Ben wrote:
———————————————————————————————————-
Come on Obama, keep it interesting! Why not deny that anyone named Goolsbee works for you? Why not deny that CTV ever made the broadcast? Why not deny the existence of Canada? At least that would have been interesting. —– Does anyone still believe that this man will usher in a new age of anything?
———————————————————————————————————-

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Barack vs Hillary Analysis
The Home Stretch- Hillary’s Personal Alamo:

http://newsusa.myfeedportal.com/viewarticle.php?articleid=53

by D. Cupples | In Ohio last Tuesday (Feb 26), Barack Obama told a debate-audience that he favors opting out of NAFTA if the agreement isn’t re-negotiated so as to help more Americans keep their jobs. The next day, CTV reported: Within the last month,…

This will lead to a dangerous situation for the nation when it comes to foreign policies. Guys if obama discusses with foreign government without having a debate with congressmen and senators as he did on NAFTA. It will be just his hidden agenda that you will see

No politician even the aboriginal tribal leaders will not discuss the internal economic factors with foreign governments unless they debate among parlament and congress to reach conclusions.

This act seems to be a rediculous! Think about what he will be talking to Iran and Iraq folks?

Thus, Hillary is wise to also say nothing is off the table. A CiC will have to make trying decisions, and sometimes wars are necessary.

If anyone claims that all wars can be avoided, can definitely be disregarded as being disconnected from reality. Mankind has had wars since the dawn of time, and will have wars to the end of time.

We just like to avoid them as they’re pretty expensive!

I’m more interested in winning the election (forget the DNC nomination), even if it takes running over O-Bomba with his short NAFTA bus to do so.

Either fight the fight, or just give McCain the election. It’s that simple. No win, the party will disintergrate anyhow over blaming everyone but themselves for picking the loser.

Just being mad or singing one to sleep isn’t enough. ACTION is what matters.

He agreed with a comment from someone today that having a “black” president would be more significant than having a “female” president. I don’t get that either.

Quite honestly, the dishonety, the unfairness, the lies, the distortions, the misogony the Clinton-hating from left and right has me so depressed I wonder if I even care anymore.

I will vote, just because I always do as a civic duty, but I will not vote for Obama if he is the nominee, I could not vote for McCain. So if worst comes to worse I’ll just write in Hillary Clinton and vote for any other Democrat I think worthwhile.
Wonder how many of them will turn out to be back-stabbing, Blue Dog Democrats who wouldn’t know a progressive idea if it bit them in the ass. Like “The One”. Gag!

BTW, we also can’t go into China to “teach them a lesson” by force alone

Anyone who thinks in this manner should be immediately disregarded.

As if the concept of asymmetrical war is non existent, they’re either incredibly ignorant, or baiting you into unwise action.

Chavez had his tanks move to the Colombian border yesterday, in answer to an assassination that occurred in Ecuador.

Doesn’t it occur to those idiots they’re being baited? Are they so inept, so stupid, so unsophisticated, they can only respond in a knee jerk manner with the weapon?

Not much ability to think, there, is there?

This one was a no brainer from the start.

I obtained this from the blog “No Quarter” by Larry Johnson and Susan. All credit for making this public on their blog belongs to them. Also, check “No Quarter” for further explanation.

New York Times/A.P. confirmed Obama economic adviser, Austan Goolsbee, contacted the Canadian consulate in Chicago in regard to Obama’s public remarks about opting out of NAFTA. According to CTV.ca, Goolsbeen “said that when Senator Obama talks about opting out of the free trade deal, the Canadian government shouldn’t worry. The operative said it was just campaign rhetoric.”
The A.P. has obtained the actual memorandum produced by the Canadian consulate as a record of its meeting. That Canadian consulate-prepared memorandum, which Goolsbee denies is accurate, states:
“Noting anxiety among many U.S. domestic audiences about the U.S. economic outlook, Goolsbee candidly acknowledged the protectionist sentiment that has emerged, particularly in the Midwest, during the primary campaign. He cautioned that this messaging should not be taken out of context and should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.” […]
The memo obtained by the AP was widely distributed within the Canadian government. It is more than 1,300 words and covers many topics that DeMora said were discussed in the Feb. 8 ”introductory meeting” between himself, Goolsbee and the consul general in Chicago, Georges Rioux.
Goolsbee ”was frank in saying that the primary campaign has been necessarily domestically focused, particularly in the Midwest, and that much of the rhetoric that may be perceived to be protectionist is more reflective of political maneuvering than policy,” the memo’s introduction said. ”On NAFTA, Goolsbee suggested that Obama is less about fundamentally changing the agreement and more in favour of strengthening/clarifying language on labour mobility and environment and trying to establish these as more `core’ principles of the agreement.”

See actual memorandum for specifics [link above].