<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Latest on Randi Rhodes (and the Obama connection) [Updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182090</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182090</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;"In order for sexism– and racism for that matter– to work, it has to be perpetrated by a member of a group in a position to enforce the epithet– in other words, in a white-male-dominated society, you kind of have to be a white male for the accusation to stick.

Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can’t get my head around it."&lt;/em&gt;

Then you don't understand self-perpetuation either.  And if you claim to understand anything about racism, thus sexism, then you certainly would have been educated in self-perpetuation.

Keep up with the conversation in the black community regarding self-perpetuation of racism, and you'll have a half a chance at understanding how the same holds true about sexism when women attack women.

I have watched women tell my wife to be a good housewife and serve me well and be all that I need her to be.  This is self-perpetuation.

I have watched women other than randi rhodes calling other women "skank hos', "bitches" and "whores".  This is self-perpetuation.

I have watched women in power not give power to other women because they were women and would give that authority to men.  This is self-perpetuation.

I hate the term self-hating because it misses the point.  Better to assess the reality that it perpetuates the power trip.

If you can't see how this is happening then I'd caution you about lecturing anyone on the topic.

And the excuse that Randi Rhodes meant "whore" in a way that meant 'compromised your integrity for gain'...then i'll introduce you to some white folks who excuse their racism by telling you there are blacks then there are 'niggers'.  This is a con game for the intellectually stunted and the morally corrupt.

Perhaps there comes a time when you have to just decide you don't get to call people such a word that has been used to beat down people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;In order for sexism– and racism for that matter– to work, it has to be perpetrated by a member of a group in a position to enforce the epithet– in other words, in a white-male-dominated society, you kind of have to be a white male for the accusation to stick.</p>
<p>Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can’t get my head around it.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Then you don&#8217;t understand self-perpetuation either.  And if you claim to understand anything about racism, thus sexism, then you certainly would have been educated in self-perpetuation.</p>
<p>Keep up with the conversation in the black community regarding self-perpetuation of racism, and you&#8217;ll have a half a chance at understanding how the same holds true about sexism when women attack women.</p>
<p>I have watched women tell my wife to be a good housewife and serve me well and be all that I need her to be.  This is self-perpetuation.</p>
<p>I have watched women other than randi rhodes calling other women &#8220;skank hos&#8217;, &#8220;bitches&#8221; and &#8220;whores&#8221;.  This is self-perpetuation.</p>
<p>I have watched women in power not give power to other women because they were women and would give that authority to men.  This is self-perpetuation.</p>
<p>I hate the term self-hating because it misses the point.  Better to assess the reality that it perpetuates the power trip.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t see how this is happening then I&#8217;d caution you about lecturing anyone on the topic.</p>
<p>And the excuse that Randi Rhodes meant &#8220;whore&#8221; in a way that meant &#8216;compromised your integrity for gain&#8217;&#8230;then i&#8217;ll introduce you to some white folks who excuse their racism by telling you there are blacks then there are &#8216;niggers&#8217;.  This is a con game for the intellectually stunted and the morally corrupt.</p>
<p>Perhaps there comes a time when you have to just decide you don&#8217;t get to call people such a word that has been used to beat down people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182081</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182081</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;say “if any” because it’s been an awful long time since the word “whore” was confined to the single sense of one who performs sexual acts for money. A person without scruples will do. &lt;/i&gt;

      So according to you it's an insult to call someone a prostitute, but it's NOT an insult to say someone has no scruples?

     Hmm.

     Some moral code you have there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>say “if any” because it’s been an awful long time since the word “whore” was confined to the single sense of one who performs sexual acts for money. A person without scruples will do. </i></p>
<p>      So according to you it&#8217;s an insult to call someone a prostitute, but it&#8217;s NOT an insult to say someone has no scruples?</p>
<p>     Hmm.</p>
<p>     Some moral code you have there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182077</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182077</guid>
		<description>...which in no way invalidates the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;which in no way invalidates the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182076</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182076</guid>
		<description>...says the person with no counterargument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;says the person with no counterargument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182065</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182065</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can’t get my head around it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That's b/c obviously you have nothing inside your head.  You have no clue do you? You don't even know the meaning of sexism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can’t get my head around it.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s b/c obviously you have nothing inside your head.  You have no clue do you? You don&#8217;t even know the meaning of sexism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182061</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182061</guid>
		<description>qwert, you have no integrity, do you? 

So can a call you a *f------ whore* provided I campaign against McCain in the Fall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qwert, you have no integrity, do you? </p>
<p>So can a call you a *f&#8212;&#8212; whore* provided I campaign against McCain in the Fall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182046</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-182046</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Some have raised the specter of sexism here, and I simply don’t know whether to laugh or lose my lunch. In order for sexism– and racism for that matter– to work, it has to be perpetrated by a member of a group in a position to enforce the epithet– in other words, in a white-male-dominated society, you kind of have to be a white male for the accusation to stick.

Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can’t get my head around it.&lt;/i&gt;

   Sorry, no. 

   Sexism is treating people differently on the basis of gender where such treatment has no rational basis (an example of 'rational basis' would be not covering testicular exams under a single-with-no-dependents- women's insurance policy.

     If what you said was true, then Ann Coulter saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote isn't sexist.

     And as for it 'being able to work', having a member of the suppressed group express it gives cover to the oppressing group, making the "ism" more likely to be perpetuated.

     You lose.

     (Better luck next time.)


                                  SR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Some have raised the specter of sexism here, and I simply don’t know whether to laugh or lose my lunch. In order for sexism– and racism for that matter– to work, it has to be perpetrated by a member of a group in a position to enforce the epithet– in other words, in a white-male-dominated society, you kind of have to be a white male for the accusation to stick.</p>
<p>Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can’t get my head around it.</i></p>
<p>   Sorry, no. </p>
<p>   Sexism is treating people differently on the basis of gender where such treatment has no rational basis (an example of &#8216;rational basis&#8217; would be not covering testicular exams under a single-with-no-dependents- women&#8217;s insurance policy.</p>
<p>     If what you said was true, then Ann Coulter saying women shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to vote isn&#8217;t sexist.</p>
<p>     And as for it &#8216;being able to work&#8217;, having a member of the suppressed group express it gives cover to the oppressing group, making the &#8220;ism&#8221; more likely to be perpetuated.</p>
<p>     You lose.</p>
<p>     (Better luck next time.)</p>
<p>                                  SR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-181457</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-181457</guid>
		<description>Newsflash, there were Hillary Clinton supporters at this event as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newsflash, there were Hillary Clinton supporters at this event as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vosburg</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180704</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vosburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180704</guid>
		<description>Not worth reply, darlin.

Anything else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not worth reply, darlin.</p>
<p>Anything else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre lee</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180643</link>
		<dc:creator>andre lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180643</guid>
		<description>You folks on this site are way to nice. Hillary Clinton is someones mother, Geraldine Ferraro is someones mother. Just the idea that a person could walk around, on this here earth, and have that idea running through their minds, 'Someone called my mother a 'fucking whore' (which I take to mean someone made a great effort to hurt my mom by debasing her to the lowest gender based socially despised level of debasement possible) and not have their response be to make an unending effort to personally remind the speaker of those words that the object of their debasement is a very real and cared about person, or to simply put a size 14 up there ass is a credit to something-upbringing, will power, not having any leave from work. It's something that I am missing and greatfully would not stop me. Folks on this site, please keep up the metered tenor of the convo. I get much appreciated perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You folks on this site are way to nice. Hillary Clinton is someones mother, Geraldine Ferraro is someones mother. Just the idea that a person could walk around, on this here earth, and have that idea running through their minds, &#8216;Someone called my mother a &#8216;fucking whore&#8217; (which I take to mean someone made a great effort to hurt my mom by debasing her to the lowest gender based socially despised level of debasement possible) and not have their response be to make an unending effort to personally remind the speaker of those words that the object of their debasement is a very real and cared about person, or to simply put a size 14 up there ass is a credit to something-upbringing, will power, not having any leave from work. It&#8217;s something that I am missing and greatfully would not stop me. Folks on this site, please keep up the metered tenor of the convo. I get much appreciated perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llilytoo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180640</link>
		<dc:creator>llilytoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180640</guid>
		<description>When caught, they always say about  sexist, or for that matter racist, remarks, oh it  was " a joke" . HA!  The funniest part of all this is the idea it was any kind of  joke! LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When caught, they always say about  sexist, or for that matter racist, remarks, oh it  was &#8221; a joke&#8221; . HA!  The funniest part of all this is the idea it was any kind of  joke! LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llilytoo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180638</link>
		<dc:creator>llilytoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180638</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; So it’s okay to call democratic women whores but heaven forbid you call the opposition a warmonger. That would be degrading and divisive.&lt;/i&gt;



You put it well.  To me, all the Obammaniacs  hyper shitting on Hillary only  makes sense when one realizes BO isn't a Dem at all, he just plays one on TV. To me, BO is plainly  a Right Wing opertive....but what does that make the Dem Elite who endorsed him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> So it’s okay to call democratic women whores but heaven forbid you call the opposition a warmonger. That would be degrading and divisive.</i></p>
<p>You put it well.  To me, all the Obammaniacs  hyper shitting on Hillary only  makes sense when one realizes BO isn&#8217;t a Dem at all, he just plays one on TV. To me, BO is plainly  a Right Wing opertive&#8230;.but what does that make the Dem Elite who endorsed him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180619</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that comment, yttik. CNN is all over the Obama apologizes to McCain for the Ed Schultz "war monger" name callling story, but not a word about Rhodes calling Hillary a "fucking whore."
Yesterday, guest host Sam Seder was defending Rhodes, characterizing her trash talk as "jokes." Jokes with no set ups and no punch lines and no humor. What is so funny about "fucking whore." I don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that comment, yttik. CNN is all over the Obama apologizes to McCain for the Ed Schultz &#8220;war monger&#8221; name callling story, but not a word about Rhodes calling Hillary a &#8220;fucking whore.&#8221;<br />
Yesterday, guest host Sam Seder was defending Rhodes, characterizing her trash talk as &#8220;jokes.&#8221; Jokes with no set ups and no punch lines and no humor. What is so funny about &#8220;fucking whore.&#8221; I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yttik</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180602</link>
		<dc:creator>yttik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180602</guid>
		<description>Today Obama came out and denounced the words being used..... against McCain. 

I want to scream.

"..Democrat Barack Obama's presidential campaign on Saturday repudiated a liberal talk show host's description of Sen. John McCain as a warmonger, a comment made to an audience that Obama later addressed... Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement: "John McCain is not a warmonger and should not be described as such."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080405/ap_on_el_pr/obama_talk_radio_host

So it's okay to call democratic women whores but heaven forbid you call the opposition a warmonger. That would be degrading and divisive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Obama came out and denounced the words being used&#8230;.. against McCain. </p>
<p>I want to scream.</p>
<p>&#8220;..Democrat Barack Obama&#8217;s presidential campaign on Saturday repudiated a liberal talk show host&#8217;s description of Sen. John McCain as a warmonger, a comment made to an audience that Obama later addressed&#8230; Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement: &#8220;John McCain is not a warmonger and should not be described as such.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080405/ap_on_el_pr/obama_talk_radio_host" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080405/ap_on_el_pr/obama_talk_radio_host</a></p>
<p>So it&#8217;s okay to call democratic women whores but heaven forbid you call the opposition a warmonger. That would be degrading and divisive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180587</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180587</guid>
		<description>So basically if I want to hold a BARACK OBAMA IS A SEXIST PIG EVENT, I can post it to his website? What do you think the chances of that are?

Are you going to tell stupid "downscale" me that nobody in the Obama camp ever looks to see who's posting at my.barackobama.com? Did the knife run away with the spoon yet?

I have an idea everyone. Plan a HILLARY event and see how well it works out for you on the Obama site.

And finally, A Fish Starts To Stink At The Head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically if I want to hold a BARACK OBAMA IS A SEXIST PIG EVENT, I can post it to his website? What do you think the chances of that are?</p>
<p>Are you going to tell stupid &#8220;downscale&#8221; me that nobody in the Obama camp ever looks to see who&#8217;s posting at my.barackobama.com? Did the knife run away with the spoon yet?</p>
<p>I have an idea everyone. Plan a HILLARY event and see how well it works out for you on the Obama site.</p>
<p>And finally, A Fish Starts To Stink At The Head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llilytoo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180586</link>
		<dc:creator>llilytoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180586</guid>
		<description>Thank you! I'm tired of folks wondering what happened to Air America....nothing , it's a front for the right wing and right wing want Obama for MaCain.  
 Air America's  other mission is to slime "progressive" media.
 Mission Accomplished!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I&#8217;m tired of folks wondering what happened to Air America&#8230;.nothing , it&#8217;s a front for the right wing and right wing want Obama for MaCain.<br />
 Air America&#8217;s  other mission is to slime &#8220;progressive&#8221; media.<br />
 Mission Accomplished!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180541</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180541</guid>
		<description>Hah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180532</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180532</guid>
		<description>Hey, if you attended Green960's event you would have seen supporters of Hillary Clinton there as well as Barack Obama supporters.  What's up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if you attended Green960&#8217;s event you would have seen supporters of Hillary Clinton there as well as Barack Obama supporters.  What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vosburg</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180505</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vosburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180505</guid>
		<description>Person or Persons unknown weho have kidnapped Larry Johnson and are posting in his name write: &lt;i&gt;Can you explain why Barack Obama’s website would list an event, that is &lt;b&gt;co-sponsored by several groups clearly linked to Obama&lt;/b&gt;, which include:

NORCAL LGBT for Obama
The Castro for Obama
San Franciso for Obama.&lt;/i&gt;

Nonsense. The event was sponsored solely by Bay Area radio station "green 960", as is clearly noted in the event description you provided.

By way of further explanation, the website carries the subdomain name of "mybarackobama", which should have tipped you off right away that this is merely a depository for obama supporters, and carries little or no content from the campaign itself. In fact, the TOS, as one might imagine, carries the explicit disclaimer that the Obama campaign does not endorse anything posted at the site.

In the same sense, you're not held as endorsing any comment posted here, capische?

I have no doubt that if the webmaster removed the Randi Rhodes item from the site-- as many have suggested or demanded here-- those selfsame offendees would immediately accuse the Obama campaign of seeking to "disappear" the event-- in order to minimize damage to the candidate.

In the end, the offense, if any, is solely that of Randi Rhodes, and not Obama.

I say "if any" because it's been an awful long time since the word "whore" was confined to the single sense of one who performs sexual acts for money. A person without scruples will do. The fact that Randi said this in the course of what was essentially a standup comic role should give pause.

Some have raised the specter of sexism here, and I simply don't know whether to laugh or lose my lunch. In order for sexism-- and racism for that matter-- to work, it has to be perpetrated by a member of a group in a position to enforce the epithet-- in other words, in a white-male-dominated society, you kind of have to be a white male for the accusation to stick.

Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can't get my head around it.

Lastly, a reminder. If the Obama campaign is responsible for Randi's statement, then you must concede that Hillary is to be held responsible for your statements, and each and every comment posted here.

That'd be silly, Larry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Person or Persons unknown weho have kidnapped Larry Johnson and are posting in his name write: <i>Can you explain why Barack Obama’s website would list an event, that is <b>co-sponsored by several groups clearly linked to Obama</b>, which include:</p>
<p>NORCAL LGBT for Obama<br />
The Castro for Obama<br />
San Franciso for Obama.</i></p>
<p>Nonsense. The event was sponsored solely by Bay Area radio station &#8220;green 960&#8243;, as is clearly noted in the event description you provided.</p>
<p>By way of further explanation, the website carries the subdomain name of &#8220;mybarackobama&#8221;, which should have tipped you off right away that this is merely a depository for obama supporters, and carries little or no content from the campaign itself. In fact, the TOS, as one might imagine, carries the explicit disclaimer that the Obama campaign does not endorse anything posted at the site.</p>
<p>In the same sense, you&#8217;re not held as endorsing any comment posted here, capische?</p>
<p>I have no doubt that if the webmaster removed the Randi Rhodes item from the site&#8211; as many have suggested or demanded here&#8211; those selfsame offendees would immediately accuse the Obama campaign of seeking to &#8220;disappear&#8221; the event&#8211; in order to minimize damage to the candidate.</p>
<p>In the end, the offense, if any, is solely that of Randi Rhodes, and not Obama.</p>
<p>I say &#8220;if any&#8221; because it&#8217;s been an awful long time since the word &#8220;whore&#8221; was confined to the single sense of one who performs sexual acts for money. A person without scruples will do. The fact that Randi said this in the course of what was essentially a standup comic role should give pause.</p>
<p>Some have raised the specter of sexism here, and I simply don&#8217;t know whether to laugh or lose my lunch. In order for sexism&#8211; and racism for that matter&#8211; to work, it has to be perpetrated by a member of a group in a position to enforce the epithet&#8211; in other words, in a white-male-dominated society, you kind of have to be a white male for the accusation to stick.</p>
<p>Female-on-female sexism? Sorry, I just can&#8217;t get my head around it.</p>
<p>Lastly, a reminder. If the Obama campaign is responsible for Randi&#8217;s statement, then you must concede that Hillary is to be held responsible for your statements, and each and every comment posted here.</p>
<p>That&#8217;d be silly, Larry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PMS</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180432</link>
		<dc:creator>PMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/04/the-latest-on-randi-rhodes-and-obama-connection/#comment-180432</guid>
		<description>Kathleen,

Green960 is a ClearChannel Radio station. That's the network that banned The Dixie Chicks from all their stations. It's a FAR RIGHT WING radio network. Of course they support Obama in the primary. The Far Right doesn't want to face Hillary in the GE. 

They've spent 12 years trying to destroy her and her husband, and haven't been able to get Hillary-Hate over about 40%. That makes it VERY difficult to persuade undecideds to hate her, so the Obama strategy works two ways for ClearChannel: 
1) Get Obarry the nomination, 
2) get Obomatrons to HATE HILLARY. 

That's their game, and the Tools are playing along merrily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen,</p>
<p>Green960 is a ClearChannel Radio station. That&#8217;s the network that banned The Dixie Chicks from all their stations. It&#8217;s a FAR RIGHT WING radio network. Of course they support Obama in the primary. The Far Right doesn&#8217;t want to face Hillary in the GE. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve spent 12 years trying to destroy her and her husband, and haven&#8217;t been able to get Hillary-Hate over about 40%. That makes it VERY difficult to persuade undecideds to hate her, so the Obama strategy works two ways for ClearChannel:<br />
1) Get Obarry the nomination,<br />
2) get Obomatrons to HATE HILLARY. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s their game, and the Tools are playing along merrily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
