<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;A loss of cataclysmic and historical proportions is afoot!&#8221; [Update]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DancingOpossum</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-270528</link>
		<dc:creator>DancingOpossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-270528</guid>
		<description>Over at mydd, where this was posted. the desperadoes are screeching that it doesn't matter if BO loses Mass, Ohio, and PA, because he will win North Carolina and Virginia. HAHAHAHAHA

I say five states total, that's all he takes. I'd bet money on it. Not quite as bad as McGovern, but not a hell of a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at mydd, where this was posted. the desperadoes are screeching that it doesn&#8217;t matter if BO loses Mass, Ohio, and PA, because he will win North Carolina and Virginia. HAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>I say five states total, that&#8217;s all he takes. I&#8217;d bet money on it. Not quite as bad as McGovern, but not a hell of a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karma</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-269198</link>
		<dc:creator>Karma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-269198</guid>
		<description>Your comment reminded me of all those news stories dedicated to seeing if she was really taking this Senator stuff seriously.  Or just biding her time until she could run for President (like Obama really did...). 

I remember footage of her sitting there focused on the subject at hand.  She had less make-up, hair was flat, and with unflattering angles looking tired at times.

They hounded her for weeks, so there were a lot of those less make-up, tired shots.

However, I don't remember THAT type of attention paid to what the rock star young Senator from the Convention was doing, day in and day out.  I even paid attention due to being impressed with his Convention speech.  Of course, all we got were the interviews of him explaining why he was towing the line and being a coward on the war he 'opposed'.

So now, months later, long after he is running for Pres, we finally get to hear in the NYT, Sen Specter discussing Obama's real work ethic, breezing into commitees and asking questions about already settled issues to make it look like he did something.  To the point that even the ever generous Sen Kennedy had to tell him to cool it.  Then there are the other reports of him in Illinois and Wash DC taking credit for people's work.  Or stepping in front of the mic at press conferences to stuff his name into the credits...yuck.

He is completely uninspiring compared to the hard work and dedication that Hillary had put in.  Despite the news trying to catch her being lazy, all they could manage was a lookism report because she was doing the hard work.  And Obama they gave him the soft touch, even then.  Obama is Dubya-2, in so many ways it is disturbing.

Thanks for reminding me of the difference in coverage of their first months in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment reminded me of all those news stories dedicated to seeing if she was really taking this Senator stuff seriously.  Or just biding her time until she could run for President (like Obama really did&#8230;). </p>
<p>I remember footage of her sitting there focused on the subject at hand.  She had less make-up, hair was flat, and with unflattering angles looking tired at times.</p>
<p>They hounded her for weeks, so there were a lot of those less make-up, tired shots.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t remember THAT type of attention paid to what the rock star young Senator from the Convention was doing, day in and day out.  I even paid attention due to being impressed with his Convention speech.  Of course, all we got were the interviews of him explaining why he was towing the line and being a coward on the war he &#8216;opposed&#8217;.</p>
<p>So now, months later, long after he is running for Pres, we finally get to hear in the NYT, Sen Specter discussing Obama&#8217;s real work ethic, breezing into commitees and asking questions about already settled issues to make it look like he did something.  To the point that even the ever generous Sen Kennedy had to tell him to cool it.  Then there are the other reports of him in Illinois and Wash DC taking credit for people&#8217;s work.  Or stepping in front of the mic at press conferences to stuff his name into the credits&#8230;yuck.</p>
<p>He is completely uninspiring compared to the hard work and dedication that Hillary had put in.  Despite the news trying to catch her being lazy, all they could manage was a lookism report because she was doing the hard work.  And Obama they gave him the soft touch, even then.  Obama is Dubya-2, in so many ways it is disturbing.</p>
<p>Thanks for reminding me of the difference in coverage of their first months in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-268442</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-268442</guid>
		<description>When the Bluest State isn't polled heavily for the democrat it is a very bad omen. They recognize Deval Patrick's speeches in Obama. Fool me once.

Dismal Failure, Patrick is. SO dismal, even Kennedy couldn't carry Mass for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Bluest State isn&#8217;t polled heavily for the democrat it is a very bad omen. They recognize Deval Patrick&#8217;s speeches in Obama. Fool me once.</p>
<p>Dismal Failure, Patrick is. SO dismal, even Kennedy couldn&#8217;t carry Mass for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-187486</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-187486</guid>
		<description>Anyone notice before all the "Reforms" were instituted by the party, superior general election candidates came out of the nominating process vis a vis after so-called reforms?

"Super Delegates" LOL ... who're responsible for that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone notice before all the &#8220;Reforms&#8221; were instituted by the party, superior general election candidates came out of the nominating process vis a vis after so-called reforms?</p>
<p>&#8220;Super Delegates&#8221; LOL &#8230; who&#8217;re responsible for that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-187466</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-187466</guid>
		<description>I know this is a late posting .... I'm in Boston and without question from my vantage point Obama is going to lose the general election by historic epic proportions ... WTF is going on with the Democratic party? First Kerry now this ... are they insane? A death wish? Do the insiders secretly work for the GOP?

What deluded moron in their right mind truely believes Obama has even a remote chance of winning a general election especialy after all the racial stuff (black racism not white) and other highly questionable associations? How deluded and blind can one be?

Why is the Democratic party a slave (no pun intended) to racial issues and the race card? What's the root of this obsession among the party true believers and white upper class liberal radical chic elite?

This is getting old real fast</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a late posting &#8230;. I&#8217;m in Boston and without question from my vantage point Obama is going to lose the general election by historic epic proportions &#8230; WTF is going on with the Democratic party? First Kerry now this &#8230; are they insane? A death wish? Do the insiders secretly work for the GOP?</p>
<p>What deluded moron in their right mind truely believes Obama has even a remote chance of winning a general election especialy after all the racial stuff (black racism not white) and other highly questionable associations? How deluded and blind can one be?</p>
<p>Why is the Democratic party a slave (no pun intended) to racial issues and the race card? What&#8217;s the root of this obsession among the party true believers and white upper class liberal radical chic elite?</p>
<p>This is getting old real fast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ouch! Those Are Hard Facts! : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-165380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ouch! Those Are Hard Facts! : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-165380</guid>
		<description>[...] “A loss of cataclysmic and historical proportions is afoot!” [Update] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “A loss of cataclysmic and historical proportions is afoot!” [Update] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaleA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-164186</link>
		<dc:creator>DaleA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-164186</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wondered at the time who he was willing to throw off the bus to get elected. It looks as though it could be everybody except himself, Michelle and their 2 daughters.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If I were the daughters I wouldn't be on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wondered at the time who he was willing to throw off the bus to get elected. It looks as though it could be everybody except himself, Michelle and their 2 daughters.</p></blockquote>
<p>If I were the daughters I wouldn&#8217;t be on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-164108</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-164108</guid>
		<description>Gregoryp,


I see your point, but McCain in office is unbearable, if not a forgone conclusion already. I have to vote against him, and after I do, rip the DNC and our "leaders" in the party a new one regarding their failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregoryp,</p>
<p>I see your point, but McCain in office is unbearable, if not a forgone conclusion already. I have to vote against him, and after I do, rip the DNC and our &#8220;leaders&#8221; in the party a new one regarding their failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apishapa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-164103</link>
		<dc:creator>apishapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-164103</guid>
		<description>But, but, but...&lt;em&gt;it was the greatest speech in the history of the WORLD&lt;/em&gt; . I read that in the Post and the Times and all over the intertubes and I'll bet Olberman said so, too (I don't watch him and more). Matthews cried, and Sullivan peed his pants. It was &lt;em&gt;glorious&lt;/em&gt;.

Or so I heard. I watched a few minuted. I thought he looked phony and desperate. THe incredlble charisma seemed to be deflated. I was uninspired, but there's something wrong with me. I'm probably just a typical white woman, and getting a little long in the tooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, but, but&#8230;<em>it was the greatest speech in the history of the WORLD</em> . I read that in the Post and the Times and all over the intertubes and I&#8217;ll bet Olberman said so, too (I don&#8217;t watch him and more). Matthews cried, and Sullivan peed his pants. It was <em>glorious</em>.</p>
<p>Or so I heard. I watched a few minuted. I thought he looked phony and desperate. THe incredlble charisma seemed to be deflated. I was uninspired, but there&#8217;s something wrong with me. I&#8217;m probably just a typical white woman, and getting a little long in the tooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campskunk</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/comment-page-1/#comment-164089</link>
		<dc:creator>campskunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/a-loss-of-cataclysmic-and-historical-proportions-is-afoot/#comment-164089</guid>
		<description>us old folks remember the watergate-era "Don't blame me -- I'm from Massachusetts" bumper stickers. nixon won everything except DC and massachusetts in 1972. that's how bad this is. we're talking winning less than 50 electoral votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>us old folks remember the watergate-era &#8220;Don&#8217;t blame me &#8212; I&#8217;m from Massachusetts&#8221; bumper stickers. nixon won everything except DC and massachusetts in 1972. that&#8217;s how bad this is. we&#8217;re talking winning less than 50 electoral votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
