The 2008 Weblog Awards
Vote for NoQuarter, finalists for "Best Political Coverage"!
You can vote every day.
No registration required!


RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

A Term of Endearment: Rev. James Meeks

The day after Barack Obama decisively won the Democratic primary for US Senate he took the time to stop by good friend and spiritual advisor James Meeks’ church to attend Bible study. “I know that he’s a person of prayer,” Meeks says. “The night after the election, he was the hottest thing going from Galesburg to Rockford. He did all the TV shows, and all the morning news, but his last stop at night was for church. He came by to say thank you, and he came by for prayer.”

Now an event like this shouldn’t cause any alarm with anyone. Politicians regularly spend some of their free time recharging their political batteries by immersing them selves in spiritual matters. Obama is surely not alone there. But most politicians don’t hang out with “men of god” who regularly call the mayor of their city a “slave master”, call other pastors and politicians “house niggers” and white people that don’t vote for him “racists.” But then again, you might not know Obama’s other spiritual advisor, supporter and superdelegate: State Senator Reverend James Meeks.

Harsh Words

Per pulpit video from July 5 Rev. James Meeks states, “We don’t have slave masters. We got mayors. But they still the same white people who are presiding over systems where black people are not able, or to be educated.”

“Is it fair to compare Mayor Daley, him and the governor, to slave masters?” CBS 2’s Mike Flannery asked.

“They do the same thing. They preside over systems where they have the control of the lives of African-American and Hispanic people,” Meeks replied.

Who does this sound an awful lot like? That’s right, another Obama “spiritual advisor” Reverend Jeremiah Wright. The racist bigot that blames 9/11 on America, that believes we should be singing God Damn America, that says the USA is just like Al Qaeda and the guy that blames all the ills of the world on white people.

Notice a pattern here?

“You got some preachers that are House Niggers. You got some elected officials that are House Niggers. And rather than them trying to break this up, they gonna fight you to protect this white man,” Meeks said in the sermon tape.

In his interview with Flannery on Friday, Meeks said, “The word nigger is not in the African-American community a bad word.
It’s a term of endearment. And I don’t see it as derogatory or defensive, offensive.”

“That is an insult. You weren’t using that term as a term of endearment,” Flannery said.

“And no one will be offended, except an individual that it applies to,” Meeks said.

So according to Obama’s spiritual advisor the word nigger is a “term of endearment.” Then does that mean that a House Nigger is an especial term of endearment, something a little more elevated than say, a lawn jockey? Because the way I heard him say it, it sure didn’t sound like he was praising anyone. Don’t believe me?

Watch for yourself:

Does he sound like he is paying anyone a compliment here? Is protecting the white man something that Meeks thinks is a good thing? If he is anything like Jeremiah Wright he sure doesn’t. But a close association with Obama shouldn’t be used as the only reason to condemn someone. Let’s allow James Meeks to speak for himself and determine for ourselves whether he is in any way prejudiced or bigoted like Jeremiah Wright.

Meeks for Governor

“Come on with me white churches … Call me and tell me to run for governor,” Meeks said. “White people who believe in Jesus, call me and tell me to run for governor”

Meeks is an Illinois senator in the 15th District. He is counting on an anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage platform to appeal to conservative white Christians.

“If I do run and there are two people in the race who both are not standing for morality, if I don’t have every white Christian vote in the state of Illinois, I will stand on top of the Sears Tower and call every one of ya’ll racist,” Meeks said from his pulpit.

So he is going to call all white people that don’t vote for him racists? How quaint. Where have we heard that before?

And just what is Reverend Meeks’ association with Barack Obama? According to his campaign they barely know one another. And of course we hear the same standard line about Obama denouncing the racist talk of this person he barely knows. Blah blah blah. We’ve all heard the drill before. It would seem that as frequently as one of Obama’s associates turns out to be a bigot and a racist that they would have a more creative explanation by now. Like maybe we are just bamboozled. Yeah, that makes sense. Okie doke!

But once you slice through the typical lie from the Obama campaign you find out that not only are Meeks and Obama friends, they have other friends in common. In fact one of their mutual friends is directly involved in the day to day activities of Obama’s campaign. Guess who? His initials are JJJ. Yes indeed, the person I am referring to is Jesse Jackson Jr., the national Co-Chair for the Obama campaign. It seems JJJ and Meeks have been close friends for a very long time. And JJJ is a member in good standing with Meek’s church. So he apparently agrees with what Meeks says. At least there is no evidence that he believes otherwise. In fact the evidence about JJJ is quite telling. He doesn’t hide his contempt for white people very well.

“The natural reminder here is O.J. [Simpson] — how does an African American candidate attack a white woman?” said Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr.

Yes, he said these words right after Obama won the Democratic caucus in Iowa. An unusual choice of a phrase don’t you think? Especially since his guy won. But just in case we failed to understand what JJJ meant when he uttered those words, he uttered a few more not barely a week later that clarified it for us.

Clinton didn’t cry for Katrina

In an appearance today on MSNBC, Jackson said that Clinton’s “tears” — none actually fell from her eyes — are something that “we’re still analyzing within the Barack Obama campaign.” “Those tears also have to be analyzed,” Jackson said. “They have to be looked at very, very carefully in light of Katrina, in light of other things that Mrs. Clinton did not cry for, particularly as we head to South Carolina where 45 percent of African-Americans will participate in the Democratic contest, and they see real hope in Barack Obama.”

You see, JJJ isn’t shy about playing the race card. And why not, his pastor and good friend James Meeks plays the race card from the pulpit. And that other close associate that Meeks and Obama share in common? Well, you have probably already guessed but it is none other than that jailed indicted political fixer and slumlord Tony Rezko. In fact of all the politicians with ties to Rezko and all the money Rezko donated to politicians, State Senator James Meeks ranks 14th in the list of politicians receiving the most money from this political pariah. 14th out of who knows how many politicians (The Cash Cow). The question to be asked, which I have been unable to find the answer to, is whether or not Meeks gave the money back or donated it to charity? And if it was to charity, was it to his own church where he uses the pulpit to call white people that don’t support him racists?

So it has been clearly determined that James Meeks is a bigot and a racist and has close ties to Barack Obama. But what has yet to be discussed are his other beliefs and activities that are a little out of the mainstream norm. For instance: James Meeks is known to be vehemently anti-gay.

2nd Obama-linked pastor under fire for racist talk

Meeks is also notorious for his strong anti-homosexual platform, which is in contrast to Obama who has been campaigning for the “gay” vote. Meeks has routinely voted against pro-homosexual legislation and has been quoted during sermons referring to same-sex attraction “an evil sickness.”

And how does the Obama campaign distance itself from Meeks on this? It’s very simple. At first they ignore it. Then they pretend as if Obama is the most forceful advocate for LGBT issues in the country. And finally, just to make sure they haven’t offended anyone, they invite a “reformed” gay singer to campaign with them in South Carolina. Of course I am referring to Donnie “I’m cured now” McClurkin.

Obama’s gospel mistake

Adding fuel to this fire was Obama’s reply to questions about the concert. He haughtily told a reporter from the gay news magazine the Advocate, “If there’s somebody out there who’s been more consistent in including LGBT Americans in his or her vision of what America should be, then I would be interested in knowing who that person is.”

In 2004, during his U.S. Senate run, Obama campaigned at Chicago’s Salem Baptist Church, whose leader, Rev. James Meeks, called same-sexuality “an evil sickness.” That was quickly forgotten, overshadowed by Obama’s eloquent speeches on hard-core Democratic issues, gay rights included, to turn-away crowds that treated him, as more than one commentator has noted, “like a rock star.”

Now a gospel star may have driven a wedge between Obama and his gay supporters and roiled others as well. For, by putting McClurkin in the spotlight, Obama has broken black America’s 11th Commandment: “Don’t talk about it in front of the white people!”

But it was McClurkin who dominated the event, claiming before an audience of about 2,000 Sunday in Columbia, S.C.: “I don’t speak against the homosexuals. I tell you that God delivered me from homosexuality. No matter what blog you read, let me tell you, if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature!”

Did it work? Was Meeks appeased that Obama had someone campaigning for him that had rejected homosexuality? Again, we may never know because Meeks, like many Obama supporters, has effectively been muted. But if there is any indication as to what type of person Meeks is and how strongly his beliefs are we need only to look toward his church where they have an unusual habit of taking things to the extreme. And what better subjects to promote their twisted view of morality than teenagers who are looking for adult guidance to begin with.

Something I was not aware of until I began writing this was the growing practice among some evangelical churches to celebrate Halloween in their own way, by scaring the hell out of children. Salem (ironically appropriately titled) Baptist Church where Meeks is the head pastor decided to create their own “Nights of Terror” where essentially they have a Christian version of a haunted House. At Salem Baptist they frighten the youth by informing them that: “YOU HAVE DIED AND GONE STRAIGHT TO HELL!”

Meeks sends kids to ‘hell’

In one scene, a girl was lying on a gurney where a masked man in surgical scrubs pretended to perform an abortion. A toilet was sitting nearby apparently to collect the aborted fetus.

A fenced-in cell housed a few denizens of “hell,” including a pedophile trolling the Internet for a young victim, a meditating Buddhist, and two mincing young men wearing body glitter who were supposed to be homosexuals.

So according to this church that Obama had to attend and pray with Meeks on the night after he won the Democratic primary, the way to a child’s soul is by scaring them. The threats of hellfire and damnation revisited. Abortion under any circumstance is a direct ticket to hell. If you happen to have a different religion that practices self responsibility, humility and peace, you are going to hell too. And if you are gay you are definitely going to hell. But at least they will let you keep your glitter.

And the church, just what does it think about all of this? Do they consider their actions controversial? As it turns out, yes they do. They are quite aware that some of the things they do are not within the norm. But like all religious zealots they have a perfect excuse: The Bible.

Comer knows some of the parts of Salem’s “hell” will be controversial but says he and Salem’s senior pastor, the Rev. James Meeks, who could not be reached for comment, are confident they can back up their vision of hell with Scripture.

Just why is it do you suppose that Obama has strong ties to so many controversial figures? Isn’t he supposed to “represent” the new politics of hope? Isn’t he supposed to be the post partisan, post racial candidate? If so, then why is he so closely associated with so many people that are clearly partisan and vehemently racial? Do you think that this is just some odd coincidence? That somehow a random alignment of the stars caused all these people to intersect the life of Senator Obama for so many years? That he had nothing to do with cultivating these long standing enduring relationships? Because that is exactly what someone would have to believe in order not to see how Obama’s acquaintance with people like Wright and Rezko and now Meeks are not accidental associations, but rather carefully calculated relationships designed to forge alliances with people of similar mind who share the same goals.

The question is: Are they your goals too?

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post79 Comments »

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-26 18:35:55

I told you before—it’s time to bring up what Obama’s KENYAN grandfather said. The man was a racist who told Madeleine Dunhan that he didn’t want the Obama blood soiled with “white blood”. Why is this relevant?
Because Obama only talks about white on black racism, and even has the gall to repeatedly castigate his still-living grandmother as a racist, yet he won’t tell the whole truth.

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-03-26 18:38:20

Do you have a link for his father’s comment?

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-26 18:42:43

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madelyn_Dunham

Madelyn and Stanley then moved to Hawaii where he found a better furniture store opportunity. Ann attended the University of Hawaii and there met Barack Hussein Obama (Sr.) a graduate student from Kenya. Both Dunhams were upset when their daughter Ann married Obama, particularly after receiving a long, angry letter from the graduate student’s father in Kenya who “didn’t want the Obama blood sullied by a white woman.”

I wonder if Obama is compensating for knowledge of that racism. He probably only discovered it as an adult, and it probably was quite a shock.

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-03-26 19:06:49

What amazed me is that BO has only glorified his father’s side of the family - they had the press staked out in Kenya to interview people who have only met him in the past few years when he won SC….but I never saw any interviews and celebrating with his mother’s side of the family.

In fact, I didn’t know he had anyone alive on his mother’s side until he decided to throw granny under the bus.

Nice grandson!

 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-26 18:45:07

Does Obama hang out with black racists to feel closer to the Kenyan side of his family?!

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 21:32:14

He hangs out with black activist racists because he wants to advance their agenda. All of his ties are part of his affiliation with Wright, and by stealth with Farrakhan, and now Meeks.

Kenya is where Obama will head for if president.
African Muslims, African marxists as his cousin is now engaging in slaughter on the wrong side of the issues in Kenya.

Help! Someone out here do some research, as I cannot, but Kenya and Obama are entwined along with his family. Black Power as advanced by Wright & co is basically revolutionary marxist doctrine.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-03-26 18:39:29

My mother always used to tell us “You are judged by the company you keep”.

Barck Obama hasn’t been keeping good company, IMHO.

 

Comment by salo | 2008-03-26 18:51:54

trouble is Obama didn’t say it himself. It’s just his mates.

it’s a careful game that he’s able to play.

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-03-26 23:47:40

Until Obama denounces the comments, if his ‘mates’ said it, then he said it.

 
 

Comment by John Stanton | 2008-03-26 18:54:59

Wow! No one likes the Obama dude here! Has anyone here noticed Appendix 2, page 81–I think—indicating that the US DOS supports a definition of antisemitism that says if one criticizes Jewish Americans and portrays them as dual-loyalists, then, well, you are an antisemite. Check it out for yourselves.

So, in a stretch, because your nutty baptist, seventh day adventist, catholic, jewish, islam, morman preachers–and your family, that you can’t choose–are all stinking nuts, well, What to do? Withdraw from a competition? Defend ‘em all? Ignore ‘em all?

At this little moment, all I can equate this silly bashing too is this, or these:

Gumby’s religious advisor–Qumby– gave a sermon saying that although Gumby loved Pokey, the reality was that it was the glue factory where Pokey would end up. Pokey’s supporters and fan club accused Qumby and Gumby of madness.

Comment by simon | 2008-03-26 19:50:20

John,

Do you know where there is a link to a photo of Obama’s mother?

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 20:21:29

These took a while to find and it wasn’t easy:

http://celebrity.rightpundits.com/?p=3191

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-03-26 21:16:15

I bet! What is the medalian BO has got around his neck?

Odd place to find them.

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 21:42:19

I am not sure what the medallion is. But it seems a little more than ornamental.

 
 
 

Comment by 1950democrat | 2008-03-26 23:06:05

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-obama-life-storygallery,0,1773480.storygallery

Here is a great one-page index with preces to the whole long series of Chicago Tribune profiles of Obama from this spring. Answers nearly all questions about his background and career.

And photos of his family etc.

 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 21:59:37

This specious rationale does not get Obama off the hook. Obama is using the race card in every way possible and counts on white guilt, white’s fear of being acccused as racists, and sterotyping whites to make his case that they [whites] are really ALL the same.

Subtext: Whites are really ALL racists.

If Jews who have dual loyalties are disagreed with, I would hardly consider that racist. For those who call “racism” and antisemitism because of disagreements about Israel, I say rubbish.

It hasn’t got a thing to do with antisemitism except for ONE thing. Reverend Wright honored Louis Farrakhan and bestowed the honor to Farrakhan as an outstanding, blah, blah, wonderful,blah blah.

Farrakhan is an outspoken anti semite who has called Jews, “Bloodsuckers”, and Judasim, “A junkyard religion”.

Farrakhan, is leader of The Nation Of Islam, and is a black supremist, and devout Muslim.

Farrakhan is a close friend of Wright, and his screeds are well known to everone including Obama.

The real problem for Obama is that he has underestimated White guilt, and he will come to understand that we have all been given an opportunity to see just how much the black community hates Whitey.

Obama is a racist, like it or not.

All blacks are alike. They hate whites.

Obama tells us that all Whites are alike. They hate blacks. They FEAR blacks just as his Grandmother did.

I don’t think you have a clue about how serious Obama’s ties to Marxist Muslim Black Activist politics and philosophy really are.

Obama wants us to discuss this. So we are discussing this, and it will continue to be a problem and go to Obama’s credibility and real goals for advancing black ideology ala Wright/Malcolm X/Farrakhan.

Anyone who has the stones to aspire to represent ALL the American people who deals [20 years] with this lot is clearly unfit for the Presidency.

Obama owes Wright and co BIG TIME. They delivered votes,endorsements,donations, and Obama CANNOT absolutely refute Wright and his church.

Wright will play a huge “advisory” role in an Obama Presidency and the new Oprah network will be a perfect vehicle for these messages. UGH!

Comment by 1950democrat | 2008-03-26 23:13:34

Speaking of white guilt, I’ve been posting a story about his white guilt grandfather refusing to help his grandmother avoid a threatening bum — because she had mentioned the bum was Black. He seemed not to care at all about his wife’s physical safety — just for her political incorrectness.

These are the white grandparents who raised Obama from age 10. No wonder Obama knows how to manipulate white liberals!

The full story is at Steve Sailer’s blog, a few days back, and I posted it at taylormarsh.com Hot Topics also.

 
 
 

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-03-26 18:55:41

Why isn’t the MSM picking up this story?

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 19:00:30

A very good question. Honestly I think they are afraid of being labeled racists for pointing these connections out. Just my best guess. Either that or they are totally incompetent journalists. Couldn’t be that. Naaaaah!

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-03-26 21:04:54

LOL…well, the Chicago CBS station didn’t seem afraid…but they did use an African American anchor and reporter. Maybe that’s what the national MSM would have to do. Unless they’re totally incompetent journalists…

 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 22:17:29

The MSM is a wholly owned subsidiary of OBAMALOVE.

First, they helped elect Bush…twice.

second, they fell into BUSLOVE.

Then they cowed and yessed for “access”.

Now they are scared witless about being critical of a black and being accused of racism and losing black clients and viewers.

Also they are running true to form. If Obama [they think for sure] will become President…..look at all the access they’ll have?

It’s the same old same old MSM. They can always be counted on to be cowards and opportunists. Nothings changed.

 
 

Pingback by A Term of Endearment | Barack Obama Chronicles | 2008-03-26 19:05:24

[...] NO QUARTER put an intriguing blog post on A Term of Endearment [...]

 

Comment by JoeySky | 2008-03-26 19:11:22

I can’t imagine surrounding myself with people like Rezko, Ayers, Wright, and now Meek. It’s so simple, they don’t represent anything I stand for.

People need to see Obama for who he really is. Not someone we want him to be.

Comment by Retired | 2008-03-26 19:21:04

True, but in his book, “Audacity of Hope,” Obama says that one of his qualities is that he is so unknown that voters consider him a blank canvas upon which they paint their own convictions. He even admits that because of this, he is likely to disappoint most, if not all, who vote for him. Read his books carefully. You will learn a lot about the man who would be President.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-03-26 21:55:25

If the proceeds went to charity I’d consider it…I’ll nick one instead…from Rezko when he’s not looking.

Why is it the books I want to read are always at the bottom and ones I need to read are at the top?

 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 22:32:27

A blank canvass that we will paint and fill in as a response to his rhetoric and persuasion.

He doesn’t have to prove anything. We are painting the picture we want on this blank canvas

So far there are lots of paintings around.

 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-03-26 23:52:17

The problem with a ‘blank canvas’ is that there could be cobra venom on it.

 
 
 

Comment by Inkslayer | 2008-03-26 19:15:24

I watched the entire Reverend Wright post 9/11 sermon that’s available online. I didn’t get anything from it except he thinks America got its comeuppance.

I don’t know if this has any traction but something in the sermon struck me as particularly distasteful. Something I don’t think anyone has mentioned yet.

Have a look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHth-GMx6j8

.

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 19:19:16

It is disgusting that you would in any way come to this man’s defense. He was careful to point out that he saw “black” people jumping to their deaths.

Comment by Inkslayer | 2008-03-26 19:22:44

What the heck are you talking about?

 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 22:55:01

The description and emotional pandering as he relishes relating to the horror of people jumping and having the gaul……

I’m finding it hard to describe this utterly despicable man.

He is an actor,manipulator,and wins as the worst person in the world.

Reverend Wright is actually evil here.

This should be played at full sound with moans and groans of audience in the background amplified.

 
 

Comment by mimi | 2008-03-26 19:46:10

You all can ponder the question all you want, this AA knows the answer. He’s confused and conflicted about his heritage. He resents having been deprived of a cultural identity that as an an adult he is compelled to wear by virtue of the racism in US society.
I also grew up with a biracial family. My BFF is the product of a white mother and a black father. She has 2 sisters. Their father was very present in their lives and they had full access to both sides of their family. After some 50+ years of close friendship with the entire family, both sides, I can tell you that I watched their evolution. Although they understand that American society views them as black and they have no problem with this, they consider themselves mulatto or biracial because they have no desire to alienate themselves from their mother’s heritage. They have good relations with blacks and whites, for those open to that.

And as an AA I’ve had access to their white relatives by virtue of our friendship with no problem. I grew up with her and intermingled with both sets of cousins. Obama has made this more complicated than it need be. And this is HIS BAGGAGE!

AAs will not call him on this, because of long standing resentments and attitudes about racism. Obama’s overcompensating just to get the loyal, unwavering support of the black community to get elected. This is why he doesn’t mention his white mother and grandparents in glowing terms or at all. He may have written in his book that he stopped mentioning his mother was white because he felt that he was trying to ingratiate himself to white people, but the reverse is also true:

He doesn’t mention his white mother to black people because he deosn’t want to alienate us.

In fact, I was arguing this with family and friends this weekend and you’d be surprised how deep in denial some AAs are on the subject of Obama’s white ancestry. When I mentioned that Obama saw his Kenyan father once or twice and didn’t meet his other relatives until he was an adult, they tried to claim they had read somewhere that this wasn’t true. All it took was to fire up an Internet connection to dispel this.

AAs simply aren’t keying into the realizatlion that Obama was raised by his mother’s family and that pretty much everything he’s attained, from his education, his manner, etc. was from this upbringing.
Too bad he won’t OWN IT.

So tell me, what kind of discussion on race does he really want to have?

I think we all know what kind.

Comment by simon | 2008-03-26 19:55:22

He doesn’t mention his white mother to black people because he deosn’t want to alienate us.

So he doesn’t show pictures of his Anglo mother because he is afraid he will alienate AA voters?

You know, Axelrod politics just like the Bush Cheney crews, too.

Not too bright, how’d that work out for them?

And Carlyle connected to both Obama, Bush and Iraq.

Again, how’d that work out for them?

 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-03-26 21:11:36

Mimi,

Thanks for giving us a look at the struggle bi-racials go through. That was great.

There are a few other things it seems that Obama has not accepted about his father - as if Obama never got past the color of his father’s skin. Obama’s father was also a big time drunk, a bigamist and a very abusive man. These are not pleasant attributes regardless of skin color.

Why do you think Obama is trying to make his dad some kind of hero, while betraying his mothers side of the family?

Comment by Nellie | 2008-03-26 21:17:17

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 21:35:21

An interesting link. But I am going to say something that may surprise some folks. I don’t think that this avenue should be pursued. It is guilt by association in a manner that I do not feel comfortable with. If someone does pursue this I won’t speak out against you but I won’t support or compliment the work either.

Comment by Nellie | 2008-03-26 22:42:19

Fleaflicker,

I think I understand what you are saying.

I probably was not clear. I did appreciate Mimi’s insight - As the American Indians said -Mimi has walked the mile in the moccasins.

My concern is not Obama’s father - it is the fact that unlike Bill Clinton who was up front about his step father, or Jimmy Carter who didn’t hide his brother Billy, I am honestly baffled as to why Obama is slamming his mother’s side and trying to make his father a hero?

Why not just be up front - to me, after teaching for years, this trying to create an illusion, instead of just dealing quickly with the reality, bespeaks of serious psychological problems on Obama’s part.

Mimi’s post added an element I had not been aware of, and so I asked her opinion as to how that fits in, or even if it does.

No offense was meant.

I do appreaciate all your terrific posts Flea, but my own curiosity, and I guess needing a sounding board, makes me ask about things I have not fully figured out to my own, satisfaction.

Hopefully this makes my intent clearer and I apologise for my poor wording the first time.

 
 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 22:42:13

He’s singing to the choir. Mama bad. Mama white,grandma white. Grandma bad.

Daddy black. Daddy good.

It is very calculating. He must keep his base which is largely AA.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-03-26 22:11:22

All it took was to fire up an Internet connection to dispel this.

What was the vibe afterwards?

Comment by mimi | 2008-03-27 08:12:53

Sorry, that I had to be offline last night after my post. I wasn’t ignoring the questions.

Sadly, the vibe after was simply a refusal to register the fact that Obama is biracial. One older, diehard Dem says they will vote for McCain if the nomination is stolen from Obama. Which is another very sneaky tactic his campaign has successfully maneuvered. So many blacks are so deeply intrenched in Obama’s candidacy it is NOT to be believed. They didn’t feel this way over Jesse Jackson’s run for the presidency and he also had the full support of the black community. Obama has engaged in the most Machiavellian kind of hustle and the methodology of his campaign will be discussed for decades.

To answer Nellie’s question, it’s for a therapist to discover why Obama has made his father into a hero, given that the reality is so tragic. And you’re right, alcoholism, abusiveness, cut across racial lines. All I know is that we’re at war in large part because of a president with unresolved conflicts with his own father. Do we really need another one working out his personal psychological baggage at the expense of the country’s well-being?

I’m of 2 minds about your question. One mind says that his hero worship is part of his devious plan to become POTUS by riding on the coattails of the AA experience and guilting white America into electing him. That deep down inside he harbors resentment toward his father, too. My other mind sees a man who clearly was troubled as a young boy with regard to his ethnic identity and holds his mother and her parents responsible for this and by association, the entire country. Either way, he just seems to me fucked up in his mindset. And given the fact that I had an opportunity to witness how biracial identity can play out in my friend’s family, all I’m saying is that Obama clearly has problems about it.

Here’s an interesting link to a story on yahoo.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080327/ap_on_re_us/chicago_student_deaths

It seems 20 Chicago students have been killed since Sept. Of course we’re talking urban blacks. I mean, this is Obama’s home state. What does he have to say about this? What is his position? And why won’t the press PIN HIM DOWN on questions like this? The AA community has had far too many gutless leaders who refuse confront the pathology in the black community from a stand point of accountability. Read the excellent post on Shelby Steele’s take. Dismissing him just because he’s a Conservative is wrong. I don’t agree with his politics, but he has some very accurate insights.

We’re not going to have a real discussion and make inroads on this racial queastion until both whites and blacks accept their pound of flesh on this issue.

Comment by Nellie | 2008-03-27 11:06:43

Thanks Mimi,

I agree there has to be a discussion. I had no idea of horrific it is for those poor high school kids. So sad, for so many to die before they really even had a chance to live.

Do you think the hate speech from those Black Separtist Chruches, in any way have influenced whats happening, or are there are other reasons for the increase in violence?

That link was shocking!

 

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-03-27 12:01:39

Thanks Mimi…I had a similar experience in a discussion with a co-worker. The conversation was not on the race aspect directly, but still left the smell of burnt kool-aid in the air.

 
 
 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-26 20:02:38

WOW! Obama is really doing the full Gary Hart over Wright and the sermons he “didn’t see”.
He’s defending Wright AGAIN.
http://mydd.com/story/2008/3/26/195646/913

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 20:39:48

Very interesting read.

 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-03-26 22:45:47

Wright website took down article he wrote in his church publication about “garlic breath Italians”, etc.

Newsday reporter saw it and then couldn’t get it back on web.

A full tilt rant against Italians. WHO can find it in “Tribute” his magazine that is no longer [scrubbed] on his site?

 
 

Comment by artmann11 | 2008-03-26 20:04:02

You folks have gone off the deep end. Ihatebarakobama.com

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-03-26 20:46:17

Obama supporters have gone totally nuts: they are saying that Obama survived the right’s attack of Wright
(!@#$#@!@#!) It makes me sick. The right’s attack on Wright? Have they no decency ? In the meantime, Obvama yet again defends his church and Wright and
says sothing so disingeneous and irrational that’s not funny:

“My pastor did say, my former pastor said some very objectionable things when I was not in church on those days,” he added, noting that Mr, Wright gave “three sermons a week for 30 years.”

Referring to critics of Mr. Wright, he said, “they find five or six of his most offensive statements” and boil them down onto a 30-second recording and replay them over and over on television. He said it drew attention “partly because it spoke to some of the racial divisions that we have in this country. I hope people don’t get distracted by that. As I said in my speech last week on Tuesday, we can’t afford to get distracted.”

Read carefully, every sentence here is a LIE.

Since Obama talked today about faith; here it’s my take. Wright-Obama-Meeks: the despicable trilogy.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-03-26 22:15:45

we can’t afford to get distracted.”

Who is “we”?

Comment by Andy | 2008-03-27 00:07:14

Who is “we”?

Answer: Obama and Axelrod Inc.

 
 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-03-26 20:51:34

Fleaflicker my apologies for being OT on this but this is sooooo unsenstitive to the millions and millions of working americans, working shift after shift and then, overtime on top to make ends meet that have to share with all of you. This is what Obama said today:

He also disputed the notion that his trip was a vacation, given that it lasted two-and-a-half days. “It’s a long weekend that most Americans get about 50 times a year,” he said. (Editorial comment: Really? Please take note, Times editors!)

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/obama-warms-to-wrapping-up-contest/

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-26 20:59:22

Not a problem being OT with me Andy. Your information is quite valuable. As are your comments.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-03-26 22:57:11

Andy, I was struck by President Clinton’s remarks about “saddling up”, a not to veiled reference to Gov. Bill Richardson.

I will be dammed if all the folks getting for-closed on are getting 50 3 day weekends.

THE OBAMA Champagne PLANE is what they call it? I wonder what the people who don’t get all those three day weekends think when they see it fly over head? Is this more of the “trickle down hope” politics the Senator is injecting the echo chamber with? The supporters have a “semi-blind trust” thing going on.

It’s 3am; answering machine picks up;
“you have reached the Obama White House we are out of town.and on vacation so leave a message and maybe we will call you when we get back.”

Putin; “I just thought you might wan’t to know I just cut a nuclear power deal with Egypt, after talking with Auchi, he said you wouldn’t mind.
Later dude.

Comment by Andy | 2008-03-27 00:00:45

TeakWoodKite:

You are very sharp !! Loved the “trickle down hope” Should coin it! Especially given Obama is so keen on Reagan.

I was struck by President Clinton’s remarks about “saddling up”, a not to veiled reference to Gov. Bill Richardson.

I didn’t get the relation to Richardson, how do you figure?

Did you think it was to rough? I think he is extremely frustrated, and has been campaigning hard in “the country”.

Comment by Andy | 2008-03-27 00:01:50

Meant “too rough ?”

 

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-03-27 12:10:50

You remember that Bill Richardson loves to ride his horses and ran a commercial once with a “cattle rustler” theme to it.

 
 
 

Comment by 1950democrat | 2008-03-26 23:46:35

two-and-a-half days. “It’s a long weekend that most Americans get about 50 times a year,”

Under sniper fire, I suppose?

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-03-27 01:10:32

1950democrat -

No. Most Americans do not get to lounge around in the Virgin Islands. Many work two jobs to make ends meet.

If BO wasn’t such a supporter of hating whites, gays, jews and the U.S.; he wouldn’t have had to hide from his hate group on Easter.

He might even get off his ass and chair his senate subcommittee someday.

 
 

Comment by 1950democrat | 2008-03-26 23:49:07

two-and-a-half days. “It’s a long weekend that most Americans get about 50 times a year,”

Under sniper fire, I suppose?

 

Comment by rwc | 2008-03-27 02:28:44

Cut from the cloth of Bush and elitist swine to boot.

Most folks don’t jet down to the bahamas for the weekend except the wealthy.

Obama is doing one good thing for the party and that is exposing the progressive movement for a bunch of wealthy white frauds and liars they are.

These obnoxious asshats are no different than those found in the far right.

Both want power or access to it.

Neither gives a shit about the country or people.

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2008-03-27 02:36:21

RWC..

How many WASPS Does it take to change the light Bulb..??

A. TWO..One to call an Electrician..and One to mix the Martinis..

 

Comment by mimi | 2008-03-27 08:21:40

Hear! Hear!!!

Love the “trickle down hope.”

 
 

Comment by apishapa | 2008-03-27 10:58:50

And those lucky suckers who lost their jobs get to jet off to the islands fom months at a time. Nothing else to do.

My God, this guy does not understand that most Americans are working 12 hour days, often two or three jobs just to put food on the table and gas in the fucking car. Or they looking for work 50 weeks a year. Does he not know that millions of Americans can’t buy food? Can’t take their kids to a doctor?Does he not know that millions of Americans have lost jobs since Bill Clinton left the White HOuse?

Is this his economic policy for the recession? Everyone can go on vacation?

 
 

Pingback by Frank Luntz on Hillary’s Remarks about Rev. Wright : NO QUARTER | 2008-03-26 20:54:14

[...] don’t miss Fleaflicker’s “A Term of Endearment” about Rev. James Meeks, who has replaced the now M.I.A. Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and presents a [...]

 

Comment by RMC | 2008-03-26 22:18:51

Those people are obscene.

 

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2008-03-26 23:07:13

Q…How Many Harvard Students does it take to Change a Light Bulb..?

A. One..If you are Barack Obama..You Hold the
Bulb Up and wait for the World to revolve around you.

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-03-27 12:15:54

LOL I am NOT sorry I got you started…
Funny :)

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-03-26 23:20:58

FleaFlicker, tough slog but informative read.

I am struck by how many of the people of this “community” are involved with Rezko. At a certain point two things are unavoidable.

The anger expressed and how interwoven the resentment is. Not that I can know it first hand but calling someone a house N* is nothing but derogatory.
I wonder what would happen if Barrack said that to his wife, what she would do.

I am left wondering, from a historical cultural point of view, what AA’s thought of the different “roles” ascribed to them during the days of slavery.

Any form of bondage is unacceptable, but to accuse metaphorically or otherwise infer guilt on someone in this manner is destructive.

I also have this image of Amer-Asian children after the Vietnam war and know idea as to why.

Comment by simon | 2008-03-26 23:46:23

I also wonder how the greater AA community would react toward knowing they’ve been bamboozled, manipulated by Obama, and his white handlers?

Speaking of laboring in the house of Daley — really, aren’t Wright, and Meeks simply traitors to the AA community, like Obama, particularly if they’ve profited off the black community, like Rezko, and Obama did, and do?

How much did they, do they get, as part of the combine?

According to Rezkowatch, Obama was instrumental in getting a local Catholic church a grant, or two.

I wonder if the money went where it was supposed to…

 
 

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2008-03-27 00:02:17

Q….How Many charismatic preachers Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb…????

A.. One One..since he’s got his Hands in the air Anyway..

 

Comment by rosaleen | 2008-03-27 00:07:56

Good job, Fleaflicker!

 

Comment by rwc | 2008-03-27 02:36:28

Good article Fleaflicker.

Obama may be a blank canvas but there is a image starting to appear on it and its a ugly one. A racist con-man surrounded by a slum lord, two racist preachers, a billionaire Saddam bag man, a vile Catholic priest who also supports Farrahkhan, various lobbyists with bags of money.

The more it develops the more it looks like a mob portrait.

Comment by deelee | 2008-03-27 12:44:03

Sounds like that canvas has shades of “Dorian Gray”,(Oscar Wilde) altho the MSM refuses to look at it.

 
 

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2008-03-27 02:38:39

I think We have a Movie Plot Here..

 

Comment by Cee Hussein | 2008-03-27 10:16:01

Obama rejected the comments from this man weeks ago. What else is in the toilet to be thrown?

Comment by PMS | 2008-03-27 11:36:43

Cee, if your man didn’t keep having his turds float to the top, maybe no one would notice.

Why you and the MSM don’t seem to notice (or mind) says more about Obama’s campaign than it does Clinton’s.

Comment by deelee | 2008-03-27 13:40:57

Looking back at Obama’s life and ALL the advantages bestowed upon him by his white grand-parents, he should not only be denouncing and rejecting Wright, he should have be CRUSADING to have this man thrown out of that church. Instead he still defends and justifies him.

 
 
 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-03-27 11:19:24

Cee,

This man, James Meeks, is a Super Delagate for Obama. Just as Kwame Kilpatrick, the Mayor of Detroit is/was? - Don’t know the rules about Super Delegates and problems with the law.

So this discussion is necessary and warranted.