Did Rezko pay big-bucks bribe for Iraqi contract?

Media Protects Hillary’s Role in Bill Clinton’s Civil Fraud Case in Los Angeles
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!

As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama admits he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has donated to charity rather than keep
Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton, Grammy’s producer Gary Smith and Clinton intimate and fundraiser Jim Levin, for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000, which has been pending in Los Angeles since 2003, and now preparing for a November, 2008 trial has NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.
Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals relating to her efforts to use of First Amendment protections from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations to be extricated as a defendant after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004.
Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.

Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.
The media – except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.

In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.

Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!

Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
Wednesday ~ March 03, 2008 by Intermeddler Posted in “Ed Rendell”, “hillary uncensored”, tony rezko| No Comments

If I published all my photos of famous folks how would that establish a “relationship”?
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to have 10 year relationship with 2 former presidents I have photos with.

My bank account would love the photo I have with Bill Gates. My music career would be a big benefit because I have hundreds of photos.

I’ve done radio for about a decade and it allowed me to interview a plethora of people. I want to get all the perks of those many years of “RELATIONSHIPS”.

Imagine if I could do that, wow. Sting, Rolling Stones, ZZTop, and so many more. But alas they are simply photos.

I’d hate to see them be smeared by their “relationship” with me. I’m a loudmouth scot who doesn’t take shit, so I’m sure the Dalai Lama would burn in hell over the photo with him.

The big thing is the ten-foot strip purchase. That might have made the property to small to build anything other than a single-family home on due to setback and landmark requirements in the city. The whole thing stinks and might not be illegal, but it sure isn’t a “new kind of politics”. The Dem machine has been doing this in Chicago for decades.

The Times piece is excellent. It is shameful that except for some of the Chicago’s journalists and their pieces in Chicago papers; a foreign media paper is the only MSM doing any serious investigative reporting.

I don;t know where did I read that the owner asking price for the 2 lots together (before “the magic split”) was about 2.2M .

Does anyone know or has heard about this? (Help)

Thank you for bringing us this post !!

grannyhelen had asked before why Obama was spending all of Thursday in Chicago. Now we know why: Rezko damage control.

Describing one’s past action as a, “boneheaded move,” does nothing to inspire confidence in one’s judgment, in my view.

“Ooops! Launched those Minutemen III’s because of a flock of geese! My bad! What a boneheaded move on MY part!”

I stand by my December prediction: by 15 April, Senator Hope-a-Dope will be old news, below the fold.

My pics of JC and me in FL in 1976 and my invitation to a White House thing in ‘78 are the only things in the house I’d carry out if it caught fire.

“And that real estate transaction, it was “a boneheaded move.” No one wants to pay attention to Rezko, and for some reason, Obama’s answers all contain the word “bone.” Surely, there’s a skeleton somewhere.”

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2008/03/i-dont-think-it-is-fair-to-suggest.html