For the past 8 years there has been a cry from the left wing bloggers that the Democrat’s in Congress have provided no oversight. They have laid down and died in the face of a President with a 27% approval rating. They cried that Nancy Pelosi was a sellout for saying that impeachment was off the table.

Now, getting back to the Lou Dobbs show, Lou actually said that it was unconscionable that Barack Obama held not one committee hearing…

We here on this blog know that Obama likes the “trappings” of position. Being a subcommittee chair gives him prestige; another feather in his cap. But, when it is all said and done he uses every position as a spring board to something else. He doesn’t nor desire to do the “heavy lifting” required of someone in

So, It should come as no surprise then that the panelist from Politico.com and the New York Daily New found nothing wrong with Senator Obama not having held one committee hearing; after all in their words, nothing of any real substance comes out of these committee meetings to begin with.

Again, please explain to me the difference between inexcusable rationalization on the right and inexcusable rationalization on the left? Other than one has an (R) after it and the other a (D)

Over at MyDD they are saying Hillary is droppin gout Friday. Is this true?

He isn’t even going to try. Obama isn’t going to do a damned thing for democrats. Obama is not going to deliver a unified country. He is lazy and he doesn’t care. He just delivers the same old reruns of other peoples’ speeches again and again. He is going to lose the election for us.

Cafferty is bending over backwards to not be considered racist (or anti-semitic). Same applies to every other so-called journalist. The backlash from every special interest group could cost them their jobs.

For what? Talking about race and ethnicity without the PCness.

Which is exactly why MSNBC and other big corporations need diversity in the newsroom! So reporters of color can ask the questions the whites are afraid to do! CNN has done a better job on this point, but they’ve got some Obama cheerleaders on their panels.

Folks can see the same dichotomy with his religious affiliation, too.

Obama: 75, C

Clinton: 100, A

Bush is bad, but Obama promises to much worse if elected given his psychological baggage.

So you really think Obama is going to push a liberal agenda down the throats of the elected officials in Washington because he’s got this movement?

Seeing is believing!!!

However, these Obama words seem to be ones he tried to distance himself from for Texas:

“Senator Clinton made an unfortunate remark, an ill-advised remark, about King and Lyndon Johnson. I didn’t make the statement,” Obama said in a conference call with reporters. “I haven’t remarked on it. And she, I think, offended some folks who felt that somehow diminished King’s role in bringing about the Civil Rights Act. She is free to explain that. But the notion that somehow this is our doing is ludicrous.”

Has he repeated his opinion in Texas?

Yes, the personnel will change – even in the White House. But the commands will remain. And this permanent, force-projecting base is of course just the icing on the imperial cake in the region; the U.S. military already has its boots in the ground all over the area, as the newspaper notes:

Col. Michael A. Carroll, USARCENT’s chief of staff, said the command has a footprint in 22 of the area’s 27 countries, where it conducts theater security engagements, peacekeeping and exercises with other militaries. [Not to mention a couple of good ole shootin' wars.]
http://www.chris-floyd.com/