelon case. I happen to believ it is better to pass no bill than a really bad one.

By: rwc

rwc — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:42:03 +0000

The American Conservative piece is a interesting one to be sure and if its even half-correct in its analysis of Obama, he’s not a person you want anywhere near the levers of power. The man is nursing some serious grudges and hate once you get beyond his flowery rhetoric and obscurantism.

Bush is bad, but Obama promises to much worse if elected given his psychological baggage.