Obama Deals the Slave Card
By Fleaflicker on April 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM in Barack Obama, Farakkhan, New Black Panther Party, Rev. James Meeks, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.
A while ago, the racist, Farrakhan-linked New Black Panther Party posted a page on the official Obama Web site. That page was pulled after complaints were lodged, with the Obama campaign implying that it would more closely monitor its site. Now, not only has the NBBP reposted its page, but the Obama Web site has become the friendly home for vicious race baiting of African Americans who support Hillary Clinton. The Obama campaign has repeatedly played the race card, at the same time that is has tried to blame the Clinton campaign — see Princeton historian Sean Wilentz’s devastingly factual articles on the subject (”Hold On–’3 A.M.’ Wasn’t Racist,” “Race Man,” and “Obama was the first to play the race card“). The Obama campaign continues its smear by allowing and apparently encouraging posting like this nasty page.
And, my friends, this is truly disgusting:
Hillary vs Obama: The Slavery Perspective
“I seen a way to freedom and power. C’mon go with me. I figured out a way to the promise land – that place Martin and Malcolm spoke of. There’s hope and possibilities out there for us. There some white folks I know say they gon help us get there. The time is now – right now. Come On…”
House Slave/Clinton Supporter:
“Massa Clinton been good to us. Git on ‘way from here Obama. You gon cause problem fo us all!! Didn’t Massa
Clinton give you food and shelter all these years. Where you gon take us? You never been nowhere but right here on dis plantation wit us. This here fine living. We don’t know where you trying to go. They gon kill you. Then how us gon survive? Aint no white folks gon hep you. Get on way from here Obama. Gon now…git”
Looking at from this historical perspective . . . who was right????
Barack Obama talks a good game. And he is an exquisite liar, nearly pathological with his ease of doing so. His campaign likes to point out that this is an open public forum and they have no control over what is posted there. But those of us that know a little something about websites know that that is a bold faced lie that may play well in Peoria but doesn’t square well with the facts. It is relatively easy to stop someone from posting in an open forum.
There are filters and IP address blocks and all kinds of other methods that allow you to screen out particular words or links. The Obama campaign DESIRES this information to be on their website. It is a part of their BIG TENT approach. Republicans, Terrorists, Racists, Mysogynists, Homophobes and Bigots For Obama is their battle cry. And the Obama campaign only takes this stuff down when someone points out that they are offended by it.
As I mentioned in “Will Obama Deny Knowing the New Black Panthers,” this pattern of Obama support is troubling. Because this group is merely the next logical step forward from the rantings of Barack Obama’s spiritual advisor, Jeremiah Wright. It is no accident that this group continues to be featured on the official Obama campaign Web site. It is a message being sent for those with eyes open enough to see.
This should be a wake-up call for anyone with a shred of decency. But apparently that wouldn’t be a supporter of Barack Obama.











































I just linked to HIS website, “community” page??? I am speechless. How will MSM portray this, what will be the new meme?
Apparently the MSM will not portray this until (if he gets the nod) he goes up against McCain. THEN and only then will the MSM tackle this. Right now most of them are careful not to soil him too much, to be sure that Hillary is the one too damaged to get the nomination. Then… oh, it’s cakewalk time for McCain.
Can the Obamacrats really believe that he can withstand even an OUNCE of the scrutiny Hillary has endured? The MSM and the GOP made Kerry, a war hero and respected Senator, look like a sniveling coward elitist. What do they think all of this will be in the GE?
Fleaflicker,
The link for this in your post is gone this morning:
Hillary vs Obama: The Slavery Perspective
Did you save a screen shot and could you please post it?
Thanks for all you do.
Of course, they took it off their site now that they were called to the carpet. The saddest part of this is that kids go on his site daily and are exposed to this race baiting.
Obama is a sorry excuse for a human being. You don’t see those sort of things on the other candidates’ sites.
Sandy, just out of curiosity what are you talking about? Shy of registering and then knowing which “member” to search for… how would the average kid be subjected to “this race baiting” as you put it?
Don’t get me wrong – I find most of the rhetoric of the NBBP offensive and crazy – and would call it ridiculously funny were it not dangerous and offensive and crazy as noted.
But shy of banning individuals or organizations that sign up as members in the network… I’m not sure what you’d want. As Larry and Susan have noted, they may not agree with some of the views expressed by some of the posters – but they’re not going to outright ban them for that – I know wrong analogy.
Fleaflicker4..
Thanks..!!….It needs to be Said..I just wish there was Broader Public Awareness of thse issues..of Comments like yours and others Here..
I hope that we will make PROGRESS in the Right Way out of this..To Honor all Progressives, Civil Rights Activists, Those who Honor the Constitution, and those who HONOR Dr. Martin Luther King..who was the BEST Black leader and ROLE MODEL..He really touched me as a Young White Teen at the time..
Barack Obama does Not…all my Insticts tell me he is a PHONY..
Totally agree Patrick
Fleaflicker,
I went to Mydd first thing this morning to recommend this diary and it was not there – What happened?
What happened was that this unbelievable piece of racist trash was yanked and the culprit banned, this time one hopes for good and all.
somebody get this to foxnews, i know, i hate fox too, but this is all telling about obamas nasty campaign. i was stunned at that on his web-site. you know the msm wont pick up on it. he gets more outrageous everyday. go to taylormarsh.com and sign the petition to get him out of the race. its easy and could be effective if enough people do it… go now !
Fox, NBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, NYT, WaPo know all about these things. I’d imagine that Rove has been carefully building up the database 9he surfaced recently with a list of contradictions that Obama hads made). They will have all the screen shots and text stored in the vaults for use in October.
But it’ll be used against no sooner than is deemed necessary.
Clinton wasn’t expecting Obama to beat her so she went easy until supertuesday. She didn’t want to damage a prospective VP pick.
Now it’s being kept from public broadcast until it is impossible to go with Clinton or respond in a partywide coordinated manner.
You know they have a mountain of this stuff form what has been posted here and from what you may have seen on Dkos or Huffpo comments…
“go to taylormarsh.com and sign the petition to get him out of the race.”
If the Hill-bots can’t beat him at the ballot box, I doubt a stern letter from them will make him leave, either!
Here is a hint: maybe if you folks spent half as much time raising money, canvassing door to door and doing something OTHER than posting on blogs and presenting yourselves as unhinged crybabies, maybe your candidate would be in the lead. But it seems you are more than content to sit around and whine about the unfairness of getting your heinies kicked by a better organized, smarter campaign. By taking this approach, you are not only NOT cutting into Obama’s lead, but you are also showing yourselves unworthy to take on McCain in the fall.
Obama is too shameful to represent Democratic Party. But I don’t want to see him be forced to quit the race. Obama’s actions will force Obama out of the race one way or another.
Scoreboard!
“Obama is too shameful to represent Democratic Party”? The majority of the party, obviosuly, disagrees with you. Which is why he has more votes, more delegates, more states won, and more donors.
The nomination is not over. Don’t act like a winner yet. It’s shameful.
And the scoreboard has changed if you haven’t notice it.
Rasmussen did the poll of Colorado in Feb after Super Tuesday, Obama had 7 point lead against McCain. He said he can change red state into blue.
In March, the same poll show Obama tied with McCain. Obama has lost the people in Colorado. He tied with McCain in MA, THE blue state. If he can’t beat McCain in Mass, he can’t beat McCain anywhere.
Obama won’t stand a chance in GE.
Let us never forget that the ultimate goal for all of us of like minds is a President that is an improvement from W. Bush. Instead of issuing sophmoric replies such as “scoreboard”, could you please enlighten us Hillary supporters as to why Obama is a superior candidate and would make a better President. I would greatly appreciate it if you could give me specific examples of what Obama has accomplished in his brief Public life. In addition, tell me how Obama is going to defend himself against the waiting Republican attack machines for his lack of experience in foreign affairs and his ties to Rev. Wright.
You might want to buy some products from this site. You seems to be in great need of it. http://www.getoverobama.com/
Funny, thanks.
more democrats have voted for Hillary. Please go away if you can’t be smarter than that. If we wanted to be bored to death by stupid comments we would be reading at dkos.
And just last night, CNN was accusing Hillary of playing the race card. When has Hillary played the race card? Race didn’t even become an issue until we saw that shameful speech by Jeremiah Wright, and Obama had to come out and placate the voters.
Lucinda,
Isn’t it infuriating to watch and read a lie repeated even after having been already corrected by that very station?
I only slightly disagree with you. The race card was first used by Obama through his surrogate/confidant/spiritual leader/Kooky Racist Uncle/Preacher/Friend Wright back in December!
When in the history of modern media have we had such a large percentage of seemingly incompetent, purposely daft or otherwise editorially brain dead reporters/pundits/journalists/anchors/hosts ..
Can we say “Gee, W?”
Now ask yourself logically, Y?
Why is the MSM so blatantly and without any shame shilling for Obama almost in unison?
This should not be a difficult answer. We get what “they” want.
FIRST of all, actual Democrats do prefer Hillary. It is the so-called “Democrats for a Day” et al who have given Obama his (apparent) lead. Many of these people have NO intention of voting for the Democrat in the GE.
I am not a member of the Dem party, and likely won’t be, but I can’t believe most of the party leadership want THIS crap to be the face of the party. Somebody forward this to them AND the SDs. By tacitly condoning this rhetoric, Obama takes ownership of it. If he REALLY wanted to take the high road as he’s always claiming, he could make a short statement on the site to the effect of “this type of rhetoric will NOT be tolerated and does NOT represent our vision of uniting America (blahblahblah)” then get one of their hired bloggers to ENFORCE IT. Then I might have a modicum of respect for his campaign.
Then they stop threatening the SDs (loyal Democrats) with a primary attack, and EARN those votes as well. I’m guessing John Lewis might not be to happy to see this stuff associated with his candidate.
I came by my support of Hillary through lots of research and soul-searching after Edwards suspended, and being in CA I may be able to vote my candidate without hurting the Ds should he be the nominee, but unless he breaks his pattern and disavows this garbage, he will NEVER have my vote, and will undoubtedly hurt the Democrats horribly. How sad, just when they had the chance to reclaim their core values, to have it wrecked by an egomaniac like this…
Wrong, Clinton has more votes from Democrats thus more delegates and in states with closed Primaries – she has won. So, the choice of Democrats is Hillary Clinton.
No matter how many times you Obama followers pronounce the inane “more votes, more delegates, more states” meme, this race is a statistical tie. The reality is that barring a collapse by one of the candidates (and if this should happen, my bet is on Obama), Clinton will lead in the popular vote and Obama will have a just a double digit lead (<100) delegates after all 50 states are counted. Thus, neither candidate can reach the magic number to obtain the nomination and the Super Delegates will decide.
Now, Clinton will have won if not all, by far, most of the remaining contests, so, the “big Mo” will be with her. Obama will continue to have his “embarrassing” associations brought to light – and show just how unelectable he is in November. Clinton will also continue to lead on issues such as the economy that are in the forefront of American voters. So, the Super Delegates unless they want to really lose and that includes Congressional seats, it is an easy decision and Clinton is chosen. Them’s the roolz and that’s how the winning hand is played.
I have a $100 bet with my cousin that if Obama is our nominee, he will lose in California.
i love it. i’m looking forward to seeing california go red if obama’s nominated. also massachusetts. maybe that will get the attention of the nutjobs who’ve made such a mess of our party. maybe it will get them OUT and get real leaders in. only then can i again call myself a dem. for now, after straight dem ticket votes every year since ‘72, i can’t associate myself with the so-called “democratic” party.
If by “the party” you mean Democrats, sorry. Clinton has a huge edge there. Obama’s edge is coming from caucuses and open primaries–and those voes will hold up in Nov, no worries.
But you’re right, if you disenfranchise 20 or so states, you might be able to find a way to jerrymander an Obama lead among Democrats. Go heavy wth Alaska.
Hillary’s votes are 75% from the Dem base. Obama’s are only 55% Dem base. 45% of Obama’s votes are from Indepdendents and Republicans. That’s almost half of his votes. And I think that one could safely assume that he picked up the majority of those votes primarily in the red-state caucuses that go to the Republican nominee in the GE.
If you extrapolate Obama’s 55% base vote our further, and make a general assumption that approximately half of those votes are from ethnic blacks, Obama has only won approximately 28% of his votes from other ethnic groups in the Dem base, such as whites, latinos, and asians.
In reality, Hillary has won more votes from the Dem base. If these were closed Primaries, we wouldn’t even be discussing Obama as the front-runner. He would be way back in second place.
Those statistics do not bode well for Obama in the GE if he wins the nomination. Unless the Dem base in all the blue-states that Hillary was won rally to support him, I’d say he’s up shit creek without a paddle.
There’s the rub, right? Obama would only win if the Democratic supporters of Hillary vote D in November. It looks like Hillary supporters (75% of the Dem base!!!!!!) are going to all be voting Republican. That means that if Obama wins the nomination, the Republican party gets an inevitable, unstoppable majority. Shame on Obama for making 75% of true Democrats (not those pesky African-Americans) vote for a Republican!!! He’s going to ruin the country by making the 75% of us true Dems who really care vote for Bush III, John “Stay in Iraq for 100 years” McSame!!!
If your candidate has it all locked up then what the hell are you doing here? Insulting and irritating people that will be needed to win a GE is not only a stupid tactic, it’s a damn stupid tactic.
Smart Obama supporters are all ready trying to make nice with Clinton supporters knowing they will need them if he wins the nomination. (Sorry folks, I know smart Obama supporter is an oxymoron.)
Go away little troll. You are boring.
I agree with you totally. He is too disgraceful and I think he will come to be known for what he is: a sham candidate.
so what is it that you are doing? are you being paid to lie and distort? are you kidding me, she would not be able to take on mccain in the fall? Give me 2 examples of how Obama would take on and beat mccain, just 2. So you come here and criticize people who have every right to air and vent their feelings and you call us cry babies, is that all you have is name calling? any and all criticism of BO is documented with facts, not rumor or innuendo or bad sportsmanship, FACTS!
Being paid to distort – talking about yourself are you – thanks for letting us know.
what the hell are you talking about?
“you are not only NOT cutting into Obama’s lead”
Fifteen yards and loss of down for premature triumphalism.
Yer man is already glissading down the backside of Gravity’s Rainbow as reported in the New York Times. The fad has passed and an ever-fickle public is looking for a new pet rock.
Shillelagh law will be the new rage at the Donnybrook Fair in the credentials committee in Denver.
Welcome to Stalingrad, Obama worshiper.
Isn’t there some moderation at BO.com?
Can you find a statement somewhere which says that all community blog posts are subject to removal if they are found offensive?
If so, then the post REALLY belongs to Obama.
If he can delete pro-Hillary comment from his blog, he sure has moderators working on his web site.
Perhaps someone needs to put up a very nice pro-hillary page and see how long it stays up? hmmm…
didn’t take them long to put up a disclaimer about Randi Rhodes. But the page sat with no disclaimer till the fit hit the shan
In order to believe the truth about a person, someone who continually denies, denies, denies, you need in a case like this to not look any further than the person who shares their bed at night, and in this case, Michelle Obama!
Her “they will get it” and her “is it a fairy tale for a black man to become President” and her “for the first time in my adult life I am proud of America” kind of rolls together the ideals of the Obama household! And let’s not forget her Thesis at Princeton on Race that is no longer available till after November 21st/08 talk about transparency Barack!
If Obama is not made accountable for this race baiting and sexism that emanates from his website and his events, we will see it used again and again in the future. The monster he is at best tolerating will end up consuming the Democratic Party and the cause of civil rights as well. The foolish enablers of Obamanism who are trying to ride the back of the tiger had better take stock and move quickly to rein it in or they will end up inside. Those who care must stand and be counted even if it means turning our backs on long established alliances and voting habits.
Not only Obama but so-called “progressive” bloggers who are using the race card repeatedly like a fire hose. Its to the point now if you’re white and don’t support Obama you have to be a racist.
Funny thing is these “progressive” bloggers are merely doing a variant of what Bush did after 9/11. Where if you didn’t agree with him you were against the U.S. and “objectively pro-terrorist”.
Pro-Obama progressives, meet Cheney.
Cheney, meet your ideological cousins from the left.
Anybody who wants to preserve this one for posterity (”Hillary vs Obama: The Slavery Perspective”) had better click on the link, right now, and save it as a pdf. You really have to see this one, in its original form, to full appreciate it.
It’ll stay up long enough to get the job done, but I don’t think they’ll keep it on the Obama website into perpetuity.
I followed the link above and fortunately, there were several sensible comments in response to that pathetically ignorant and bullying blog Hillary vs Obama: The Slavery Perspective.
African Americans need to ask themselves a few pertinent questions: Where was this passion when Jesse Jackson, Sr. was running for president? Al Sharpton? Not all blacks supported them with votes (although I did). Why does Barack Obama, who is half-white and has NO African American relatives apart from the ones he sired, engendering all of this viciousness within the black community?
I don’t think AAs really want to have an honest discussion about The Slavery Perspective and slave mentality just to get this biracial candidate elected POTUS. This is a public office and as such he will have to represent ALL of the people. He has to swear to “defend, protect the Constitution of the US.” and that means having to adhere to a system of checks & balances and working with the members of Congress. The Supreme Court is there riding shotgun on our Democracy. It’s absolutely pointless and absurd to hurl offensive racial insults at AA supporters of Hillary Clinton when the reality is that Obama would not be crowned King and have absolute sovereignity. AA supporters of Hillary are merely excercising their rights as citizens of the US to stand behind the candidate of their choice. A decision based on a sober look at the issues confronting the US at the present time. Not based on the politics of racialism.
That Obama supporters seem hellbent to be at the forefront of historically racist agendas that have kept AAs from enjoying their rights as American citizens, begs the question, who really is the slave? Who really is doing the slave masters bidding? Disenfranchizing voters, bullying oponent’s supporters, threatening and demeaning AA elected officials pubicly who have served our interests in some cases for decades, all of this for what purpose? To get Barack Obama elected president?
It should be remembered that slavery was commonplace in most civilizations in antiquity. Sadly, on the continent of Africa it was still practised long after other societies in the world had abandoned it. This is how it came to pass that Africans cooperated with European slave traders to send our ancestors on the long inhuman, vicious voyage known as the Middle Passage which resulted in our ancestors enslavement, those that survived, that is. I mention African involvement not to let white European slave traders off the hook, but to be historically accurate. The Obama campaign, however, seems to have a problem with historical accuracy.
BTW, Obama has no ancestors who suffered under slavery. I do.
Thank you for your thoughtful post. I agree with your statements. I am not African American so I cannot possibly know of the AA experience but I can empathize with it. I am not a racist for not supporting Mr. Obama. I am foremost an American citizen who is interested in Democracy and fair play. These dangerous race games he is playing are scary and do nothing to further any honest public discourse.
You are absolutely right. And don’t let them guilt you into voting for someone you don’t want. It’s your right as an American citizen to choose the candidate you wish to vote for.
Obama mastered the art of white guilt manipulation growing up and practising it on his white grandfather. He’s now using it on all white America. Don’t fall for it.
I resent that he’s played all sides against the middle: posturing as the most important symbol for AAs since MLK while covertly playing the race card. At the same time he’s encouraged the notion among whites that to not support him means that you are racist.
No good will come from this kind of divisive politicking. And that the DNC has allowed it, along withe the MSM’s disgusting behavior, and then blamed the Clinton campaign for everything is an outrage.
They are treating us as if we are stupid. As if we don’t have a brain to think for ourselves. I think this is what I resent more than anything.
FleaFlicker, Viewing his web site is like playing “wack a mole”. Good find.
The vitrolic satire used offenseive in the way and text it was used in. It is an insult to the memory of Harriet Tubman.
http://www.americaslibrary.gov/cgi-bin/page.cgi/aa/tubman
Obama supporters say Hillary plays the race card. It turns out that she is for veterens and their families going all the way back to the Civil War.
Senator Clinton Secures Funding to Repay
Harriet Tubman Civil War Pension
Go figure Harriet Tubman is one of Hillary’s heroines.
here is the link for Senator Clinton Secures Funding to Repay
Harriet Tubman Civil War Pension
http://www.harriettubman.com/senclintion.html
It is an interesting read.
Thanks Susan for getting it out of the “spam” cage. You rock!
I would really enjoy reading a diary by you backing up what you are claiming. I have never heard anyone say this before.
I’ll look into it. It occured to me after that ‘great’ race speech when he threw his grandmother under the bus. What kind of husband doesn’t heed his wife’s fears about feeling threatened? I though it was very telling that his grandfather felt the need to explain to Obama that the man his grandmoter was so frightened of was black and that was the only reason she was making a big deal of it. It was like his grandfather was apologizing to him for his wife’s reaction.
We all know that kids in general will manipulate their parents if they find out they can do so. Kids do this all the time. I don’t think it’s a stretch to think that Obama may have done so. They sprung for a private school. Did his mother also attend private school as a child? I don’t get the sense these people were rich. There are a multitude of reasons people spring for private school apart from the belief that you can get a better edcucation. Some people put kids in private school to protect them from the ‘unsavory’ influences of kids they feel come from families that don’t share their values. And if they paid for his schooling they would have more say/clout if there was a problem. Maybe they felt they were protecting him from possible discrimination. Or could it be that if there were other AAs in Hawaii, they wanted to keep him from mingling with them.
They seem to have been a very insular family. You have yet to see anyone step forward to claim to have known them. Considering his historic candidacy, wouldn’t human interest stories be expected?
Another thing that bothers me on this track: no ex-grilfriends either. No prom dates? Or anything like that. Not saying it had to be serious. Just saying….
Odd, no childhood friends or Obamagirls…
eh Barry?
(rib rib) to flea!
I see where you’re going with this you little sneak! LOL
Good Idea!!!
Slavery was practiced elsewhere, but NOT the particularly brutal form that we practiced here. The horrors of teh middle passage are embleatic of that.
mimi—
I suspect that BO has ancestors that were associated with slavery…..they probably brought your ancestors to the “Door of No Return”.
Obama shows his lack of leadership skills that inspire only hate and smear campaigns. I’d bet that few of those racist bloggers have been in Iraq or know what his Iraq exit plan really is, or fully understand that his proposed universal health coverage plan can’t be affordable, or realize that when he says there are plenty of good ideas, that the one’s he promotes aren’t very good. How can he be a serious candidate on hope and inspiration when what he inspires is repugnant? Of course the Republicans know everything, they knew about Wright and know about Michelle’s dissertation, they know how much ‘blow’ he did and with whom, and he’s clearly the easier to beat and if he happens to win he’s clearly the least progressive and will also be the least effective. But, hey, it’s Democracy and hate buys votes. What will he do with McCain though? the media also loves him and he once lost an election because he’d has an adopted daughter of color.
Look, the Obama campaign is careening out of control. This is not the kind of thing that confident campaigns do. He has no general election strategy obviously if this is the kind of stuff he’s using right now. Or he’s too clueless to realize that all this will come back to bite him and the party completely in Nov.
This is Obama’s base. He attracts thousands of anti-White and anti-American bigots.
God help America if Obama and his supporters get in the White House.
Please, spare us your pseudo-racial histrionics. Such neo-Confederate reasoning makes you sound like a fool, which I assume you’re not. Suffice to say that Obama has repeatedly misrepresented himself on many levels and issues during his campaign for president, you’re not going to vote for him on account of it, and leave it at that.
You Know..
I get the Impression by now…that Niether Obama or his Campaign Organizers Care what anyone thinks..No matter what He does or says..thaere has been little Public or Media Backlash like there has with Hillary..THE pOWER has gone to thier Heads with the momentum and support they have now..Obama apparently feels like He can FLAUNT it..and show his TRUE COLORS..and True Ideology…Pastor Wright Style..
His Web Site shows One side of Obamas Ideology..He public shows the other ..”I’ve kissed thousands of Babys (Poohee SIDE..) using everyone elses tlaking points because He has taken enough Notes to know the Cheeer lines..He”s SAAAAALICK..alright…
Here is a hint: maybe if you folks spent half as much time raising money, canvassing door to door and doing something OTHER than posting on blogs and presenting yourselves as unhinged crybabies, maybe your candidate would be in the lead. But it seems you are more than content to sit around and whine about the unfairness of getting your heinies kicked by a better organized, smarter campaign. By taking this approach, you are not only NOT cutting into Obama’s lead, but you are also showing yourselves unworthy to take on McCain in the fall.
Oh yes and dont forget his be a democrat for a day commercials… Or I have her supporters but she cant say the same… Hmmmm sounds like Obama is all about himself not the party.. Get a clue then come back and chat
I’ve got to run and take some photo’s, it’s been fun chatting with my fellow NQ friends, I look forward to reading B-Rob’s comments later, if he responds.
Have a great Sunday. Go HILLARY!
Fleaflicker, I sure hope you post this on MyDD where the Obamamorons gather.
How can anyone think of voting for this duplicitous, power hungry, divisive hypocrite!
I will post it there tomorrow Mary Jo. Count on it.
Send it to Jeralyn at TalkLeft as well. Perhaps she can address the legal issue discussed below.
I am not a lawyer but these words are included in the Terms of Service at Obama’s website. If they are claiming copyright they are also claiming ownership. It seems implied.
The entire Website is copyrighted. Certain articles or materials within the Website also may be separately copyrighted by us or by others, as indicated. If you find these materials useful, you may download, copy, display, print out, or send a copy to others so long as each copy indicates the appropriate copyright notice, credits us as your source, and is used only for your personal use. You are expressly prohibited, however, from downloading, copying, displaying, printing out, or sending a copy to others for bulk or commercial uses, or for any defamatory or otherwise illegal purpose. You acknowledge that the permission granted in this section does not constitute an endorsement by us of you or your use of the information and content. Please contact us directly for special copyright permissions.
By submitting material, you grant (or warrant that the owner of such material has expressly granted) to us the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate and distribute such material (in whole or in part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed for the full term of any copyright that may exist in such material. You also permit any other user of the Website to access, view, store or reproduce the material for that user’s personal use. You grant us the right to edit, copy, publish and distribute any material you make available to us.. You will indemnify us for, from and against all claims, losses, costs and expenses resulting from the content and information you supply.
Great find!
Tech question: how do you make the LINK function work around here? Thanks to anybody who responds.
All you need to do is put in your address and then highlight it and click the Link button. That’s all.
FleaFlicker, viewing his website is like playing “whack a mole”.
I have been wondering what the dynamics were in AA community during the history of slavery were from an AA’s percpective.
I apoligize in advance for the launguage I use and refer to it from a strictly historical perspective.
Question; Why do I get the impression Obama’s campaign and supporters are “framing the argument” in such a way as to call anyone who supports Senator Clinton “house niggers” and Obama supporters as “field hands”?
I have “Gone with the Wind” between the ears.
The vitriol of the satire and the context it was used in is an insult to Harriet Tubman.
http://www.americaslibrary.gov/cgi-bin/page.cgi/aa/tubman
Senator Clinton Secures Funding to Repay
Harriet Tubman Civil War Pension
They say Hillary play’s the race card, when in reality the senator is for veterens and their families, all the way back to the civil war.
Go figure Senator Clinton has said Ms. Tubman is one her heroines.
http://www.harriettubman.com/senclintion.html
Sam Seder, just a moment ago on his Air America show:
“Barack Obama is, clearly, fully vetted, and Hillary Clinton is pretty muchvetted…”
Obama is “fully vetted?” Really? Did you think that before the Rev. Wright fiasco? Before Rezko? Hey Sam, you realize that the media has barely touched on Obama’s sleazy dealings with slumlords? FULLY VETTED?
And Hillary is “pretty much” vetted?
Caller says that Obama-Webb would be a good ticket “except, with Obama’s Senate experience, having another Freshman would not be a good idea…”
Seder: “Does anybody doubt that when Obama and Webb say things, they aren’t being serious? Does anyone doubt that these two have gravitas?”
Um, simply put, Sam: Nobody questions Jim Webb’s gravitas and seriousness. Obama will have to answer for himself. They are NOT the SAME PERSON.
Finally: Seder tells us that “the media needs to stop telling us that this is still a race, this race is (cough) mathematically over…”
Uh huh. Screw you, Seder. I can’t believe I wrote an email protesting your demotion on Air America last year. You and Air Obama radio can go straight to hell.
What a jackass.
Does someone care to vet him on Odinga?
Would Sam Seder dare to ask Obama about this?
No offense, but merely asking the candidate isn’t exactly vetting.
You are right. “Grill” is a better word.
Better yet, I want him vetted on Odinga and Dick Morris. I think that the FEC would be interested to see where the funds came from to send Dick Morris, an Obama Campaign advisor, to Kenya to help with that election. Dick Morris doesn’t to “pro bono”. count on it.
Seder is a koolaid drinking tool.. I’m so tired of people falling all over themselves to be the hippest guy on the block by supporting Obama.
Obama.. vetted? Yeah right. And to compare Obama to Jim Webb is an insult to Jim Webb. Obama hasn’t an ounce of “gravita”, he can’t even fucking bowl!
“Obama is clearly, fully vetted.” Has this guy (Seder) completely lost his mind? For the majority of voters who don’t visit this site, Obama hasn’t been vetted at all. But don’t think that the republicans will fail to change that if Obama is nominated.
Sam Seder is just a more polite male version of Randi Rhodes. All reason and common sense has disappeared on Air Obama. I cringe to recall that just a few months ago I listened to those people all day everyday. This Obamamania has been a wake-up call for me in so many ways.
I know exactly how you feel. It makes me feel stupid on one hand and like I need to give my brain a bath on the other.
Air America may believe that all us little libs will come trotting back once the Dems have a nominee but I think they’re really wrong on this one.
Many of us thought that Air America was a progressive/liberal place where progressive/liberal ideas and issues would be discussed. Turns out it’s the Obamanation and in between short bursts of sending some vitriol John McCain’s way they trash Hillary Clinton as often as possible.
Some of us don’t like being conned. Some of us get down right pyst-off about that. And those of us that don’t like dishonesty no matter which direction it comes from will not go back to Air Obama to listen to them spew about McCain. They’ve all ready proven they have no integrity; why would we care what they think or say?
Seder is refusing to take phone calls concerning Rhodes until the last half-hour of his three-hour Sunday show. Why? Because “I want to stay on task” and “I can’t believe that with all these Macro-issues…torture, spying, the war…anyone wants to deal with…this” (he never actually says what “this” is, but I think we can infer…)
I wonder if, when the time comes around, Seder will criticize RHODES for spending so much time calling Hillary a “whore” when there are all these “Macro-issues” to deal with. On second thought, I don’t wonder at all.
And Seder ended the second hour of his show by repeating “the conventional wisdom is that there is still a race for the Democratic nomination…but it IS over…I’m not saying Hillary should drop out because you know what? No one would listen to me if I did.”
Got that last part right, at least.
You all are turning into a bunch of hypocrites. Is it news to you that some blacks feel this way? So much for coalition building LOL.
Blame Hillary on slavery is wrong. And Obama is not a victim of slave trade.
“Is it news to you that some blacks feel this way?”
SNCC and the rest of the black power freaks drummed the white folks out of civil rights in 1966, about the same time that Stokley Carmichael said that the only position for women in SNCC was horizontal. There are those of us still around that remember that twofer.
Then came Malcolm , then came James Cone, a bunch of others and now Wright. That late 60’s/early 70’s cul de sac is so jammed full of oppression fetishists that you couldn’t blast them out with an army of tunnel rats.
It’s so goddamn old it’s become banal. But we’re not bitter.
“So much for coalition building LOL”
Your kind doesn’t build coalitions. Your very own Teddy Kennedy did everything he could do to destroy Carter in a doomed fight to wrest the nomination away from a sitting President. He did most or Reagan’s work for him. The ayatollah did the rest.
Following the “drive-by handshake” at the convention which Teddy gave Carter after a badly battered Jimmy secured the nomination, Teddy’s next gesture of solidarity was to tell his aides to spread the word that it was OK for Kennedy Liberals to vote for Anderson.
Yeah, we know what to expect from you. But we’re not bitter, honest.
Welcome to Stalingrad, Obama worshiper.
In 1966 Malcolm X was already dead.
I’m not a Ted Kennedy fan, I’m a Mo Udall fan.
And I’m actually a Hillary supporter, or trying to be.
Don’t make assumptions.
Being bitter does not a productive person make. I’m black and I know I ain’t living the best, but I don’t blame “Massa Clinton” for that. In fact, I was doing a fucking lot better when “Missta Clinton” was heading up the plantation. He was trying to make sure I could fucking buy a house before he let me out of the shackles. Then, the new owned, slapped ‘em back on me only to make sure that the house Ole Masssa C let me get was gonna go up in flames.
Coalition my ass. I don’t wanna hang out with folk who think they’re life’s gonna get better because they’ve bullied everyone into feeling guilty for opposing them. I don’t give a damn how those people feel anymore; I’m sick of having my right infringed because they’re pissed at some white people the Clinton are NOT related to. Bullshit. Enough making excuses. You don’t bite the hand that helped you up then kick the person it connects to.
I’m done with BO’s coalition. Fuck ‘em. They want waffling, amorphous, nebulous rhetoric and jack for backbone. Fine with me. But don’t go around invoking the greats and expect me to be quiet. JFK was not weak, even if he was reticent. LBJ was a damned true Democrat. MLK was real leader, as was Barbara Jordan. You know who else was a real trail blazer? Her name is Geraldine Ferraro, the first viable female Vice Presidential candidate, who the Obama campaign referred to as a racist in spite of the fact she only repeated words that the candidate himself had stated. True Democrats, the only ones that remain are Bill & Hillary Clinton. The fact that they have been forced to parse within an inch of their lives everytime they speak is an atrocity. They are the Greats of our time. Bill was the “first black president.” Then, we got the real thing, and suddenly all he is a little bit of trailer trash shined up real good. Suddenly, he’s a hick, a good ole boy.
Like I said, “Bullshit.” I no longer care how the black community feels. You wanna back a weak-ass candidate, do it. But don’t expect everybody to shut up just because you call them a racist. I know a group that won’t and will in fact take great pleasure in taking the AA community down a few dozen pegs: I like to call them ReThugs.
They make the Crips and Bloods look like p**sies.
Well, Regency, glad to hear another black person put their finger on the pulse of some honest to goodness truth. The reaction of the AA community over this biracial candidate borders on hysteria. So many have been nothing short of delusional.
I dare any AA to even be in the same zip code as me and use the words ‘uncle’ and ‘tom,’ ‘house’ and ‘ni**er’, in the same sentence.
The very last thing any black person in this country wants to do is have a dialogue with me on the slave mentality among AAs. Not with the rampant mindless consumerism, still prevalent conflicts of identity issues ranging from self-image, beauty, skin color, hair texture, black-on-black crime that exists in the AA community today. Especially not judging by the photo of the person who posted that nonsense.
The tragedy is that Obama is taking the AA community down with him. If he’s elected look for huge disappointment and even rage in the AA community. I wonder how’ll he’ll handle it?
One thing’s for sure, he won’t have to experience it. He’ll be safe and secure in the White House, protected by the Secret Service. And, as with his entire life, he’ll have no direct experience in what it means to be an African American.
You all?
Who the hell are you to say, “You All” to a bunch of people who don’t all think alike. You have an ignorant bigotted mind. I don’t need a lecture from you about how “some blacks feel”. And you call this coalition building?
Deal with the writer you have issue with, don’t lump. This sweeping crap written by writers is just a sign of weak takes that require some imperial We aimed at a generalized YOU.
Seder: “ding dong, the witch is dead….”
6:53– Seder throws the “Mark Penn is a crooked lobbyist working with Columbia” bomb.
6:54– Seder FINALLY takes a phone call about Rhodes, but doesn’t let the caller talk until he plays two bits of music suggesting that the caller is a nutcase.
6:55– caller finally gets to speak for twenty seconds, saying that Rhodes’s suspension was correct. Seder interrupts with “I don’t agree with what Randi said, necessarily…”
Seder goes on to explain that he disagrees with the suspension. “I hope the suspension is short-lived.”
He appreciates the call. Cue the closing music. Show is over.
What a cowardly dick. Twice during the show he said he would NOT take calls on the Rhodes situation until the last half-hour, then he takes ONE call, four minutes before the end of the three-hour show. No time for follow-up, no time for anyone to ask him how he can defend Rhodes, no nothing.
Total, utter coward. Total fail. You suck, Seder. And to think you were my favorite Air American host when Franken left.
To hell with all of you.
I couldn’t agree with you more, Janeane was another hero until their obama mania took over. on Friday, Janeane acutally said that it wasn’t Randi’s fault that a you tube video existed! wow, i was floored. anyway i stopped listening a few mos. ago but checked in to hear him cover for RR and hear the sentiment. don’t miss AAR at all!
Well, I miss the old Air America a lot. I work at home and listened to Air America all day over the internet. I have tried to get Taylor Marsh’s radio program over the internet but keep getting error messages.
Also I don’t have television because I got sick of all that propaganda about three years ago. I used to spend many hours at Huffington Post before it became Obamington Post. No Quarter and Taylor Marsh’s website are where I get news now, about the only information sources not infected with Obamamania.
I am pleased to read so many people on the same wave-length, regarding the MSM. I wonder when the advertisers are going to pitch a fit?
Same here about the Obamington Post. I used to like Arianna. I respected her as a woman who made lemonade out of lemons. But her total lack of objectivity regarding Hillary borders on psychotic. Same with MoDo. And the NYTimes.
Mp sister bragged to me the other day about how she got this great subscription deal with the Times. I told her about their unfair reporting and she cancelled. Let them eat their words.
I hope all of these people’s profits dry up. I want them to realize that they can’t take us for stupid. You want Frank Rich, Dowd, Herbert? Well at least give us an opposing view on Obama. Bill Krystol ain’t cutting it for me.
I actually love the way the so-called ’savior,’ the uniter, is taking people down with him. Should he get the nom, I’ll be on total new blackout and ditto the Convention coverage and I haven’t missed a Dem Convention since I was a little girl. It will be so easy, too. Summer’s around the corner, baseball, lot’s of outdoor activities and book reading.
Perhaps, they’ll appreciate the irony in what happens to them.
Nah!!!!…. They’ll blame it all on Hillary.
welcome to the radio world. sam seder knows how to run out the clock on the air. having done literally thousands of hours of radio i can tell you there are few mistakes when the host runs out the clock. we look at the switchboard, almost always have a sidekick screening calls for any bombs then skip around to pick the calls we want to take.
in my case i rarely did a talk show format and mostly did voice work, hosting forums, all sorts of music shows, and some work for the local news coverage. most community stations don’t have a paid staff but when they do, those folks aren’t always the on-air personalities.
i used to wince at piss-poor hosts who would act like cowards after they raised issues they should have known would be very controversial or would raise the ire of the audience.
and unfortunately, and speaking from experience, liberal talk show hosts can be some of the worst because they seem to be bound by some bullshit code of “nice guy” that makes them passive aggressive most of the time.
As for Air America, the network has never been stellar anyway. It was a neat idea based in phony concepts about talk radio. I do clearly believe that America would love a ‘liberal’ network of sorts, but when it is showcased as such it fails because America doesn’t really want a ‘conservative’ network. Its kind of like what Outfoxed showed about Cablenews and how they all went dumb as shit when FoxNews showed up and went as low as possible. Now you have Glenn Fucking Beck!! Catering to the biases of listeners only makes more biased listeners. Build on a principle not a ideology.
Air America is the latte sellout radio version, the McRadio version of what Pacifica was trying to do for the last 60 years. Lew Hill founded Pacifica after WWII, after he lived in a concentration camp to be a contientious objector. He was doing it out of a principle. Air America was built on capitalistic ideals. There’s a big fucking difference between the two. Air America insulted Pacifica’s very existance by trying to pretend it was the first Liberal Network. Pacifica may have only 5 stations, but it has vast affiliates as well. Air America never learned from Pacifica’s mistakes or successes. Instead it simply went to Advertising radio. It played mimic to right wing radio, and look at the result, too many shockjocks.
And as for Gerafalo, let us not forget she’s an actress, a talented one no less, but as for radio?…not really. I think only Franken and the Young Turks are the only good thing to come out of Air America. I’d like to say Rachael Maddow, but after watching her on MSNBC I don’t think so. Smart in many ways, but her bias runs her and she puts on airs too much. She gets caught in the conversation and forgets to have much of a critical voice. There are others who get on the same shows that make her look like a complete MSNBC sell-out, trading access for integrity.
I heard Gerafalo’s take on Rhodes, and she blew credibility with the woman who matters in my home. She was deeply disappointed. “Awww…not her..damnit” Spoken like a fan disappointed.
Drink the kool-aid if you wish, but stay off the radio or become a part of the vast wastebin of AM radio talk show hosts.
(Note: Fuck Clear Channel and AMFM Broadcasting)
Senator Clinton Secures Funding to Repay
Harriet Tubman Civil War Pension
http://www.harriettubman.com/senclintion.html
The spam filter has got in for my string today so I will see if this works…
A racist eh? Go figure, Hillary Clinton is for vetererns and there families, all the way back to the civil war.
If Obama can delete pro-Hillary comments from his website, he sure does have the moderators who can delete this kind of inflammatory racial devision from his website.
I just want to point out something, at both bogs on Obama’s Campaign website, just above the blog entry you will see the following:
Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content
so clearly, there IS a mechanism in place for someone to report the blog post. Obviously either no one did, or if so, the administrator felt the entry was okie doke and met “Community Standards”. Also, the first time the NBPP a blog decided to perform a test to see what steps there were to create a blog on the site. While he could not say whether or not the measures were in place the FIRST time the NBPP appeared, the were definitely in place the second time. And those measures are that a blog MUST be APPROVED by the site administrators BEFORE the blogger can begin posting. Go ahead and try to create a blog there, before you can it says the site has to be “approved” first. So who “approved” the NBPP being on there a second time, eh?
Fleaflicker, this is disturbing. I don’t get why the MSM neglects to report on Obama; it seems they just regurgitate whatever is in the daily conference call or press releases. And this is right out there for everyone to see. Great post, keep it up. TD.
Pretty hurtful. As usual, this is the low road we’ve all been experiencing.
The supporters fan so much hatred all the time, the Reverend Wright shows Obama also chose to sit at the feet and learn this name calling at the altar. If your spiritual advisor calls black Republicans slurs, yells the N word in front of children on Christmas AND is the only preacher in America who said America deserved Sept. 11th what should we expect? His campaign’s “hope” would be any less false, phony, and “audacious” (one word for this, but not the right one).
This is the whole underbelly of this campaign and it’s endorsed officially. It has been since the beginning. It has been all along. It’s been here the entire time. There is no excuse for this. That’s the truth.
Obama can play the race card all he wants.
But the truth will prevail.
The only person to be a slave who is running for president is John McCain. He was a prisonner of war, forced to submit against his will, denied freedom of speech and movement.
The only person to be a slave master who is running for president is Barack Hussein. He has, like all cult leaders, convincing his followers to give him their money, during a supposed recession according to him, so that he can use it to buy men and women.
Slave-master Obama is so proud of his quarter billion dollars he sucked out of hard working people to buy him more hard working people so he can suck money out of them too.
If the Democratic Party ignores the democratic rights of voting people in Florida and Michigan, it will be proving that Obama’s illegally begotten money talks louder than a few million votes, and that it consents to be bought, as slave, by and for him. And consents to sell out the democrats of those states now – as well as all Americans in the end.
I tried to save the page, but received an error when re looking at it, i went directly to his campaign site, GONE! Did anyone save it like someone suggested? If it such a good, fair message why was it removed Obama campaign?????? I am so sick of the b.s.
[...] 1 Comment Guest Post by Fleaflicker (post deleted at myDD & author banned) cross posted at No Quarter A while ago, the racist, Farrakhan-linked New Black Panther Party posted a page on the official [...]
MASSA Clinton? This man drops millions into a foundation to help stop the spread of AIDS in Africa, and he’s called a goddamned SLAVEOWNER for his troubles?! What the hell has Obama or that lying sack Wright ever done for black people but spread LIES about how that horrible disease spreads and that white people invented it to kill black people?
I know who’s the real caring person here. I know who really cares about black lives. And given Wright’s million-dollar mansion bought from the money of his parishioners, I know who’s living large on the labor of others, too.
It’s not Clinton who is buying votes with 1/4 billion dollars of money that could go into supporting the US economy instead of the CEO’s and reporters of both television and print media corporations, it’s Obama.
Obama is doing the buying – just turn on any news channel and you can see his purchased reporter slaves trying to convince the whole world to submit to Obama. If Hillary was the buyer, they’d be working for her instead.
Thanks for the info regarding Wright living in a million dollar mansion. Do you have more information on that?
[...] April 6th, I reported that Barack Obama’s website had a disgusting analogy comparing what is going on in this [...]
Found this at http://www.stop-obama.org
PLEASE JOIN THE ACTION AND ASK ALL YOU KNOW TO JOIN IN
We at Hillary_Clinton_In_2008@yahoo.com has taken your advise and got active: We’ve join with the April 11 protest of Mainstream Media and let Florida and Michigan be counted by starting a massive simultaneous email campaign on the unfair treatment of Sen: Clinton in the media. On April 11th at 8 a.m. we will let our voice be heard along with the protesters in NY. Please join us and send emails to CNN, MSNBC, ABC on that date in solidarity of WE THE PEOPLE HAVE HAD ENOUGH. thank you
(I am taking this FRI AM off to participate in the above and will flood them from all of my various email addresses. Please pass this on.
http://www.writehillaryin.com
Thanks for reply to my comments. Re your request for more info on Rev. Wright’s mansion. (Images of purchase documents available. Article on Mar.27 below links to:
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/27/obamas-former-pastor-builds-a-multimillion-dollar-retirement-home/
“FOX News has uncovered documents that indicate Wright is about to move to a 10,340-square-foot, four-bedroom home in suburban Chicago, currently under construction in a gated community.
While it is not uncommon for an accomplished clergyman to live in luxury, Wright’s retirement residence is raising some questions.
“Some people think deals like this are hypocritical. Jeremiah Wright himself criticizes people from the pulpit for middle classism, for too much materialism,” said Andrew Walsh, Associate Director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life with Trinity College in Hartford, Conn.
“So he’s entitled to be tweaked here. So the question really is, how unusual is this? Somewhat unusual,” he said.
According to documents obtained from the Cook County Register of Deeds, Wright purchased two empty lots in Tinley Park, Ill., from Chicago restaurant chain owner Kenny Lewis for $345,000 in 2004.
Documents show Wright sold the property to his church, Trinity United, in December 2006, with the proceeds going to a living trust shared with his wife, Ramah.
The sale price for the land was just under $308,000, about $40,000 less than Wright’s original purchase two years earlier.
Public records of the sale show Trinity initially obtained a $10 million bank loan to purchase the property and build a new house on the land.
But further investigation with tax and real estate attorneys showed that the church had actually secured a $1.6 million mortgage for the home purchase, and attached a $10 million line of credit, for reasons unspecified in the paperwork.
There is apparently nothing wrong with that, according to non-profit tax expert Jack Siegel of Charity Governance Consulting, who examined public documents FOX News obtained from the Cook County Register of Deeds and the Village of Tinley Park.
“At least looking at it from a public document standpoint, there’s clearly not a problem that jumps out or some sort of wrongdoing,” Siegel said.
Siegel characterizes the transaction as unusual, however, because of the way Wright sold the property to Trinity and the way the deal was financed, with the attached $10 million line of credit.
Because churches are classified as private businesses, Trinity isn’t required to reveal its intended use for the line of credit. Nor, because it’s a non-profit entity, is it required to provide that information to the IRS.
A spokesman for ShoreBank, the Chicago-based financial institution that secured mortgages for the loans, said the deals were aboveboard.
Wright did not respond to repeated calls for comment, and Trinity United refused to discuss the specifics of the home it is building for him and the way the deal was financed.
The church referred FOX News to its denominational headquarters in Cleveland, which provided a statement of support:
“It is customary and appropriate in many Christian denominations, including the United Church of Christ, for local churches to offer housing provisions for retiring clergy, especially in cases where pastors have served long-term pastorates. We support efforts by our 5,700 local churches to ensure that retiring pastors and spouses have continuing housing, adequate pension and health care, as an expression of our continuing appreciation for their years of service. Each local UCC congregation is free to honor a retiring pastor in ways it feels most appropriate to address the needs of that clergyperson’s circumstances,” wrote the Rev. J. Bennett Guess, spokesman for UCC’s national office.
“This is about how these kinds of churches work,” notes Walsh. “These pastors who made big successful churches are real valuable commodities. Is it morally wrong? Well, Protestants don’t have the idea that their religious leaders should live modestly or aesthetically. We’re not talking Buddhist monks or Catholic priests here. There’s no tradition that says they have to live poor.”
Tradition at Trinity United centers on a congregation that’s unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian, according to the church’s website. There are also no apologies from the church for the home it’s building for its former senior pastor, who nurtured a religious empire that grew to have more than 8,000 congregants”
Food for thought: The timing of Wright’s “retirement” and his “Victory” tour (as they called it) when spiriting him out of Chicago are clearly no accident. . . the various shuffles of paperwork, surrounding the 2004 property purchase indicate that MORE was paid for the land then it sale price (?) and transfers made possible the TEN MILLION DOLLAR Line of Open Credit requires no explanation for use (because it is “church sheltered”.
All else aside, what the devil do you do with a $10 million dollar credit line ? (start a race war?!)
Remember, don’t let your vote be a lie:
http://www.writehillaryin.com
Thank you so much for taking the time to insert the article on this Wright mansion.
I’ve been looking at some of the math, and the way I see it, Wright has made a:
1. Loss of $37,000 (probably not his own money so it can hardly be called a loss)
2. Gain of a $1,500,000 real estate land and house
3. Gain of at least $1,500,000 from not having to pay interest on the mortgage over its lifetime.
4. Gain of $10,000,000 for his house expenses over his time in that house (divide by 20 years, provides about $500,000 for expenses like heating, hydro, water, taxes, landscaping, snow removal, maintenance, renovations, travelling around the country and thus, air flights, hotels, restaurants, etc…)
I’m curious how he was living before his lawyer Obama became a US senator with the intention of running for president, thanks to the “donations” of campaign money by Rezko, a Syrian national, who if he was wealthy in Syria, means he was a Bath party member there, the same party as Saddam Hussein. Since Rezko loves politics so much, there can be no doubt of his connections to the Syrian and Iraq Bath parties – and since he was Obama’s principal backer, no surprise Obama would side with Saddam’s Bath party against the US Wash. parties.
It’s not a coincidence that Obama also got to expand his real estate, at a loss for the seller Rezko, a slum lord real-estate thief, so that Obama could increase his mansion. These two real estate losses and crooked deals both have one thing in common: Obama. It’s interesting that Obama got to live in a mansion thanks to the poor people sucked dry by Rezko and Wright gets to do the same thanks to the suckers who went to his church. All of them are predators that steal from the poor to make themselves rich.
But it fits in with the signs from God that have been non-stop for months, warning about Obama.
The most notable sign is Obama’s first and middle names. One is “barrack” and the other is “house in”. The “housing” crisis is a sign of, and tied to, “hussein” crisis. The housing crisis is about whether the “house in” which people live, they get to keep.
I’m not surprised to see Obama tied to a pair of twin real estate thefts.
Bush got rid of one Hussein supported by the Bath Party. Hopefully, McCain will get rid of the other one if Hillary can’t.
Again, thank you for the article.
thanks for reply to my earlier post. Can you help here?
Two debates coming up with week. ABC at least reports Rezko, seems more balanced. CBS debate was requested by BHO – a strange change of stand on his usual debate evasions – which sounds like a set-up. Which brings up this question:
Am preparing a list of questions these networks should ask Obama in these debates. It includes unanswered, overlooked or media blocked information. I want to make this QUESTIONS TO ASK OBAMA ON AIR list available to ALL, as an email campaign to these networks on the part of any interested in participating – and(complete with email addresses of the four debate moderators and news desks.)
It is categorized by: Biographical contradictions; Questionable Supporters; Quotes of Concern to Voters; Vital Policy & Platform Issues. Even keeping it brief, I think it’s too long for your comment section.
I’m working on a blog site but the debates are this week and that might not be up in time.
So, is there some other way for your to post this? If so, I will send comment links to viewers of other like minded sites to come here for a copy, with forwarding addresses to CBS and ABC.
I realize that MSM might ignore it. . . but it’s worth a shot, espec. if they get repeat email requests. Can you help? (You are so well informed, that if you do post it, you are more than welcome to edit as you see fit first.) It will be ready by tonight – none too soon. Is there an email address where I can send to you, this LIST OF DEBATE QUESTIONS FOR OBAMA to you?
(I’ll check my inbox for your reply.)